in the united states, you have independent bodies that create a systems of checks and balances on each other.
we don't have that in canada.
rather, we have a cabinet that works to reach consensus, and then acts in solidarity with itself.
Annex D  Cabinet Decision Making
The Cabinet is the political
 forum where Ministers reach a consensus and decide on issues. It is the
 setting in which they bring political and strategic considerations to 
bear on proposed ministerial and governmental actions. These 
considerations must necessarily reflect the views and concerns expressed
 by Canadians, caucus colleagues and other parliamentarians. Once a 
consensus is reached, Ministers can fulfill their collective 
responsibility to Parliament. This Annex addresses the main elements of 
the organization and conduct of decision making in the Cabinet.
D.1.  Basic Rules for Cabinet Business
A
 number of basic ground rules for the conduct of Cabinet business are 
essential to maintain Cabinet solidarity and enhance its practical 
effectiveness.
Decision making is led by the Prime 
Minister. Through the Cabinet and its committees, the Prime Minister 
provides Ministers with the principal forum in which they can resolve 
different perspectives. The Prime Minister organizes Cabinet 
and Cabinet committee decision making, determines the agenda for Cabinet
 business and chooses committee chairpersons to act on his or her 
behalf. The Privy Council Office is the Cabinet’s secretariat and 
administers the Cabinet decision-making process on behalf of the Prime 
Minister.
Cabinet government works through a process of compromise
 and consensus building, which culminates in a Cabinet decision. The 
Cabinet and Cabinet committees do not vote on issues before them. 
Rather, the Prime Minister (or committee chairperson) “calls” for the 
consensus after Ministers have expressed their views. As the Cabinet 
secretariat, the Privy Council Office records and communicates the 
decision.
Consultation among the Ministers, departments and portfolios involved must precede the
 submission of a proposal to the Cabinet by the responsible Minister or 
Ministers. Ministers must also consult caucus at an early opportunity on
 policy and expenditure proposals. Ministerial discussions in the 
Cabinet or Cabinet committee focus on the decisions required and provide
 Ministers with an opportunity to participate in and influence those 
decisions.
Ministers have the right to seek their colleagues’ 
consideration of proposals for government action in their area of 
responsibility. This is, of course, subject to the agenda set by the 
Prime Minister for government priorities. Cabinet committee agendas are 
set by the committee chairpersons acting on the Prime Minister’s behalf.
Confidences
 of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada, more commonly referred to as 
“Cabinet confidences,” must be appropriately safeguarded from 
unauthorized disclosure or other compromise. The Cabinet’s collective 
decision-making process has traditionally been protected by the rule of 
confidentiality, which enhances Cabinet solidarity and collective 
ministerial responsibility. Confidentiality ensures that Ministers can 
frankly express their views before a final decision is made. The Prime 
Minister expects Ministers to announce policies only after Cabinet 
decisions are taken, in consultation with the Prime Minister’s Office 
and the Privy Council Office.
Cabinet business is extensive, and 
Cabinet consensus at times is difficult to achieve. Given the limited 
time available to Ministers and the importance of clear decisions to 
government operations, Cabinet business must be conducted efficiently 
and according to accepted ground rules that are fully understood and 
respected. Cabinet discussion is not used to air introductory or 
preliminary discussions of issues. Deputy ministers are expected to 
ensure that other affected departments are adequately informed in 
advance and that coordination across portfolios is pursued, so that 
other Ministers are prepared for Cabinet discussion and government 
decisions are coherent and aligned with overall objectives. When 
departments directly involved differ on a matter, the dispute should not
 be referred to the Cabinet until all other means of resolving it have 
been exhausted.
https://pm.gc.ca/eng/news/2015/11/27/open-and-accountable-government#Cabinet_Decision_Making