the case they cited was about an actual stalker, and still upheld the need for an objective analysis to demonstrate that a reasonable person would interpret a conscious intent to instill fear in the victim. they took a line out of context. it's actually pretty brutal, really.
and, i was hardly catcalling somebody - i would never do that. i'm frequently on the receiving end of this bullshit, actually. i'd never talk to somebody like that.
but, this is a more useful precedent.
i will cite both cases, though.
i'm mostly done, already. this was pretty quick, because it was pretty easy.