From: sennheiser.ca
To: Jessica Murray <death.to.koalas@gmail.com>
I'm sorry!
I missed this entire thread.
Let's see what you come up with, in terms of experimentation. We take cheques, so if you decide a parts order is for you, s. on the Parts Desk can give you bottom line. Same deal for repairs, it just lengthens the process somewhat.
We're not huge, so we've never set up a warranty depot chain. In fact, the only one we ever did set up, dropped us because he didn't get enough business! Considering that we have a fairly large product catalogue, I guess that's a good thing!
Thursday, November 7, 2013
The
HD 440 II was designed to be user serviceable. This is no longer true
with our products, save for the really high end stuff. This is why I
mentioned rehabilitation of the old, rather than buying new.
The cable will come out without destroying anything. Wiggle the boot while firmly pulling downward on it. It's been in there a long time, it'll be stubborn. Observe polarity! Letter faces out.
The cable is steel on your model. Big on strength, but tough to solder. If it's not completely trashed, you can put a new plug on. Your call on whether it's worth it.
This model was one of the first to come from the Tullamore factory. They make almost all of Sennheiser's European product nowadays. A few(Uber-expensive) models come from Germany, while the buds and streetwear are out of China.
If your problem is intermittent operation, you can reverse the cable and see if the problem switches sides. If it doesn't, the capsule is trashed, and there's nothing to be done about it. Those parts are long out of production. (One of our techs still uses a pair of these, just to underscore how durable they are)
069427 is the number of the cable, just FYI
if you're not following that, it's excellent news - i just need to replace the fully modular cord.
i remember seeing an audiophile shop down on.....ottawa street. be back in a few minutes, hopefully with good news.
The cable will come out without destroying anything. Wiggle the boot while firmly pulling downward on it. It's been in there a long time, it'll be stubborn. Observe polarity! Letter faces out.
The cable is steel on your model. Big on strength, but tough to solder. If it's not completely trashed, you can put a new plug on. Your call on whether it's worth it.
This model was one of the first to come from the Tullamore factory. They make almost all of Sennheiser's European product nowadays. A few(Uber-expensive) models come from Germany, while the buds and streetwear are out of China.
If your problem is intermittent operation, you can reverse the cable and see if the problem switches sides. If it doesn't, the capsule is trashed, and there's nothing to be done about it. Those parts are long out of production. (One of our techs still uses a pair of these, just to underscore how durable they are)
069427 is the number of the cable, just FYI
if you're not following that, it's excellent news - i just need to replace the fully modular cord.
i remember seeing an audiophile shop down on.....ottawa street. be back in a few minutes, hopefully with good news.
Re: Fw: Neue Anfrage aus dem Sennheiser Kontaktcenter vom 2013-11-03 [##SVS-Web-SK]
From: sennheiser.ca
To: "Jessica Murray" <death.to.koalas@gmail.com>
The HD 440 II was designed to be user serviceable. This is no longer true with our products, save for the really high end stuff. This is why I mentioned rehabilitation of the old, rather than buying new.
The cable will come out without destroying anything. Wiggle the boot while firmly pulling downward on it. It's been in there a long time, it'll be stubborn. Observe polarity! Letter faces out.
The cable is steel on your model. Big on strength, but tough to solder. If it's not completely trashed, you can put a new plug on. Your call on whether it's worth it.
This model was one of the first to come from the Tullamore factory. They make almost all of Sennheiser's European product nowadays. A few(Uber-expensive) models come from Germany, while the buds and streetwear are out of China.
If your problem is intermittent operation, you can reverse the cable and see if the problem switches sides. If it doesn't, the capsule is trashed, and there's nothing to be done about it. Those parts are long out of production. (One of our techs still uses a pair of these, just to underscore how durable they are)
069427 is the number of the cable, just FYI.
To: "Jessica Murray" <death.to.koalas@gmail.com>
The HD 440 II was designed to be user serviceable. This is no longer true with our products, save for the really high end stuff. This is why I mentioned rehabilitation of the old, rather than buying new.
The cable will come out without destroying anything. Wiggle the boot while firmly pulling downward on it. It's been in there a long time, it'll be stubborn. Observe polarity! Letter faces out.
The cable is steel on your model. Big on strength, but tough to solder. If it's not completely trashed, you can put a new plug on. Your call on whether it's worth it.
This model was one of the first to come from the Tullamore factory. They make almost all of Sennheiser's European product nowadays. A few(Uber-expensive) models come from Germany, while the buds and streetwear are out of China.
If your problem is intermittent operation, you can reverse the cable and see if the problem switches sides. If it doesn't, the capsule is trashed, and there's nothing to be done about it. Those parts are long out of production. (One of our techs still uses a pair of these, just to underscore how durable they are)
069427 is the number of the cable, just FYI.
Re: Fw: Neue Anfrage aus dem Sennheiser Kontaktcenter vom 2013-11-03 [##SVS-Web-SK]
From: "Jessica Murray" <death.to.koalas@gmail.com>
To: sennheiser.ca
sorry, one more question.
i'm looking at replacement parts, and it almost looks like the cord clicks into place. well, here's a picture of a replacement part:
you can see what i mean. i'm getting the feeling that i can maybe pull the cord out and then snap a new one in. but i obviously don't want to determine if that's the case or not through experiment.
these are the 440-IIs. there's a big MADE IN IRELAND on the side if that makes a difference. could you determine for me (i understand you may have to forward me to a different department) if the cable is meant to snap in and out that way or if the plastic needs to be broken to recable?
i know it seems like it should be designed to disassemble, almost everything is nowadays, but this model is from the 80s...
jessica
To: sennheiser.ca
sorry, one more question.
i'm looking at replacement parts, and it almost looks like the cord clicks into place. well, here's a picture of a replacement part:
you can see what i mean. i'm getting the feeling that i can maybe pull the cord out and then snap a new one in. but i obviously don't want to determine if that's the case or not through experiment.
these are the 440-IIs. there's a big MADE IN IRELAND on the side if that makes a difference. could you determine for me (i understand you may have to forward me to a different department) if the cable is meant to snap in and out that way or if the plastic needs to be broken to recable?
i know it seems like it should be designed to disassemble, almost everything is nowadays, but this model is from the 80s...
jessica
Re: Fw: Neue Anfrage aus dem Sennheiser Kontaktcenter vom 2013-11-03 [##SVS-Web-SK]
From: "Jessica Murray" <death.to.koalas@gmail.com>
To: sennheiser.ca
on second thought, i've taken a little closer look at the phones and it looks like the cord is connected to the phones as a single piece. of course, it must be soldered into place underneath the plastic, but it doesn't appear like there's a way to replace the cord without breaking the plastic apart and regluing it. there's no screws or anything. i kind of don't want to do that as a first attempt.
i think i can probably get the phones back in working condition by just replacing the plug, which is a quick soldering job that i can do myself.
if that doesn't work, i'll want to send them in to have the plastic taken apart and put back together - i'll recontact sennheiser if that turns out to be necessary.
thanks for your response,
jessica
To: sennheiser.ca
on second thought, i've taken a little closer look at the phones and it looks like the cord is connected to the phones as a single piece. of course, it must be soldered into place underneath the plastic, but it doesn't appear like there's a way to replace the cord without breaking the plastic apart and regluing it. there's no screws or anything. i kind of don't want to do that as a first attempt.
i think i can probably get the phones back in working condition by just replacing the plug, which is a quick soldering job that i can do myself.
if that doesn't work, i'll want to send them in to have the plastic taken apart and put back together - i'll recontact sennheiser if that turns out to be necessary.
thanks for your response,
jessica
actually, i think it's obvious that i should get something similar.
i've got a price estimate coming in from sennheiser but i expect it to be ridiculous.
so, i think what i should do is take the phones down to a store and see if i can find a similar cord. then see if i can find a soldering iron....
i should really probably have a soldering iron.
i've got a price estimate coming in from sennheiser but i expect it to be ridiculous.
so, i think what i should do is take the phones down to a store and see if i can find a similar cord. then see if i can find a soldering iron....
i should really probably have a soldering iron.
Re: Fw: Neue Anfrage aus dem Sennheiser Kontaktcenter vom 2013-11-03 [##SVS-Web-SK]
From: "Jessica Murray" <death.to.koalas@gmail.com>
To: sennheiser.ca
yeah, they seem to have just shorted permanently, and i'd kind of feel better about letting sennheiser fix them then taking them to a random shop.
i found this order form:
http://www.sennheiser.ca/live/download/Sennheiser_Repair_order_form.pdf
....but i don't have a credit card and, despite my previous rhetoric, i do need to watch the price very carefully. they're obviously well past whatever warranty my dad bought in the early 90s. do you have any licensed repair centres in windsor, ontario i could just take them in to and pay out cash for? if not, i'm wondering if you could give me a quick price quote and let me send you a check.
the symptom is that one of the ears is deaf. there's two possible causes, and i'm not sure which one is dominant. one of the ears has been a little loose, solved by jiggling it a bit. also, the base seems to have a short in it, solved by rotating it. it's the second of these that i've been doing more often. either way, there's two shorts in the wire.
if i'm going to do this, i'd prefer to just replace the entire copper wire altogether, from the phones right down to the plug. i don't want to do it twice, kind of thing. how much do you think that would cost?
To: sennheiser.ca
yeah, they seem to have just shorted permanently, and i'd kind of feel better about letting sennheiser fix them then taking them to a random shop.
i found this order form:
http://www.sennheiser.ca/live/download/Sennheiser_Repair_order_form.pdf
....but i don't have a credit card and, despite my previous rhetoric, i do need to watch the price very carefully. they're obviously well past whatever warranty my dad bought in the early 90s. do you have any licensed repair centres in windsor, ontario i could just take them in to and pay out cash for? if not, i'm wondering if you could give me a quick price quote and let me send you a check.
the symptom is that one of the ears is deaf. there's two possible causes, and i'm not sure which one is dominant. one of the ears has been a little loose, solved by jiggling it a bit. also, the base seems to have a short in it, solved by rotating it. it's the second of these that i've been doing more often. either way, there's two shorts in the wire.
if i'm going to do this, i'd prefer to just replace the entire copper wire altogether, from the phones right down to the plug. i don't want to do it twice, kind of thing. how much do you think that would cost?
ok. they're not as bad as i thought - coming from a quality source, and with the noise reduction turned off. they're not replacements for the 440-II's, but given that i'm just running everything through the same filters *anyways* (same source...i'm doing it track-by-track but i haven't deviated from the base algorithm of custom izotope patch + nr), i think i can use them while i'm waiting for them to get fixed. so i shouldn't get slowed down at least.
i'll also say that they died on me once before and came back. i wonder if it's temperature related, even. i'm going to let them sit for a few days and see if they come back.
....and, now to wade through all kinds of audiophile nonsense trying to get a straight answer about how important the wiring is in the sound...
i'll also say that they died on me once before and came back. i wonder if it's temperature related, even. i'm going to let them sit for a few days and see if they come back.
....and, now to wade through all kinds of audiophile nonsense trying to get a straight answer about how important the wiring is in the sound...
i got a response back from sennheiser. they are indeed long out of
production, and the response i got basically told me that if i want a
similar sound, i'm fucked - they don't make anything remotely like this
model anymore, so i'm better off trying to get them fixed than replacing
them.
he also explained that if i end up getting new ones, i want to focus on open back models. after doing a little googling, i think he's right - and i think that the fact that most of the headphones i've tried have been closed back might be the biggest sound degradation issue i've been unable to get over. that muffed sound seems to be defined by this difference. but that's going to cost me probably close to $300.
it's imperative, though. i can't do anything without headphones.
the pair i got back in january are just not useful for recording. even at the time, i remember wishing that i would have got a gift certificate or something. they turned out to be ok for the laptop. but they run on a battery that turns on a "noise reduction". batteries in headphones isn't a good idea at all. but, that's secondary to all the processing at the headphone stage. i need headphones with zero processing - clean reproduction. those ones are made for people that want to listen to mp3s on their cell phone, not people that are recording or mastering things.
...and when you turn off the battery they're just glorified ear buds. i'm going to try them though....
he also explained that if i end up getting new ones, i want to focus on open back models. after doing a little googling, i think he's right - and i think that the fact that most of the headphones i've tried have been closed back might be the biggest sound degradation issue i've been unable to get over. that muffed sound seems to be defined by this difference. but that's going to cost me probably close to $300.
it's imperative, though. i can't do anything without headphones.
the pair i got back in january are just not useful for recording. even at the time, i remember wishing that i would have got a gift certificate or something. they turned out to be ok for the laptop. but they run on a battery that turns on a "noise reduction". batteries in headphones isn't a good idea at all. but, that's secondary to all the processing at the headphone stage. i need headphones with zero processing - clean reproduction. those ones are made for people that want to listen to mp3s on their cell phone, not people that are recording or mastering things.
...and when you turn off the battery they're just glorified ear buds. i'm going to try them though....
:(
seem to be gone, and it's an emergency. no headphones = no recording. or, for right now, no remastering. which basically means no reason to continue to exist.
i'm going to try and get them fixed, but if i can't then i may have to sell some gear to get new ones. having one pair of good headphones is more important than having two guitars.
hopefully, i can get them fixed, though. that means plans for a telephone and border clearance are going to have to be put on hold for another month, maybe two.
and that i'm going to have nothing to do but read for the next little bit. ugh.
i don't feel i'm at fault. i left them in a safe space, woke up, and caput.
there's two problems. one of the ear plugs is a little weak, but it hasn't been a problem lately. the larger problem has been at the base, which has been solved by spinning the jack around. it seems like it may be a contact problem inside the base, but i have to admit that i'm not intuitively grasping what may be wrong with it.
seem to be gone, and it's an emergency. no headphones = no recording. or, for right now, no remastering. which basically means no reason to continue to exist.
i'm going to try and get them fixed, but if i can't then i may have to sell some gear to get new ones. having one pair of good headphones is more important than having two guitars.
hopefully, i can get them fixed, though. that means plans for a telephone and border clearance are going to have to be put on hold for another month, maybe two.
and that i'm going to have nothing to do but read for the next little bit. ugh.
i don't feel i'm at fault. i left them in a safe space, woke up, and caput.
there's two problems. one of the ear plugs is a little weak, but it hasn't been a problem lately. the larger problem has been at the base, which has been solved by spinning the jack around. it seems like it may be a contact problem inside the base, but i have to admit that i'm not intuitively grasping what may be wrong with it.
Wednesday, November 6, 2013
demo #22: screwed up
this was meant to be really catastrophic sounding, with fuzzed out guitars really saturating the sound. while it seems to exist in the same genre as other early post-rock bands that started off around the same time, it would actually be a few more years (mid '99) before i learned that the genre existed and was rapidly developing an audience. i point this out to avoid easily constructed misconceptions about where the sound in the track came from. while it's certainly happening in parallel to the developing post-rock sound, and is perhaps best categorized that way, i was not yet aware of it. i was still just an alt rock kid, at the time.
there were drums recorded, but i mixed them out because i found they added too much lift to the sound. the intended aesthetic was catastrophic: dreary, claustrophobic, hopelessly noisy. it's sort of meant to be a bit of a lucid experience, looking back at myself through a haze. who knows what an oobe actually sounds like, but this is a guess. so, the drums were just getting in the way of that. the absence of a rhythm may give the impression of slowing the track down, as well. headphones are a good idea to get the swirl and compression.
lyrically, this is actually one of a handful of songs that is explicitly related to feeling transgendered. you have to read into it a bit to get that. it could be about anything, really. but, gender issues are what it was *actually* about. that's not something i talked to anybody about for several more years. i was probably more of a dour realist then than i am now; by 16, i had actually resigned myself to the seemingly clear truth of there not being anything i could realistically do about it, except write mopey songs about feeling like i was living a lie.
recorded in march, 1997. remastered on nov 6, 2013.
there were drums recorded, but i mixed them out because i found they added too much lift to the sound. the intended aesthetic was catastrophic: dreary, claustrophobic, hopelessly noisy. it's sort of meant to be a bit of a lucid experience, looking back at myself through a haze. who knows what an oobe actually sounds like, but this is a guess. so, the drums were just getting in the way of that. the absence of a rhythm may give the impression of slowing the track down, as well. headphones are a good idea to get the swirl and compression.
lyrically, this is actually one of a handful of songs that is explicitly related to feeling transgendered. you have to read into it a bit to get that. it could be about anything, really. but, gender issues are what it was *actually* about. that's not something i talked to anybody about for several more years. i was probably more of a dour realist then than i am now; by 16, i had actually resigned myself to the seemingly clear truth of there not being anything i could realistically do about it, except write mopey songs about feeling like i was living a lie.
recorded in march, 1997. remastered on nov 6, 2013.
demo #21: circus
so, we all know what the most important thing that happened in the 90s was....
yes. oj. you were expecting this, admit it.
i feel that, despite the myriad of angles and analyses, the most important question of all was never asked: what would homer j simpson think about the trial of orenthal j simpson? this answers that question, by exploring the optics around the whole thing from the perspective of homer.
seriously.
ok, so maybe the oj trial wasn't actually a joke, but it certainly seemed like it was. and that's actually kind of what i'm trying to get across here. i watched far more cnn than the average 16 year-old (note the particularly egregious decision to rhyme "menendez brothers" with "unabomber"), but i was still mostly getting my news on the topic from conan. on that level? it was, in fact, a joke.
thinking back, we were all so ridiculously obsessed. the school (this is the second half of grade 10) actually arranged to have live televisions on every floor to broadcast the verdict. classes were suspended to watch, then cancelled to discuss. like, did that even happen for the fucking moon landing?
so, i'm sort of mocking the whole thing. yet, i'm also mocking the idea that it was somehow turning oj into some kind of role model. 'cause it definitely wasn't. well, unless, maybe, you think on roughly the level of homer j simpson.
i spent a lot of time trying to clean the audio on this up and eventually concluded that i can't do much besides boost the mids. if you listen closely, there's some neat guitar harmonies, but they're really buried and i just can't get them out. i don't remember most of the lyrics, exactly, and can't really make them out well.
there is a frank zappa sample at the beginning of the track.
recorded in march, 1997. remastered on nov 6, 2013.
yes. oj. you were expecting this, admit it.
i feel that, despite the myriad of angles and analyses, the most important question of all was never asked: what would homer j simpson think about the trial of orenthal j simpson? this answers that question, by exploring the optics around the whole thing from the perspective of homer.
seriously.
ok, so maybe the oj trial wasn't actually a joke, but it certainly seemed like it was. and that's actually kind of what i'm trying to get across here. i watched far more cnn than the average 16 year-old (note the particularly egregious decision to rhyme "menendez brothers" with "unabomber"), but i was still mostly getting my news on the topic from conan. on that level? it was, in fact, a joke.
thinking back, we were all so ridiculously obsessed. the school (this is the second half of grade 10) actually arranged to have live televisions on every floor to broadcast the verdict. classes were suspended to watch, then cancelled to discuss. like, did that even happen for the fucking moon landing?
so, i'm sort of mocking the whole thing. yet, i'm also mocking the idea that it was somehow turning oj into some kind of role model. 'cause it definitely wasn't. well, unless, maybe, you think on roughly the level of homer j simpson.
i spent a lot of time trying to clean the audio on this up and eventually concluded that i can't do much besides boost the mids. if you listen closely, there's some neat guitar harmonies, but they're really buried and i just can't get them out. i don't remember most of the lyrics, exactly, and can't really make them out well.
there is a frank zappa sample at the beginning of the track.
recorded in march, 1997. remastered on nov 6, 2013.
RE: point form update
From: the initial landlord
To: "'Jessica Murray'" <death.to.koalas@gmail.com>
Jessica, I have just started this morning to read my e-mails since last week....sorry. I see your many e-mails. I will stop around this morning some time before noon to look at all the concerns.
To: "'Jessica Murray'" <death.to.koalas@gmail.com>
Jessica, I have just started this morning to read my e-mails since last week....sorry. I see your many e-mails. I will stop around this morning some time before noon to look at all the concerns.
hrmmn. second thought, those voip phones are a lot. laptop it will be.
laptop is good for skype and shit, too.
so, again, can i convert a modem into a wall plug that connects through voip? seems exotic, but not impossible.
i know, headset, but there's something comforting about having something that actually rings.
laptop is good for skype and shit, too.
so, again, can i convert a modem into a wall plug that connects through voip? seems exotic, but not impossible.
i know, headset, but there's something comforting about having something that actually rings.
no google voice.
no skype-in.
why, thank you, bell-rogers corporatocracy!
currently? a little irritated.
there are potential workarounds, but they're annoying.
for now, this looks like a better idea than getting a sim card at the 7/11. 0.25 v 0.01 is a big difference, and the monthly cost for the number is less than 7/11 will charge for 9-11 access.
http://www.voip.ms/features.php
on average, that's going to cost me about $1.05/month. i put $20 down in credits, it'll last me well over a year.
google voice would be ideal, though - wouldn't even cost that - because i really just need a voicemail for people to leave messages (chances of answering the phone are zero). the site up there has the voicemail-to-email feature that converts voice messages to text messages, which i really really like....
i don't want that software on any pc i'd use for anything else, though. luckily, i have an old laptop i can convert into a dedicated, glorified phone.
last thing to check is if i can integrate this "normally" into an ip phone through software on the laptop.
no skype-in.
why, thank you, bell-rogers corporatocracy!
currently? a little irritated.
there are potential workarounds, but they're annoying.
for now, this looks like a better idea than getting a sim card at the 7/11. 0.25 v 0.01 is a big difference, and the monthly cost for the number is less than 7/11 will charge for 9-11 access.
http://www.voip.ms/features.php
on average, that's going to cost me about $1.05/month. i put $20 down in credits, it'll last me well over a year.
google voice would be ideal, though - wouldn't even cost that - because i really just need a voicemail for people to leave messages (chances of answering the phone are zero). the site up there has the voicemail-to-email feature that converts voice messages to text messages, which i really really like....
i don't want that software on any pc i'd use for anything else, though. luckily, i have an old laptop i can convert into a dedicated, glorified phone.
last thing to check is if i can integrate this "normally" into an ip phone through software on the laptop.
Tuesday, November 5, 2013
re: point form update
From: Jessica Murray <death.to.koalas@gmail.com>
To: the initial landlord
so, sorry, for (3) i was wondering if i should just go ahead with that or not...?
To: the initial landlord
so, sorry, for (3) i was wondering if i should just go ahead with that or not...?
point form update
From: Jessica Murray <death.to.koalas@gmail.com>
To: the initial landlord
hi.
sorry about those rambly emails. i'm a reading person, and sometimes forget that other people aren't. so, you wanted this in point form...
1) the handle is really unusable. my options are between ice cold and steaming hot showers. the point in the middle that would be normally chosen is the point where the shower turns off. i've realized that if i turn it just a tad to the hot side then there's just barely enough flow to have a hot shower, but it's a problem on two levels - (a) i'm really showering in little more than a trickle and (b) it really is ridiculously hot. and that's coming from somebody that likes unusually hot showers. if it's too hot for me, it's absurd! so, i'm wasting all kinds of hot water...
i guess i can take a look at it myself, if you want. i have no idea how it works, though, so i'd be fumbling around trying to figure it out...
2) the little bit of moisture on the ground seems to just be condensation, probably magnified by the ridiculous temperature. i think the caulking is a little weak at points and could probably benefit from a second run. but that's not imperative. the shower is *not* leaking right now.
3) to clarify about the windows - they seem ok. i don't think they need any work. but i'd like to put some plastic around them anyways. it could save you a bit on heating, but what i'm more interested in is locking the heat in to boost the air temperature, whether it makes a difference for the thermostat or not.
j
To: the initial landlord
hi.
sorry about those rambly emails. i'm a reading person, and sometimes forget that other people aren't. so, you wanted this in point form...
1) the handle is really unusable. my options are between ice cold and steaming hot showers. the point in the middle that would be normally chosen is the point where the shower turns off. i've realized that if i turn it just a tad to the hot side then there's just barely enough flow to have a hot shower, but it's a problem on two levels - (a) i'm really showering in little more than a trickle and (b) it really is ridiculously hot. and that's coming from somebody that likes unusually hot showers. if it's too hot for me, it's absurd! so, i'm wasting all kinds of hot water...
i guess i can take a look at it myself, if you want. i have no idea how it works, though, so i'd be fumbling around trying to figure it out...
2) the little bit of moisture on the ground seems to just be condensation, probably magnified by the ridiculous temperature. i think the caulking is a little weak at points and could probably benefit from a second run. but that's not imperative. the shower is *not* leaking right now.
3) to clarify about the windows - they seem ok. i don't think they need any work. but i'd like to put some plastic around them anyways. it could save you a bit on heating, but what i'm more interested in is locking the heat in to boost the air temperature, whether it makes a difference for the thermostat or not.
j
Fw: Neue Anfrage aus dem Sennheiser Kontaktcenter vom 2013-11-03 [##SVS-Web-SK]
From: sennheiser.ca
To: <death.to.koalas@gmail.com>
Thanks for writing.
Twenty years would be just about right.
There have been a number of successive generations to the 440 over the years, and if you're looking for an exact replacement, you'll be looking for a long time!
First: In that style range, there are no more supra-aural models. Doughnuts rule. The only supra-aural types are the more miniature 2** series. Pretty good headphones in their own right, but perhaps a bit petite for your requirements.
My recommendation, based on style, type and sound quality, not necessarily price or specs, would be HD 428 or HD 448. These are closed back models, as opposed to yours, but they acquit themselves well in overall sound. Wearing comfort and weight are about par.
If you need open style, you really have no choice but to move up to the 500 series. The 518 would make the most sense here. Quite a bit larger in style, these are considered *High End*.
All of this having been said,
Why not fix yours? You can get pads, you can get cables, you can't get capsules, but if they're still working, why ditch them? You know better than I do what shape they're in, but I'll put that out there.
(Interesting email address. Good thing I'm not a zoologist. My sister is, though.)
Kidding aside, need more info? Please let me know.
To: <death.to.koalas@gmail.com>
Thanks for writing.
Twenty years would be just about right.
There have been a number of successive generations to the 440 over the years, and if you're looking for an exact replacement, you'll be looking for a long time!
First: In that style range, there are no more supra-aural models. Doughnuts rule. The only supra-aural types are the more miniature 2** series. Pretty good headphones in their own right, but perhaps a bit petite for your requirements.
My recommendation, based on style, type and sound quality, not necessarily price or specs, would be HD 428 or HD 448. These are closed back models, as opposed to yours, but they acquit themselves well in overall sound. Wearing comfort and weight are about par.
If you need open style, you really have no choice but to move up to the 500 series. The 518 would make the most sense here. Quite a bit larger in style, these are considered *High End*.
All of this having been said,
Why not fix yours? You can get pads, you can get cables, you can't get capsules, but if they're still working, why ditch them? You know better than I do what shape they're in, but I'll put that out there.
(Interesting email address. Good thing I'm not a zoologist. My sister is, though.)
Kidding aside, need more info? Please let me know.
this is a pretty nasty report. which means they're doing their job. which means that industry hasn't found a way to silence them yet.
of course, the substance of the report will be ignored. instead, the department will be restructured and a bunch of people will get fired for embarrassing the fuhrer. a couple of people may even end up dead (not exaggerating). in a few years time, there will be a similar report that praises investors and oil companies for their role in building sustainable development, while scientists out of the country gnash their teeth.
this is the topsy turvy world of the petro state that is canada. all hail our dark, pungent and rather sticky overlord.
http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_cesd_201311_e_38658.html
of course, the substance of the report will be ignored. instead, the department will be restructured and a bunch of people will get fired for embarrassing the fuhrer. a couple of people may even end up dead (not exaggerating). in a few years time, there will be a similar report that praises investors and oil companies for their role in building sustainable development, while scientists out of the country gnash their teeth.
this is the topsy turvy world of the petro state that is canada. all hail our dark, pungent and rather sticky overlord.
http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_cesd_201311_e_38658.html
why is the media *never* able to interpret these acts as political statements opposing our deeply engrained and enforced war culture?
http://blackburnnews.com/windsor/windsor-news/2013/11/05/ensuring-cenotaph-continues-to-shine/
http://blackburnnews.com/windsor/windsor-news/2013/11/05/ensuring-cenotaph-continues-to-shine/
Monday, November 4, 2013
http://www.democracynow.org/2013/10/16/us_eases_rules_on_exporting_military
http://www.democracynow.org/2013/10/18/journalists_find_12_year_old_girls
http://www.democracynow.org/2013/10/23/prisoners_of_profit_despite_widespread_abuse
http://www.democracynow.org/2013/11/1/court_blocks_nypd_stop_and_frisk
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2013/10/the-preposterous-removal-of-judge-scheindlin.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1m-PMMCxS4
http://recomposition.info/2013/10/30/what-happened-in-edmonton-this-week/#more-1230
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/as-mohamed-morsi-goes-to-trial-general-sisi-should-remember-egypt-is-a-dangerous-place-to-rule-8919862.html
http://www.nature.com/news/air-movement-pattern-portends-us-heatwaves-1.14033
i think that when you understand what 'chance' actually means the question becomes meaningless. p(life happened) = 1.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=life-on-earth-was-not-a-fluke&WT.mc_id=SA_Facebook
http://phys.org/news/2013-10-quantify-toxic-ocean-conditions-major.html
http://www.nature.com/news/spectacular-flyover-of-mars-1.14041?WT.mc_id=FBK_NPG_1310_NatureNews
http://phy.so/302018016
http://phy.so/302109881
http://www.nature.com/news/black-holes-shrink-but-endure-1.14051?WT.mc_id=FBK_NatureNews
http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2013/1028/Clouds-break-on-Saturn-s-moon-revealing-vast-lakes-salt-flats
http://plos.io/16jFFty
sssssssso....i'm not one to believe in the ether. it's back to the drawing board...
http://www.nature.com/news/no-sign-of-dark-matter-in-underground-experiment-1.14057
http://phy.so/302351406
it all depends on if there's space between space.
https://www.simonsfoundation.org/quanta/20131031-physicists-eye-quantum-gravity-interface/
it was kind of a ridiculous idea in the first place
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=lux-dark-matter-null-result&WT.mc_id=SA_Facebook
http://www.nature.com/news/supercharged-antibodies-fight-hiv-related-virus-in-monkeys-1.14060
i don't know why they're producing hydrocarbons, though. getting it to work just produces another dirty energy source. the hydrogen production techniques may have questions about net energy, but at least it's clean....
http://bit.ly/16rvtz6
i don't doubt this actually, but where is fracking ever going to be properly run and regulated? in theory, nuclear is safe if properly run and regulated. pipelines don't spill if upkept, etc.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=shale-gas-fracking-a-low-risk-to-public-health&WT.mc_id=SA_Facebook
i still don't see what basis exists to assume we met neanderthals as competitors rather than as collaborators.
http://popular-archaeology.com/issue/09012013/article/resourceful-neanderthals-in-france
i still claim you can't seriously do this classically.
http://phy.so/302541945
http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/news/10.1063/pt.5.2004
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2013/nov/01/uncertainty-reigns-over-heisenbergs-measurement-analogy
http://www.democracynow.org/2013/10/18/journalists_find_12_year_old_girls
http://www.democracynow.org/2013/10/23/prisoners_of_profit_despite_widespread_abuse
http://www.democracynow.org/2013/11/1/court_blocks_nypd_stop_and_frisk
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2013/10/the-preposterous-removal-of-judge-scheindlin.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1m-PMMCxS4
http://recomposition.info/2013/10/30/what-happened-in-edmonton-this-week/#more-1230
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/as-mohamed-morsi-goes-to-trial-general-sisi-should-remember-egypt-is-a-dangerous-place-to-rule-8919862.html
http://www.nature.com/news/air-movement-pattern-portends-us-heatwaves-1.14033
i think that when you understand what 'chance' actually means the question becomes meaningless. p(life happened) = 1.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=life-on-earth-was-not-a-fluke&WT.mc_id=SA_Facebook
http://phys.org/news/2013-10-quantify-toxic-ocean-conditions-major.html
http://www.nature.com/news/spectacular-flyover-of-mars-1.14041?WT.mc_id=FBK_NPG_1310_NatureNews
http://phy.so/302018016
http://phy.so/302109881
http://www.nature.com/news/black-holes-shrink-but-endure-1.14051?WT.mc_id=FBK_NatureNews
http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2013/1028/Clouds-break-on-Saturn-s-moon-revealing-vast-lakes-salt-flats
http://plos.io/16jFFty
sssssssso....i'm not one to believe in the ether. it's back to the drawing board...
http://www.nature.com/news/no-sign-of-dark-matter-in-underground-experiment-1.14057
http://phy.so/302351406
it all depends on if there's space between space.
https://www.simonsfoundation.org/quanta/20131031-physicists-eye-quantum-gravity-interface/
it was kind of a ridiculous idea in the first place
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=lux-dark-matter-null-result&WT.mc_id=SA_Facebook
http://www.nature.com/news/supercharged-antibodies-fight-hiv-related-virus-in-monkeys-1.14060
i don't know why they're producing hydrocarbons, though. getting it to work just produces another dirty energy source. the hydrogen production techniques may have questions about net energy, but at least it's clean....
http://bit.ly/16rvtz6
i don't doubt this actually, but where is fracking ever going to be properly run and regulated? in theory, nuclear is safe if properly run and regulated. pipelines don't spill if upkept, etc.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=shale-gas-fracking-a-low-risk-to-public-health&WT.mc_id=SA_Facebook
i still don't see what basis exists to assume we met neanderthals as competitors rather than as collaborators.
http://popular-archaeology.com/issue/09012013/article/resourceful-neanderthals-in-france
i still claim you can't seriously do this classically.
http://phy.so/302541945
http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/news/10.1063/pt.5.2004
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2013/nov/01/uncertainty-reigns-over-heisenbergs-measurement-analogy
i think it might be nice to have a study that rules out any serious link between intelligence and genetics.
http://www.nature.com/news/root-of-maths-genius-sought-1.14050
i mean, what's the evolutionary pressure producing excellence in algebra? how does that increase reproductive success rate?
the idea makes no sense. but, people are still attached to the creationist myth. s'ok, that's what science is for.
http://www.nature.com/news/root-of-maths-genius-sought-1.14050
i mean, what's the evolutionary pressure producing excellence in algebra? how does that increase reproductive success rate?
the idea makes no sense. but, people are still attached to the creationist myth. s'ok, that's what science is for.
wow.
i've written here a bit about turkey having difficulty finding a greater trade bloc to work with - rejected by racist europeans and racist arabs alike, with impossible historical tensions to the north and east.....and hundreds of kilometres from "home" in central asia....
if turkey is shifting to the sco, this is a major blow to us/nato hegemony in the region.
http://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/2013/10/28/without-precedent-turkey’s-chinese-missile-defense-system
i've written here a bit about turkey having difficulty finding a greater trade bloc to work with - rejected by racist europeans and racist arabs alike, with impossible historical tensions to the north and east.....and hundreds of kilometres from "home" in central asia....
if turkey is shifting to the sco, this is a major blow to us/nato hegemony in the region.
http://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/2013/10/28/without-precedent-turkey’s-chinese-missile-defense-system
Sunday, November 3, 2013
demo #20: unintelligible
silly self-deprecating pop-punk-noise thing. musically, this is pretty tight. neat bassline. the percussion, i clearly remember, was tapped out onto a wood desk with two bic-style pens. try it. it's fun.
well, actually, i should add a few more words because it otherwise seems rather pointless.
i was at the time talking about starting a punk band with a friend of mine, named matt. there was actually a song recorded with matt on vocals and bass and myself on guitar (i can't remember the name of it, and don't have a copy of it). the name of the project was meant to be "second class citizens", with an acronym stylized as 2CC. nothing else came of it.
but i had initially written this song for that purpose and demoed it out to show him. that kind of explains why it's different than the other stuff on these early demos.
eventually, it became clear that the project wasn't developing, so i just added my own vocals. as the song was meant for matt to sing on, i didn't have any thematic concept attached to it. so, what i did was take random words out of the dictionary. it was honestly just a close-your-eyes-pick-a-page-pick-a-word process. then, i added the chorus in reaction to the random dictionary process.
....except the bridge. that's an nwa reference.
i guess you could maybe pull something accidentally insightful out of it regarding my view of lyrics in mainstream punk (or grunge) at the time. it could be interpreted as a parody, but i wasn't consciously thinking of it like that.
recorded in march, 1997. remastered on nov 3, 2013.
well, actually, i should add a few more words because it otherwise seems rather pointless.
i was at the time talking about starting a punk band with a friend of mine, named matt. there was actually a song recorded with matt on vocals and bass and myself on guitar (i can't remember the name of it, and don't have a copy of it). the name of the project was meant to be "second class citizens", with an acronym stylized as 2CC. nothing else came of it.
but i had initially written this song for that purpose and demoed it out to show him. that kind of explains why it's different than the other stuff on these early demos.
eventually, it became clear that the project wasn't developing, so i just added my own vocals. as the song was meant for matt to sing on, i didn't have any thematic concept attached to it. so, what i did was take random words out of the dictionary. it was honestly just a close-your-eyes-pick-a-page-pick-a-word process. then, i added the chorus in reaction to the random dictionary process.
....except the bridge. that's an nwa reference.
i guess you could maybe pull something accidentally insightful out of it regarding my view of lyrics in mainstream punk (or grunge) at the time. it could be interpreted as a parody, but i wasn't consciously thinking of it like that.
recorded in march, 1997. remastered on nov 3, 2013.
thee silver mountain reveries - pretty little lightning paw
Collector's Item
in hindsight, this ep comes off as a sort of an experiment. the mt zions have repeatedly indicated a sort of boredom with post-rock and have been trying to get out of it for quite a while. in the end, they seem to always go back to it. on a level, they're sort of stuck. i can plead guilty to keeping them stuck there, but it's not out of an aversion to them trying something different so much as the directions they keep going in. like, start a punk band. i'd dig that. they seem to like punk. there are a lot of reasons to think they'd be very interesting if they went in a sort of hafler trio direction, or even flat-out industrial noise. but, the delves into generic folk and corporate rock have left me unsatisfied, even as i rant about how boring and generic that post-rock has become.
obviously, i'm suggesting less commercial turns of direction than they've actually taken and that contrast sort of colours my reaction. the experiments here are sort of floundering; a few of them come off fairly well, but even the more interesting sections are marred by a sort of contrivedness. see, it's sort of obvious that they're trying to piggyback on what radiohead was doing at the time. well, the shift is too dramatically obvious to suggest anything else. they were generating a lot of interest in the radiohead community. this is a deduction, but it's obvious. that's not to say that the ep sounds like radiohead so much as it is to suggest that it seems like it was constructed to appeal to radiohead fans - a subtle, but very significant distinction. or simply influenced by? no, not this band.
so, here is the reality, bluntly, after many years of contemplation: when a collective that built itself up on it's ability to channel raw emotion all of a sudden moves to something that is cerebrally calculated, the contrast is so clear that it cannot be missed. it denies the act of the precise, exact quality that generated interest amongst fans, rendering them almost obsolete.
what happens with the next few mt zion discs, though, is a sort of a struggle between the real and emotional and the calculated and dour that swings back and forth rather wildly, creating highly erratic results. for this disc?
the first track is some kind of homage to do make say think, or broken social scene, or something like that. on some level it seems tongue in cheek, but the sad thing is that it seems to miss it's own irony. it comes off more as a parody than anything else, but due to the way it's presented in it's introduction it seems more like a parody of themselves. the second track moves into the aforementioned post kid a territory, rooting itself in an awkwardly dour and heavily reverberated loop that seems to go on forever before it breaks up into a wash of noise - a neat track in theory, but the emotion is missing. something similar could be said of the third track. lyrically, the explorations are of paranoia and freedom, themes that are actually shared between radiohead and the gybe/zion collective. however, they have a distinctly mundane quality that could be arguably labeled as "annoying".
the last track is a real treat, though. some kind of johnny cash type thing; the band may have been thinking of freak folk as a way to break the monotony of being a post-rock band, and while they would explore folk further they never produced anything remotely approaching this. there's a continuity in the heavy reverb from the previous two tracks, but what separates it from the rest of the disc is that it feels real in it's resignation and passive hope.
as this is a collection of mostly failed experiments, i'm labeling it a collector's item and sticking to it. however, it's probably the band's most accessible work. the caveat is that it isn't at all similar to any of their other records.
stream:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaJpJ9OX0zs&list=PLnpQFjefXCRMI_cUh5536j-nMfLVicRQ_
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/music/artists/ASilverMtZion/2004-PrettyLittleLightningPaw/index.html
on the question of doggy mens rea
jessica amber murray
dogs are incapable of mens rea?
i don't know about that. ever had a dog steal a turkey? clearly pre-meditated. and, they clearly know they shouldn't.
i count mens rea + actus reus = criminally responsible.
sentence: six months community service at the orphanage.
Kardinal ZG
They know that they shouldnt? So not only do they have an understanding of property but respect the notion enough to feel guilty if they transgress it? Come on.....
jessica amber murray
it's not property, it's authority - and it's taught. they might not get the why so well, but they know not to eat food on the stove top.
Kardinal ZG
It's kinda impossible to figure out what dogs 'know'. The whole scenario can be explained away by simple behavioural conditioning. Obedience and moral deliberation are not exactly the same.
jessica amber murray
i don't disagree, but the law is also rooted in obedience, rather than morally correct thinking; it seems outlandish to deny dogs can have mens rea based on a lack of moral reasoning, when we don't need moral reasoning to construct mens rea in humans.
Kardinal ZG
If i understand correctly, the mens rea/actus reus distinguishes between the intention and the crime itself. If there is wilful intent to commit a crime as a crime, there is knowledge of its moral character. Now if the law would be extended to animals, a dog ( i hope you realise this conversation is getting ridiculous) committing an offence could at worst be accused of criminal negligence.
Incidently, there was the story of some old german guy that trained his German Shepard Adolf to raise his paw when he scream 'sieh heil'. Of course thats an offence over there, but since the code doesnt specify its specifically for humans, the judge had to find all sorts of loopholes to let the dog off the hook.
jessica amber murray
it's the implication there that i think is problematic, but i'm going to take a step back.
under english law, a crime is technically not a moral wrong but an act that disobeys the monarch's orders. on some level, this is sort of archaic. you can see it's remnant in court cases: R v. Smith is literally the monarch vs. smith. but it's still realistically the way the court system functions. so, under english law, rape isn't illegal due to the immorality of assault but because the king (perhaps through the suggestion of parliament) has decided he doesn't like it when people do that. the question before the courts, then, is not whether the accused has a moral understanding of the wrongness of rape but whether or not the accused formed a mental intent to disobey the king's orders.
you'll have all kinds of philosophers, old and new, try to rationalize that. natural law and whatnot. and they may make a few good points. but it's not what the law is trying to determine. legally, what mens rea refers to is simply whether the act is pre-meditated - whether there was a conscious intent to break the law.
we could pull out an extreme example and break godwin's law on purpose: suppose i built a time machine, went back in time, killed hitler, and then bragged about it. complex moral question; not up to the court to decide. premeditated, therefore guilty.
so, if the dog is sitting there eying the turkey while you're preparing for it, biding it's time, waiting for you to leave before it acts? so long as it knows that jumping up on the stove is "bad", the premeditation to do something "bad", to disobey orders from authority (here the owner, there the king), is enough to build a mens rea, regardless of moral concerns.
Kardinal ZG
I agree, but understanding something as 'bad' (even if that badness is committing offence to the King) seems like it requires deliberation. It seems like a case in which only the act can be punished. This kinda reminds me of the story of that old German dude that trained his german shepard Adolf to lift the paw when he shouted 'sieg heil'. The judge had to find some loophole to let the dog off the hook.
jessica amber murray
well, i think the dog is capable of deliberating on it's decision to obey orders or not. i've seen dogs almost do something they shouldn't, then think twice and stop. it's more than conditioning; dogs are pretty smart, relatively speaking, in the animal world. the thing is that that's really all the law is trying to determine for humans, too.
that dog would have been convicted at the nuremburg trials, although i'd argue something like "not criminally responsible", as the dog lacks the context to understand what it's doing. but that was a rare and isolated situation when the court was actually operating under something close to natural law theory. and, in truth, whether we can collectively come to grips with it or not, it was a set of show trials.
"One area that seems to have potential for showing that dogs have morality is the matter of property. While some might think that dogs regard whatever they can grab (be it food or toys) as their property, this is not always the case. While it seems true that some dogs are Hobbesian, this is also true of humans. Dogs, based on my decades of experience with them, seem to be capable of clearly grasping property. For example, my husky Isis has a large collection of toys that are her possessions. She reliably distinguishes between her toys and very similar items (such as shoes, clothing, sporting goods and so on) that do not belong to her. While I do not know for sure what happens in her mind, I do know that when I give her a toy and go through the “toy ritual” she gets it and seems to recognize that the toy is her property now. Items that are not given to her are apparently recognized as being someone else’s property and are not chewed upon or dragged outside. In the case of Isis, this extends (amazingly enough) even to food—anything handed to her or in her bowl is her food, anything else is not. Naturally, she will ask for donations, even when she could easily take the food. While other dogs have varying degrees of understanding of property and territory, they certainly seem to grasp this. Since the distinction between mine and not mine seems rather important in ethics, this suggests that dogs have some form of basic morality—at least enough to be capitalists."
at least enough to be capitalists. heh.
that's a convincing argument, and conforms to my own experience (my dad had either 2 or 3 dogs at a time for as long as i can remember). however, i think that needs to be tested more rigorously through experiment to determine whether the dog (on average) understands property as a concept or is merely obeying authority. but, really, how many humans understand (personal) property as a concept? i think there's a danger in applying an ideal that we ourselves don't fully conform to.
i know dogs have been rigorously demonstrated to lack an understanding of syntax, in contrast to smarter animals like elephants. what that means is you can teach an elephant what an object is called and what a verb is and then randomly put them together. if an elephant understands "fetch" and knows what "beer" is, you can tell it "fetch beer" and it will put it together and understand it without having to be explicitly taught. dogs need to be taught "fetch beer" as a single command, and can't abstract it to "fetch stick", which needs to be separately taught. what that suggests to me is that it may have difficulty understanding property as an abstract concept, even if it can be taught that each item - individually - belongs to it or doesn't. but that again just pushes off the question of whether it really gets it or is just responding to authority.
http://blog.talkingphilosophy.com/?p=6594
dogs are incapable of mens rea?
i don't know about that. ever had a dog steal a turkey? clearly pre-meditated. and, they clearly know they shouldn't.
i count mens rea + actus reus = criminally responsible.
sentence: six months community service at the orphanage.
Kardinal ZG
They know that they shouldnt? So not only do they have an understanding of property but respect the notion enough to feel guilty if they transgress it? Come on.....
jessica amber murray
it's not property, it's authority - and it's taught. they might not get the why so well, but they know not to eat food on the stove top.
Kardinal ZG
It's kinda impossible to figure out what dogs 'know'. The whole scenario can be explained away by simple behavioural conditioning. Obedience and moral deliberation are not exactly the same.
jessica amber murray
i don't disagree, but the law is also rooted in obedience, rather than morally correct thinking; it seems outlandish to deny dogs can have mens rea based on a lack of moral reasoning, when we don't need moral reasoning to construct mens rea in humans.
Kardinal ZG
If i understand correctly, the mens rea/actus reus distinguishes between the intention and the crime itself. If there is wilful intent to commit a crime as a crime, there is knowledge of its moral character. Now if the law would be extended to animals, a dog ( i hope you realise this conversation is getting ridiculous) committing an offence could at worst be accused of criminal negligence.
Incidently, there was the story of some old german guy that trained his German Shepard Adolf to raise his paw when he scream 'sieh heil'. Of course thats an offence over there, but since the code doesnt specify its specifically for humans, the judge had to find all sorts of loopholes to let the dog off the hook.
jessica amber murray
it's the implication there that i think is problematic, but i'm going to take a step back.
under english law, a crime is technically not a moral wrong but an act that disobeys the monarch's orders. on some level, this is sort of archaic. you can see it's remnant in court cases: R v. Smith is literally the monarch vs. smith. but it's still realistically the way the court system functions. so, under english law, rape isn't illegal due to the immorality of assault but because the king (perhaps through the suggestion of parliament) has decided he doesn't like it when people do that. the question before the courts, then, is not whether the accused has a moral understanding of the wrongness of rape but whether or not the accused formed a mental intent to disobey the king's orders.
you'll have all kinds of philosophers, old and new, try to rationalize that. natural law and whatnot. and they may make a few good points. but it's not what the law is trying to determine. legally, what mens rea refers to is simply whether the act is pre-meditated - whether there was a conscious intent to break the law.
we could pull out an extreme example and break godwin's law on purpose: suppose i built a time machine, went back in time, killed hitler, and then bragged about it. complex moral question; not up to the court to decide. premeditated, therefore guilty.
so, if the dog is sitting there eying the turkey while you're preparing for it, biding it's time, waiting for you to leave before it acts? so long as it knows that jumping up on the stove is "bad", the premeditation to do something "bad", to disobey orders from authority (here the owner, there the king), is enough to build a mens rea, regardless of moral concerns.
Kardinal ZG
I agree, but understanding something as 'bad' (even if that badness is committing offence to the King) seems like it requires deliberation. It seems like a case in which only the act can be punished. This kinda reminds me of the story of that old German dude that trained his german shepard Adolf to lift the paw when he shouted 'sieg heil'. The judge had to find some loophole to let the dog off the hook.
jessica amber murray
well, i think the dog is capable of deliberating on it's decision to obey orders or not. i've seen dogs almost do something they shouldn't, then think twice and stop. it's more than conditioning; dogs are pretty smart, relatively speaking, in the animal world. the thing is that that's really all the law is trying to determine for humans, too.
that dog would have been convicted at the nuremburg trials, although i'd argue something like "not criminally responsible", as the dog lacks the context to understand what it's doing. but that was a rare and isolated situation when the court was actually operating under something close to natural law theory. and, in truth, whether we can collectively come to grips with it or not, it was a set of show trials.
"One area that seems to have potential for showing that dogs have morality is the matter of property. While some might think that dogs regard whatever they can grab (be it food or toys) as their property, this is not always the case. While it seems true that some dogs are Hobbesian, this is also true of humans. Dogs, based on my decades of experience with them, seem to be capable of clearly grasping property. For example, my husky Isis has a large collection of toys that are her possessions. She reliably distinguishes between her toys and very similar items (such as shoes, clothing, sporting goods and so on) that do not belong to her. While I do not know for sure what happens in her mind, I do know that when I give her a toy and go through the “toy ritual” she gets it and seems to recognize that the toy is her property now. Items that are not given to her are apparently recognized as being someone else’s property and are not chewed upon or dragged outside. In the case of Isis, this extends (amazingly enough) even to food—anything handed to her or in her bowl is her food, anything else is not. Naturally, she will ask for donations, even when she could easily take the food. While other dogs have varying degrees of understanding of property and territory, they certainly seem to grasp this. Since the distinction between mine and not mine seems rather important in ethics, this suggests that dogs have some form of basic morality—at least enough to be capitalists."
at least enough to be capitalists. heh.
that's a convincing argument, and conforms to my own experience (my dad had either 2 or 3 dogs at a time for as long as i can remember). however, i think that needs to be tested more rigorously through experiment to determine whether the dog (on average) understands property as a concept or is merely obeying authority. but, really, how many humans understand (personal) property as a concept? i think there's a danger in applying an ideal that we ourselves don't fully conform to.
i know dogs have been rigorously demonstrated to lack an understanding of syntax, in contrast to smarter animals like elephants. what that means is you can teach an elephant what an object is called and what a verb is and then randomly put them together. if an elephant understands "fetch" and knows what "beer" is, you can tell it "fetch beer" and it will put it together and understand it without having to be explicitly taught. dogs need to be taught "fetch beer" as a single command, and can't abstract it to "fetch stick", which needs to be separately taught. what that suggests to me is that it may have difficulty understanding property as an abstract concept, even if it can be taught that each item - individually - belongs to it or doesn't. but that again just pushes off the question of whether it really gets it or is just responding to authority.
http://blog.talkingphilosophy.com/?p=6594
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10912
http://www.socialist.ca/node/1959
http://rabble.ca/columnists/2013/10/fighting-economic-war-alongside-us
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/kony-2013-us-quietly-intensifies-effort-to-help-african-troops-capture-infamous-warlord/2013/10/28/74db9720-3cb3-11e3-b6a9-da62c264f40e_story.html
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/10/29/japa-o29.html
http://fpif.org/22179/
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10902
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10907
this is actually one of the very important points where bakunin was in conflict with marx, and yet no mention of the anarchist counter-perspective to marxism is made in the article. it's presented as some kind of random correction of a flaw in marxist thinking that nobody had previously contemplated. nobody, i suppose, besides the international itself? it's a subtle, academic point. but i don't know why we go around calling ourselves anarchists when we consistently define ourselves in purely marxist terms.
http://libcom.org/library/neighborhood-new-factory
well, it's a war the americans can't win, and they know it. but the sanity is likely temporary.
http://fpif.org/diplomacy-war-finally-march-middle-east/
it's just an occupation. like in japan. and korea. and...
http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/10/28/leaving_afghanistan_not_with_a_bang_but_a_whimper
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/10/28/obam-o28.html
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/10/29/how-human-rights-watch-covers-for-companies-in-colombia/
http://fpif.org/egypts-dark-tunnel/
http://jacobinmag.com/2013/04/imported-from-detroit/
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/10/28/baghdads_burning_and_its_kind_of_our_fault_iraq_afghanistan_drawdown
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10928
http://libcom.org/library/states-brutality
we need to get beyond this question, and i'm willing to more or less just cut the insurrectionists lose and let them rot in jail. a movement is required before the use of force is feasible, not the other way around. this is pure idiocy. simply.
http://libcom.org/library/professional-anarchy-theoretical-disarmament-insurrectionism-miguel-amor%C3%B3s
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2013/10/29/quebec_euthanasia_bill_gets_troubling_diagnosis_from_philippe_couillard.html
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2013/10/29/forget_the_senate_scandal_its_the_economy_stupid_walkom.html
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10922
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10931
http://jacobinmag.com/2013/10/reclaiming-comrade-orwell/
it's tied into homophobia.
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/10/when-governments-go-after-witches/280856/
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10930
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/10/30/the-war-in-iraq-an-assessment/
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/thecable/2013/10/30/meet_the_weird_well_connected_ex_terrorists_threatening_our_relationship_with_iraq
http://jacobinmag.com/2013/10/when-richard-nixon-met-karl-polanyi/
http://www.socialist.ca/node/1963
http://www.thestar.com/news/queenspark/2013/10/30/consumerfriendly_cellphone_rules_coming_in_ontario.html
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10939
http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/kgrandia/2013/10/walking-airhead-zombie-trudeau-backs-spooky-keystone-project
http://jacobinmag.com/2013/10/from-bandung-to-brics/
http://www.policyalternatives.ca/publications/reports/ceta-and-pharmaceuticals
http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/elizabeth-may/2013/10/can-you-keep-secret-join-csec-canadas-corporate-democracy
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/10/31/exclusive_syria_tries_to_hold_on_to_its_chemical_weapons_factories
http://fpif.org/forces-amassing-undermine-p51-nuke-talks-iran/
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/10/31/israel-on-the-lookout/
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10929
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10942
http://thetyee.ca/Blogs/TheHook/2013/10/31/Fisheries-Act-Gutting/
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/11/01/pers-n01.html
http://thetyee.ca/Books/2013/11/01/War-on-Science-Review/
this is propaganda. fuck. will you drop it, already? everybody knows it's just a front to carry out military operations designed to control resources. EVERYBODY KNOWS THIS.
http://fpif.org/perpetual-war-global-war-terror-ever-end/
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10924
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10946
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/10/28/libya-is-liberated-but-please-dont-visit/
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2013/10/21/the-eu-should-intervene-in-the-debate-over-romanias-controversial-rosia-montana-mining-project/#comment-28991
http://endimmigrationdetention.com/2013/10/31/migrantstrike-day-44-oct-31-meet-the-hunger-strikers/#more-554
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10923
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/10/30/phil-o30.html
http://www.thestar.com/news/queenspark/2013/10/30/kathleen_wynne_floats_green_bonds_for_transit_projects.html
http://rabble.ca/columnists/2013/10/canada-massively-fails-to-meet-copenhagen-targets-calls-it-progress
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2013/10/30/ottawa_silent_as_113_years_of_hamilton_steelmaking_ends_walkom.html
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/10/30/parallel-disintegrations/
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/10/31/iran-o31.html
http://fpif.org/saudi-arabias-temper-tantrums-mean-u-s/
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/10/31/how-we-lost-in-iraq/
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/10/31/pers-o31.html
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10949
sounds like a scripted charade. i have little faith that freedom of the press will prevail, but hopefully there's a backlash against what the government is about to do.
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/11/02/west-n02.html
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/10/31/israels-mistreatment-of-palestinian-children/
http://www.socialist.ca/node/1959
http://rabble.ca/columnists/2013/10/fighting-economic-war-alongside-us
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/kony-2013-us-quietly-intensifies-effort-to-help-african-troops-capture-infamous-warlord/2013/10/28/74db9720-3cb3-11e3-b6a9-da62c264f40e_story.html
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/10/29/japa-o29.html
http://fpif.org/22179/
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10902
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10907
this is actually one of the very important points where bakunin was in conflict with marx, and yet no mention of the anarchist counter-perspective to marxism is made in the article. it's presented as some kind of random correction of a flaw in marxist thinking that nobody had previously contemplated. nobody, i suppose, besides the international itself? it's a subtle, academic point. but i don't know why we go around calling ourselves anarchists when we consistently define ourselves in purely marxist terms.
http://libcom.org/library/neighborhood-new-factory
well, it's a war the americans can't win, and they know it. but the sanity is likely temporary.
http://fpif.org/diplomacy-war-finally-march-middle-east/
it's just an occupation. like in japan. and korea. and...
http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/10/28/leaving_afghanistan_not_with_a_bang_but_a_whimper
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/10/28/obam-o28.html
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/10/29/how-human-rights-watch-covers-for-companies-in-colombia/
http://fpif.org/egypts-dark-tunnel/
http://jacobinmag.com/2013/04/imported-from-detroit/
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/10/28/baghdads_burning_and_its_kind_of_our_fault_iraq_afghanistan_drawdown
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10928
http://libcom.org/library/states-brutality
we need to get beyond this question, and i'm willing to more or less just cut the insurrectionists lose and let them rot in jail. a movement is required before the use of force is feasible, not the other way around. this is pure idiocy. simply.
http://libcom.org/library/professional-anarchy-theoretical-disarmament-insurrectionism-miguel-amor%C3%B3s
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2013/10/29/quebec_euthanasia_bill_gets_troubling_diagnosis_from_philippe_couillard.html
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2013/10/29/forget_the_senate_scandal_its_the_economy_stupid_walkom.html
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10922
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10931
http://jacobinmag.com/2013/10/reclaiming-comrade-orwell/
it's tied into homophobia.
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/10/when-governments-go-after-witches/280856/
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10930
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/10/30/the-war-in-iraq-an-assessment/
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/thecable/2013/10/30/meet_the_weird_well_connected_ex_terrorists_threatening_our_relationship_with_iraq
http://jacobinmag.com/2013/10/when-richard-nixon-met-karl-polanyi/
http://www.socialist.ca/node/1963
http://www.thestar.com/news/queenspark/2013/10/30/consumerfriendly_cellphone_rules_coming_in_ontario.html
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10939
http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/kgrandia/2013/10/walking-airhead-zombie-trudeau-backs-spooky-keystone-project
http://jacobinmag.com/2013/10/from-bandung-to-brics/
http://www.policyalternatives.ca/publications/reports/ceta-and-pharmaceuticals
http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/elizabeth-may/2013/10/can-you-keep-secret-join-csec-canadas-corporate-democracy
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/10/31/exclusive_syria_tries_to_hold_on_to_its_chemical_weapons_factories
http://fpif.org/forces-amassing-undermine-p51-nuke-talks-iran/
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/10/31/israel-on-the-lookout/
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10929
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10942
http://thetyee.ca/Blogs/TheHook/2013/10/31/Fisheries-Act-Gutting/
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/11/01/pers-n01.html
http://thetyee.ca/Books/2013/11/01/War-on-Science-Review/
this is propaganda. fuck. will you drop it, already? everybody knows it's just a front to carry out military operations designed to control resources. EVERYBODY KNOWS THIS.
http://fpif.org/perpetual-war-global-war-terror-ever-end/
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10924
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10946
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/10/28/libya-is-liberated-but-please-dont-visit/
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2013/10/21/the-eu-should-intervene-in-the-debate-over-romanias-controversial-rosia-montana-mining-project/#comment-28991
http://endimmigrationdetention.com/2013/10/31/migrantstrike-day-44-oct-31-meet-the-hunger-strikers/#more-554
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10923
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/10/30/phil-o30.html
http://www.thestar.com/news/queenspark/2013/10/30/kathleen_wynne_floats_green_bonds_for_transit_projects.html
http://rabble.ca/columnists/2013/10/canada-massively-fails-to-meet-copenhagen-targets-calls-it-progress
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2013/10/30/ottawa_silent_as_113_years_of_hamilton_steelmaking_ends_walkom.html
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/10/30/parallel-disintegrations/
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/10/31/iran-o31.html
http://fpif.org/saudi-arabias-temper-tantrums-mean-u-s/
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/10/31/how-we-lost-in-iraq/
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/10/31/pers-o31.html
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10949
sounds like a scripted charade. i have little faith that freedom of the press will prevail, but hopefully there's a backlash against what the government is about to do.
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/11/02/west-n02.html
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/10/31/israels-mistreatment-of-palestinian-children/
these kinds of jobless numbers really create no other option than the construction of some kind of new system. i just hope the european masses are not too indoctrinated to be unable to see beyond a "fix my problems for me" perspective, and go out and actually build something.
unemployment in europe is a structural problem created by "globalization" and increasing automation. there's neither a serious solution in increasing or decreasing spending. the paradigm has to break, and shift.
(link apparently lost)
unemployment in europe is a structural problem created by "globalization" and increasing automation. there's neither a serious solution in increasing or decreasing spending. the paradigm has to break, and shift.
(link apparently lost)
the lack of a union movement is a big difference between now and then, and the structural changes dumping production elsewhere (excluding germany) make it unlikely for one to develop. history doesn't move backwards. something may indeed be on the brink of change, but it's going to have to revolve around the massive unemployment levels that seem to have no long or short term solution short of......war? disease? or the organization of something new?
so long as unemployment remains high, production remains minimal and unions remain dead, the only solution is in building local infrastructure, with the possible long term effect of a society broken into incredible class stratification - managers at the top running global trade and finance to create goods for themselves, with peasants building self-sustainable communes at the bottom. that is what is currently inevitable in europe. and whether that flows into violence or not depends on how or if the state obstructs it.
http://jacobinmag.com/2012/04/introduction-europe-against-the-left/
so long as unemployment remains high, production remains minimal and unions remain dead, the only solution is in building local infrastructure, with the possible long term effect of a society broken into incredible class stratification - managers at the top running global trade and finance to create goods for themselves, with peasants building self-sustainable communes at the bottom. that is what is currently inevitable in europe. and whether that flows into violence or not depends on how or if the state obstructs it.
http://jacobinmag.com/2012/04/introduction-europe-against-the-left/
'That God promised the land to Jews no matter what would happen to its Arab inhabitants who was there long before Joshua and his army crossed River Jordan to destroy Jericho and kill every man, woman, child and animal by “God’s command.”'
the people that lived in the area before the exodus (which probably did not actually happen) would not be described using the word 'arab'. this is one of those debates that just needs to go away. it's really irresponsible for people to continue to cycle this bullshit around.....
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/10/31/drying-up-ideological-wellsprings-of-arab-israeli-conflict/
the people that lived in the area before the exodus (which probably did not actually happen) would not be described using the word 'arab'. this is one of those debates that just needs to go away. it's really irresponsible for people to continue to cycle this bullshit around.....
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/10/31/drying-up-ideological-wellsprings-of-arab-israeli-conflict/
" However, the unexpectedly strong opposition by the American population blocked the plans of the Obama administration. "
see, here's the thing. the writers know this is false, there's no use debating the issue. yet, it's useful as propaganda because it presents the (mostly false) idea that democracy is possible in the heart of the empire.
the biases that the wsws pushes are actually fairly weak in comparison to any kind of mainstream north american news network. the analysis is of course marxist, but in context that's often more academic than political. on top of that, the biases are hard to pull out because they actually align fairly well with basic assumptions about western democracy. the difference is more in motive; the state wants you to believe in democracy in order to pacify you, whereas the trotskyists want you to believe in democracy to radicalize you.
but, that sentence above, there, is a lie - a conscious, purposeful lie with the aim of putting a politically motivated skew on the story. it's maybe not the bias some might expect from a source like the wsws, but it's the one that is actually there.
the article itself is explaining how obama is organizing europe into provinces of the american empire.
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/10/30/nato-o30.html
see, here's the thing. the writers know this is false, there's no use debating the issue. yet, it's useful as propaganda because it presents the (mostly false) idea that democracy is possible in the heart of the empire.
the biases that the wsws pushes are actually fairly weak in comparison to any kind of mainstream north american news network. the analysis is of course marxist, but in context that's often more academic than political. on top of that, the biases are hard to pull out because they actually align fairly well with basic assumptions about western democracy. the difference is more in motive; the state wants you to believe in democracy in order to pacify you, whereas the trotskyists want you to believe in democracy to radicalize you.
but, that sentence above, there, is a lie - a conscious, purposeful lie with the aim of putting a politically motivated skew on the story. it's maybe not the bias some might expect from a source like the wsws, but it's the one that is actually there.
the article itself is explaining how obama is organizing europe into provinces of the american empire.
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/10/30/nato-o30.html
timeline: 2004
100 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0- 0+ 1 2
000
00 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09
000
00 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09
| previous | next |
2004
jan 25: a silver mt zion @ the black sheep, wakefield |
| apr 16: tortoise, four tet @ capital city music hall, ottawa |
| may 10: thee silver mountain reveries - pretty little mountain paw |
| june 10: ember swift, jane siberry @ westfest, ottawa |
| aug 6: sonic youth @ capital city music hall, ottawa |
| aug 26: broken social scene, ember swift @ folk festival, ottawa |
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/chronology/CE/2000/000/00/04.html
well, ok. but the sanctions - against iraq, iran, whoever - are always meant as collateral. ramping up sanctions before talks actually implies a hope that talks will work out.
i find this source seems to lack a good grasp of the nihilist, might-makes-right brand of power politics that drives both parties in the united states, opting to interpret the world through a sense of false rationality, instead. well, they're liberals, i guess. there's a lot of naivete here....
http://fpif.org/congress-vs-obama-iran/
i find this source seems to lack a good grasp of the nihilist, might-makes-right brand of power politics that drives both parties in the united states, opting to interpret the world through a sense of false rationality, instead. well, they're liberals, i guess. there's a lot of naivete here....
http://fpif.org/congress-vs-obama-iran/
i wish you could hear how good these phones sound, though....
....i just compared them to a newer model of sennheisers i got last year and they're just not on the same level...
when i put the 440-IIs back on, all i could think was "why did i ever take them off?".
it was like taking a pair of ear plugs out.
like switching from grey-scale to colour.
like walking out of the city and taking a breathe of fresh air...
like, the way they're able to separate the fuzz guitar in the middle section of mountains made of steam so that it's directly harmonic to the guitar part is...it's almost impossible, really....there's *no* blur....
and, then when the bow comes in, i can clearly hear the buzz on the fucking string. spectacular!
i'm wondering if the model name is a coincidence or a hint.
something about these sennheisers, though, is that they don't have those big muffy ear pieces - and that's an asset, as i find they muffle. all the new phones come with all this noise cancelling stuff that fucks with the signal. no. i want clear, crisp, perfect reproduction...
about five or six years ago, i picked up a pair with some funny digital processing in them that reduces more or less to a boost on the high and low; it was meant to compensate for mp3 compression, and it did give the sound a nice boost through an mp3 player. but, they were impossible for mastering. that's what i'm trying to avoid.
but the market has changed. back in the 80s and 90s, people bought high-end headphones to listen to record player and cd player signals through high end amps. so the focus was on reproducing the signal exactly. that's sort of rare nowadays; the market now is for mp3 players, laptops, djs...
...and because the sources suck, the phones companies have come up with all these digital tricks to try and make their product sound better. basic reproduction is a niche market, now.
....i just compared them to a newer model of sennheisers i got last year and they're just not on the same level...
when i put the 440-IIs back on, all i could think was "why did i ever take them off?".
it was like taking a pair of ear plugs out.
like switching from grey-scale to colour.
like walking out of the city and taking a breathe of fresh air...
like, the way they're able to separate the fuzz guitar in the middle section of mountains made of steam so that it's directly harmonic to the guitar part is...it's almost impossible, really....there's *no* blur....
and, then when the bow comes in, i can clearly hear the buzz on the fucking string. spectacular!
i'm wondering if the model name is a coincidence or a hint.
something about these sennheisers, though, is that they don't have those big muffy ear pieces - and that's an asset, as i find they muffle. all the new phones come with all this noise cancelling stuff that fucks with the signal. no. i want clear, crisp, perfect reproduction...
about five or six years ago, i picked up a pair with some funny digital processing in them that reduces more or less to a boost on the high and low; it was meant to compensate for mp3 compression, and it did give the sound a nice boost through an mp3 player. but, they were impossible for mastering. that's what i'm trying to avoid.
but the market has changed. back in the 80s and 90s, people bought high-end headphones to listen to record player and cd player signals through high end amps. so the focus was on reproducing the signal exactly. that's sort of rare nowadays; the market now is for mp3 players, laptops, djs...
...and because the sources suck, the phones companies have come up with all these digital tricks to try and make their product sound better. basic reproduction is a niche market, now.
sent to sennheiser support (via online form)
sent to sennheiser support:
hi.
i've had a pair of hd 440-II's for about twenty years now. that's two thirds of my life. these 440-II's have followed me everywhere - from bus rides to high school in the 90s with a cassette player right into recording studios for mastering processes. every piece of music i've ever connected to or created has been heard through these phones.
after 20 years, they're getting a little shorted, and i feel it's time to replace them.
i would like to replace them with another set of 440-IIs. otherwise, the world would just sound entirely different. better specs, worse specs - it wouldn't matter. my recordings would all sound wrong; my favourite records would become alien. my universe would just implode in on itself...
yet, they appear to be discontinued. i am very distraught by this thought.
and, so, i have two questions:
1) do you have any hd 440-iis sitting around somewhere?
2) if not, what is the closest model?
if you end up answering (2), i would like to request that you take the time to run the question by some engineers that can answer it properly, rather than try and sell me on something. i'm not looking for the phones with the best specs, or the cheapest phones or any other such thing - i am looking for phones that can replace the 440-ii's with the least amount of variance.
thank you,
jessica
hi.
i've had a pair of hd 440-II's for about twenty years now. that's two thirds of my life. these 440-II's have followed me everywhere - from bus rides to high school in the 90s with a cassette player right into recording studios for mastering processes. every piece of music i've ever connected to or created has been heard through these phones.
after 20 years, they're getting a little shorted, and i feel it's time to replace them.
i would like to replace them with another set of 440-IIs. otherwise, the world would just sound entirely different. better specs, worse specs - it wouldn't matter. my recordings would all sound wrong; my favourite records would become alien. my universe would just implode in on itself...
yet, they appear to be discontinued. i am very distraught by this thought.
and, so, i have two questions:
1) do you have any hd 440-iis sitting around somewhere?
2) if not, what is the closest model?
if you end up answering (2), i would like to request that you take the time to run the question by some engineers that can answer it properly, rather than try and sell me on something. i'm not looking for the phones with the best specs, or the cheapest phones or any other such thing - i am looking for phones that can replace the 440-ii's with the least amount of variance.
thank you,
jessica
why does this model of headphones have to be discontinued? FUCK.
they're still kicking, somehow. but, they're dying a slow death and i need to replace them. i really, really, really want to replace them with the same model. even if i get something with drastically better specs, it's going to sound different, and it's going to throw me for a loop. these are literally the only headphones i've ever had to record with.
any headphone geeks out there reading this? suggestions for something that sounds similar? anybody happen to even have a pair?
sennheiser hd-440 IIs.
guess i'll look on ebay. but if you have a pair or know somebody that does....
they're still kicking, somehow. but, they're dying a slow death and i need to replace them. i really, really, really want to replace them with the same model. even if i get something with drastically better specs, it's going to sound different, and it's going to throw me for a loop. these are literally the only headphones i've ever had to record with.
any headphone geeks out there reading this? suggestions for something that sounds similar? anybody happen to even have a pair?
sennheiser hd-440 IIs.
guess i'll look on ebay. but if you have a pair or know somebody that does....
Saturday, November 2, 2013
penguin random house
penguin random house
formed as a joint venture between bertelsmann and pearson, who own random house and penguin, respectively.
random house
penguin
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/books/publisher/PenguinRandomHouse/index.html
gp putnam's sons (putnam & wiley)
gp putnam's sons (putnam & wiley)
owned by penguin.
| author | title | year |
|---|---|---|
| william gibson | pattern recognition | 2003 |
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/books/publisher/PenguinRandomHouse/Penguin/GPPutnam/index.html
wh allen
wh allen
richard branson bought this in the 80s, probably because of dr. who. also note that this is listed in the timeline at 1835, but i think it's even older. the lack of information online is curious. a subsidiary of virgin books.
| author | title | year |
|---|---|---|
| robert payne | marx | 1968 |
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/books/publisher/PenguinRandomHouse/RandomHouse/Ebury/VirginBooks/WHAllen/index.html
knopf doubleday
knopf doubleday
formed when bertelsmann merged doubleday (which it bought in 1986) into random house (which it bought in 1998). knopf was a subsidiary of random house, purchased in 1960.
doubleday
knopf
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/books/publisher/PenguinRandomHouse/RandomHouse/KnopfDoubleday/index.html
anchor books
anchor books
founded as an imprint of doubleday in 1953.
| author | title | year |
|---|---|---|
| friedrich engels & karl marx | basic writings on politics and philosophy | 1959 |
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/books/publisher/PenguinRandomHouse/RandomHouse/KnopfDoubleday/Doubleday/Anchor/index.html
henry holt
henry holt
owned by henry holt & co.
| author | title | year |
|---|---|---|
| thomas pynchon | mason & dixon | 1997 |
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/books/publisher/GeorgVonHoltzbrinck/HenryHoltCo/HenryHolt/index.html
unwin hyman limited
unwin hyman limited
owned by harpercollins
allen & unwin
bell & hyman
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/books/publisher/HarperCollins/UnwinHyman/index.html
allen & unwin
allen & unwin
was previously named allen & sons. merged into unwin allen.
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/books/publisher/HarperCollins/UnwinHyman/AllenUnwin/index.html
george allen & sons
george allen & sons
merged into george allen & unwin.
| author | title | year |
|---|---|---|
| friedrich engels | on historical materialism | 1892 |
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/books/publisher/HarperCollins/UnwinHyman/AllenUnwin/AllenSons/index.html
columbia records
columbia records
first record label. owned by sony .
| pre | # | artist | title |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7464 | 38944 | al di meola | scenario |
| 40875 | carlos santana | blues for salvador | |
| 45480 | antonio carlos jobim | stone flower | |
| 57628 | alice in chains | jar of flies | |
| 63649 | alice in chains | nothing safe | |
| 67248 | alice in chains | tripod | |
| 80190 | 54-40 | smilin' buddha cabaret | |
| 80280 | david gilmour | on an island | |
| 86630 | david bowie | heathen | |
| 90576 | david bowie | reality |
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/music/index/label/sony/columbia/index.html
an adventure
i was just sitting here, very late on a friday night, reading a book, and something sort of triggered your memory.
i don't know if anything ever triggers my memory, or if you've burned everything that might, or if that's even possible - if you can ever really contain the smoke that rises, phoenix-like.
this isn't meant to be a flowery email.
i just wanted to say that you and i need to go on another adventure one day, somewhere, somehow...
i think we will, once you can get out of that blasted orb...
j
i don't know if anything ever triggers my memory, or if you've burned everything that might, or if that's even possible - if you can ever really contain the smoke that rises, phoenix-like.
this isn't meant to be a flowery email.
i just wanted to say that you and i need to go on another adventure one day, somewhere, somehow...
i think we will, once you can get out of that blasted orb...
j
demo #19: confusion
continuing on with the theme of exploring mental illness, in this song i'm trying to get in the head of somebody who has difficulty controlling the penis and ends up resorting to self-mutilation. in a sense, it's a sarcastic allegory on the question of thinking with one's cock. in another sense, it's a transgendered teenager carrying out a sort of morbid fantasy.
musically, this is the first song-oriented keyboard-driven track in my discography. it's not the last one, but these tracks are relatively rare, coming from me. production wise, it's also a huge step forwards.
recorded in mar, 1997. remastered on nov 2, 2013.
musically, this is the first song-oriented keyboard-driven track in my discography. it's not the last one, but these tracks are relatively rare, coming from me. production wise, it's also a huge step forwards.
recorded in mar, 1997. remastered on nov 2, 2013.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)