my whole time here, i've been wondering if i should be concerned about the apparent aggressive nature of the neighbourhood cats. i wonder if it may have to do with the fact that they were at one point fed here.
we think of alley cats as domestic animals, but in any random sample that's only going to be partly true. there are feral colonies of cats in most cities now that have been wild for multiple generations. they really should be treated as wild animals.
...and the number one rule for living around wild predators is not to feed them, and to make sure they're not eating around you. that's when animals start to get more aggressive around humans.
that's something to keep in mind when you feed the alley cats.
Sunday, December 11, 2016
“Everyone should know WikiLeaks was involved from the very beginning,” Reid continued. “They leaked the information as if it was run by one of the great political operatives in America when in fact it was run by the political operatives in Russia."
mr. reid has said a little too much here. i guess he's in the habit of just reading memos verbatim, or what?
mr. reid has said a little too much here. i guess he's in the habit of just reading memos verbatim, or what?
i think this whole russian trump plot is a distraction from the reality of a cia plot to put trump in.
i mean, it's one of those situations that is just fishy. nobody saw it coming. so, people like me put the dots together and realize "ok. trump is a puppet of the military-industrial-intelligence complex. exxon ceo for secretary of state? well, sure. that makes sense. look at all of those leaks. controlled, obviously. so, it's gotta be cia.".
they're not going to get away with denying it completely. it's too obvious. so, i guess we need to forget about the fbi shenanigans, and focus solely on the questionable evidence that triggered them? as though the russians were playing the fbi for fools, and they took the bait like buffoons? that was obviously a relay: you drop the bait, and then you react to it. almost hegelian.
but, that's the bait and switch: you blame the interference on the guys you wanted to demonize, anyways. you can't deny it. so, you just shift the blame.
i think that what's more curious to me right now is why they're so worried about it at this particular moment. seems a little paranoid. not a good sign.
i mean, it's one of those situations that is just fishy. nobody saw it coming. so, people like me put the dots together and realize "ok. trump is a puppet of the military-industrial-intelligence complex. exxon ceo for secretary of state? well, sure. that makes sense. look at all of those leaks. controlled, obviously. so, it's gotta be cia.".
they're not going to get away with denying it completely. it's too obvious. so, i guess we need to forget about the fbi shenanigans, and focus solely on the questionable evidence that triggered them? as though the russians were playing the fbi for fools, and they took the bait like buffoons? that was obviously a relay: you drop the bait, and then you react to it. almost hegelian.
but, that's the bait and switch: you blame the interference on the guys you wanted to demonize, anyways. you can't deny it. so, you just shift the blame.
i think that what's more curious to me right now is why they're so worried about it at this particular moment. seems a little paranoid. not a good sign.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)