if the gross, ugly rats are dead, is the wittle mouse that wants to be my friend, and who is just as gross, still here?

in fact, i think i've seen increasing signs of it coming out, now that the rats are dead.

the rats would likely eat the mouse if they could catch it but mice are dramatically smaller than rats and they may have a hard time catching it. the mice must view the rats as big, evil giants.

i won't bug the mouse if i can't see it or signs of it.

i hope it stays in the walls and eats the bugs.

The Karen Court of Ontario

only karens may file

i want to suggest that the ontario superior court rebrand as the karen court of ontario.

it's nice to see the israelis took out the navy guy, but this isn't going anywhere unless the americans do it, and it's not what they want. they want a deal.

the opposition need to act immediately.

iran has no future and this is not the end of this, but it's apparently going to take a president with bigger balls to get the job done.

as far as i can tell, they haven't even hit 1% of the ruling class, and there are thousands of clerics and judges and other bureaucrats that need to die for the regime to collapse. they didn't even try. they just blew up some boats and planes to created some leverage. who gives a fuck.

i supported wiping them out in one blow and i meant wiping them out in one blow. 

i don't and never did support bombing their military to create leverage in order to sign an agreement.

it appears as though the iranians are leading dumbass donny around by his nose at this point. 

there's not going to be a "deal".

unfortunately, it's looking like trump is too much of a pussy to finish the job and would rather be manipulated by terrorist thugs into a false negotiation process that will accomplish nothing, just so he can say he signed a deal.

what a loser.

people that know they're always right are usually wrong.

stupid bitches that know they're always right are not court justice material.

something i've learned over the last few years is that justin trudeau stacked the ontario superior court with complete morons, who were picked for dumb reasons, like that they were indigenous, or muslim, or black or female. this created an incredible problem, because when you put stupid people in positions of authority, they're more likely to abuse it. the decision to arbitrarily utilize institutional power is a sign of low intelligence and i'm seeing it over and over.

our court justices have always had problems with science, math, technology, etc. court justices tend to have little to no education in science; it's a serious problem, and it's longstanding. they tend to basically be english majors. but english majors have a certain mentality to them that makes them unlikely to abuse power, or use it recklessly because all the books they've read taught them not to. the trudeau appointees i've interacted with are consistently disinterested in this, and willing to abuse any power handed to them in any way they can, which is kind of just like trudeau, himself.

we elected an unqualified moron and he put idiots on the court. we should not have expected otherwise, but the situation is longterm and is going to create serious problems in the lives of a lot of people, who have to deal with specious rulings written by dumb airheads. there was an expectation that the party would prevent this kind of thing, and it didn't. canada needs to learn this lesson and never elect another unqualified aristocrat ever again.

it's the white women that are the worst. it's like he went out of his way to pick the most hysterically irrational, dumbest bitches he could find. and that's now the court. and those are now the rulings people have to try to deal with.

i'm in the process of appealing a case to the supreme court that is the result of the court of appeal making an error in understanding the statute that is so rudimentary that an 8 year-old could identify it. the statute says if. the court has discarded the if.

worse is that the court has itself dealt with this reading comprehension error several times already. i've given the court a half dozen references that indicate that the issue is dealt with in case law and it won't address it.

the resultant situation is absurd - the court has been shown it's rudimentary error and even shown that the rudimentary error has been corrected repeatedly in case law, but will not address the error. it is holding to it's false reading, and that's the end of it. it will not allow itself to be corrected, because it's run by stupid, irrational bitches that don't listen and don't learn and get off on abusing power.

we've all met the stupid bitch that won't be corrected when they're wrong and yells and cries and has a hissy fit and throws things at you instead. we don't expect them to be superior court justices. in canada, they are, now. this is the most substantive legacy of justin trudeau.

the court needs to be an antidote to the serious social problem of the stupid bitch, and not a corollary of it. stupid bitches aren't going away. society needs a way to prevent them from hurting people, which has historically been the courts. in canada, we gave them control of the courts, instead, and now they're abusing it, which was predictable, and which any intelligent person should have seen coming.

so, i have to drag their retarded asses to the supreme court to get them to fix a basic reading error any little kid could identify. it's a waste of everybody's time that is the result of poor hiring decisions made by the pmo.

let this be a lesson: don't put stupid people in power, because they will bring more stupid people with them, and even if you can get rid of the first stupid person, you might not be able to get rid of their stupid friends.

it's somewhat hilarious to see bernie sanders go full conservative retard in launching a quixotic crusade against artificial intelligence.

hey, bernie. do you know what they call it when technology takes away jobs from workers/slaves? that's called communism. and, do you know what they call people that resist it? conservative reactionaries.

now, that said, if this change occurs without any sort of government oversight, it is sure to create a mess of unemployment, but fighting against progress is sisyphean and would be pyrrhic if it were successful. cancelling ai is a foolish approach to dealing with the challenges presented by it.

rather, it would seem like some legislation written by somebody like a senator to help displaced workers find new jobs, or to capture and redistribute profit streams, would be a better approach.

i'm not sure what the senator really wants in the end if he's opposed to technology eliminating shit jobs. that's the point of being a leftist. fighting for increases in working conditions is one thing, but it's a reaction to a simpler time and a less advanced technological reality. when you have the ability for the machines to take over in front of you, and you're fighting against it instead of for it, you're neither siding with workers nor with capital. you're just resisting change for the sake of it. you're just afraid.

i'm strongly in favour of ai displacing workers and any worker would be, but i understand that such a change will require a parallel shift in ownership of the machine and in how commodities are distributed. fight for that. don't fight to turn the clocks back, or off. that's neither pro-worker, nor pro-management, nor leftist. it's base conservatism. and i don't support that.