yeah, i'm sorting through that case and it actually upholds my argument, not theirs, as the case makes it clear that a stalking charge requires there to be an objective concept of fear.

i was applying for housing, something i have an explicit right to do under ontario's human rights code. the premise that i was stalking her is preposterous. in fact, i thought i was applying to a guy named ryan - i hadn't the slightest clue of the identity of the property owner, and i actually still don't. the only thing there's any evidence of is that she was suffering from some kind of schizophrenic fantasy.

but, i know as a matter of fact that this issue has been dealt with more recently and the supreme court has explicitly ruled on the question: being annoying is not harassment under the law.