but, you have no job creation plan, lisa.

i've been clear over a long period that i don't share your views on labour, or on your religious outlook on work. we are philosophically diametrically opposed to each other, on this point. i do not believe that hard work sets anybody free, and will fight as hard as i possibly can to prevent you from enslaving me.

but, relative to your own skewed morality, or your fucked up logic of capital, shouldn't your first priority be to create jobs, and not to cut welfare? by your own belief system, shouldn't people choose to work, if the jobs were only available to them?

we're mere weeks into their mandate, and they've immediately announced plans to cut social assistance - without even musing about ways to improve the economy. so, it seems like they care more about cutting welfare than they do about creating jobs, and aren't really interested in the question of whether there are jobs available for people or not.

they presented absolutely no plans about cutting social assistance to the electorate, either.

the fact is that they just want to cut spending, at any cost. and, if the result of their policies is simply increased homelessness and higher crime rates, they'll just dump the responsibility off to the church - because they don't believe that government has a role to play in social cohesion, they just think it's a waste of money.

well, when the crime rate picks up, lisa, because you tossed all these people out on their ears, we'll see how well that money is really being spent, won't we?

it's just mind-boggling to me that these people need to make the same mistakes over and over again - that they're incapable of learning from history, or understanding the outcomes of science.

but, they just cancelled the ubi rather than wait for the results. they're not interested in data. they don't care about science....