he's a moron.

a correct timeline for hudson bay opening up year round is c. 2100. 

this won't be built in the next 50 years.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/manitoba-kinew-megaprojects-analysis-9.7177015

i've repeatedly called for the assassination of donald trump and think that that would be the correct outcome in the american legal system. i've called for the intelligence agencies to remove him, as a national security threat.

i might applaud if some random person took him out, but that's not what i've been calling for. i've been calling for the intelligence agencies to do it.

i certainly would not do that myself. i'm not a martyr for any cause. i don't believe in the "greater good", and i don't care about the children. i'm driven by self-interest and maximizing my individual goals and i'm driven so much by self-interest that i don't care about societal goal posts like family or status. i have no interest in measuring myself against others. i completely reject any and all form of competition and i'm completely opposed to market economics. 

i'm not even an american citizen. i'm not going to put my own country ahead of myself, let alone somebody else's country ahead of myself. that would be retarded.

if they ever tried to conscript me, i'd make a show out of killing the officer that tried to conscript me. i'd be safer in jail. great.

so, it would not be in my self-interest to commit suicide for the greater good in that context or in any other context and i would not be considering doing that.

it's not my job.

assassinating a president like donald trump, who is a clear threat to the national interest, is the job of the security agencies. i would again call on them to do their jobs, but i have no interest in putting myself at risk to do their jobs for them. that would be irrational; it would be idiotic.

i think the cia/nsa should be assassinating donald trump, as he is a clear threat to the security of the united states.

i'm not entirely sure why they haven't yet. we haven't seen a lunatic in power like this since jfk, and they did the right thing in taking him out, then.

if our increasingly far right fascist government in canada moves to ban internet access for young people in any way, we need to start organizing street protests at once. the idea is unacceptable on it's face and should not even be being discussed. we should immediately move to shut the society down in response. this is an issue that would get me out on the street protesting. 

i would suggest organizing the protests in a way that emulates the street protests in iran.

fear of technology - let's call it technophobia - is a growing, developing threat in our society that needs to be addressed with education and exposure. when people have a better understanding of technology, and are exposed to it more, they tend to have less fear or resentment of it.

banning children from technology is not a socialist position; socialists embrace technology as the solution to wage slavery, which is the characteristic of capitalism that makes it little different than feudalism or other historical forms of slavery. wage slave capitalism is just the current world's form of slavery. civilization needs slaves to function. only technology offers us an escape, where we can build a civilized society without the coercive wage work or other types of physical slavery that are required for the civilization to function.

banning children from technology could only be seen as an extremely right-wing political position, and those that advocate for it should be correctly considered to be far-right, technophobic extremists.

canadian politicians have been bitching about "competitiveness" for decades, and then they keep doing retarded things like banning kids from technology. you think that's going to make us more or less competitive? i mean, c'mon.

if you let these right-wing conservative politicians in the ndp make decisions for the country, we're going to end up looking like iran.

there's a country that bans internet access for young people: iran. is that what we want? it seems to be what the ndp wants.

some percentage of children are going to end up as worthless, hopeless retards. that's how it is.

at the end of the day, some percentage of children will survive to reproduce and some percentage will die. that's inevitable. that's evolution. your genes might fail. so it goes.

you very well might have stupid, useless, worthless children. that might be true.

but, it's your own fucking fault, and the fact that you're considering banning them from using technology is a symptom of the poor parenting skills that led you to this situation, not a solution. maybe you should start giving them things instead of focusing on taking things away.

your stupid idiot kids are not jeff bezos' fault. they're you're fault.

take responsibility for your failures as a parent and stop blaming it on technology.

i don't want to see children raised in some backwards dystopic primitivist amish hellhole and i'll fight to stop it to the extent that i can. that's not the kind of society i'm going to live in.

banning your kids from technology is not good parenting. it's abusive and it will harm them.

some kids will use the technology to write symphonies and novels. some of them will waste their lives playing video games.

but that's a reflection of the person and not of the technology.

stop blaming technology for the defects of human behaviour. it makes you sound like a conservative retard.