that money would be better spent on economic diversification.
the idea that it is in the national interest relies on the idea that we need a secondary oil market to lessen dependence on american oil purchases. but, this logic only holds in the context of the country existing as a petrostate, which is itself not in the national interest.
what is in the national interest, first and foremost, is to lessen our fiscal dependency on oil exports.
i think the courts need to remind trudeau that he has a set of rules, called a constitution, that he has to follow.
...and that the government is following a wrongheaded set of priorities that is outside of it's mandate, will harm itself electorally and will leave the country worse off, over all.
i expected him to support these pipelines, don't get me wrong; they all supported all the pipelines. but, he has apparently forgotten that he campaigned heavily on transition - and that this is where the country's focus and resources should be focused, first and foremost.
https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2018/04/09/trans-mountain-pipeline-extension-will-be-built-trudeau-vows.html
Monday, April 9, 2018
when she's not coughing and hacking and heaving, she's crying or
cursing - but she sounds drunk more often than stoned, so who even knows
what she's on. if it's medical, it's not helping with any symptoms,
that's for sure - not with anything physical and not with anything
emotional. and she has that patty/selma croak in her voice that makes
her sound like she's on the brink of shooting up a playschool.
this is a scary person, through and through.
this is a scary person, through and through.
at
09:53
i mean....
i have to file the complaint before i can apply to get out of the lease.
and, even if i win, it could take forever.
i just want to get away from this person. now.
i have to file the complaint before i can apply to get out of the lease.
and, even if i win, it could take forever.
i just want to get away from this person. now.
at
09:46
i'm actually hoping that they don't follow through with the secondary complaint, so i can just go ahead and apply to get out of the lease.
i just want to get out of this place, asap.
this woman appears to smoke upwards of a half ounce of pot a day.
i'm continually astounded by this.
it's like something out of a cartoon.
but there's no end to it. there's no reprieve. it's just constant.
and, it's terrible for my skin :(.
i just want to get out of this place, asap.
this woman appears to smoke upwards of a half ounce of pot a day.
i'm continually astounded by this.
it's like something out of a cartoon.
but there's no end to it. there's no reprieve. it's just constant.
and, it's terrible for my skin :(.
at
09:41
i mean, i keep pointing out that i'm going to have the same problems in the next place: that there isn't a solution to this.
but, i'm living on top of what is probably the most disgusting person in town.
she's chain smoking marijuana, for hours. she's bringing people in to smoke with her. there might not be a perfect answer, but the status quo is almost the worst situation imaginable.
but, i'm living on top of what is probably the most disgusting person in town.
she's chain smoking marijuana, for hours. she's bringing people in to smoke with her. there might not be a perfect answer, but the status quo is almost the worst situation imaginable.
at
04:48
actually, i should...
this is just logic. i'm not an engineer. i can't even build a paper airplane.
but, if trying to tarp over the floor leads me to the conclusion that i'm just moving the smoke around, it follows that the problem is that the smoke is getting into the subfloor - and the actual renovations that need to be done are in the smoker's unit, not mine.
i'm just wondering to myself what kind of reaction that would produce in the smoker. if i could get a court order to renovate her unit, would she stick around for it?
and, would they just pay me to leave, instead?
but, this is what i need to present: that renovations need to occur in the unit below me.
i have nothing to lose by upsetting management; i don't want to be here.
this is just logic. i'm not an engineer. i can't even build a paper airplane.
but, if trying to tarp over the floor leads me to the conclusion that i'm just moving the smoke around, it follows that the problem is that the smoke is getting into the subfloor - and the actual renovations that need to be done are in the smoker's unit, not mine.
i'm just wondering to myself what kind of reaction that would produce in the smoker. if i could get a court order to renovate her unit, would she stick around for it?
and, would they just pay me to leave, instead?
but, this is what i need to present: that renovations need to occur in the unit below me.
i have nothing to lose by upsetting management; i don't want to be here.
at
04:43
i spent some time tossing and turning, but i'm ultimately still awake - tired and angry and frustrated, but still awake.
i'll have to give them until wednesday, but i'm going to be making a call on that day.
we initially had four options:
a) talk to her
that's clearly not going to work.
b) get rid of her.
i have to continue my due diligence on this, but it's a very difficult and probably unsuccessful process. and, it will no doubt embolden her, if she wins.
c) fix the unit.
i'm giving up on this.
i initially thought i had the bedroom fixed up, but what that did was push the smoke into the bathroom and hallway. so, i patched those areas up, and it just pushed the smoke back into the bedroom.
i patched up the closet the other day, and it just came up a few feet to the side of it.
i had to do the experiment to see how bad it really is, but it seems like i'm not just patching up holes, but in need of replacing the whole floor. i kind of realized i'd need to tear out some fixtures, but it's beyond that, i'd have to tear down the whole unit. really.
the smoke is just going to have to come out somewhere, eventually. and all i'm doing by putting down tarps and taping up spaces is moving it around - i need something much deeper than this.
so, i'm realizing that i can't win this fight on these grounds. it's really gotta be that one of us leaves.
d) let me out of the lease.
this is going to have to be the option i pursue on around the 1st of may, unless i get a clearer response over the next few days.
so, it's not going to be a letter. it's just going to be a call. i'll have to update her on the situation: the n4 didn't work, and my attempts to smoke proof the unit have led me to the conclusion that this would require replacing the entire floor. i consequently need management to dedicate itself to removing the tenant below me, or prepare to have me try and escape the lease.
i can't live in filth, like this.
i'll have to give them until wednesday, but i'm going to be making a call on that day.
we initially had four options:
that's clearly not going to work.
b) get rid of her.
i have to continue my due diligence on this, but it's a very difficult and probably unsuccessful process. and, it will no doubt embolden her, if she wins.
i'm giving up on this.
i initially thought i had the bedroom fixed up, but what that did was push the smoke into the bathroom and hallway. so, i patched those areas up, and it just pushed the smoke back into the bedroom.
i patched up the closet the other day, and it just came up a few feet to the side of it.
i had to do the experiment to see how bad it really is, but it seems like i'm not just patching up holes, but in need of replacing the whole floor. i kind of realized i'd need to tear out some fixtures, but it's beyond that, i'd have to tear down the whole unit. really.
the smoke is just going to have to come out somewhere, eventually. and all i'm doing by putting down tarps and taping up spaces is moving it around - i need something much deeper than this.
so, i'm realizing that i can't win this fight on these grounds. it's really gotta be that one of us leaves.
d) let me out of the lease.
this is going to have to be the option i pursue on around the 1st of may, unless i get a clearer response over the next few days.
so, it's not going to be a letter. it's just going to be a call. i'll have to update her on the situation: the n4 didn't work, and my attempts to smoke proof the unit have led me to the conclusion that this would require replacing the entire floor. i consequently need management to dedicate itself to removing the tenant below me, or prepare to have me try and escape the lease.
i can't live in filth, like this.
at
04:22
as should be obvious, i don't care if people smoke pot, in the abstract.
i just don't want them to plume smoke into my unit, which i've always kept completely smoke-free.
i have never smoked inside, anywhere.
and, when it's obvious that people are blowing smoke in my face to upset me, i'm willing to use whatever tools are available to me to get them to stop.
i don't grasp the intent of people that want to split the world into binary choices of smokers and non-smokers. that's like arguing that everybody who has a glass of wine now and again is an alcoholic. most people measure their alcohol intake on a monthly or yearly scale, not a weekly or daily one. so, it shouldn't be that hard to understand.
enjoying a glass of wine now and again doesn't mean you want your bedroom to smell like vomit and urine. likewise, enjoying a toke when i'm out at a concert doesn't mean i want my pillow to smell like a bong.
this is not binary.
there is a very wide spectrum.
and, i am an extremely infrequent smoker that doesn't want to live in a hazy environment.
i just don't want them to plume smoke into my unit, which i've always kept completely smoke-free.
i have never smoked inside, anywhere.
and, when it's obvious that people are blowing smoke in my face to upset me, i'm willing to use whatever tools are available to me to get them to stop.
i don't grasp the intent of people that want to split the world into binary choices of smokers and non-smokers. that's like arguing that everybody who has a glass of wine now and again is an alcoholic. most people measure their alcohol intake on a monthly or yearly scale, not a weekly or daily one. so, it shouldn't be that hard to understand.
enjoying a glass of wine now and again doesn't mean you want your bedroom to smell like vomit and urine. likewise, enjoying a toke when i'm out at a concert doesn't mean i want my pillow to smell like a bong.
this is not binary.
there is a very wide spectrum.
and, i am an extremely infrequent smoker that doesn't want to live in a hazy environment.
at
00:15
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)