Thursday, March 20, 2025

should there be federal standards for education?

there should, in principle; the shrinking of the world would imply more standards and not less. facts are not different in idaho than they are in new york. however, it's extremely difficult to enforce and uphold them.

in some states, deferring to local agencies is likely to be an extremely retarding process that severely harms young children. in some states, greater freedom to modernize and advance the curriculum will be used to great betterment.

there's good and bad in this and how it turns out depends on what the people in these states let and don't let happen. i'm reminded of the backlash against the abortion ruling.

this decision could very well cost republicans the house.
but why would canada want to cut off oil exports to the united states when it can increase the price instead?

the reason these pipelines don't exist is that there's no business case for them. alberta oil is high cost, dirty and low quality. we export it all to the united states because nobody else wants it. further, cutting supply to the united states will increase profits for venezuela and saudi arabia, and cut us out. 

there's a saying about cutting one's nose off to spite one's face.

it's an utterly stupid idea.

this is nonsense.

increasing taxes can cause inflation, but this tax is so small that the level of inflation has been measured at 0.25%.

decreasing taxes never reduces prices and those arguing it does are stating what amounts to a religious belief taken on faith that has been thoroughly debunked by decades of empirical science.

nothing gets cheaper on april 1st, except mark carney's credibility as an economist.

in canada, education is solely the responsibility of the provinces.

s 93, constitution act, 1867.

we do not have and have never had any sort of federal department of education.
trump's issue with canada is that trudeau made him feel inadequate. it's personal.

it'll blowover like a bad combover.
the flip flop in the presidency has perhaps obscured the fact that this is trump's second term and he's a lame duck on arrival. he has at most three years, probably less. there are midterms in 2026, which is now a year and a half away.

is trump going to conquer canada in six months?

further, the likelihood of this policy surviving trump is essentially nil. the reason mark rutte laughed is because it actually is a joke, although i happen to remember mr. rutte in his previous job, and this is not uncharacteristic of him, as an individual. mr. rutte is a longstanding asshole. he also laughed when bush invaded iraq.

you never know with trump. maybe it's an elaborate loyalty test. i think that would be giving him too much credit. however, we see that there is a subset of the elite in canada that did not require much of an incentive to abandon north america as a project, of which we are a part of, as a sovereign country.  

canada should look in the mirror and see itself for what it is and understand the truth; trump is accusing us of being a bad ally and to a large extent we're proving him right. it is true that we have values that are different than theirs and we can't allow them to be compromised. we should absolutely be telling them to fuck off and spitting in their face if they want to put tariffs on us. defence contracting should be on the table, at least. we have to demonstrate via empirical fact that we're not the 51st state and expect them to get it when we do. however, talking about supplying weapons to military alliances in opposition to the united states that would put us in direct conflict with the united states military is too much and needs to be rejected - that's not in our self-interest and not what's going to happen. voices calling for this outcome should be identified and isolated for what they are, which is stupid and dangerous and borderline treasonous.

the chinese are not communists, they're the most vicious capitalists in the history of the planet and arguably have tipped over into fascism. workers in china not only do not control the means of production but have absolutely no rights at all. i've been over this before - china is unique in the world as being the singular standing non-greek culture. all of europe is greek, all of the regions colonized by europe are greek, the russians are the most greek, the muslims are greek, the indians are greek and most of southeast asia is even greek, too, as the furthest extension of greek colonialism. what's left is the very bottom of subsaharan africa,  but it is emerging from colonialism as functionally greek, and the far east of asia, which was massively influenced by greek thought via the spread of buddhism (which we know today was invented and spread by greek colonists tailgating on alexander), but which retained it's unique identity - china, korea and japan. japan and korea are under massive american military occupation. only the chinese are left standing as a non-greek cultural force that is alien to the rest of the world.

the chinese neither view the american continents as competitors or as adversaries, but as half empty lands awaiting colonization. the west needs to understand the chinese as an alien race with a unique culture, because they see us an inferior race to be replaced by chinese colonial expansion. if the chinese get their way, they will do to america and canada what the europeans did to the native americans. i don't want to get into it, but covid may have been a 21st century smallpox blanket, and it may have worked better than we realize.

this isn't about ideology. it's not a clash of civilizations....although it is. it's about race and it's about race because the chinese have made it about race.

trump is a goof and his policies won't survive him. we need deeper thinking that can see more than a foot in front of us and can plan for more than two years in the future, when a new president comes in and completely reverses course. however, there's a kernel of truth in recognizing the need for north american defence because the chinese are coming and we will need to work with the americans to stop them.

the thing we should be on the lookout for is chinese expansion in north eastern asia, which is nominally russian but historically chinese. there were previous skirmishes between russian and chinese emperors around the amur river, but the japanese had a brutal and genocidal occupation of manchuria during world war two (which collapsed the chinese state entirely) and the soviets annexed it in the process of driving the japanese out, thereby stealing a large area of and from historical china. in recent years, the russians have largely ceded sovereignty over greater manchuria back to beijing and they have in the process allowed chinese capital to move in, which is exporting raw resources to china without giving moscow a cut. all evidence suggests that they're just taking over with the intention of annexation. they're aggressively moving north up the coast very quickly. it will be when we find ourselves face to face with chinese jets rather than russian jets running chicken runs into alaska that we will know the day of conflict is upon us, and the chinese are ready to go.

the canadian policy needs to be to find a way to juggle it's need for sovereignty with it's need to help the americans contain the chinese by slowing them down. detente with russia would help us do this and should be seen as in our self-interest.

further, our massive border with russia should be strongly incentivizing us to support trump in minimizing tensions with the russians. our support for ukraine has been self-defeating and stupid - it's not at all in our interest to stoke tensions with the russians like this. you have to remember that trudeau is a failed actor that grew up on 80s blockbuster films full of anti-russian propaganda, and he saw russia as an enemy for that reason. he was not a deep thinker and this is not a well thought through policy for canada. he also had chrystia freeland, who is ukrainian, nipping at his heels like a chihuahua about it. we have a big border with the united states that is undefended; i believe our border with russia is actually bigger and less defended. the best way to protect ourselves from russian incursions is to become friends with the russians, which has been how we've defended ourselves from american incursions. for decades, it was the americans that were stopping us from doing that. if trump is seeking detente, and detente survives him, which it might, we should be taking advantage of that, not fighting it. turning russia into a friend will prevent our need to defend ourselves against them and potentially open up very lucrative markets across the arctic.

i know this got dumped on our lap, but we need better thought out policy than knee-jerking into a position where we define ourselves as enemies of the americans. i know they tend to piss us off. that's not a reason to shoot ourselves in the foot.

whatever policy positions are preferable to us, smart, enlightened leadership right now would begin with the realization that trump is a lame duck and that we should avoid rash overreactions. unless we ourselves decide otherwise, which would be very foolish, it is exceedingly likely that this is a blip in time and we'll look back and laugh at it.
the war in ukraine is not in america's interest, nor in russia's interest and not in europe's interest. it is only in china's interest.
canada will remain in the ukusa alliance.

starmer will likely not last very long.

but a neonazi germany could very well find friends in china that help it out of under the american jackboot and it should be a primary strategic goal of canadian government policy to help make sure that can't happen.
i mean, how did we get to the point where we have politicians like chrystia freeland, whose grandparents were nazis, telling us the germans are our allies?

the germans are not our allies.

the germans are our enemies; the russians are our allies, to help us fight the germans.
at the end of this, we're not going to be aligned with the germans.

we're going to end up fighting the germans.

again.
about the only rational explanation i can think of for the existence of an article like the one i just posted at the canadian state media outlet is infiltration by chinese influences, which could mean buying out the reporter or could be more structural and sinister than that.
the chinese have infiltrated mainstream western media very badly. i don't exactly want to call for a mccarthyite purge of media, but i would have tentative support for an investigation to figure out the depth of it.

more important than that is that, as readers and analysts of western media, individuals should be constantly on the lookout for pro-chinese biases.
china's official eu policy is support for "EU strategic autonomy.", which means helping it free itself from american occupation.

as i pointed out yesterday, the american occupation of europe is necessary to prevent it from returning to fascism, and the europeans will be nazis again in ten minutes if the americans ever leave.

talk of the europeans aligning against the united states is somewhat premature given the 100,000 american troops on the continent in major bases like rammstein in germany.
so, the reaction to trump's tariffs should be that canada should become a colony of europe, again.

no thanks.

worse, this is pre-modern carbon/industrial age thinking. we should take advantage of the opportunity to build a post-carbon economy and increase trade networks with south america, not turn into a factory to send tanks to neo-nazi germany. 

what is underlying this kind of thinking is actually a desire to build an alliance with china, which europe may very well find itself in. while the americans are intelligently looking for detente in russia, the chinese are looking to steal europe, and the european elite has a lot to benefit from aligning with the chinese, especially if it expects china to win.

when the shit hits the fan and war breaks out with the chinese, and it is inevitable, the russians will be more reliable allies than the french, if they can be. the truth is that europe is the weakest link, as it is not in their self-interest to remain under the american jackboot, and it never has been.

europe is not our friend and we need to stop pretending that it is.