inri003 is updated and tested

four more, and i'll be able to move on to inri015.

https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/inrisampled

inri002 updated and tested

this one had some typos that i really needed soundcard access to in order to fix

the last five should all be quite quick.

https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/inricycled

ok, let's get to work on this for the night.

it did.

weird.

will this link broadcast?

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/28/us/iran-strike-soldier-injuries-pentagon.html

i'm not out there mailing this stuff to random people. i'm not spamming anyone. this isn't going to people that don't want it.

it is only going to people that made the explicit, purposeful choice to sign up for it.

and, nobody - not any faceless government bureaucrat, not any empty suit in any corporate boardroom, not any self-appointed arbiter of moral goodness, not any despotic religious leader - has any right to get in between me and that person, and overturn the decision they made.

you're not that important.

when somebody signs up to receive notifications for this blog, they don't also sign up to have those notifications filtered by some self-important, dimwitted bureaucrat at google for some arbitrary concept of moralistic self-righteousness.

they signed up to get notified about all of the fucking posts - because they don't want to miss any.

and, if they don't want to receive notifications, they should unsubscribe, and fuck off while they're at it, for good measure.

as it is, i'm sorry - i do realize that posts aren't broadcasting, but i have no control over how google makes these choices, sadly. 

if this bothers you - and it should - you should contact google about it and raise a stink. i can't do anything from my end.

that system should be dismantled, and the person that implemented it should be fired.

see, it wouldn't broadcast this post, either:
http://dsdfghghfsdflgkfgkja.blogspot.com/2020/01/weird.html

to be clear, it posts.

the unwelcome moderation is happening at the broadcast list stage, not the posting stage.

so, if you're getting email updates, google has decided that they are important enough to determine what you're allowed to read and not - not you. they have taken that decision away from you, and they have no right to do it.

weird.

the link to the actual article at the bbc still won't post, as though it's going through a spam filter on a moderation site.

i do not want this site moderated. obviously. i am the moderator. and, fuck you for thinking you're important enough to interfere - you're not.

www dot bbc dot com slash news slash world-us-canada-51301825

test.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51301825

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51301825

any other president in the history of the country would have launched a major airstrike.

any other president in the history of the country would have launched a major

any other president in the history of the country would have launched a 

any other president in the history of the country would have launched

any other president in the history of the country would have

any other president in the history 

any other president

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51301825

it's on par with hillary's disaster in libya, and an embarrassment to nato dominance in the region.

any other president in the history of the country would have launched a major airstrike.

trump's decision not to retaliate will go down in history as a historic abrogation of his responsibilities as commander-in-chief, and apparently because he was too much of a weakling to react.

i didn't agree to having my emails filtered.

please disable that feature.

i'm just trying to figure out if i'm being actively screened by a person or if there's a program running....

http://dsdfghghfsdflgkfgkja.blogspot.com/2020/01/an-independent-palestine-would-not.html

http://dsdfghghfsdflgkfgkja.blogspot.com/2020/01/let-me-try-this-again.html

that last post won't broadcast over email.

will this broadcast?

http://dsdfghghfsdflgkfgkja.blogspot.com/2020/01/let-me-try-this-again.html

let me try this again. is it something i said?

=======

trump's decision not to retaliate will go down in history as a historic abrogation of his responsibilities as commander-in-chief, and apparently because he was too much of a weakling to react.

any other president in the history of the country would have launched a major airstrike.

it's on par with hillary's disaster in libya, and an embarrassment to nato dominance in the region.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51301825

an independent palestine would not accept israel any more than israel accepts palestine.

setting up two states in the region is just an algorithm for perpetual conflict; this ends when the divisions come down, not when the fences are built at some sufficiently high level.

so, i'm not opposed to the annexation at all, i actually think it's a step in the right direction. but, there has to be an accompanying rights framework...

so, i suppose i would support regime change in israel, as well, in addition to supporting it in iran and saudi arabia.

secular democracy for all.

there should neither be two states defined by religious segregation and ethnic nationalism, nor should there be a binational state where the people are kept separated by antiquated notions about their belief systems.

there should be a single, secular, democratic state where people are treated equally under the law regardless of their background or beliefs.

as far as i can tell, the so-called deal in palestine is just an adoption of the status quo as official policy; this is exactly what they've been doing for years, anyways.

i'm not an advocate of a two-party state; i don't think that you create peace in the region via ethnic or religious segregation. i'm an advocate of a one-party state with equal rights for everybody. israel should be democratic, at the expense of being intrinsically jewish. 

i will reject ethnic nationalism, every time.

so, i'm not going to get particularly angry about this. trump hasn't actually done anything at all here, and the issue has been fundamentally about civil rights for palestinians for a long time now, anyways.

if they are going to annex the jordan valley, that should be interpreted as a first step towards the constitutional adoption of a proper rights framework for the palestinian people. that's what i care about here - civil rights - not which group claims which area as a consequence of which contrived dark age text.

trump's decision not to retaliate will go down in history as a historic abrogation of his responsibilities as commander-in-chief, and apparently because he was too much of a weakling to react.

any other president in the history of the country would have launched a major airstrike.

it's on par with hillary's disaster in libya, and an embarrassment to nato dominance in the region.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51301825

inri001 updated and tested

2 down, 6 to go.

i need to take a nap.

https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/inri-cassette-demo-2

inri000 updated and tested

that's step one.

there's only eight of them.

https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/inri-cassette-demo-1

ok.

so, that minor change appears to have done exactly what i wanted it to do - it now loads flawlessly in both browsers.

now i have to fix it... 

to be clear, what i have to do is remove the codecs=CODEC section everywhere it exists.

the desktop uses about twice as much electricity as either the laptop or the chromebook (the 90s laptop is in between, when it's on), so i was expecting a spike, but it's been offset by the lesser fan use, and the fact that i avoided laundry this month. if i hadn't had the desktop on all month, i would have come in under the $45 limit and paid down the balance. as it is, it's going to be about $2.00 over.

i have no intention of paying this bill. i'm going to pay it off via electrical saving. i just need to get the laptop fixed, first, so i'm not running the desktop all of the time...and in fact running two computers all of the time....

i don't see any specific usage that i can attribute to the 90s laptop, but we're going to keep it off for a while, anyways. at least until i can figure out what's going on with the windows 7 box.

the desktop will only be on like this for a few more days. i was hoping to get all of this done. life's always more complicated than i want it to be. but, i should start the troubleshooting process on friday or saturday...

the soundcard installed cleanly, so that's at least easy. and, i guess i'll need to install a recent version of chrome in the virtual machine to do the testing i need to do.

but, i'm concluding that i probably need to remove the line "codecs=flac". and, if i'm going to do that, i should remove the other codec specifications, too. just let me be sure that it actually works...

there are flac codecs in the system, but the version of the chrome browser that is installed on the 90s laptop is too old to be able to launch flac over html5, and it's picked for a reason - if i start using newer versions of the browser, the system won't run.

i'm a little concerned about that machine, though. i've been noticing for a while that every time i take it out of hibernation, it shuts off. this is actually primarily frustrating because it means i lose my place in the youtube video i'm watching and have to start over again. i don't have any interest in what's happening on that machine in general, but it was really overheating, and i'm concerned about the electrical, and it kind of defeats the point if i have to start the video over again every time i turn it on. so, it's now going to sit unplugged from the internet. there's no wireless in the device. and, let me check my electrical...

yeah, this is weird.

this is an example of my control:

<audio autoplay controls style="width:500px;height:50px" id="Player">
<source id=flac src="../inri - inrisampled - 02 war.flac" type='audio/flac; codecs="flac"'>
<source id=mp3 src="../inri - inrisampled - 02 war.mp3" type='audio/mpeg; codecs="mp3"'>
<source id=aac src="../inri - inrisampled - 02 war.m4a" type='audio/mp4'>
<source id=wav src="../inri - inrisampled - 02 war.wav" type='audio/wav'>
<source id=ogg src="../inri - inrisampled - 02 war.ogg" type='audio/ogg; codecs="vorbis"'>
</audio>

the controls work for all five types on firefox in windows, and for the last four types on chrome in the chrome os. i don't see any logical reason why flac breaks when mp3 doesn't, other than that chrome doesn't like being told to use that codec. so, i think that's more of a chrome-specific thing.

i want it to work, though....

i'm not even going to test on...they call ie "edge" now, right? whatever.

the fourth major browser is safari, and i don't have an apple device, so i don't do any testing with anything to do with apple - no apple lossless, no safari, none of it, because i just don't have access to it. sorry...

so, i can test with firefox and with chrome, on windows and on the chrome os, giving me four possible testing scenarios.

i'm going to then argue it's irrational to run firefox on the chrome os and rule out that possibility. so, the last thing i can try is the chrome browser in windows, and i do use chrome on the 90s laptop, because it's too old to launch a version of firefox that is new enough to run html5, which you now need for youtube. they forced me into it, basically. 

i just did a search to make sure i'm not missing anything, and firefox' share has sure declined recently, although it's actually safari's share that seems to have gone strangely up. chrome has been at 65% for a while, now - i'm not surprised by that. but, how did safari get to 25%? i thought iphones were losing badly to android? double-checked - yup. are apple pcs up, then? no, they're down. ??. so, how can safari have a 25% market share if the iphone is at 15% and apple pcs are at 10%?

the last version of safari for windows was in 2013, and you would bizarrely need to run it via wine to use it on linux, according to a cursory google search.

but, you can install safari on android devices. so, i guess that a lot of people have switched from iphone to android, but don't want to let go of safari just yet? even so, the numbers are still weird.

it may be closer to the truth that firefox' decline is tied more to the general decline of the desktop/laptop and it's increasing replacement with phones. it may be less that people are moving away from firefox, and more that people are moving away from computers altogether.

i'm going to continue to resist this, and when i do finally move past firefox, it's going to be to some kind of fork. i could end up migrating to linux, and using a linux fork of firefox. i don't know what's still kicking, it's been a long time.

i've just had issues with chrome being particularly invasive, in terms of spyware. i had it installed for a while, years ago, but i kept finding it dialing home, and every time i turned it off, it would install itself back into the startup menu. it was acting like a virus, basically, and i don't have a lot of patience for aggressive corporate spyware like that. so, i ripped it right out of my machine, and i've avoided it ever since. i don't intend to go back to it....

but, i should check to see how this thing behaves on the 90s laptop, first. if...does it even have flac codecs at all?

if it was funny over aac or ogg, i wouldn't mind so much, but i expect people to download in flac, so i want this to work on the chromebook. in the world of windows and linux, flac is the default lossless audio codec.