i'm going to spend a little time listening to inri019 this afternoon, and hopefully get the cover art mostly done. it's probably going to be the extent of labour completed for the day.

i've got running around to do for tomorrow. but, inri20 and the remaining three tracks for inri021 are what is up, next.

http://musicofjessicamurray.blogspot.ca/2016/11/it-turns-out-that-i-had-click-in-track.html

i'd actually like to see them omnibus everything harper ever did into a giant "undo" button and then set it on fire in a public ceremony.

www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wherry-liberals-voting-rules-1.3863896

due to our universal health care system, obtaining voter id in canada is not the same kind of problem that is for some low income people in the united states. but, anything that makes it easier to vote is a step forwards and should be applauded.

www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wherry-liberals-voting-rules-1.3863896

meh.

if you walk into an intersection chasing a pokemon, you shouldn't get a fine - unless it's a standard negligence tort. you should get a darwin award.

"distracted walking" is kind of like "drunk in public". it happens. it's part of living in a free society.

but, dui is inexcusable. so, likewise, go after the people texting and driving.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/majority-of-canadians-support-legislation-to-ban-distracted-walking-poll-suggests-1.3822086

it was an inside job, though.

http://globalnews.ca/news/3083800/hillary-clinton-urged-to-demand-vote-recounts-over-claims-polls-were-rigged/?utm_source=Article&utm_medium=Outbrain&utm_campaign=2015

if you were paying close enough attention, you saw this coming from a good ways away. the fbi leak. wikileaks. kellyanne conway was on tv 24/7. it was rigged, alright - but not by russia. this was an inside job. cia, and the whole network subterranean to it. and, clinton is being ordered to stand down.

your brother is trying to pressure me into signing a document with false information on it

i don't know what he's up to.

but, it obviously doesn't matter if i sign it if it has false information on it. false information is false information. signing it doesn't make it true. and, a court isn't going to uphold it if it's false.

as we both know, and as can be easily demonstrated, i signed an all-inclusive lease in the summer of 2013. i did not sign a utility-dependent lease in 2010.

(pause)

seems like a misunderstanding. nevermind.

although i should also point out that he threatened to initial for me if i didn't sign it.

it was explained to me incorrectly the first time and i didn't sign it because it said six years instead of three. when i read the full thing, i was not opposed to it; she told me it said i paid my utilities, but when i read it it said that the utilities were included. so, i initialled it.

but, he should be aware that signing for a tenant is not only legally invalid but can get him in a lot of trouble.

i would highly suggest you call him.

j