Monday, April 7, 2014

everything has been pointing to a decision by the egyptian ruling class to carry out a cull of it's excess youth population.

marxist historians have been pointing to high unemployment as a function of a "baby boom" as the root cause of the instability. there's probably a great deal of truth to this idea of overpopulation being at the core of this. but, this kind of thing - while cheap and easy - is not a long term solution. humans are a special type of animal in the sense that we can be taught not to overbreed.

unfortunately, this does nothing to reverse the perception of islam as the primary enemy. it's still islam that is at the core of the overbreeding, and it's not likely that you're going to get through this argument without a social revolution.

now, i know that egypt is largely thought of as a mostly secular society, but the recent conflict has demonstrated that this is somewhat of a charade and that, underneath the gloss of official government-endorsed enlightenment, lies much continued backwardsness.

regardless of what perspective is chosen, the problems in the region continually reduce to the role that islam continues to play, culturally. the answer to this problem is not military, and the other religions don't provide for more enlightened thinking. rather, it's dawkins that has the proper perspective - namely that local, secularist groups need to be strongly supported by the west in their aims to modernize society and change a number of cultural norms, such as high breeding rates.

otherwise, these problems will only exacerbate as the climate warms and these culls will be more than a lazy strategy by an ignorant and authoritarian state, but necessary to maintain civilization throughout the rest of the world.

not alarmist. reality.