oct 1? 2008
hrmmn. it looks to me more like he's ferrying a kid out of incoming fire. when are people going to begin to understand that you can not believe ANYTHING that is presented to you in the form of video? this media has no value as a form of communication.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OefgMtXOc1M
???
oct 2?, 2008
moral relativists would not claim that evil does not exist, they would claim that evil is relative to the society one exists within. as an example, there are people alive today that think that soldiers are all evil because they are murderers and there are others that think they are heroes. consider the abortion debate. a moral relativist would argue that when you brand your opponent as evil what you are really doing is stifling debate. clearly, THEIR viewpoints are invalid - they are evil.
so, in order to maintain a civil discourse in the face of controversial topics the concept of morality needs to be accepted as subjective as a very first axiom. opposing viewpoints need to be presented as viewpoints and not as moral truths, no matter how obvious and truthful these viewpoints may seem to you or i. i would brand hitler as evil without a second thought, but i would append a clause: hitler was evil relative to the set of morals that most existing societies consider fundamental.
???
oct 4?, 2008
so, what's the hold up on decriminalization, then?
???
?oct 31, 2008?
unfortunately, most people won't "get it". throughout the 70s, phil collins was one of the most talented drummers on the planet. check out his work with brand x, mike olfield, brian eno and, of course, genesis (up to about '77) for more info.
they used to say he was an "animal on the kit".
???
?oct 31, 2008?
random viewers should be informed that the track starts halfway through.
???
?nov 15, 2008?
they were asking him the wrong question, as they have been conditioned to by NWO-stooges like alex jones. the question to ask paul martin is:
"sir, do you think that you are more qualified to determine the cause of the collapse than a council of engineers and architects?"
once he said "no" and it was agreed that the experts have concluded that there were explosives, the questioner should have drawn on his background as a lawyer to help him construct the obvious chain of logic.
???