Saturday, December 16, 2023

what are these service members going to do when they get raped by enemy soldiers? call their commanding officers?

the idea of having a professional military is that they need to be able to fight. military personnel need to be rough, dirty people with low levels of individual morals.

we take the lack of actual ground wars we've been involved in for granted and it's really an increasing problem. what needs to be addressed here is the softening of the military, as it does not serve our interests, as canadians.

we have a military so that it will protect us; soldiers that cannot protect themselves should not be soldiers any longer. 

as for the alcohol, drinking is a part of war in order to desensitize ourselves to it. we want our military members to be rough vikings that reject authority and like their mead and their women, not weak religious people that do what they're told and follow the rules.

progressives are idiots. this is exactly the foolish thinking that led to rome's collapse; we have to be able to defend ourselves, and we need a group of barbarians at our disposal to fight for us when required.

if you show up to the barracks and get raped because you can't defend yourself, the reality is that you should look for a different job. you're actually a liability to the country, as a military officer. sorry.

they actually thought that they were going to gain political points by taking on "big silicon".

it's rooted in this cynical, hyper-capitalist analysis of why people don't like corporate actors; it's not because some corporations, like exxon or monsanto, are legitimately sociopathic psychotics but just because they're wealthy. everybody hates rich people because they're rich. right?

well, no. neither facebook nor google are responsible for raping children in africa, destroying rainforests, patenting dna, dumping chemicals in lakes, etc. elon musk and steve jobs are more the psychopathic type that you might get some public sympathy around going after, but jobs is dead and musk has his hands full with the american regulators. the one that the state has spent the most time attacking is bill gates, who has spent more of his time as a philanthropist, at this point. i would actually endorse bill gates if he ran for president. google is maybe a little bit scary; facebook isn't scary at all. it's really the state that spies on you, not google. it's just not comparable.

people like facebook, and people like google. that was obvious, wasn't it?