yesterday started the same way as saturday, although all i had to eat to start was an apple, and i was out after that.
i took the same walk through town to the same bike store and picked up the walmart bike, which had the brakes replaced and adjusted and a general tune-up done to it. this is marketed as a light weight aluminum frame 700c hybrid, but it is by far the lightest hybrid i've ever ridden, and i'd be more likely to label it a road bike; it will ride best on smooth and paved and clean surfaces, which are somewhat sparse here in the detroit-windsor area but do exist if you know where to find them. this bike is super light and picks up high speeds with minimal effort. it climbs up hills like butter, and faces minimal resistance in the windsor wind, which i often complained about when biking with my much heavier miele*, which is also aluminum but is actually a true hybrid (for example, it has a spring front suspension suntour fork. none of the others do, they all have rigid forks, of various thicknesses and sizes.). in fact, it's so light that the wind knocked it over when i set it down for a minute to wait for a train to pass on dougall last night.
i initially avoided taking this bicycle outside because i was concerned about it's flimsy build, but i had to take it in after i busted one of the brakes on it, just to verify it was set up correctly and there weren't any mistakes in the factory, and i rode it around yesterday after the tune-up to see if i felt like it could handle being outside. the bike store guy explained to me that it might have been the stationary that busted the brakes, and i shouldn't engage my brakes at all when on a stationary. ok. the brakes on the bicycle are working well after the tune-up; as mentioned, it is very light and very fast and very smooth. it seems sturdy. it handles and rides well - good turning, good response. i was able to dangerously weave through traffic on tecumseh rd like i like to rather effectively and able to hit turns and cut through narrow passageways at unrecommended velocities in ways that would frighten the elderly and cause them to yell at me, as has happened at least twice this month (i can't be sure i always heard them, as old people sometimes yell in ways that doesn't actually escape their weakened lungs). great. and i'm not even in shape, right now. so, this should be my new outside exercise road bike, right?
yes, with a caveat.
the gears are clicking, meaning i'm going to need to adjust the gears myself, which is disappointing after explicitly paying for a tune-up. i didn't explicitly say "check the gears" and should have, but that should have been a part of the checklist, too. they did what i explicitly asked for, and oiled it up; i was hoping they'd give it a more thorough examination and try to find problems with it. it seems like they didn't do that. that said, with a bike like this, it's potentially the case that everything is a problem, and you just need to wait for things to break before you replace them. if they had actually gone over it part by part, it would have ended up with a $1000 bill. i get that.
still, the gears shouldn't be clicking when you take the bike out of the shop.
which leads me to the real problem with this bike and the real reason i'd be careful about riding it too hard, which is the flimsy drive train. the bike cost $340 with tax and the tune-up and brake replacement together cost $166. it will likely cost me another $75-100 to upgrade the drive train, which will likely also fix the clicking gears. i think. that's still under $600 for a bike that looks like it should cost well over $1000. i've consequently decided to:
1) see if i can fix the clicking gears myself. if it's a simple trial and error process involving turning a screw, and i can fix it myself, whatever, it's done. if it's something more than that, i'll have to decide what to do when i understand it.
2) after or if the gears stop clicking, i'm going to ride it until the drive train falls apart and then replace it. i'll get something economical but decent - that's my balancing proposal. i think that if that gets done, this bike will be ideal for hard exercise runs for many years, until i need to do it again. but, as i mentioned a few years ago, bikes are not immortal. you ride them. they break. you fix or replace them. so it goes.
if you're keeping track, that means i have a shopped vintage mountain bike for riding through detroit (a comparably bulky 90s gt palomar (it looks like a hybrid by today's standards because it's a 90s female bike)), a shopped inexpensive road bike (technically a hybrid) for exercising outside (a 2020s walmart hyper 700c, also female), a to-be-shopped vintage hybrid (technically a mountain bike) for grocery shopping and day to day riding in windsor (a light rigid bmx mongoose switchback (a male bicycle)) and a currently disassembled early 2000s miele siena hybrid 700c* (a true hybrid, also female) that i need to clean up and try to reassemble but will either leave inside for the stationary if it turns out to be fragile and unsafe for outside use or reclaim for day to day shopping, reducing the mongoose to a backup and putting me in the market for a cheap light bike for the stationary before november. if i can fix the miele*, the mongoose becomes the weakest bike, as it is old and worn out and not worth spending much on, but it is very useful for a heavy bicyclest like myself to have a general purpose backup bike, and the mongoose does that - i can ride it long distances if i have to, i can use it on bumpy terrain or flat terrain, etc. it could be a temporary exercise/road bike or a temporary day-to-day grocery shopping bike. so, this is what i'd like:
1. exercise/road bike: walmart hyper 700c with increasingly subbed parts, as the stock parts wear out (technically a hybrid)
2. detroit bike: 90s gt palomar (technically a relatively light female mountain bike)
3. shopping/commuting bike: early 2000s miele siena* (technically a hybrid*)
4. backup bike: 90s mongoose switchback that feels like a heavy hybrid (technically a light mountain bike)
5. stationary bike: i'd like to get something very light. to be purchased second hand.
i then took the walmart bike out to walmart to get my two new coffee makers, and rode them both home. stop two was to the dollar store to get the glass mugs, and to freshco to look for some bacon, which they didn't have (they had some brand name lysol wipes). i then checked the close food basics for similar items, which they didn't have. so, i biked out to the metro because i knew they had nutritional yeast (a scarce item since the start of the pandemic, which has never recovered it's stock here in windsor), and also got some bacon while i was there, but they did't have any flax bread. so, i stopped at the freshco on the way back to get the wipes, dropped the bacon off at home, and then headed out to the superstore to get some flax bread, along with some nivea and a loofah.
that was that, and it should be the end of my shopping run for the month, i expect.
costs:
$180 - movers
$300 - bicycles
$70 - coffee related items
$300 - groceries, toiletries, pantry items
i snuck a double tomato sandwich (because i'm doubling everything this run) into my meal cycle and had one last night before i passed out and then this morning when i woke up around 6:00, along with a big cup of coffee in my new 25 ounce beer mug. the tomato sandwich was supposed to come up last, because i was supposed to make a salad out of the giant tomato that the food bank gave me. however, i decided at the last minute that i should buy fresh tomatoes for the salad and make two tomato sandwiches out of the giant tomato, due to the legitimately excessive giantness of the giant tomato. it was too giant for one salad, but about right for two sandwiches.
i did not need to make subs for my tomato sandwich recipe, except to use one tomato instead of two, which is as follows:
- two pieces of quinoa/flax bread
- olive oil margarine on the bread
- one half an avocado, diced, on each piece of bread
- one large clove (or two small cloves) of garlic on each avocado
- one tbsp of nutritional yeast on each side
- one tbsp of paprika on each side
- one tbsp of hemp seeds on each side
- five slices of medium cheddar cheese on each side
- one piece of bacon (cut in two or three) on each side
- a spiral of caesar dressing on each side
- a half a tomato on each side [due to the extreme giantness of this tomato, we did a 1/4 instead of 1/2]
- frank's
- pepper
- and a tall glass of grapefruit-orange juice
i regularly serve my coffee with chocolate soy, and am currently filling it up with vanilla flax, which was a food bank item.
i have now spent all day researching this miele bicycle, which is not what i wanted to do, and will need to spend the evening cleaning, which is what i did want to do today.
* this miele siena doesn't appear to be what it says. while the branding decals point to a procycle-era miele bicycle made in canada (2003-2004), i can't find any bicycle made by miele that looks anything like this, and it doesn't look like any other siena i can find pictures of. it looks a little more like a tuscana than a siena. more tellingly, there is a sticker on the bike indicating it's made of aluminum alcalyte, which is an alloy specially licensed to a high-end bike company called cannondale. i feel i've done as much research as i can and need to run it by some people with better knowledge bases, but it seems to me that the frame is a 2002 or 2003 cannondale scalpel frame and that somebody built a custom branded miele from that frame as a base. if i can verify that that is the case, i'm going to rebuild it as a 2002-3 cannondale scalpel, with equivalent (not identical) parts. notable is that this bicycle is a 700c hybrid, not a 26" mountain bike, but there are minimal explanations as to how a bike from this time frame gets this sticker on it, indicating it is made of this alloy. it could be that miele had some agreement with alcoa to sell this type of frame in canada, but more likely, i think, is that miele himself built this bike out of his special order factory in 2002 from an essentially pirated part that was otherwise licensed to cannondale, which he had a history of doing in the 80s with bianchi bicycles. the scalpel bikes had similar but more expensive suspension systems, meaning this was probably built to mimic one of those bikes at lower cost. that's exactly what i will do, as well - mimic the 2002-3 cannondale scalpel at lower cost, once i understand what model the frame came from, or how the frame was intended to be adjusted. i will probably need to completely rebuild the drive train; if i'm going to do it, let me do it right. i will still want this to be a hybrid for biking around town, but it's worth noting that this model of bicycle was intended to be a cross-country racing bike, much as the switchback was in the 80s. i don't have any interest in racing or in competition in general.