(edit: this was written in the late 00s, and saved in this file to this date for unknown reasons. 27/08/2019)
there's a window company. and the window business is a little bit slow right now. so, they're trying to find ways to increase business.
they decide that the problem is that there are too many functional windows out there, and the only way to increase sales is to correct that problem. yet, that's sort of criminal. the government, with it's regulations....always getting in the way of business...
so, they needed to find a way to accomplish this without making it seem illegal. but, it turned out the window company was unpopular due to weak acknowledgement of the relevant environmental regulations. see, what you can do if you're a catastrophically polluting company is calculate whether the cost of modifying your business practices is more or less efficient than the government red tape. of course, if it costs less to destroy a community than it does to sustain it, it would be irresponsible to sustain it.
but, they have a common enemy with their detractors: government. well, sort of. it's not really possible to speak of a common entity in this context, but it's vague enough to be effective. this is how the people are assembled.
the next step in the scheme is to infiltrate the group with employees, union members, to get the idea of window smashing normalized, to implant a logical, causal connection between anger at systemic oppression and breaking somebody's window - solution obtained.
but, will it work? and what will become of the people living under the shadow of the reconstruction firms, whose anger only makes their oppressor stronger?