Thursday, June 17, 2021

today;s post is inri073.

=======

it was in may of 2015 that i first contemplated the idea of a chamber works. i was creating compilations to end my second period, when i realized that a couple of the tracks that did not fit well into the orchestral works might work better as chamber pieces. so, the chamber works was intended as a kind of companion disc to the orchestral works, both to offer a different flavour and to collect the remaining tracks into a compilation of serious music, so they are not left out. 

so, i went back and did a systematic evaluation of the period 2 material to see which tracks could or could not be converted into chamber pieces. the last three mixes were created at this time, while the first was removed of clicks. 

then, i stopped. i decided that an electronic chamber works was an idea of questionable worth, and i should put the idea aside for a bit and take a look at the idea again upon reconstruction of the period 1 tapes. 

what the issue really comes down to is how good the electronic strings sound. does this actually sound like chamber music, or does it sound like a computer creating chamber music? and, if it sounds like a computer, is the issue resolvable somehow? 

when i came back to completing period 2 in the fall of 2017, i decided in favour of the release, as the sound fonts are convincing enough, even if one needs to ignore a few relics here and there. tracks two and three were subsequently added to the compilation. 

i decided at the end that this format has some future to it, whether it is fully realistic or not. string music will probably never go away. but, composers are going to find themselves less and less interested in actual physical reproduction, as time moves forward. the question of realism in the tracks is consequently somewhat misplaced, as the chamber music of the future is likely to be performed by computers, and sound like it just a little bit. 

initially written and recorded between 2001-2003 and remixed and recorded further over 2014-2015. an idea for this compilation was developed over the last week of may, 2015, but it was not finished or released at that time. corrected and expanded from october, 2017 to january, 2018. finally released & finalized as lp022 on jan 14, 2018. as always, please use headphones. 

this release also includes a printable jewel case insert and will also eventually include a comprehensive package of journal entries from all phases of production (2014, 2015, 2017, 2018). 

released may 2, 2003 

j - controller input, programming, effects processing, mixing, digital wave editing, composition. 

the various rendered electronic orchestras include piano, orchestral drum kit, violin, guitar, viola, cello, contrabass, various string sections and choir.

so, i got pth, cortisol, alp (again), p-anca & cea done today and i'm in for the night.

last night was a cleaning night, and i'm at least done in the studio space. so, tonight needs to be about catching up a little on what i was doing.

i'll have a more detailed write-up when i'm in for a longer period.
the left really isn't supposed to be about everybody being the same, even if it's supposed to be about treating everybody equally under the law. in mathematics, we have a separation between identity and equality - and this is useful in computer science, as well. we can decide that the values of two variables are the same, or that the two variables are the same thing, and these are entirely different concepts.

the idea that everybody is the same is actually fascism, not socialism. the idea that everybody deserves equal treatment in order to uphold their individuality is what socialism and liberalism are supposed to be getting at.

so, marx' statement was from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs -  and that presupposes that differences of ability do in fact exist, as well as differences in need. the way to grapple with that in education is to teach to people's strengths and encourage them to maximize their potential, not to argue that we're all just equal worker drones; the latter idea isn't marx, it's mussolini (perhaps via lenin).

and, this is consistent. people label these utterly fascistic ideas that originated on the far-right as "socialism", and then decide that their fascism is left-wing. 

the era of orwell, people.

i keep stressing this. and, nobody's going to listen - they're just going to take me away.
canada is fast-tracking itself to mediocrity and stagnation.

if we're not already there...
the reason i was moved into the honours stream from the advanced stream is that a perceptive teacher realized that i was being picked on by some idiot jocks, and it was the best way to protect me from being harmed by them.

the idea that you should just put everybody in the same room together and expect them to get along and work at the same pace is entirely backwards type thinking, and precisely what's wrong with the society.

that said, i realized when i got to the honours stream that they didn't put me in the smart class but rather put me in the rich class, and the ideas underlying the implementation were shoddy, at best. and, i wasn't rich - or at least wasn't culturally rich (my stepmother had some money, and by this time i was living fairly comfortably, even if i grew up in a ghetto).

if the program was implemented accurately - and was actually about smarts rather than class - then it could have been a way out, for me. instead, i got bored, skipped a lot of classes and ended up tuning out.

so, i would call on the system to drop this stupidity about education "creating inequities" and instead refocus on what the honours stream is supposed to be about, which is allowing the brightest kids to escape the collectivism of public education. we're going to end up stagnant and backwards if we take our brightest and force them into the same stream as the dumbest...

or, maybe you just want to purge them, instead?

this sounds like it's more about tracking your phone than it is about reducing the spread of the disease.

yeah, right in time for the change of rules.

asshole...

there is no imaginable reason why any legal entity ought to be allowed to do something as absurdly antisocial as own 400 houses in this country.

the government needs to step in and stop this from happening - it's ridiculous.
is property freedom or theft?

well, its impossible - because it's both.

but, the best we're going to do in a bourgeois state is bring in reasonable limits, and there is actually no constitutional right to property in canada - we can write these laws, here.
there should be a limit on how many homes a corporation or person can buy, set to around 10 or so.