wait a second - are we supposed to uncritically believe women without any attempt to fact check, or not?

it seems like that principle is really only as good as it is useful as it is to run a good story. and, the ladies here should realize that they're really being taken of advantage of by a media that doesn't actually care about what they have to say, but sees exploiting them as a good way to make a lot of money.

in the end, if what they say gets in the way of the story, it gets jettisoned. and, that was predictable.

so, when ariana huffington says the photos weren't harassment in any way, that should be enough, based on the logic of this lacking movement, itself. instead, we're invited by the same media that pushed these ideas of female purity to question her motives, as the media tries to figure out what she was thinking from her body language [her lips said yes, but her body said no. she clearly wasn't asking for this.] and questions her allegiance to women's advocacy for the sin of refusing to take part in an obvious smear campaign.

are you starting to understand what's going on, yet?

https://pagesix.com/2017/11/20/new-pics-show-al-franken-grabbing-arianna-huffingtons-breasts-and-butt/

jagmeet singh must cut his beard.