the two new accusations of franken-groping are from somebody that claims it happened before a picture was taken (with the picture being of him touching her arm) and from another anonymous source.

there remains no meaningful evidence, here - just a militant demand to accept hearsay as evidence, despite all legal norms to the contrary. you could make the case that the plurality is evidence, except that these are all questionable sources. army vets are property of the establishment, not paragons of virtue. she may very well have killed innocent people in her role. they train you to be a psychopath, and to take orders.

and it remains the case that franken is the #1 guy that the establishment would want to ditch, right now. there is an overwhelming motive for a co-ordinated campaign against him.

with each hokey claim designed for obvious maximum media effect, the credibility of the accusations is diminishing, not increasing.

but, again: it's clear that this isn't going to stop until he resigns. he's not wanted in the halls of power. at all.

there is again a lesson here: be careful of who you let photograph you. any picture of anybody touching anyone....

jagmeet singh must cut his beard.