i think that gaza needs local government, not an international oversight body.
however, who has a real role in an international oversight body like this board of peace?
- egypt, obviously
- israel, obviously
- the british have a role to play due to the british mandate and the suez canal
- the french should purposefully not be invited as they have no role to play in gaza, in lebanon, in syria or anywhere else in the middle east
- no other western european country should be invited
- the united states needs to be on the board
- canada should not be invited
- no country in latin america, and especially not nazi-aligned argentina, should be invited
- iran should be invited in principle, but an iranian opposition group should represent them, not the current government
- greece should be invited
- italy should be invited
- turkey should be invited
- these are the four stable historical powers in the region
- jordan should be invited
- lebanon should be invited
- syria should be invited in principle, but a syrian opposition group should represent syria, not the current government
- saudi arabia should be invited in principle, but an opposition group should represent them, not the current governent
- no other arab country should be invited
so that is:
- the governments of the united states, egypt, israel, the uk, greece, italy, turkey, jordan and lebanon and democratic opposition groups representing the iranian, syrian and saudi arabian governments.