i've been listening to these religious retards upstairs and i'm just going to be terse. i have no patience for this idiocy, and i have no obligation to tolerate them. they ought to be rounded up by the police, declared mentally ill and thrown into a rubber room for the rest of their lives. these are utterly insane dipshits.

i'm not going to bother trying to sort through this nonsense.

the phrase "islamic law" is a contradiction in terms and i won't even let you get that far before i interrupt you and shut you down. there is no such thing as islamic law. law, by definition, requires a democratic process to generate. if you have an absence of democracy, you have an absence of law. for that reason, islam's rejection of the democratic process places it entirely outside of any legitimate concept of law and the term cannot be accurately applied to it. islam is entirely inconsistent with the entire concept of law, and i won't engage with a discussion with you on those terms - islamic rules are never laws, and i will get up and walk out of the room if you decide to refer to them as laws.

rather, when a group of people get together and decide to enforce a set of rules on people not just despite of but in spite of their democratic rejection of those rules, that is not called law, that is called the absence of law. that is the definition of tyranny; it is the definition of totalitarianism. as such, we should speak only of islamic tyranny and islamic fascism, and never of islamic law. 

there is no islamic law. there is only islamic fascism.

i'm never going to listen to a word any group of people that wants to enforce rules outside of a democratic process wants to say. they can pretend they're the fuhrer in their basement all they want, i'm just going to laugh at them and ignore them, and if they get too pushy, they'll need to get the shit kicked out of them (perhaps by a mob of fed up atheists) to teach them a lesson about the supremacy of democracy over totalitarianism.

through a poorly vetted immigration policy, we've allowed some very dangerous people to set up in this country and there's going to necessarily be some level of violent response required to prevent them from enforcing their rules on people outside of the democratic process. the best outcome will be for that violence to be enforced by the police on the religious groups, in a process of upholding the rights of the people they start attacking, who will predictably be queer people and women. but some violence is inevitable one way or another, and is coming sooner than later.

canada is on a direct path to civil war.