i was able to reconstruct and authoritatively back up my archival
material a lot easier than i thought i would be able to. the only thing
i've lost of any consequence is a couple of backing files for 'ignorance
is bliss'. i can live with that.
now that i'm a
little more focused as to what i'm looking for, i'm going to do one more
data recovery scan through the other two physical disks to see if i can
salvage anything. i'm not overly confident.
as for the
script? i did this once before and concluded the data was garbled, but
if i can reconstruct the directory structure and file names of the
script, and get a bit lucky in pulling out a few text fragments, i
should be able to rebuild the script with minimal effort - even if it
takes a few days to write it all out and do some virtual testing. well,
shit, it could be a month before the bus pirate gets here, anyways.
i'm
going to move some things around with the expectation of getting used
to living with three discs for the time being. i'm not sure i could even
buy a 250 gb sata II drive new anywhere (and second hand hard drives
are a dumb idea). so i'm going to end up upgrading.
when
i do, i'll move the music files to the new drive. they're both the most
important and need the most space. that'll leave me with two 250s i can
boot into 32 and 64 bit, respectively, and one to use for various types
of backup.
for right now, though, i don't have the
appetite to set up a 64 bit system. but i might end up at least nliting
it, depending on how much time i end up waiting for, and how
successfully i can salvage the other laptop.
as the
problem with the other laptop is the hard drive (there's a pattern here;
i'm tempted to go to ssd, i'll have to check prices), what i'll have to
do is work off an external. then again, it hasn't actually died yet. in
the long run, that's another component i'll have to replace, but it's
not a priority.
so, i'm chugging away at this. i can't
provide an eta for getting back to what i was doing, but i can at least
report having a few ideas.
Thursday, April 10, 2014
there is absolutely electricity in the air. this isn't pushing towards contradicting thermodynamics. there's two important questions:
1) is there enough to use? (almost certainly not)
2) what kind of effect might such a thing have on something like farming?
free energy sounds great, and i'm usually all for experimenting, but this is something i'd say should be avoided. it could literally be the process of sucking all the life out of the earth....
....to play angry birds.
now, as for pulling all the magnetic energy and radio signals we throw around back down...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJTl2oqaWPs
i've read a little research over the last few years about how mammals actually have a genetic memory of electro-reception (magnetic reception). you hear about it a bit in herd migration, sometimes. and supposedly birds are really good at it. but it's nothing like sharks, for example.
if we had a sixth sense in our genetic history and lost it, it's because we couldn't use it. i think the basic answer is that terrestrial creatures have less use for it than water or air based creatures.
but, we now live in a world with radio waves and wifi and cell signals bouncing everywhere. even if we're not the beneficiaries, it's interesting to ask questions about how this might drive evolution in the future.
i think it would be awesome to be able to sense fields....and the repressed physicist in me jumps at the possibilities in better understanding the universe...
if only lamarck was right, huh? alas...
i mean, who needs wearables when you've got a wifi receptor (and perhaps transmitter!) in your brain?
conversely, this is maybe an area of future research in genetic engineering:
http://www.actahort.org/books/29/29_34.htm
just to clarify, what that suggests is that sucking down the electricity out of the earth *might* lead to a reduction of crop yields.
that's where quantifying it becomes useful. but, millions of cell phones can't be negligible. i don't think we should be thinking of this as renewable and infinite, like the sun.
yeah. just from a brief googling of this, it seems like it has to do with the difference in polarity between the earth and the atmosphere. if one were to start sucking out the electricity, they'd be draining the charge from the earth, which could in theory actually fuck the whole field up. i'm getting the impression that this isn't entirely predictable, but would also require large amounts of sucking. kind of a doomsday scenario, but maybe reason to be careful with this.
i mean, you have to work in the size of the earth and it's rotation and what not. but what happens at the moment that charge pulled out equals charge created? how likely is it?
"The earth can be considered as a big battery, and thunderstorms pump back electrons that the earth gives off. It is estimated that without that replenishment of electrons, the earth would lose all of its charge within an hour."
great.
1) is there enough to use? (almost certainly not)
2) what kind of effect might such a thing have on something like farming?
free energy sounds great, and i'm usually all for experimenting, but this is something i'd say should be avoided. it could literally be the process of sucking all the life out of the earth....
....to play angry birds.
now, as for pulling all the magnetic energy and radio signals we throw around back down...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJTl2oqaWPs
i've read a little research over the last few years about how mammals actually have a genetic memory of electro-reception (magnetic reception). you hear about it a bit in herd migration, sometimes. and supposedly birds are really good at it. but it's nothing like sharks, for example.
if we had a sixth sense in our genetic history and lost it, it's because we couldn't use it. i think the basic answer is that terrestrial creatures have less use for it than water or air based creatures.
but, we now live in a world with radio waves and wifi and cell signals bouncing everywhere. even if we're not the beneficiaries, it's interesting to ask questions about how this might drive evolution in the future.
i think it would be awesome to be able to sense fields....and the repressed physicist in me jumps at the possibilities in better understanding the universe...
if only lamarck was right, huh? alas...
i mean, who needs wearables when you've got a wifi receptor (and perhaps transmitter!) in your brain?
conversely, this is maybe an area of future research in genetic engineering:
http://www.actahort.org/books/29/29_34.htm
just to clarify, what that suggests is that sucking down the electricity out of the earth *might* lead to a reduction of crop yields.
that's where quantifying it becomes useful. but, millions of cell phones can't be negligible. i don't think we should be thinking of this as renewable and infinite, like the sun.
yeah. just from a brief googling of this, it seems like it has to do with the difference in polarity between the earth and the atmosphere. if one were to start sucking out the electricity, they'd be draining the charge from the earth, which could in theory actually fuck the whole field up. i'm getting the impression that this isn't entirely predictable, but would also require large amounts of sucking. kind of a doomsday scenario, but maybe reason to be careful with this.
i mean, you have to work in the size of the earth and it's rotation and what not. but what happens at the moment that charge pulled out equals charge created? how likely is it?
"The earth can be considered as a big battery, and thunderstorms pump back electrons that the earth gives off. It is estimated that without that replenishment of electrons, the earth would lose all of its charge within an hour."
great.
at
06:14
Location:
Windsor, ON, Canada
cmd files may technically be programs, but people interact with them like text. they're more like modern-day scripts, really.
in trying to salvage old files off my working drives (to replace the files on the trashed one), i've noticed that i'm often able to pull text files up that have been deleted for up to five years but i can't pull off cmd files that were deleted last month. it doesn't seem to be dependent on size. i'm led to conclude that ntfs is filing cmd files as programs and they're getting easily corrupted as binary.
but they're not really programs. they're certainly not binary they're text...
i realize that there may be some security issues with treating scripts as text files. but how serious an obstacle is this nowadays really? i mean, if you can launch notepad remotely, you're pretty much in control, are you not? even so, wouldn't it make more sense to block at the kernel than the file system? even backup drives crash. rather, this strikes me as an ancient windows artifact from the early 90s or the late 80s when cmd files really were programs and that should be updated for modern usage. i can't be the first person that's run into this.
i don't know enough about other file systems to comment.
in trying to salvage old files off my working drives (to replace the files on the trashed one), i've noticed that i'm often able to pull text files up that have been deleted for up to five years but i can't pull off cmd files that were deleted last month. it doesn't seem to be dependent on size. i'm led to conclude that ntfs is filing cmd files as programs and they're getting easily corrupted as binary.
but they're not really programs. they're certainly not binary they're text...
i realize that there may be some security issues with treating scripts as text files. but how serious an obstacle is this nowadays really? i mean, if you can launch notepad remotely, you're pretty much in control, are you not? even so, wouldn't it make more sense to block at the kernel than the file system? even backup drives crash. rather, this strikes me as an ancient windows artifact from the early 90s or the late 80s when cmd files really were programs and that should be updated for modern usage. i can't be the first person that's run into this.
i don't know enough about other file systems to comment.
at
02:47
Location:
Windsor, ON, Canada
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)