1% after 10 hours. 1000 hours is 42 days. and that's just the os partition. it'd better pick up.
it doesn't look unusable, so far. even if i can just get what's there off...
...and
this ancient 90s compaq actually isn't bad once it got tweaked to a
bigger pagefile. it can only handle a few tabs, sure. but it's at least
as functional as an iphone...
if you want to run a 90s computer on
the existing internet, you'd better get used to adblock. i don't need
more RAM, websites need to stop loading their pages with crap.
seriously.
as an aside, i get why i need to block twitter. i think
its useless, but it's popular. why, though, do i need to block aol? why
are websites still linking to aol? who uses aol? it's a 90s computer,
not a time machine back there...
bonus: one can block entire commenting systems.
Saturday, January 4, 2014
(it turns out it won't be necessary to actually partition anything
out because chkdsk does that in the mft. i did know how mfts work, but i
wasn't clear on whether the information coming at me related to the
physical sectors or the mft; it's the latter. which makes things easier.
a chkdsk is enough; the file system will take it from there. and,
thankfully, it does seem, right now, that the corruption is just at the
front of the mft.)
i should point out that i've got the disc split into a small operating system partition and a large file partition. it seems like that's going to save my data, even as the os needs a fresh install. which is why i did it like that.
i should point out that i've got the disc split into a small operating system partition and a large file partition. it seems like that's going to save my data, even as the os needs a fresh install. which is why i did it like that.
at
15:00
Location:
Windsor, ON, Canada
i've had a lot of bad luck with storage over the last few days and
it's probably going to be a few days, if not longer, before it gets
entirely fixed. i'm typing this from a compaq evo that was manufactured
in the 90s, that's missing half it's keys and in all honesty probably
belongs in a museum.
but note that it still boots. that's better than i can say for two far newer laptops that are even made by the same company. proof that everything was better in the 90s? fuck, this thing has *rust* on it. laptops with rust is a weird idea, but think of it like a reliable old chevy. it was probably actually even manufactured on this continent.
i even have an old quantum fireball drive that came with windows '98 on it that still boots. yet, the hard drive in the fancy windows 7 machine that my dad left me imploded after less than a year. it's not that we can't do better than this, it's that it isn't profitable to make electronics that don't break after a year. it's fucking pathetic, really.
it started yesterday when one of my usb drives just snapped. nothing out of the ordinary happened, it just disintegrated - almost as though it was timed to fritz out after the first. it might actually have been designed that way. engineers actually take full credit courses in a concept called "forced obsolescence". they spend as much time designing things to break as they do designing things to work. because profit. it's fucking pathetic.
i snapped the plastic off and the solder just gave way. nothing complicated about it, no fault on my behalf - it was just designed to break. just cheap garbage.
this morning, i take the laptop out of sleep (as mentioned, it's practically brand new) and the video spazzes out into static to reveal a blank screen. wait. fuck. reboot. nothing. memory is fine, but the hard drive test is failing. again, there was no strain on the device. worse, it came with no warning - it wasn't clicking or whirring or buzzing. it's almost like it has a timer in it....
i'm running it through a chkdsk right now, which should hopefully be done by the end of the week, and it looks like, in the end, i may get away with a corrupt boot sector and a reinstall; hard to say at this point, but it appears like i may be able to partition out the bad part. but, there's no reason for this. it's just badly designed (accidentally on purpose) garbage.
the laptop is sort of gravy. it was a gift, to replace one that came to me on a grant (another compaq with another dead hard drive). if i can't get it back up, it just means i'll have to get that router fixed sooner than later. it's not devastating.
in the mean time, it's this museum piece with 650 MB of obsolete RAM that is the one that's still kicking - rusty joints and all. and hp/compaq should be fucking embarrassed about that. except not. 'cause profit.
but note that it still boots. that's better than i can say for two far newer laptops that are even made by the same company. proof that everything was better in the 90s? fuck, this thing has *rust* on it. laptops with rust is a weird idea, but think of it like a reliable old chevy. it was probably actually even manufactured on this continent.
i even have an old quantum fireball drive that came with windows '98 on it that still boots. yet, the hard drive in the fancy windows 7 machine that my dad left me imploded after less than a year. it's not that we can't do better than this, it's that it isn't profitable to make electronics that don't break after a year. it's fucking pathetic, really.
it started yesterday when one of my usb drives just snapped. nothing out of the ordinary happened, it just disintegrated - almost as though it was timed to fritz out after the first. it might actually have been designed that way. engineers actually take full credit courses in a concept called "forced obsolescence". they spend as much time designing things to break as they do designing things to work. because profit. it's fucking pathetic.
i snapped the plastic off and the solder just gave way. nothing complicated about it, no fault on my behalf - it was just designed to break. just cheap garbage.
this morning, i take the laptop out of sleep (as mentioned, it's practically brand new) and the video spazzes out into static to reveal a blank screen. wait. fuck. reboot. nothing. memory is fine, but the hard drive test is failing. again, there was no strain on the device. worse, it came with no warning - it wasn't clicking or whirring or buzzing. it's almost like it has a timer in it....
i'm running it through a chkdsk right now, which should hopefully be done by the end of the week, and it looks like, in the end, i may get away with a corrupt boot sector and a reinstall; hard to say at this point, but it appears like i may be able to partition out the bad part. but, there's no reason for this. it's just badly designed (accidentally on purpose) garbage.
the laptop is sort of gravy. it was a gift, to replace one that came to me on a grant (another compaq with another dead hard drive). if i can't get it back up, it just means i'll have to get that router fixed sooner than later. it's not devastating.
in the mean time, it's this museum piece with 650 MB of obsolete RAM that is the one that's still kicking - rusty joints and all. and hp/compaq should be fucking embarrassed about that. except not. 'cause profit.
at
12:00
Location:
Windsor, ON, Canada
excited about new mt zion record
i'm actually pretty excited about this. the last really amazing one was back in '08. they're due for something consciousness-altering. you can't take this band out of context, but the excerpt sounds focused.
actually, it seems to have been leaked.
(https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnpQFjefXCRPozHrQgQnQ4_djW51IA_fk)
little borrowed melody from ka-spel to start things off. gotta keep things clean, clean, clean....
you can almost instantly tell if they're "on" or not. they're on. the recording quality on the youtube up is not so good, though. and that matters for this band.
(wait)
wow. as always, this is going to require some disassembling. not the kind of thing that you can listen to once or twice. i'm impressed on first listen, though.
actually, it seems to have been leaked.
(https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnpQFjefXCRPozHrQgQnQ4_djW51IA_fk)
little borrowed melody from ka-spel to start things off. gotta keep things clean, clean, clean....
you can almost instantly tell if they're "on" or not. they're on. the recording quality on the youtube up is not so good, though. and that matters for this band.
(wait)
wow. as always, this is going to require some disassembling. not the kind of thing that you can listen to once or twice. i'm impressed on first listen, though.
at
04:34
Location:
Windsor, ON, Canada
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)