the narrative, of course, was backwards. people saw obama as the underdog, taking out the establishment candidate. the opposite was true.
i'm getting deja vu.
you're talking about sanders' fundraising as a good thing. rather, it should be a red flag. had voters listened to the people that were pointing out that obama was working for goldman sachs, we might have avoided electing him.
i think it's very important that people know where he's getting that money from. as mentioned: i was expecting them to come in and fund somebody to knock hillary out. i'm a little shellshocked that this person appears to be bernie sanders. but, i guess we all have a price.
i don't want to go through this again. the liberal media has a responsibility to vet his funding sources, and get the information out there.
i'm not saying hillary is a great choice. i'm saying i don't want to go through another wall street commercial for hope and change and end up with the heritage foundation dictating policy again.
imagine forcing everybody to go to college, or pay a fine.