i seriously may have received a false order.

i'm just comparing to the previous one. i mean, i don't know...

1) there is no stamp on the order.
2) the previous ruling took two weeks. this one took two business days. i'm happy to get a quick ruling, too, mind you, but, still.
3) these people are horribly dishonest. i'm absolutely certain they opened the letter for the previous decision. i was actually expecting something funny, here.
4) it's not on the web page.
5) "this order contains all of the reasons in this matter and no further reasons will issue.". there is then no "reasons" section. ?.
6) the signature is curious to say the least.

i dunno. very fishy. i must call.

this is what the website should look like:

this is what it does look like:

would they do this? yeah. and, they're in huge trouble, if they did.

jagmeet singh must cut his beard.