Scientists generally do not recognize races as biologically meaningful.
Yet scientists, including me, discuss race and describe the racial
composition of our samples. To be clear, I am not advocating that we
ignore race. In fact, there are many dangers in ignoring race as a
social topic. Race is “real”. But race is socially real, not
biologically real. Socially important categories can be very real and
meaningful, but arguably nonetheless arbitrary in nature.
see, i don't offer any dissent, here. but, if we understand this, what does it imply for social interaction amongst people that understand it?
i mean, it's one thing to argue that random, uneducated idiots are usually racist and they're probably denying it if they claim otherwise. i'll probably agree with you, depending on how you state it. it's another to argue that it's a universal that everybody is racist, no matter what, and can never do anything about it.
read the italic part again, please. if you really understand this, what it does it mean to still be racist?
"yes, i understand that race doesn't have a biological existence, and is just a contrived means of statist control. but, i still think you're inferior because i can't help it - despite not being able to state what that even means."
it defies reason.
if i'm able to understand that race doesn't biologically exist, how can i possibly be racist?
now, if you extrapolate that further, you get to the right way to deal with this: we should abolish racism by abolishing the social construct of race - because racism and race are in fact exactly the same thing. that's the rational deduction from this.
it can't happen overnight, of course. but, you can start by teaching your kids that race is pseudo-science, that it has no biological basis and that it's something that only exists in peoples' heads. if you don't put the idea of race into your kids' heads, they won't be able to understand what racism is.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/without-prejudice/201612/race-social-construction