there really is a lot of confidence in the market, and i've been pointing it out for months - people want to believe that the economy can ride without training wheels, that a free market economy is more than a naive abstraction, that government intervention is at the root of all problems, etc. and, of course, they want to believe that they can put money into a market and profit from it, regardless of what the fed is doing.
and, yes - democracy is a powerful force. if people could vote their portfolios up, you can be sure they would.
so, how do you explain to people that have shown up, cash in hand, that this is simply a bad time to invest? they want to invest, dammit!
they should invest in a local charity, instead - if they're insistent on throwing their money away.
these swings are happening because the bubble is so deep that there's no concept of reality in sight. you can throw an anchor out from this market, and you won't hit anything. there's no reference point. it's lost in space.
and, i'm as interested as anybody else in the question of how long the power of delusional thinking can offset the empirical and quantitative reality of a shrinking money supply.
Friday, December 28, 2018
it might not be harmful, but i don't think that earth metals deserve the presumption of innocence. sorry.
it's better to err on the side of caution. and, what we know at this stage is that the assumption that your liver would be able to deal with it is wrong - you can't eject this, it builds up...
that said, the issue needs to be about harm reduction, not ban hammering. if you think or know you have a serious tumour, you need to weigh the risks - the tumour will almost certainly kill you, whereas the gadolinium is just an unknown. you're weighing a known known v a known unknown. i had the presence of mind to realize what was happening and stop and question it; what i found disturbing was the lack of interest in providing enough information to me to allow me to make a choice.
for me, i had little reason to think i had cancer, and consequently avoided a cat scan. what i was looking for was signs of broken or demented bones, not signs of tumour growth. the injection struck me as insane and irresponsible.
i haven't called a dentist yet, but that was the end conclusion, after seeing a neurologist in mid 2017.
i'm not saying you should reject this, necessarily. i'm saying you should think carefully about what you're doing before you do it.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28361260
it's better to err on the side of caution. and, what we know at this stage is that the assumption that your liver would be able to deal with it is wrong - you can't eject this, it builds up...
that said, the issue needs to be about harm reduction, not ban hammering. if you think or know you have a serious tumour, you need to weigh the risks - the tumour will almost certainly kill you, whereas the gadolinium is just an unknown. you're weighing a known known v a known unknown. i had the presence of mind to realize what was happening and stop and question it; what i found disturbing was the lack of interest in providing enough information to me to allow me to make a choice.
for me, i had little reason to think i had cancer, and consequently avoided a cat scan. what i was looking for was signs of broken or demented bones, not signs of tumour growth. the injection struck me as insane and irresponsible.
i haven't called a dentist yet, but that was the end conclusion, after seeing a neurologist in mid 2017.
i'm not saying you should reject this, necessarily. i'm saying you should think carefully about what you're doing before you do it.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28361260
at
08:28
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)