he keeps saying that, and harper is going to have to announce a press conference consisting of three words muttered in an austrian accent.

i understand the issue with the american house. but, part of me would like to see "legally binding" targets anyways. i'm just not clear on what that actually means, though.

i mean, call me an anarchist - i'm guilty - but i'd argue that a law is only as valuable as it's means of enforcement. let's say you pass these legally binding targets. what happens if you break that law?

there are examples of enforceable international law. well, sort of. so long as you're not american, anyways. so, we have an international war crimes tribunal in the hague. will there be an international climate crimes tribunal? and, who gets tried?

it just strikes me as an absolute red herring.

www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-address-climate-change-paris-1.3343394