Friday, March 13, 2026

the lebanese parliament has taken a position that essentially relegates themselves to a dhimmi group in the arab league. they just want to pay the mob bosses to leave them alone. this is a historical position, as lebanon has lived under muslim rule for centuries. the lebanese are used to this. but it's not acceptable; it's a cop-out.

if lebanon wants to be a country, it needs to have a monopoly on violence in it's own borders.

if it refuses to do that, it can't be a country and will need to be partitioned. the time for holding on to empty rhetoric about "territorial integrity" is past. a country that cannot defend itself is not sustainable and cannot exist.

if canada wants to actually help, it should be sending soldiers to lebanon to train the military. at the end of the day, it is the lebanese that will need to stop paying the jizya, take up arms and defeat hezbollah, or we will need to stop pretending that lebanon is a country, and do away with it.

if canada wants to help, it has the expertise to help train the lebanese. that is what they need. not food.
lebanon is not a third world country. it's considered middle income. they can grow food. they have jobs.

they need help fighting the fuckers, not help feeding their people.
canada is the pathetic sick man of the oecd, writing checks for charitable donations across the world to generate respect and seek influence, and getting nothing but contempt in return.

there's lots of wealth in this world. the world doesn't need wealth. it needs leadership. we don't have it.

they don't need our money. we need our money.
i would support sending canadian soldiers to lebanon to fight hezbollah before i would support throwing money at empty attempts at philanthropy that will do nothing to stabilize the region.
i don't think that sending $40 million in aid to lebanon is very high impact, especially if it's for food. they're not experiencing a famine in lebanon and the people being moved out are not being blockaded. rather, this is the kind of stupid, self-serving philanthropy intended for domestic audiences to feel good about themselves that has given canada a low level of global respect. it does nothing to address any issue of substance or concern about iranian terrorist proxies in the region and the money will in all likelihood just end up stolen by corrupt elements of the organized crime networks in the region.

that money would have been better distributed to build housing for refugees in canada.

but, if the canadian government wants to do something in the world instead of something here, which i may strongly suggest it should reanalyze it's priorities around, it should be sending resources to help fight the terrorist networks, not basically funneling them money. 

lebanon certainly has some problems, but they don't need food. they need guns to fight off hezbollah with.

Thursday, March 12, 2026

i was thinking as i was eating a salad that i can be fucking sarcastic in my foreign policy proposals. proposing a blockade of iran and telling the iranians to suffer the consequence of shitting in their own bed for shooting at ships is pretty vicious, really. it's sort of sadistic. but, sadism is one of the most blunt forms of comedy, because it is so absurd. really awful forms of punishment have a deep level of comedic value to them, which is really what i'm going for.

you'll have to forgive me. i don't watch tv. so, maybe i'm summarizing something that already exists, in which case i apologize. but there should be a resultant tv show called sarcastic dad that is about taking cruel and unusual punishment to it's logical conclusion in extremely dark comedy. these little fucking punks are going to get what's coming to 'em in the most ironic way possible, with flair and with shock value.

it would get cancelled, but that would just be the aura of it.
a lot of people, including myself, were loudly in support of regime change in iran way back in 2003, even as we were arguing against invading iraq. a lot of us have held these opposing positions the whole fucking time.

i would have preferred for the united states to have done this through the un. but so be it. the un is broken.
it's funny how everyone that supported iraq is opposed to iran, and everybody that opposed iraq supports iran. it doesn't mean anything on it's face, but it's true.

while a lot of former iraq supporters are going to claim they learned something, the reality is that they clearly didn't. even if they don't realize it, the difference is in the nature of the regime and the nature of the opposition to it.

iraq was a secular regime and iran is a theocracy. that's the difference.
i am not in support of the assassination of iranian scientists. that strikes me as of no utility whatsoever.
the americans are focusing on destroying iran's more conventional war machines, which is a necessary but not a sufficient condition to dismantle the state. they are not killing enough clerics, enough judges or enough of the deep state, and it's clear enough this won't work unless they refocus on wiping out the ruling class and the state's institutions, along with the weapons.

winner: russian and chinese weapons manufacturers.
loser: american taxpayers
the americans should close the straits themselves and sink anything coming in and out.
the americans clearly should have ensured they had control of the gulf before they started bombing. it's not america's responsibility to govern iran, but it is their responsibility to make coherent war plans. historically, the americans have had naval dominance over this waterway and the idea that iran could unilaterally close it would be absurd on it's face.

it's not that anything really changed. the united states still has naval dominance, but they appear to have allowed the iranians to put mines in the straits due to not foreseeing it happening. i warned you when this started that the obliteration would have to be complete and immediate, or it would open up opportunities to get in. anything iranian operating in the gulf should have been immediately bombed; it seems like it wasn't. the iranians themselves will suffer the most from this, so i can see how it didn't seem like a real threat, but somebody dropped the ball at centcom in not being aggressive enough. now, this is going to require clearing, which is going to take some time. further, mine-cleaning ships are not exactly military vessels, and they would be vulnerable to terrorist attacks.

this doesn't change any balance of power, it just creates annoyances and slows things down. it's a demonstration of incompetence by centcom that they let the inferior iranians mine the straits they have naval dominance over, right under their noses. it's an annoyance that's going to cost time and money to address.

that means that demining will have to wait, and there's no really easy way to make the straits usable again in the short run, even if they can send marines in to control the straits, which they should be doing.

i actually think they should do the opposite - they should blockade it and even mine the opening themselves, to prevent anything from getting in and out. demining will legitimately need to wait until moogabooga is eliminated and replaced with a democratically elected leader and iran will need to suffer the consequences of shitting in it's own bed.
on first glance, i would consider an israeli annexation of southern lebanon to be a little over the line. that's too far.

however, some things have to be acknowledged.

- lebanon is a failed state
- lebanon is unable to stop hezbollah
- the muslim colonization of southern lebanon is unsustainable
- israel has suffered terribly from the oct 7th massacre, and some increase in territory is morally justified as a reward for that suffering

when you put all of those things together, israel's need to take control of this territory and the region's need to decolonize it of recent islamization in the face of the collapse of the federal authority actually make the idea fairly reasonable.

however, israel should be making an attempt to get the people out of lebanon, and not just pushing them north. the people being driven out of southern lebanon right now are overwhelmingly not lebanese, but mostly syrian or palestinian. a better destination for the shiites, which is most of them, is iraq. israel should help get them there.
the guy going to the game on the tunnel bus is going to park downtown, pay parking, have a beer downtown, get something to eat, have a beer when he gets back, etc. you take away the bus, he either stays at home or just takes a cab right through downtown without stopping. 

it was the dumbest economic decision imaginable.

i also want to point out that the people on the bus pay taxes, too. for them, the bus is a service and taking it away is taking away a service they were paying for with their taxes, in order to pay for stupid christmas festivals and whatever else that they would largely not give a fuck about. did any regular tunnel bus riders get a tax rebate in return for the service that was taken from them? no - those taxes were rerouted towards other things, and most of those other things are bullshit. now, they're still paying taxes, but they lost this service they used.
when we bring back the tunnel bus, it should just run 24/7.
it's not like windsor has alternatives to the events that the tunnel bus serviced. the logic that the bus is taking money out of the city is deeply flawed; the bus was taking money into the city by increasing foot traffic into it. canceling the bus is redirecting the money elsewhere.

i don't give a fuck about sports and think competition is barbaric. however, a large number of people would take the tunnel bus over to see hockey, football, baseball or basketball games. i may be mistaken, but i don't think there's an nhl or nfl team in windsor. going to a minor hockey league game is not a comparable product.

i go over strictly to see concerts and i don't even go to the big shows. detroit is still a large market. so, i could go see a band like pearl jam in detroit, or see a pearl jam cover band in windsor. pearl jam's not coming to windsor. it's not comparable.

for me, though, i don't even go to the big shows, i go to the underground parties. in the summer, detroit usually has a party going until 7:00 am. in windsor, everything closes at midnight, nowadays. you can't even find a venue open until 2:30 anymore.

so, this idea that windsor is competing with detroit is deeply wrong. windsor is simply not competing with detroit, and there's simply no way to get people that want to go to a game or a show or a party to spend that money here instead. if the mayor of windsor wasn't a retard, he'd be trying to capture some of the multiplier effect of people coming through town to spend money in detroit. instead, he's sending them to lasalle or sandwich to spend that money there, instead.
i think that there needs to be a criminal investigation into this organization to determine why it's doing business in iran.

certainly, any donors are entitled to an explanation as to why they are doing business in iran instead of buying food in canada.

i'd like to see some new venues open up on sandwich street.

there's a dom in windsor that should greatly benefit from the new bridge.
worse is this idea that cancelling the tunnel bus is going to coerce me to spend more money in canada. wrong

the more correct way to think of it is that the tunnel bus was drawing me into the downtown core on days i wouldn't have otherwise gone downtown at all. i may have taken a few shots before i left, or otherwise spent money downtown on my way to and from the bus. cancelling the bus means i'll spend less money downtown because i have less reason to go downtown, and sending me on a detour to the new bridge is going to see me spend more money in lasalle or sandwichtown, instead. the new bridge is going to shift the centre of the city away from ouellette and to the southwest. in 20 years, we may call this area lasalle-windsor, or go back to calling it sandwich.

it's maybe not realized, although i don't know how people could miss it, that the reason downtown windsor shifted from sandwich town to ouellette in the first place was because the tunnel and the tunnel bus was there. you cancel or shift or undo that and you cancel or shift or undo downtown, because the major reason people go to downtown windsor is to go back and forth from detroit.

the problem with mayor dilbert is that he's a dork-ass family values conservative loser. we need somebody that's more interested in individual rights and less interested in family values and sees the priority in funding things like the tunnel bus, while slashing funding for stupid christmas bullshit.

from what i can tell, the decision to cancel the tunnel bus was broadly unpopular. we'll have to see if it's career ending and if it's a big enough issue to overturn city council, if we can find some candidates willing to put it on the ballot.
i'm hoping that they eventually sell the ambassador bridge to some government, who turns it into a walking bridge.

i'm a five minute walk from the bus station to go under the tunnel, a ten minute bicycle ride from the old bridge (which i've never been on) and at least a 20 minute ride to the new bridge. i don't know exactly how i'm going to access the bridge with a bicycle yet and that will determine the amount of time it takes to get across. then, when i am across, it's a twenty minute ride back to woodward. so, this might end up being an hour detour into town and i might find myself willing to pay to take the bus over, if i had the option, and then bike back around whenever i'm done - at 2:00 am, 4:00 am, 7:00 am, whenever.

i will not have to wait for the tunnel bus at the diner anymore, which often added an extra $10 to the trip, on it's own, and forced me to plan for overnight parties, even if i wasn't totally into them.

if they turn the old bridge into a pedestrian link, it will cut 10-15 minutes of bicycling, in either direction. 

i may eventually just move closer to the new bridge, and i tried to do that last fall, but i wasn't able to find the kind of place i wanted to, and moved downtown instead. i like the new place. there's some issues but i hope they work out. if they don't, i'll have to see if i can maybe even buy a small house near the bridge.

unfortunately, i don't think i currently have the choice to pay $5 to bring my bike across from downtown and then bike around the long way to get home, like i used to. the city took that away. i would hope it's a ballot issue in the next city election.

i can come up with a million better ways to save money than cutting the tunnel bus. the city just wasted millions of dollars on a useless skating rink, and wastes millions of dollars every year on stupid christmas lights. these are things that could and should be cut in order to bring back the tunnel bus, which was a major benefit to living here that is far more valuable than stupid christmas lights.
this is deeply undemocratic, and consistent with the government's broad behaviour, including it's foreign policy. this government has demonstrated a broad level of contempt for the concept of democracy, both at home and abroad.

it's up to voters in toronto to make sure that the liberals lose these elections.

Wednesday, March 11, 2026

i think that the americans have not sufficiently targeted the irgc or the iranian judiciary and need to escalate to get it done.

if they don't succeed in collapsing the state, i'll have to agree that this was a waste of money, self-defeating and pointless. it will make the americans look weak at a time when they need to demonstrate a show of hegemony but it will be due to a lack of political will rather than a lack of ability.

and, what to say of western democracies rushing to release oil reserves rather than move towards renewable energy sources and carbon transition? pathetic. i have no sympathy whatsoever for people bitching and complaining about the price of gas. there's an easy solution: stop burning carbon.

so, i mean, this is a shit show, and the media is just shitting on the shit show with a shit narrative advancing a shit worldview. it's shit all around, from every angle, from every source.
lebanon is a religious federation. it's constitution requires a specific proportion of christians, muslims and druze. the mass movement of muslims into the country (mostly from syria) in recent decades has upset that equilibrium and destabilized the political system. the country has already collapsed from the weight of this mass muslim migration.

they will have to go.
the mass displacement in lebanon is necessary to undo the islamic colonization in the south of the country and stabilize the country.

they mostly came from syria.

i think they might consider going to iraq instead of lebanon.
    
they can't stay in lebanon.
canada's foreign policy for the last twenty years has been utterly pathetic and the world took note of it and reacted to it.
if you were to tell trudeau or freeland that people around the world don't respect them - don't respect their ability, their intelligence, their competence - they'd be likely to give you a pile of steaming bullshit about "dignity", and that's at the core of the problem. the entitlement that rich liberals feel for respect is a deplorable personality trait, and the american right is correct to spit in their face for it. you are not born entitled of respect in this world. respect is something that you earn, and if you don't earn it, you don't deserve it.

canada needs to stop bitching about dignity and start behaving in a way that commands more respect, and that begins by analyzing it's politics, to ensure it's not supporting fascist dictatorships and providing proper support to groups that are fighting to dismantle them.

in the short run, canada should understand that it is not commanding respect because it hasn't behaved in a way that is worthy of it.

no more aristocrats in the pmo. that's the lesson. 

it's going to take time to rebuild our standing in the world.
mark carney claims that canada will not be involved in the liberation of iran from islamist barbarism, but it supports the process from the sidelines.

while the definition of 'involved' may be of some importance in understanding exactly what that means, all evidence in front of us is in line with this claim. this does not appear to be a nato operation and none of the nato countries, or contractors within them, seem to be invited to participate in the process. this appears to be a joint us-israel operation, with necessary logistic support from regional actors. neither the british nor the french were invited to take part in the operation, either. given the central role of the israelis, and israel's contempt for the carney government, i see little reason to expect that canada will be invited to participate, or that canadian firms will be allowed to bid on contracts. the government may be framing the issue as some kind of moral decision, but the blunt reality is pretty clearly that canada was not invited to participate and that there is no reason to expect that canada will be invited to participate in the near future, without a drastic change in the direction of the canadian government.

i would certainly not characterize that reality as beneficial to canada, to canadians or to canadian capital seeking to invest at home or abroad and powerful interests in canada may have something to say about this, as they appear to in france and britain. further, you'd have to have a pretty warped concept of morality to support sending massive amounts of ammunition to fight a war of attrition in ukraine, and not support a clear war of liberation in iran. the liberation of iran is an infinitely more morally grounded mission than the forcible ukrainian occupation of the novorossiya/donbas region of southern russia, which has been fighting a lengthy war of succession against kiev. if anything, the canadian government is demonstrating a unified doctrine that it opposes the principle of self-determination, because it thinks history is over, and the geopolitical map of the world is permanently set. holding to this extremely conservative worldview is going to backfire against canada, as nobody else has it; it sounds like splendid isolation, and that's what's going to happen if we stick to it.

canada's non-invitation to this particular action may not be particularly upsetting to many canadians, which i find disappointing. canadians should be in solidarity with iranians seeking to overthrow their fascist government and happy to participate in any action leading to that outcome. the canada that i grew up in would adopt a liberal internationalist position and have solidarity for iranian self-determination, not retreat to isolation and right-wing non-interventionism. but i see that many canadians are confused by the geographical proximity of iran to iraq and, due to their own ignorance of history, are allowing themselves to be easily misinformed in conflating the two very different countries with each other. the fact that so many canadians get their information from bad sources like twitter and facebook is not helpful. it is a trivial example, but jon stewart's dusting off of the mess'o'potamia meme, despite the fact that iran is simply not in any historical definition of mesopotamia at all but is a completely different geographical area with an entirely different ethnic group that speaks an entirely different language, is instructive of that confusion. it didn't bother many people. it's close enough, and people just don't want to educate themselves. it's easier to make dumb, ignorant and/or misinformed assumptions.

however, canada's non-invitation is also coming directly off of our snub of the gaza reconstruction process. there's a direction things are moving in, and it's towards canada getting cut out and canadian capital getting cut out. further, whether we participate in this action or not, it is unquestionably in our national interest that the united states demonstrate it is able to conduct this kind of operation, after the logistical failures in iraq. many naysayers and pessimists will point to iraq as a mistake being repeated and while i think this is ignorant and wrong, it's actually not the point. the point is that the united states, as the continuing unchallenged hegemonic power, needs to demonstrate to the world that it can learn from the mistakes it made in iraq by doing the job right this time. the israelis have demonstrated a higher level of competence in this regard but the americans need to be the ones showing the world they can do this right after all and that iraq was a blip rather than the establishment of a norm. i do not share the delusions of sovereignty held by my government; i understand that canadian security is dependent on america's ability to project power, and i don't fear that but seek to influence it.

the reasons the united states is bombing iran are dubious, but regime change in iran is a goal worth supporting and the kind of action that a good police man would carry out, if it had unlimited power. i believe canada's role should be to influence the united states through soft power and, to that extent, it should be to encourage it to carry out more revolutionary acts, and not less.

canada currently has no influence in washington at all and is not invited to anything. we don't get the memos. they don't respect our opinions. they don't ask; they're not interested, they don't care. this is the legacy of justin trudeau's focus on identity politics, and mark carney is not the right person to correct the problem. so, when carney says we're not involved, it is believable, because they don't respect us. they don't want us to be involved; they wouldn't call us as they don't see us as partners. we're cut out. this should cause us to question if we're moving in the right direction, and seek a course correction that is intended to restore the level of canadian influence that existed in washington in the post-war period.

Tuesday, March 10, 2026

i'm really annoyed that i still cannot get a picture of jesse jackson's grave. i want to post it here with the ironic caption "common ground". but nobody will upload the jpg.

when gorbachev died, i couldn't believe my good fortune - it was open casket. but it took a while for me to get that picture of putin standing over the casket, so that i could scrawl glasnost in graffiti on the back.

it didn't take this long.

i will post it when i find it, i'm just worried i'm going to forget about it. 

Monday, March 9, 2026

what's going on with me and my actual life? there have been no concert reviews here in years.

it seems like folk music became very popular after the pandemic. there's some logic in this. i'm not going to write an essay, but i don't want to pretend i don't get it. the borders shut down. they shuttered virtually all of the venues here for years. it opened up a vacuum, and this is the kind of thing that folk music is good at walking into as it creates a sense of "community". i think the reality is that this is a lot of bullshit, and drinking friends are not real friends (i've had too many...they surprise you periodically, but they don't give a fuck in the end), but it seems real enough in the absence of meaning, in the futility of existence, and i have no real prerogative to shatter the desperate delusions of people that have nothing else to live for. it's a closed loop, but it can sustain itself in the short run, until people start leaving and/or dying or more vibrant art starts to bomb it's way in. then, when real art needs a place to exist, you get the problem of trying to get rid of the folkies to open up space, and venues that are on your side or opposed to you. the folkies are like the kurds - they have no friends but the gutters. they always lose. but they never disappear.

my basic position is that folk music is boring and sucks, so it's a process of trying to find ways around it just for my own entertainment value and the maximization of my own self-interest and own utility function. i don't want to go to your folk show because i don't like folk music. it's kind of that simple. sorry. art scenes don't elevate themselves to folk scenes, they cave in and collapse into them. when all that is left is folk, your scene has hit rock bottom and needs to rebuild from scratch. but that also means trying to navigate around the 80s rock losers, who will invariably present themselves as the natural alternative, and are even worse. the dead dichotomy between boring 60s folk and cliched 80s rock is emblematic of the death of contemporary western culture and it's time capsuling in reagan v clinton. and, sure - you'd might as well just get a falafel and go to the festival at the mosque, instead. the messaging is borderline barbaric, and the politics are horrendous, but at least you're learning something about the world as it exists today, rather than getting lost in reliving the retro scenes of the past.

since we got unstuck in time in the 90s, art scenes everywhere have been fleeting, they come and go in short bursts. they're extremely fragile and subject to political whims and economic destruction, to inflation, to demographic shifts, to gentrification and to everything else in the ether. we can build temporary autonomous zones, and expect them to collapse.

detroit-windsor was actually doing pretty well until early 2020. the pandemic utterly annihilated the art scene here, and now all that is left is that boring dead dichotomy - 60s v 80s. death. emptiness. in windsor, the retro 60s folkies will always defeat the retro 80s rock losers. it's a union town. the hippies never died out, but they're at their end of life. and, then all that's left are the arabs, and whatever underground can eke itself out of the ooze.

my pandemic is just ending now, this spring. no shit. i had a false start in 2023, but my house got bought by these disgusting lesbians from toronto. i remain convinced that the sick lesbian perverts wanted to fuck the barbie doll tranny, and were shattered when i shaved my head in protest. in response, they tried to steal my gear and give it to some no-talent losers and failed. they tried to drug me with testosterone to actualize their creepy queer fantasies and failed. i had to lock myself inside for two two years, i move thrice to escape them and it cost me thousands of dollars that the broken court system has to this point failed to properly compensate me with. so i lost three further years on top of the three years lost in the pandemic.

this spring, everything is finally resolving itself. i have a new place that is way better. my financial situation is improving. my hormones are correcting and turning over. my hair has grown back. i'm almost ready to go.

what have i missed, since 2023, if not since 2020? the answer is not much, but folk. everywhere you look, it's folk; there's some 80 retro losers around still, and the arabs are more numerous than ever, but the local white culture is exclusively folk, now. everything else is gone - left, migrated, bankrupted, given up. venues are gone. people have left. it's a wasteland of apparent artistic emptiness that i'm going to have to rediscover from scratch and learn to renavigate. everything is gone. everything is new.

i know i missed some shows in detroit from 2020-2023 because the border was closed. i missed squarepusher, i missed son lux. that's the tip of it. but i had no option; there was no way to get back and forth. biden only re-opened the border in 2023, and i went over once in may, but then was forced to lock myself inside until march, 2025 due to the aggressive investors buying my rental and the vacancy rate n windsor being 0.5%. there was nowhere for rent at all, letalone anywhere to move that i could afford. i have spent the last year trying to rebuild, and twice evaded homelessness by a week via the seat of my pants, but they cancelled the tunnel bus, so i had no (affordable) way to detroit, anyways. i can't spend $200 crossing the border for a few hours of partying. that makes no sense for me to do.

in that time frame, promoters have disappeared and venues have closed and if i missed anything since 2023, i don't even know for sure what it was. all i can find in windsor is folk, which i think is boring and sucks. i've looked. unable to cross since they shut down the tunnel bus, i was actually largely unable to find much of anything worth going to in windsor. i skipped something here and there. there was a rave at the airport, apparently. i've largely been out of touch.

but i actually don't think i've missed so much.

i actually think the scene is d-e-d.

we're going to remember the 2020s as a lost decade, culturally. we didn't lose the 2020s because we were forced to by science, but because we decided to destroy our own economy. this self-inflicted wound will have consequences.

as it is, this region now has to rebuild, and it is different than it has been in previous eras. both detroit and toronto have historically been fertile artistic centres and what makes these cities - along with chicago, montreal, new york and seattle - different than los angeles has been the underground. detroit and toronto have not always been the center of mainstream north american society, but they have always maintained booming undergrounds -  jazz, techno, punk, experimental, progressive/alternative, psychedelic, etc. you expect this here.

it's gone.

it must return and, when it does, it will need to reflect the demographic changes in the region. and this is a race against time. we need to westernize the immigrants before they despotize us.

so, i'm expecting to emerge like a phoenix this spring, but i'm walking into what is now a dead culture. detroit has nicer buildings than it used to, but that's a bad thing in terms of venues. the carnage is immense. i will document it as best as i can.

and as for windsor? 

come to windsor.

book a show.

we need it.

right now, there's nothing here but a boring folk scene that i have no interest in except to continue to evade it.
it's almost summer here today. it's too bad i'm trapped in boring as fuck canada.

i live in the canadian suburb of detroit, but my idiot mayor cancelled the tunnel bus over. i don't have a car, but i shouldn't be driving in detroit, given why i'm going there, anyways. i used to take my bicycle over. am i supposed to stay here and get drunk in a bar in windsor and just stare at the wall? this city is boring as fuck. there's nothing worthwhile to do here, unless you're from the middle east.

so, i sure hope that bridge is open soon, so that i can bicycle over and go dancing in detroit again. it's been too long.

i hope that the tunnel bus is a ballot issue in our next city elections.
i don't accept the concept of a "supreme leader", or think some council somewhere has the right to make executive decisions. that's the fucking point. so, i don't accept the legitimacy of this moogabooga whatever as "supreme leader".

i don't have a plan. it's not up for the west to write a plan.

only the iranian people, through a legitimate democratic process, can determine their own system of government, and it's up to them to write their own fucking plan. when they have elected a leader, they can let us know. kurdish fighters are the most organized group for this purpose but they are not the only one.

no form of non-democratic governance is to be considered legitimate.

moogabooga should already be dead, but they should kill him instantly, and should kill any undemocratic replacement chosen for him. they should not negotiate. they should not try to make a deal. but, it is clear that they are doing that and want that outcome, and i don't support that process, that negotiation or that potential negotiated outcome.

i told you i support a revolution in iran ending with a secular, socialist, representative government and i meant that. i would not stop bombing until the obstructions are removed and the iranians are self-organizing, but i am not representing the same interests as the military forces that are in motion.



khalistani extremists are responsible for the worst act of terrorism in camadian history, the 1985 air india bombing. yet, they continue to maintain politically protected status in canada, by abusing minority rights status. 

in canada, sikhs are a more elite group and more powerful force than jews are. they have a stranglehold on all three national parties.

and they get away with shit like this because of it.

i believe i met this person. i don't remember where or when.

Sunday, March 8, 2026

you and your imaginary god can go fucking curl up in the corner over there and die by yourself.

i don't want to fucking hear about it.


we're not bringing back the cold war and we're not going to live in a multi-faith society. those are failed ideas that the world is not bringing back. the generation that lived those ideas needs to just fucking die off and go away already.

we are going to continue on the march to militant global atheism, and a post-cultural, socialist globalist order. 

all religions will be destroyed in the process.
the only good hippie is a dead one.
all of these retarded baby boomers that want to bring back the cold war need to go fuck themselves and just go get mass assisted suicide already. we're overdue for the die off. hurry the fuck up and keel over.

russia is not our enemy. 

our enemy is islam. 

keep up with the fucking times, you useless old men.
it should be clear to anybody that's not retarded that britain's enemy is islam.
simon tisdale is an abject retard.

the tactic i supported in iran was not to kill a few figureheads in a show of force to set an example and bully them around but to completely obliterate the entire fascist regime with the intent of creating a revolution by necessity, and the united states has to this point not carried through with that. the fact that the son of mr khamenei was not killed in the first wave of strikes in the first place is a failure of tolerance. this will not succeed if key members of the regime are allowed to survive in order to "make a deal", it has to be merciless and total, with the intent of wiping them off the map and forcing them to start from scratch.
to adopt a quote: the united states is the worst country in the world, except for all of those other countries in the rest of the world, which are way worse.

canadians made quite the effort to get full independence from europe, and we succeeded when we ratified our constitution for the first time, in 1982.

i am not interested in turning the clocks back. i would prefer to dissolve confederation altogether. ontario's future is in a new great lakes confederation, not in a return to european colonialism.

in that sense, i am in agreement with the monroe doctrine: europe has no place in the americas of the future. that is, i will choose to align with groups in this hemisphere to expel the europeans, and not with europeans to pick a fight with the americans.

but canada is very much the last colonial state and a substantive proportion of the people that live here continue to act like it.
frankly, i'd rather join the united states.

Saturday, March 7, 2026

trump hotels, on the other hand, will be protected with a space-based laser shield.
now, trump is bombing the ramada.

you're next, hilton.
i've been patiently waiting for pictures for days.

in all seriousness, if this pezeshkian guy is walking into the power vacuum, that would be a tremendous modernizing step forward. there should not be another "supreme leader" or another guardian council or any of that bullshit. they have an elected leader. the process is imperfect, but where isn't it? 

this is not ideal. the state needs to be destroyed and rebuilt, and this will happen in the long run, regardless.

in the short run, the best thing that could happen would be for the elected representatives to do away with the theocracy by acting as caretakers.
iran just issued an apology for bombing neighbourng countries and promised it won't do it again.

my take on this is that they're mocking trump by impersonating canada, just to get under his skin. 

every time you bomb iran, imagine you're torturing a canadian. 

SAY YOU'RE SORRY, BITCH.

https://www.reddit.com/r/offmychest/comments/156zu6m/the_guy_i_was_seeing_broke_up_with_me_because_i/
did bono ever sue corey hart?

it's never too late.
this one goes out to iran.


i apologize for the gay hockey player singing the song, but it's canada. everybody's like that here.
i actually don't think kristi noem should be forced to answer questions about who she's fucking at a senate hearing. that's not relevant. those senators should be ashamed of themselves, and i hope they face the wrath of their voters for it.

the democratic caucus will just need to wait for the secretary to release the footage via pornhub or onlyfans or however they do it nowadays (i actually have no idea) like everybody else.

Friday, March 6, 2026

i've been recovering from another migraine this week. i'm feeling better and need to get in the shower this morning.
what the americans and the world need to brace themselves for now is learning what the administration was doing at dhs behind the scenes when we were being distracted by noem's hair.

Thursday, March 5, 2026

i actually bet trump would appoint rupaul to cabinet.
i've very disappointed that kristi noem got fired before i had the chance to drop a vicious drag queen punchline.

people say that donald trump is transphobic, but he hired america's first drag queen homeland security secretary, so he can't be that bad.

that wasn't good enough.

so i waited.

and alas.
you should never eat carbs that are unfortified. it's pointless. it's just sugar.
this is where we are right now, in terms of progress, in late capitalism: our children are rising up and demanding that the corporations remove the added vitamins from the food, because they don't understand why they were added, or what they are.

we are all responsible for this.
the oatmeal doesn't have electrolytes yet.

yet.

don't let that happen.
yeah, i'd actually like to supplement my cereal a little with some oatmeal and an apple, but the backwards, depressing and dystopic reality in 2026 is that i can't find any oatmeal with any kind of vitamin added to it because the oligopoly has removed it, because we made it voluntary. 

our stupidity will have limits that we will need to push back against to stop our society from collapsing. 

mandatory food fortification is one of them.
i was doing some grocery shopping online today and stopped to look up some instant oatmeal. instant oatmeal is not a part of my normal diet, but it's a regular part of food bank pickups, and i got used to eating it last year. i've long been aware that fortified cereal is the only feasible way for me to get key minerals, and picked out vector and all bran (two of the more fortified brands) for that reason. the instant oatmeals have substantive amounts of iron and b vitamins.

or so i thought, and until recently.

after looking into it, i just learned that quaker oats has caved to public pressure in removing "weird chemicals" from it's oatmeal. apparently, a concerned group of millennials took a good look at the ingredient list, couldn't pronounce any of it and demanded quaker oats remove these weird chemicals.

the weird chemicals were fortified vitamins. 

quaker oats has completely defortitifed it's products due to public pressure.

now, this is particularly egregious due the fact that the purpose of grains is fortification. "whole grains" are mostly a scam because you can't really digest most of them. fortified cereals solved a wide variety of health issues in north america, including widespread vitamin deficiencies. this is going to literally render large swaths of the continent retarded if it isn't addressed.

cereal fortification apparently became voluntary at some point relatively recently. it was never voluntary before; these were mandatory public health requirements, to ensure poor kids were getting enough brain development not to be potentially violent, at the least.

if these stupid milennials didn't understand the ingredients, quaker oats certainly did, and it should be publicly condemned for such a cynical reaction.

we need an immediate return to mandatory fortification requirements, clearly.

Tuesday, March 3, 2026

mark carney is increasingly reminding me of principal skinner, for some reason.

if there's ever a movie about mark carney, he should be played by principal skinner.
why does trump need to sell iran, or anything else, to us voters?

he's not up for re-election.

he doesn't need to sell them a fucking thing, actually.

but, why is this being sold to americans? this is a global security operation, and that's the problem. the united nations is useless, but some body should fulfill this role, not the united states.

american politicians should actually be focusing on domestic issues..

but that doesn't mean that this doesn't need to get done and it's what the commander in chief's job is, not american voters'.

Monday, March 2, 2026

this should not happen and i would call on americans to mobilize to stop it.

this is toronto recently.



the reality is that opposition to these strikes is likely to find little support in canada, and it is because of the high immigrant population here, not in spite of it.
what is canada's position on iran?

1) canada has a large iranian diaspora that supports the strikes by the united states more than our government does, which is awkward. while mostly white fake left americans are protesting the american attacks, iranian-canadians are dancing in the streets. it's actually a pretty stark contrast. most of these voters are far more liberal than arab voters, but the demographic is also up for grabs. it's also a relatively wealthy diaspora that contributes substantively to political campaigns. it follows that smart politicians in canada need to be careful that they don't alienate iranian voters by condemning the attacks or standing up for the regime.

2) anti-israeli politicians have been extremely unsuccessful in canada, going back to the social credit collapse.

3) canada is a major oil producer and benefits from supply disruptions.

4) however, canada also benefits from what it calls international law, which is not written anywhere, and cannot be enforced with any meaning.

it follows that canada is forced into blatant hypocrisy, in supporting the strikes because they are popular amongst iranian-canadians, while trying to balance threats of us hegemony it perceives as aimed at itself.

canada actually has an opportunity to propose reforms to the international order, but it isn't doing it, because it's being driven by cynicism from both sides of it's ass. it should be. it should be arguing in favour of rules that allow for this kind of intervention when it is justified, to dismantle states that are willing to slaughter their own people by the thousands at a time, which i would argue includes ukraine.

taking the initiative to write new rules of intervention that clarify when and how intervention can happen when it should, and it should, is a more principled position than canada is currently taking, or appears willing to take.

sovereignty is not the same thing as self-determination, and is a stupid idea in the global integration of the 21st century.
i have been unable to get "circular materials" to confirm they are recycling even #1 or #2 plastic.

they probably aren't.
if recyclers won't actually recycle plastic, even though they can, and laws should exist forcing them to (even at a financial loss) that our political class won't legislate because they're corrupt, manufacturers should focus on more glass production, and consumers should take note of it.

they will recycle glass and metal.
the french should not be building more nuclear weapons, and they should be economically sanctioned and isolated if they insist on it.

hey, if the iranians want to weaken the saudis a little on their way down, that's just gravy.

let the fascists kill each other.

great!
the united states should not negotiate with iranian leadership, and time is of the essence in ridding the planet of the regime.
the americans are not doing this for the reasons i'm suggesting, but i don't care why the americans are doing this, and if it blows up in america's face, that's irrelevant to me. i am not supporting these strikes because i care about american security, even if i agree that it will advance it. the destruction of iranian fascism is a necessary precondition to advance socialism in the area, and if america can be used as a blunt implement for that reason, socialists should support that. the overthrow of fascism cannot be done peacefully, as was just demonstrated in iran.

i understand that the americans just want the oil.

that is of no relevance to my calculations.
libya should be remembered as the larger blunder than iraq, but fake leftist hypocrites run the media.

iraq was moral, but stupid.

libya was both immoral and stupid.

iran might be immoral if judged solely by the administration's motives, but i don't think it's stupid, and it might work, despite being immoral, because it's not stupid. we'll see if it works.

....and it's worth remembering that afghanistan was a united nations isaf mission to install a government and not a regime change operation. really, libya is overdue for the same kind of un mission that afghanistan saw.

arming the kurds to fight isis, and fighting isis directly, was both moral and not stupid.

immoral stupid
libya
iraq X
iran X
isis X X
lebanon, for example, is frustrating. the lebanese are not extremists, they are secularists and want democracy, and they want to rid themselves of the plague of hezbollah, and of being colonized by shiite muslims. however, they refuse to fight to assert their self-determination. an attack like this would not be successful in lebanon and should be avoided, even if the israelis have no choice but to keep degrading hezbollah as much as possible.

turkey would be a good candidate for regime change but the dynamics are more complicated and this is unlikely to be a realistic policy decision.

an operation like this might work in dismantling the new fascist regime in syria, which replaces a moderate one, which fell in a moment of poor decision making by the russians. it was a mistake for the russians to let syria fall. however, syria will need time to build the kind of serious democratic opposition to fascism that already exists in iran, after 45 years of resistance. the situation in syria for many years was such that socialists and secularists did not mobilize because it was more strategic to back the assad government as a lesser evil, as they were fighting the islamists. now, syria will need to build a resistance against fascism. that resistance should be supported when it develops.

there is currently no substantive resistance against the fascist saudi arabian monarchy to support. the resistance in egypt and algeria needs to be rebuilt. libya was one of the most progressive states in the region before it was attacked by a psychotic lunatic named hillary clinton that sadly destroyed it. there is no resistance left to support because the americans destroyed it. it will need to develop as well.

in iran, there is a resistance and there is revolutionary potential. the conditions are met for revolutionary overthrow, and the international order should support that revolutionary overthrow or itself be reformed so that it does.
sovereignty has no value in an interconnected world and is foolishness masquerading as principle. democracy is valuable and is worth the use of force to implement.

iraq was stupid because it was obvious that it wasn't going to work, not because it infringed on some moral principle. from a purely moral perspective, iraq should have been obliterated, and there remain a number of countries in the region that ought to collapse or be collapsed. it just had no chance of success because iraq is a deeply conservative society that wanted more religion and not less of it. 

there's a good chance that this might work in iran and if it does work in iran it should be repeated in other states that it would have a high likelihood of success in, although there are few of them. iran is actually almost unique in that sense.

if the guardian claims that revulsion with the iranian regime is not a justification for force, i disagree. some level of tolerance for people different than you is perhaps required in this world, but slaughtering tens of thousands of your own civilians is not something that can or should be tolerated.

the international order needs to be reformed to ensure that states that act like iran are held accountable by it. 

Sunday, March 1, 2026

these changes to the international order are not yet codified and no body exists to enforce them. they should be codified, and a body should exist to enforce them. the united states has been and will no doubt remain to be the largest impediment to this.

i support these strikes in principle. we'll see if it works.

but i also support the developing emergence of an international order that provides direction and oversight to this kind of action, and a body that can legitimize it in law and hold actors participating in it accountable.
international law is in crisis. it is no longer relevant to the contemporary world and needs radical reform. i am not in solidarity with conservative perspectives about holding international law static, relative to an international order that has changed twice since it was formulated.

an international strike force to liquidate states like those in iran and saudi arabia is something that should exist and be legally justified.

global government is a good idea. global governance would not tolerate iran.
why would they print this?

the slow collapse of the transatlantc fake left into vocal support for outright fascism is a deep embarrassment.

i condemn this article.

i do agree that a war on iran would clearly require congressional authorization under american law, but that's an internal political issue for the united states to deal with, and they do clearly need to deal with it. decades of ignoring the constitution in favour of a consolidation of presidential power has made the constitution functionally irrelevant. trump didn't create this, it goes back to at least the 60s, but at this point congressional authorization is functionally irrelevant. it's just a stupid piece of paper.

it's up to the americans to change it if they want but, right now, the precedent is fairly clear that the president, as commander in chief, does in fact have the practical power consolidated in the office of president to unilaterally declare war, and obama and clinton have been as or more responsible for this as any republican. both sides will bitch about this, but it is strictly performative across the aisle, and there is in truth clearly a bipartisan consensus in support of consolidating presidential power.

this isn't my concern, it's an internal american political issue. as a non-american looking in, i see a bipartisan consensus that has developed since jfk that the president can in fact bypass congress to declare war, and trump is merely doing away with the last standing formal vestiges in asserting that consensus as precedent. it is up to the americans to decide if they want to legislate and codify existing consensus and precedent, or enforce centuries old laws that haven't been enforced in decades. usually, when laws are not enforced, they are removed and updated. but i am not an american and this is not my concern.

as a canadian, i'm concerned about international trade and to some extent about international law. the united states is of course not a treaty to the rome statute and, as the hegemon, is not accountable to any legal process or body. i am concerned about a concept of international order that isn't clearly written anywhere or enforced by any body. i am also concerned about the rights of secularists, apostates, socialists and atheists in iran, and am in solidarity with their struggle for self-determination.

it is these considerations, rather than issues of internal american politics, that would lead me to support a wholesale one-off obliteration of the iranian state, which means the wholesale destruction of the iranian ruling and governing structure and class, including but not limited to the overnight liquidation of the following:

- the iranian dictator
- the guardian council
- the iranian clerical class, including the judiciary
- the iranian political class
- the iranian military
- the irgc
- the iranian police

i do believe the american hegemon does actually have the power to disappear all of these things at once in a single decisive blow, like a terrible storm tearing down a spanish armada. this would in fact allow for an iranian revolution from the bottom up. 

unlike iraq, this is ready to go in iran and might actually work. i expect to see many comparisons to iraq and would consider them ignorant and poorly formulated. i would prefer to compare the situation in iran to that of pre-revolutionary france.

i am not a clairvoyant and cannot predict the future. wars have high levels of uncertainty. it might fail, and any delay will give other state actors an ability to interfere. but it might work and it's worth trying if it's done decisively.

the ideological authors of these viewpoints are marx and trotsky and i am articulating a concept called "permanent revolution" that is fundamental to trotskyist political ideology. my own politics are more on the order of kropotkinism, but that was a long time ago and needs to be updated.

i would support arming the kurds to eliminate any remaining regime resistance and rebuild a democratic infrastructure for the implementation of secular iranian socialism. it is up to the iranian people to determine their own future.

i do not support the return of the shah, any move towards nationalism or fascism, the idea that the state can be taken in tact and converted or co-opted (it must be destroyed and rebuilt) or a long war involving the use of american or nato troops. oil and other natural resources in iran belong to iran.

i may also be concerned about the extent of israeli involvement, as that may destabilize the region and generate crazy people that want to wage jihad.

Saturday, February 28, 2026

if the ayatollah is truly dead, i would like to call on the icc to try him in absentia and posthumously, and sentence him to death.
ok, maybe i underestimated the scale of the attack. the israelis are claiming they got the ayatollah after all.

i'll wait before i make any further comments.

but whether this works or not will depend on how effective the initial assault is.
speaking of the shah.

let us never speak of the shah again.

maybe we can book him a nice flight to a resort on diego garcia.
iran is trying to shut the straight of hormuz.

pshah. pardon the pun.

america knows how to fix that.


this is what putin didn't understand.

...and why i continue to think we need to leverage our alliance with japan to send a ninja force into russia.

the only way to stop putin is via a rapid ninja strike force.

when this happens, winter is taking it's last huff and puff for the year, and the end is neigh.

it's a little early this year, due to the solar activity at the poles.

expect an early and warm spring.

it is rational for the americans to want to take control of iran. as an anarchist, my solidarity is with the people on the ground fighting the regime. american air support is what anarchists have been asking for since the spanish revolution.

but the americans do not want a war in the region. even if the americans had the bestest of intentions, which is silly, allowing a war to develop would just be giving less sincere actors an ability to get in there.

i have been criticizing putin for years for not just pulling the trigger in ukraine. as time has developed, i've realized the russians were more cynical than i thought, and were carrying out a kind of byzantine barbarian management. putin's goal in ukraine is not conquest of kiev, but to bog the europeans down. the russian tactic is to have the inevitable war in ukraine now rather than in russia later. it's overly pessimistic, but it's also delusional in it's longterm optimism. even in terms of barbarian management, it made more sense for the russians to rapidly advance to the dnieper to cut the country in half and eliminate supplies.

in trying to control iran in a managerial, capitalistic manner (like it's a corporate takeover) rather than in an all out destructive orgy, trump is making the same error of restraint that putin made in ukraine, and the result is likely to be the same outcome.
i want to see the ayatollah dead within 24 hours.

they have the force to do this, but they're choosing to show restraint, and that's a mistake.
i don't think that trying to incentivize iran to surrender is a very good strategy.

the action i support is an overwhelming obliteration in one blow, and that's not what the us is doing. they're trying to bully them into submission. that's just giving them an opportunity to plan a counter-offensive.

you can't reason with the faithful. trump doesn't believe in god, but the iranians do, and they think their god will protect them and deliver them. there is no way to rationalize with the psychosis of faith. if trump's deal-making is psychotic with a rational actor, it's idiotic with an irrational one.

it is easy to predict that if the americans try to do this methodically, target by target, negotiating with each one, it's just going to blow up in their face, and lead to a drawn out war. the russians are busy, but the chinese will slip in. the iranians will mobilize all kinds of crazy people.

the right tactic is overwhelming but pinpointed destruction intended to completely eliminate every aspect of the regime with no possibility for surrender, not careful negotiation and case by case litigation by force. you can't negotiate with the religious.

there was a way to do this that might have worked but they're not doing it and this looks like it's doomed to turn into an inescapable mess the americans can't get out of.
i would encourage the americans to keep it brief and get it over with in iran.
donald trump has certainly done some things worthy of impeachment.

but accepting primate evolution as a fact is not impeachable.
i have some exclusive footage of the democrats' new impeachment hearing.


i believe this is some footage of representative green, a littler later on:

Friday, February 27, 2026

ok, i found some numbers after all.

it's all #1 or #2.

i want the company to tell me that it's going to recycle these items rather than burn them, or i'll bring them to detroit.
i think that the following is probably the best way to do it:

- put glossy or painted cardboard, metal and glass in this blue bin
- compost any unmarked paper with your compost
- if your plastic has a number on it, save it and get it to a recycling facility
- otherwise, throw anything with this "how2recycle" label on it in the garbage to get it into a landfill instead of an incinerator.
after realizing that the province has decided to let plastic producers collect waste plastic and convert it into diesel, i made a conscious decision to not participate by trying to find an actual recycling facility that will at least take plastics 1-4.

i haven't found one yet. i was going to take it across to detroit.

i just realized they took the numbers off. those numbers determined what would get accepted by independent recyclers.

they obviously did that intentionally.

there's now no way for a citizen to know what plastic mcdonalds and loblaws are recycling, and what plastic they're converting to diesel. a good guess is that almost none of it is going to get recycled, and there's now no way to divert it.

i'm considering throwing it in the landfill instead. it's probably the lesser evil, at this point.
instead of wasting our time, money, resources, property, breath and efforts trying to save drug addicts, we should just designate camp site areas in unusable spaces (areas too close to the city dump to live in, land that can't be built on due to industrial hazards (lebreton in ottawa), etc), relocate them there and tell them to kill themselves off. this will cost us nothing, get them out of the city and allow us to refocus our social services on people that better deserve it.

drug addiction is an endless, unsolvable problem.

addicts are a waste of time.
about a year ago, the ontario government shut down the supervised injection sites. i didn't even know that they did that. i did know that the premier's brother and former mayor of toronto was a notorious drug addict, and doug ford is, unusually for a modern post-thatcher conservative, bent on saving the souls of the lost drug addicts.....and getting them jobs. it's not clear how much of this is rhetoric.

the truth is that the government probably foolishly thought it could save money by shutting the supervised injection sites down.

now, a year later, it's dealing with public drug use in libraries, on subways, in parks and other places where the drug addicts are causing a nuisance. well, they shut the sites down.

contrary to ignorant conservative argumentation, the reason these sites were set up was to offset the web of social costs created by drug addiction, from higher policing to higher health costs.

predictably, ontario is now exacerbating a paramedic shortage, due to having to send ambulances out all over the place for overdoses and is considering setting up an expensive special police force with unique powers to act without a warrant that threatens everybody's civil liberties.

drug addicts are not worth the costs. they aren't worth the financial costs and they aren't worth the social costs. we can't be squandering such a high number of resources on drug addicts if we want functional health care, housing and policing resources.

it's not worth it.

if there's an aversion to putting these sites in specific areas, find more acceptable sites, perhaps out of urban cores. 

the alternative is skyrocketing costs, attacks on civil liberties and, eventually, putting them in jail, instead.
we know bill's words are worthless. what about hillary?

well, it's not like this is the first time hillary's been through this and the general picture is she had a pretty clear understanding of what bill was up to, even if he wasn't sending her progress reports, and the basic deal was she could work on her own flings. the general understanding is that hillary may have liked women better anyways.

the open question - and we don't have the evidence for hillary yet - is if hillary liked young women as much as the rest of them.

well, there are a few photos of epstein and hillary, if not yet any pictures of hillary with young women. 

it's curious that hillary denied going to the island. did anybody ask her? i wouldn't imagine most people would have thought to think she might have.
i take it that genuis, as in garnet genuis, is how you spell genius in the retardspeak dialect of american english.
cuba is not a socialist country, it's an agrarian monarchy in need of modernization.
i'd like to encourage chelsea to come forward, if she has anything to say.
bill clinton did not have relations with that woman.

she was just sitting on his lap because there weren't enough chairs.

what's hard to believe about that?
donald trump has a habit of saying things out loud that you don't expect to hear.

we learned on tuesday night that the tariffs are not anything that any economist has imagined, but rather a corollary of an old debate in american history. trump is really holding pretty hard to this idea of trying to bring back the gilded age, which featured a longstanding opposition to the idea of income taxes. income taxes are a relatively new idea in the united states. 

what did the united states use to generate revenue before it had taxes? the answer is tariffs.

the tariffs are a shift in taxes from income taxes to import taxes. step two is a massive tax cut for the ultra rich and he doesn't even attempt to generalize it. he said in his address that the tax cuts were intended for him and his family.

it follows that donald trump is literally increasing taxes on the people that voted for him in order to cut taxes for himself.

the tariffs are not a negotiating tactic, they're a permanent tax, but it's not to raise revenue.

the trump tariffs are little more than a tax cut for donald trump.

Thursday, February 26, 2026

no, tax cuts did not decrease the price of housing and, no, prices are not driven by supply. prices are driven by demand. that's economics 101. supply side economics, also called reaganomics, is delusional nonsense. further, tax cuts have no effect on the economy, they just make rich people richer and governments poorer.

the issue of high demand hiking prices has always been at the bottom of the market and that's not where new units are being built. the article is primarily talking about the millions of empty condos in toronto, which are sitting empty because they're overpriced shoeboxes. this is a consequence of market failure - canada's inability to build housing that meets actual demand because it's not profitable. but it has no relevance to the decrease in rent.

the only longterm solution to this market failure is going to be for the government to step in and build more government owned and run affordable subsidized rental housing. that, and that alone, will take the pressure off the bottom of the market. there is no market solution to market failure. tax cuts are certainly no solution to market failure.

in the short term, while we continue to live through a market failure, the decrease in rent that normal people are experiencing is due almost entirely, virtually 100%, to the cut in international students, which opened up existing, affordable housing that normal people can afford and created a competitive rental market with a healthy vacancy rate, rather than a <1% vacancy rate across the country, with normal people biting and clawing just to find somewhere to sleep.

when you do the statistics, you'll find that these condos don't affect the vacancy rate because they're not considered to be affordable, despite being comparable to university dorm rooms, rather than apartments, let alone for-purchase condos. that's why they're empty. but that fact is irrelevant, because they're not a part of the housing stock.

canada has been creating incentives for years to build millions of closets for investors to buy that have no effect on rental statistics but have contributed to the ongoing market failure to build useful housing that meets demand and this airhead reporter fell for it in an attempt to argue against basic economics, because what she really cares about is colonizing canada through increased immigration levels and wants to trick you into thinking that immigration levels therefore weren't responsible for high rents. but she's full of shit. 

Wednesday, February 25, 2026

so, they end up eating in food banks and competing with canada's existing poor for already stretched resources. this just downloads costs to municipalities, it doesn't eliminate or reduce them.

america can make it's shitty gas guzzling pickups and suvs.

let's try to get contracts for bmw and mercedes to build their newer ev cars here.
let them hike the price on the whiskey.

those homeless drunks over there can drink their cheap american whiskey. but, high grade, expensive canadian whiskey will be the whiskey of choice for america's more sophisticated gentlemen.

you get the point.
take lumber, for instance.

market it is canadian premium lumber. let them tariff it. sell it to people that want higher grade wood, whatever that means.
american dairy products would be unable to pass health and safety tests in canada. it's unclear why the americans don't understand this; american dairy products are full of poisonous hormones that canadian regulators will not allow to be sold and that canadian consumers don't want to consume because they're cancerous.

you can take your carcinogenic milk and go fuck yourselves. we don't want it. we won't buy it. we won't drink it. 

you can put it on the shelves, and it will rot. 

if the united states wants to sell milk in canada, it's going to have to change it's regulatory practices first. 

this issue is not on the table.

canadians don't want to buy poisoned american milk. it's a fucking garbage, piece of shit product.

canada should consequently happily embrace the tariffs and market canadian milk in the united states as healthier than american milk, with a mark-up. smart consumers will pay more for a superior product.

this is ready to go when it comes to milk because there's a clear difference: clean, hormone-free canadian milk is clearly superior to poisoned, shit american milk. but this is the template that canada should follow.

let the americans mark our goods up. fine. canadian exporters should focus on making superior products aimed at more discerning consumers, and import more from mexico to offset it. further, we should be implementing export taxes on goods that the americans require as our retaliatory measure. we should not enforce retaliatory tariffs.

if the americans want to cut themselves out, that's their choice. it will be up to us to make them pay for it.

the greeks and romans were aware of black africans, so this idea that early pre-modern europeans thought they were monkeys or gorillas is silly. rather, there are quotes from leading intellectuals of the period suggesting the opposite - that they found it intuitively obvious that the other great apes are in fact people, too.

this idea tying black people to dirty monkeys is really post-evolutionary and largely post-slavery, reconstruction period deep south bible belt ignorance.

the greeks called the blacks ethiopians, often with the homeric epithet snub-nosed ethiopians, because they thought they were so badly sunburned that they turned black, like a chicken in the fire. it's clear from the mythology that the greeks explored africa and decided it wasn't worth it, but kept their colonies on the coasts of southern europe, west asia and north africa. the romans fought wars down the nile and lost but managed to convert them to christianity, like they converted the germans. there is evidence of them sailing down both sides of the coast of africa. on the west, there are colonies well down the atlantic coast and they knew there was a bend around west africa. on the east, they made it to the south african coast but don't seem to have circumnavigated it. roman maps from antiquity have the island of madagascar on it. there were expeditions to find the source of the nile and the written records indicate they got to the great lakes but turned back due to the climate. there is evidence of roman settlement around lake tchad. they describe wildlife in the niger river delta. african traders brought goods into the empire from the desert and beyond and there's no indication they were seen differently than arabs, indians or any other non-european traders.

by the time the spaniards were driving the muslims out of spain, the arabs had been enslaving west africa for 1000 years. they don't teach you about the other part of the reconquista, the part that failed until the french did it, which was the reconquest of northern africa. standing in southern europe in the year 1450, you didn't see this natural geographic barrier across the pillars of hercules separating europe from africa and christian from muslim, you saw the carthaginian part of rome half reconquered and half still held by barbarians and usurpers. the entirety of north africa, from egypt to the atlantic, was roman. the spanish fully intended to finish the job by conquering morocco, algeria, tunisia and libya and rechristianizing and reromanizing it but they just failed to. had they not discovered america instead, they probably would have. this is where tying blacks to slavery develops, when the spanish began to participate in the islamic slave trade and expanded it to america, but it was really about religion, and not about race.
this is an interesting post:
hey, look at this.

by the way

i think representative green could use a shave.

he's looking a little chimpish, with all that shit on his chin.
all people are apes.
the democrats are just never going to accept that primate evolution is a fact, are they?

i did my taxes electronically yesterday morning. first day.

what's my income going to be for 2026? more than 2025, by quite a bit.

odsp: $1408/month until aug 1, 2025. the cpi is a little higher for 2025 than 2024. it's probably going to be 3.4%. if so, that would increase rates to $1456/month.

cohb: currently $401/month. this will change as follows in july or august: 1000*1.021 - 599*1.034 is...$401. no change.

cdb: $200/month to june, set to increase to $204 in july.

otb: $75 to june, set to increase  to $85 in july because i paid extra rent last year.

gst: $110 quarterly in april, set to increase to $138 due to the amount of rent i paid last year and again to $172 due to the legislated 25% increase in july. they should also send me a lump sum payment of $220 some time soon.

total: 

1408+401+200+75+110/4 = 2111/month. 
                                            - $1000 (rent)
                                            - $30 (internet)
===================================
                                              $1081

in july:

1456+401+204+85+172/4 = 2189/month
                                            - 1021 (rent)
                                            - 30 (internet)
==================================
                                             $1138, roughly

2189*12 = $26268

does that mean i'll have to pay taxes?

the cdb, otb and gst are not taxable. taxable social assistance amounts are:

(1456+401)*12 = 22284.

i might have to pay a "healthcare premium" on that of something like $50, which is goofy, but whatever.

however, the $50,000 of education credits i have should offset that. if it comes up as a taxable amount, it will convert itself into a refund.

Tuesday, February 24, 2026

there was a time when canada had the ability to influence us policy rather than stand directly against it. years worth of stupid policy intended to be confrontational and competitive instead of cooperative and pragmatic have eliminated any room canada may have had to change the outcome.

the best thing canada can do is call for an orderly and prompt transition of power. we don't have the soft power influence in washington that we once did.

i was expecting to get two or three meals out of this. i might get as many as 7.

so, i'm altering this to adjust:

i actually made this last night and then didn't eat much of it. i'm going to try to get through it tonight, but it might be three or even four days of soup.

it's far more like soup, now.

===============

- take a full package of oxo cubes and let it sit in a bowl with water, stirring until it dissolves. this will be intense beef gravy.

- chop up broccoli florets
- chop up an entire bulb of garlic
- chop up 75 g of kale stalks

- chop up thawed or defrosted broccoli stalks and put them in a blender. use a 375 g margarine container full and refill for next pot.
- add chopped up citrus peels. also use 375 g margarine container and refill.
- add a full carton (1 L) of unflavoured, unsweetened soy milk
- blend a little, just to cut it up a bit

- using a frying pan,
- start with olive oil margarine
- i'm chopping up kale stalks instead of celery. fry them in the margarine for two minutes, covered.
- add the entire bulb of chopped garlic. fry for another two minutes, covered.

- put the contents of the frying pan in a pot
- add the blended mix with a 1/2 box of vegetable or chicken broth (500 ml) and the bowl of dissolved oxo cubes
- add the chopped broccoli florets
 - let this come to a boil (uncovered)
- cook it half-covered on low for 30 minutes. stir regularly, checking for overflows.

while it's cooking, 

put the bacon on first. i'm using an entire 375 g pack.

put the following in a bowl:
- chopped fresh dill
- two avocados (chopped)

- also, grate some cheese (200 g monterrey jack, 200 g mozzarella, 200 g cheddar, 200 g marble)
- chop up some bread (this time, i'm using up the remaining sourdough)

- put the contents of the pan in the bowl
- put the bacon with the grease and oil in the bowl

- add the following: 

- frank's
- pepper
- cayenne
- oregano
- cumin
- paprika
- dried dill
- jalapenos

this bowl of soup cannot be eaten at once and will be stored as is. i was surprised by this.

- partition a small amount into a reasonable sized bowl. fill the bowl, but note that the soup is flling.

- add some bread
- add some amount of the grated cheese
- broil to melt cheese

when done, add the following on top:

- nutritional yeast
- hemp seeds
- ceasar
- fresh broccoli florets