see, again: i've never heard of this show and i don't know who any of the actors are.

but, reading this very brief write-up, i'm able to come up with a clear motive from the supporting actress, who seems to want to take over the show.

and, he appears to have quit.

what do you do if you're amazon and you run your careful investigation and you figure out that that's true? it says in the article that this guy has won two emmys. he's old. but, you'd think you'd want to write a character like that out, not get them turfed like this. and, it's going to hurt the show.

even if it's completely true, it's going to hurt the show.

it could be that every single one of these accusations this month is legit. but, out of all of the accusations i've seen, the only one that seems void of an ulterior motive (excluding the ones that don't really even strike me as problematic) is the weinstein case. case after case has a really plausible take down scenario.

it's insane to take this line that you can or should make accusations without proof, in context, when every single one of these cases require a serious cross-examination to rule out obvious ulterior designs.

this is all just insanity.

at least the show, here, is doing an investigation. nobody else seems to be.

https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2017/11/19/jeffrey-tambor-wont-return-to-transparent-amid-sexual-harassment-allegations.html

jagmeet singh must cut his beard.