Sunday, September 16, 2018
no, listen.
i'm not on the side of people that want to criminalize communication.
i will stand up for my right to be annoying.
and, fuck you if you don't like it...
i'm not on the side of people that want to criminalize communication.
i will stand up for my right to be annoying.
and, fuck you if you don't like it...
at
14:40
Your complaint details
- Address
null
windsor
there was a phone call & a visit to my door, of a threatening, harassing and frankly simply incompetent nature.
- Incident Dates
-
- Date
- 12/9/2018
- Time
- 3:56
- Date
- 16/9/2018
- Time
- 12:00
- Summary of complaint
- Please note formatting has been stripped for preview purposes - original intact
this officer has threatened me with arrest for a non-crime on two occasions. the first occurrence occurred by phone, and i have a recording of it. the officer called me at 3:56 am - that is almost 4:00 in the morning - on sept 12, and threatened to arrest me for repeatedly responding to an online ad. the number that the officer called me from was . i txted a response to this number, and was told it is not an officer's number. it must have been a friend or partner's number, i suppose. i do have the recording of the officer identifying himself and can email it somewhere. i explained that my behaviour - repeatedly responding to an online ad for an apartment - is not harassment under the criminal code, and not only would i not stop, but i am preparing a human rights case against the landlord, for discriminating against me on enumerated grounds. the second occurrence happened at roughly 12:00 pm on sept 16th. two officers showed up at my door (the other was a white male officer and said nothing during the encounter), and this "constable mancino" threatened me with arrest a second time if i did not stop responding to the ad. i asked the officer to explain what harassment under the law is, and he failed to do so in a correct manner. he seemed to believe that harassment is merely annoying somebody, rather than threatening to harm them. of course, if that were true, then telemarketing would be against the law, and the jails would be full of call centre agents. it's just wrong. after determining that the officer did not understand the law, i told him i didn't have time for this, encouraged him to launch a report if he wanted to and went to close the door. he then put his foot in the door, preventing me from doing so. i informed him that he does not have a warrant, and yet he still refused to move his foot. he did eventually move his foot after i asked him to several times. he then threatened to arrest me if i reply to the ad again - not if i conduct in threatening or harassing behaviour, but if i merely reply to the ad. on his way out, i asked him for his badge number and he refused to give it to me. he started with "184" and then said he already gave it to me, which he did not. even if he had already given it to me, that would not be a reason to not give it to me again. when a citizen asks for a badge number, an officer should state it slowly and repeatedly if necessary. this officer may have been acting out of bias regarding my gender identity, as i am openly transgendered, but i cannot state that for certain. regardless, he should not have called me at 4:00 am from an unofficial police number that may or may not have belonged to his friend or partner, he should not have threatened me with arrest without understanding the nature of the law, he should not have prevented me from closing the door without a warrant and he should have given me his badge number when i asked. i would suggest that this particular officer has a superiority complex, is unreformable and should probably look for a different line of work.
at
13:18
i have filed a complaint on the following grounds.
1) calling me at 4:00 am from an unofficial #.
2) threatening to file charges on unjustified grounds.
3) refusing to let me close the door, without a warrant.
4) refusing to give me his badge number.
and, i do very much hope that he gets fired - or that it at least contributes to the process of him getting fired.
1) calling me at 4:00 am from an unofficial #.
2) threatening to file charges on unjustified grounds.
3) refusing to let me close the door, without a warrant.
4) refusing to give me his badge number.
and, i do very much hope that he gets fired - or that it at least contributes to the process of him getting fired.
at
13:16
if i have to defend myself against a frivolous criminal harassment charge - for repeatedly applying to an ad for an apartment that is being denied to me on enumerated grounds - you can be sure that i will seek a seven figure settlement from the city.
bring it on.
bring it on.
at
13:12
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)