there still hasn't been any scientific polling released since the weekend.

and, no - it's not the case that you can argue that the unscientific polls are convincing if they're consistent with themselves. fallacy.

i'm not arguing that the unscientific polling is necessarily wrong; it might be correct, by coincidence. or, it's trajectory might be continuing evidence of the argument i presented previously - that the media is trying to split the vote.

i'll need to consult some scientific polling before i can present an analysis of this.