yeah, but they talk about this like nobody's actually reading it.

i don't actually even see the utility of sanders winning if it's not policy-driven. it might even be counter-productive, if you just get a backlash to it. if there's some gulf between reality and perception here, the focus should be turned back on voter education.

i guess this goes back to being an anarchist: the movement is more important than the people in it, and if it's a sham then you need to pull the deck and start over again.

revolution is perpetual, and destruction is never negative; you have to destroy to rebuild.

https://washingtonmonthly.com/2019/05/14/biden-needs-to-be-challenged-by-someone-other-than-sanders/