viewless (original album mix)

this was re-recorded significantly earlier, but left to sit. i updated it over the christmas holidays, re-recording some sections and adding samples.

the star wars samples have actually been removed. that required a bit of splicing, but it's the only actual editing on the track.

original version:
http://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/track/viewless-2

initially, it was a song about being young and not listened to. as i grew up, i realized this is a general condition of society that is not limited to young people. so, i've generalized it here to reflect the illusion of what we call democracy.

recorded in december, 1998. edited on nov 19, 2013.

https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/track/teenage-jesus-original-1999-cd-mix

anticipation (original album mix)

this was constructed as a bridge between tracks 16 and 18, which are conceptually linked. it samples the initial demo tape recording and adds some noisy sequencing.

recorded in december, 1998.

https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/track/teenage-jesus-original-1999-cd-mix

timeline: 1886

100 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0- 0+ 1 2
000 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
00 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

previous

next

1886

unclear date:

friedrich engels - ludwig feuerbach and the end of classical german philosophy

http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/chronology/CE/1000/800/80/06.html

friedrich engels - ludwig feuerbach and the end of classical german philosophy

waste of time

there's no value in reading a 175 year old marxist "materialist" critique of german "idealism" in 2013 that was repeatedly deemed unfit for publication until well after engels' death. eventually, the soviet government finally published it for historical rather than theoretical reasons. hegel's brand of platonism is too insane to require a rebuttal, and marx was never able to truly understand what science is. it's the deaf arguing against the deaf, with the intent of leading the blind.

the critique, at it's core, is presented as a rejection of the idea that history is teleological. yet, marx is no less teleological than hegel or feuerbach, he just derives a mildly different ideal. as mentioned, engels is confused, primarily, by marx' bizarre concept of science, which in truth has more in common with something like intelligent design than it does with any kind of real science. it's also plagued by a decidedly classical/newtonian mindset, precisely as the world was entering the modern era. so, the dichotomy presented here is blatantly false. do we need a dialectic, then? maybe. historical materialism is a branch of german idealism, rather than a reaction against it. nor does it have anything at all to do with science. this essay is utter nonsense.

points of interest...

- engels has made similar, but more interesting, arguments elsewhere in deriving "materialism" from baconian science and pitting it against continental philosophy.

- engels suggests two flaws of eighteenth century materialism. the first is the idea that natural laws only function at a chemical/physical level. the implication is that natural laws also apply to human behaviour, but the statement is too vague to really analyze. if he means to suggest that there are mechanical laws that govern human economic behaviour, he's certainly wrong; today, we model the complexity of human societies using dynamical systems and chaos theory rather than causal laws. human behaviour is dominated by uncertainty, rather than certainty. in truth, physics is also dominated by uncertainty; we don't model molecules using causal laws anymore, either. there is indeed a cited flaw in eighteenth century materialism, but it's in the idea of assigning mechanical cause to the universe in the first place, not in it's limited application. this observation is devastating to marx' pseudo-scientific arguments. the second supposed flaw is that it doesn't understand history as a "process". but, what is this but a restated teleology? the flaw in materialism is that it wasn't idealistic! ha! some materialism!

- the attempt to describe evolution teleologically is painful. biology profs could conceivably use this text to teach common fallacies in evolutionary thought.

- "the conviction that humanity, at least at the present moment, moves on the whole in a progressive direction has absolutely nothing to do with the antagonism between materialism and idealism". marx/engels did not deny their teleology, they just didn't realize that teleology is inconsistent with baconian science. rather, they seemed to think it was an essential aspect of materialism that actually helps define it.

- historical materialism is explained, here, as a hidden variable theory. events may seem random, but they are controlled by hidden laws. i wonder if there's an analogous bell theorem? do humans obey an uncertainty principle?

- to be fair, if you replace marx' teleology with a concept of chance (as measured with probabilities, rather than causal laws) then his description of things as being processes does have some insight. it completely negates his entire dialectic, sure, but it at least realizes that everything exists merely within a moment that is defined by perpetual flux.

- likewise, the idea that economics and class struggle may play a role in shaping history is a good one, and well-established. the error marx is making is pretty common: he's generalizing the specific. it's just that he's doing it in a way that is exceedingly derpish, in no small part due to his flamboyantly arrogant rhetoric. what he's failing at, badly, in his generalization is three-fold: (1) there's no idea of controlled laboratory conditions, (2) he's falsely equating variables that are obviously widely different and (3) there's no idea of repeatability. they often provide an example or two, claim they've proven something and then turn that into a general law that they claim is on the same footing as the conservation of energy, without any attempt to build statistical correlations or mathematical models. any scientifically literate person would interpret this writing as consistently preposterous, and essentially write these guys off as quacks.

- yet, if you read between the lines, it seems like marx is more interested in constructing a morality out of history than he is in taking historical materialism seriously. he reacts badly to the idea of a history that narrates the ignoble defeating the noble. it's like he doesn't want the bad guys to win, so he's rewriting the story. how seriously this is really meant to be taken really strikes me as an open question. is it just propaganda? is it even really some kind of joke?

full text:
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1886/ludwig-feuerbach/

http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/books/congress/B/2973.E572/index.html 

this is horribly morbid. it's via a cracked article that turned the sound off in the embed. maybe that's advisable.

i'm posting it for the camera work, which is unreal.

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303755504579206493707558658

circus (original discarded outtake)

i spent the entire fall with this, only taking a break to do the offspring cover. i eventually got really frustrated by my inability to get the tone i wanted, put it aside, then went back to it, then gave up altogether. it might be the first example of me getting lost in overproduction, and in that sense it's sort of important.

recorded in november, 1998.

https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/track/circus-orginal-1998-outtake

circus (original album mix)

i had spent the last three months frustrated by my inability to get the tone i wanted for this. often when i ran into that problem, putting it down for a few days and approaching it fresh solved it, but that wasn't working.

there was a power outage that knocked my computer out as i was running a part of the track through a transform. the track - and all the digital additions i had added to it - were largely destroyed. what was left was this completely corrupted wave file.

i've never been a religious person (obviously), and i don't want to say i took at as a sign or something. yet, i let chance assert itself; the corrupted wave file became the final version of the track, and i moved on to the next thing.

the closest thing to a completed version of the actual track is here:
http://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/track/circus

recorded in november, 1998. 

https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/track/circus-original-album-mix

circus (zoo mix)

i was playing around with some guitar ambience stemming from a track i was working on (circus). i had bigger plans for this that would eventually be realized with {e}.

recorded in november, 1998. 

https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/track/circus-zoo-mix