Thursday, November 28, 2013

charles rogers - memoir of george wishart, the scottish martyr


for researchers

this is a glorified family tree of the wishart family, along with what is basically an encyclopedia entry for george wishart, and would only be of interest to people studying that family in or outside of the context of the scottish reformation. the main source of this history is john knox, who may have romanticized/fabricated certain aspects of certain things rather substantially in order to fix a desired narrative. this is cursory to my interests in things. rather, it's important in my tree from three contexts.

the first is that the wishart line is ancestral to karl marx' wife. the second is that the wishart line descends from scottish nobility (thereby making marx a sort of nouveau riche). the third is that there were some reformation-era preachers along the line that had an influence on the development of protestantism in the united kingdom.

the primary topic of the text is discussed on his own page, over here.

the text was clearly never edited, as it is full of confusing typos. thankfully, the logic to put the tree together properly is entirely self-contained.

full text:
http://www.archive.org/download/cu31924074412580/cu31924074412580.pdf

http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/books/congress/BR/1725.W81.R72/index.html
he's trying to make the point that depression should be taken seriously (i.e. not written off as something hard work can resolve, like calvinists and liberals tend to), but his argument falls apart into hippie bullshit halfway through.

depression is a component of consciousness. like every other component of consciousness, it has a chemical basis. don't accept that? ok, well back to the nineteenth century with you. go pick berries over the rolling fields and explain your holistic completeness to the birds - and tell me what they say. yes, reductionism has it's limits, but to deny a chemical basis of consciousness is to retreat back to the world of magic; to discuss the limitations of reductionism, in context, means to question the abundance of complicating factors.

happy? your body has an app for that, in the form of a chemical reaction. sad? yup. depressed? absolutely.

now, suppose you're fucked up on heroin. "get up! pull yourself together!". successful approach? probably not - you're fucked up on heroin, and it's preventing you from doing much of anything at all except drooling.

likewise with depression. as an aspect of consciousness, it has a chemical basis. as with any other chemical reaction, it has a period of influence.

the difference is that we don't get to pick when we inject depression, or when we stop shooting up on it. and there may even be a chemical dependency that develops, as we wallow in our own despair.

when i'm tired, i take caffeine. like every other component of consciousness, alertness has a chemical basis. for people that have bodies that are running off depression-inducing chemicals every which way, drugs are at least a short term solution. we understand this much: the mechanics of it. depression = chemicals. eliminating depression = chemicals.

the tricky part is in asking why some people's internal chemistry is doing this to them. genetics? environment? addiction? bad luck? there's probably not a neat and clean answer...

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/jamie-flexman/depression-mental-illness_b_3931629.html
bro culture could have some upsides in worker solidarity.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/shipyard-workers-walk-off-job-complaining-of-bullying-1.2443497
in the midst of a recent debate, the topic of john kerry came up. i very nearly fell back into my expected reply:

"john kerry is a war criminal.".

however, i had to stop myself. kerry hasn't yet been responsible for anything of the sort. the truth is that, after four years of open war mongering by hillary, kerry seems to be a pleasant shift towards non-engagement.

he's still got time to become a war criminal, mind you. but the accusation, as of today, rings hollow.

it's been a long time since i've been able to say that about a prominent american leader. it's worth noting somewhere.

what the world needs to learn from hillary is the dangers of careerism in politics.

ANYTHING TO GET A PROMOTION.

you could see her crack from time to time. have second doubts. moral qualms.

in the end, her career was more important.

james wishart

james wishart

born:
died: 1575
father: james wishart [1]
mother:
spouse:
child: sir john wishart [1]

note that the source has an obvious typo for his father, which is clear in context. 

[1]: memoir of george wishart, p. 342-343

http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/gen/lines/wishart/jamesd1575.html

charles rogers

charles rogers

born: 1825
died: 1890
works:
memoir of george wishart, the scottish martyr(1876)



relationships:
george wishart (topic of study)


sources:
1) transactions of the royal historical society, vol. 4 (1876), pp. 260-363
notes:

http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/books/authors/CharlesRogers/index.html

george wishart

george wishart

born: 1513
died: 1546
father: james wishart [1]
mother: elizabeth learmount [1]
spouse:

briefly, wishart's show trial for heresy and subsequent ritualistic murder by the catholic church was the event that set the scottish reformation in motion.

- taught greek at a school created by john erskine of dun. specifically, new testament greek. this was a revolutionary act at the time. as surreal as it sounds, the bible could only be read in latin. this is not the language it was written in; anybody wanting to get at the oldest manuscripts would need to read the greek or aramaic. yet, the church was hardly interested in this. rather, it enforced the law specifically to prevent the laity from reading the bible on it's own and coming to it's own conclusions; only the clergy was permitted to read and understand the book. as literacy spread with the renaissance, the blatantly absurd nature of this reality became apparent: the western world was run by a nearly omnipotent church that based it's power in a book that nobody was allowed to read. this was one of the major causes of the reformation. so, it seems silly now, but distributing biblical material in greek was, at the time, a deeply revolutionary act.

- once the authorities found out what he was doing, he had to flee to england where he studied "reformed doctrines" at cambridge.

- friend of hugh latimer, bishop of worcester. upon latimer's suggestion, wishart went to bristol to preach. he was quickly arrested, charged with blasphemy and sent to thomas cromwell, chief minister to henry VIII, who had his own reasons to engineer an overthrow of papal supremacy. however, a law was then quickly passed through parliament that restored catholic ascendancy and wishart was forced to recant.

- when the church successfully forced somebody to recant, they had to wear an embroidery on their sleeve that illustrated a heretic being burned at the stake. this was meant to remind everybody of what happens when you challenge the authority of the church. as punishment, wishart was forced to wear the badge as he continued to preach.

- the nature of his initial heresy is unclear, which strikes me as suspicious. was there a heresy at all, or was the church merely attacking the language issue? some people have suggested that wishart carried on the views of latimer: denial of purgatory, rejection of the saints, rejection of the virgin birth and some other typical reformist views. others have suggested socinianism. all that is clear is that he recanted and continued preaching with the burning heretic sewn into his sleeve.

- he left for germany and switzerland soon after, no doubt realizing his own luck in escaping death. he seems to have studied calvinism while there. eventually, he went back to england, and then returned to scotland under the apparent protection of his maternal uncle, john learmount, who was in the inner circle of the scottish monarchy.

- he seems to have started preaching again at the age of 32 or 33, which is clearly consistent with all of the other evidence that strongly suggests 'jesus freak'. he also stopped running from persecution, plausibly under the hope that he would die horribly. see, this is the creepy side to jesus freaks: an obsession with being the object of sacrifice. i know from experience...

- as it was, a law was passed in 1543 that allowed for people to read the bible in greek. so, wishart was safe from direct persecution on that level. however, the evil cardinal was still out to get him for challenging his authority. wishart was sent a cease and desist order; he reacted with a speech full of fancy, delusional language that was saturated by an egotistical grandeur that saw his persecution as having some kind of divine purpose. see, this is why you can't persecute these nutcases. it's like arguing with a conspiracy theorist. the more tyrannical you are, the more virtuous their suffering is. strategically working towards the final abolition of religion requires a different set of tactics that digs deeper into it's root causes.

- wishart seems to have collapsed into irrational behaviour at this point, fully expecting his own ritual murder. or, perhaps, the stories enter the realm of exaggerated legend rather than historical fact. he began preaching in public spaces, getting involved in private quarrels, preaching to the sick - that sort of thing. he also started spending an unhealthy amount of time by himself in the garden in the middle of the night, which began to concern people. of the more obvious jesus freak fabrications, which appear to be attributable to knox, there's a story about him catching a priest that was sent to kill him and then pleading with the angry crowd not to harm the fucker. there's also a story where he predicts his own death.

- wishart eventually ended up in edinburgh, where he was allowed to preach under the personal protection of some powerful local landowners (alexander chrichton of brunstone, hugh douglas of longniddry, john cockburn of ormiston). some of these landowners appear to have been involved in a plot against the existing cardinal that also included the maternal uncle and brother of george wishart. that is to say that there were political reasons for this protection. here, he became a sort of mentor to knox. however, his ministry was not well attended. the plan to "make it big" in the city was a failure, and wishart began to lose funding from his investors. so, wishart became morose and suicidal, stating he was 'weary of the world' and other such things. it's not stated whether or not he turned to drugs, but he'd be a shitty failed corporate rock star if he didn't. while wishart went home to be burned alive, knox stayed in edinburgh to spearhead the scottish reformation.

- wishart was arrested while under the care of john cockburn in a less treacherous spin on the judas myth. knox seems to have recreated the story of the last supper in his retelling of events, with minor modifications. then, like jesus, wishart went quietly with his capturers, stating that what happens is god's will. he was then tortured by the earl of bothwell, who plays the part of judas. a trial then follows, in which wishart is convicted of heresy. there's much jesus freak wordiness in his last words, which knox somehow obtained a perfect recollection of.

- one of the accusations against wishart is that he denied the sacrament of confession, claiming instead that confessing to the priest "has no warrant" and that confession ought to be done with god directly. this is particularly interesting to me, as confession is one of the most blatant examples of religion being used as a means of statist control.

- overall, knox' narrative of wishart seems to be directly adapted from the life of jesus - to the point that it is questionable if it has any historical value whatsoever. the catholic church is even substituted into the role of the pharisees, cartoonish villainy and all. but, what strikes me most about the story is how wishart is a scottish substitution of jesus, and how that may have played into a nationalist discourse. i'm going to leave this page here because he has no descendants and it is of little consequence how historical the account of his life actually is. historically, he's an important person. yet, if i were to make a rationalist guess based on the nature of the stories surrounding george wishart, it would be that he did not exist at all as we know him - that he was almost entirely a fabrication of knox and perhaps even purposefully designed as his socrates.

[1]: memoir of george wishart

http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/gen/lines/wishart/georgemartyr.html