so, what the package from the hrto was was the same thing that was sent to me in december, just resent because they did get a response from the property owner after all, via email.

why didn't they just email her in the first place? why did they need a physical address? because the laws are out of date.

no, really. i gave them a valid means of contacting her (email) and they insisted i give them an address, which i couldn't find. the court then emailed her, and she responded via email with an address. they could have just emailed her in the first place, but something that makes that much sense isn't consistent with the law.

and, this is ignoring the absurdity of being arrested for stalking somebody that you don't know the address of.

that means my request for deferral is....i need to call them in the morning. they might want me to serve her, now that i have an address, before they carry through with it.

something of some interest to me, though, is that she admits in the email that i don't know her address - and requests it not be provided to me. in the police report, she claimed she feared that i would come to her house. is that enough to prove she lied on the report?

if i can prove that ryan myon is a real person, that is enough to prove she lied on the report.

there is a new deadline: mar 24th. she needs to get a response to the tribunal by that date, now.

i should write the hrto an email updating the situation.