"this is no time for philhellenism, jessica."

bollocks.

it's always time for philhellenism.

i think that regime change - real regime change. not a window dressing election. - in iran is feasible, but the 2003 invasion of iraq is not a model for it. specifically, the americans should not be involved and neither should the jews or arabs.

afghanistan is a better model, but they have to do it with their full asses. i think a joint action, that is approved by the united nations, and led by the turks or indians would be most helpful in permanently removing the iranian terrorist regime from tehran for good and that this is an idea that should be contemplated seriously by serious people in serious positions of power.

one way or another, the iranian regime of the ayatollah cannot be left in power to continue to launch terrorist attacks against it's neighbours. the time has come to remove them from power. the other option is going to be watching israel beat the fuck out of a hapless iran, and that's actually not very helpful for the region, or for israel, in general.

oh alexander, where art thou?

i'm not a jagmeet singh supporter (at all.) but i don't understand the intention of the conservative party attack ads i'm seeing on youtube.

am i supposed to think he doesn't deserve a pension? is that supposed to upset me? why?

i think everybody deserves a pension. doesn't everybody else?

i don't get it.