don't get upset. just have a cigar. you're gonna go far.

and just remember that you need to be trusted by the people that you lie to, so that when they turn their backs on you, you have the chance to put the knife in. 

that bro trust is key to "success" in backwards, idiocratic late capitalism.

if you want your daughter to be "successful" in capitalism and have a "career" (i would suggest to my kids that there's more important things in life than "succeeding" in capitalism, and they should follow their hearts, not their accountants), you'd be doing her more favours by buying her a tit job than buying her a degree.

and if you want your son to succeed, let him get Cs. nobody is going to care. just make sure he's good at sports and can hang out with the bros.

and then we can all continue to decline further into dystopia, together.

the truth is that this is a lot of stupid brotard mra bullshit. the idea that boys are violent and dumb and need more monkeybars while girls are bookish and smart and need more libraries is sexist and dumb. the idea that boys need more exercise while girls need more reading material is hardly going to do anything but create a systemic barrier for success. that is bullshit. girls need just as much exercise (some will argue they need more) and boys need just as many books, and arguing otherwise is just going to get you into a macho idiocracy that looks like a retarded joe rogan (or howard stern) podcast.

there's a few things i want to point out that are more worth noting.

1) the reality is that academic success has almost no utility in a capitalist economy. capitalism simply does not reward education levels. the business people don't give a fuck. to succeed in a capitalist economy, you need good people skills, not a good education. that is why your bosses in life will always be C student brotards, whether you're a high intellect boy or girl, unless you're also good at being a slut. men get further in life with their social skills than their book learning, and women get further in life by being sluts than by being scholars. that's how capitalism works. your female boss probably did suck somebody's cock to get her job, and it's a coin toss as to whether she did well in school or not. that won't matter, unless she has nice tits.

2) if there's a gender problem in the schools, it's not a reflection of the curriculum, but a reflection of the teaching staff. almost all primary school teachers are women. have you ever talked to any of them? anybody that's spent much time talking to female school teachers will instantly realize that they themselves are the reason the girls get better marks - it's favouritism, and the young boys know that. if you ask the kids, they won't tell you they need more hands on learning, they'll you their teacher is a rad fem sexist bitch that isn't giving them a fair chance.

a better solution is more standardized testing. your marks in school should not be a reflection of your teacher's opinion. your teacher's opinion shouldn't fucking matter - your teacher should be forced to give you an A if you ace the test, whether she hates you or not. testing should be objective and empirical, not subjective and emotional. we have made the testing too subjective and in the process rewarded too much power to a gender bias that reveals itself clearly in the subjective grading criteria. that needs to be reversed.

you will notice the marks balance out if you take away the subjective bias underlying the issue, and the fact that the teachers are the problem, not the kids, will reveal itself through proper empirical analysis.