one of the scandals in the election was around a candidate that suggested that taxpayer-funded contraception was a eugenics program, and he was rightly laughed out of the room for it. wilkinson reacted by pointing out that he, too, supports taxpayer-funded contraception.

but, his base in rural bc sure doesn't - which is who that candidate was accurately representing. they don't support abortion rights either, fwiw.

again: the data is too minimal to present a clear prediction. but, how this turns out is going to have a lot to do with how that coalition holds, and you just wouldn't have a good grasp of that by reading the media reports, which largely report like there isn't a right in bc, at all.