so, green infrastructure means building subways and light rail through manufacturing areas? it's maybe not what i was hoping for.
it's easy to make the argument that increasing infrastructure in high employment regions is a good investment. but, the term "supercluster" would have described the auto industry around detroit and southern ontario 50 years ago, and no amount of infrastructure in the world could have kept it there.
i'm usually in favour of infrastructure. i'm not going to argue against building. but, if this is their attempt to fight offshoring, it's pathetic.
in the long run, i would expect a train or two to nowhere.