Sunday, March 20, 2016

j reacts to the democratic party nomination process (final analysis) (section 2)

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/history_lesson/2000/10/was_nixon_robbed.html

illinois results

clinton: 1017006 (51%)
sanders: 982017 (49%)
difference: 34989

cook county results

clinton: 617612  (54%)
sanders: 525000 (46%)
difference: 92612

rest of illinois results

clinton: 399394  (47%)
sanders: 457017 (53%)
difference: 57623

---

michigan results


clinton:  576795 (48%)
sanders: 595222 (50%)
difference: 18427

wayne county results

clinton: 163886  (60%)
sanders: 104999 (38%)
difference: 58887

rest of michigan results

clinton: 412909  (46%)
sanders: 490223 (54%)
difference: 77314

he overpowered it in michigan with brute force turnout, the only strategy possible, but couldn't in illinois.

the importance of stressing turnout to the sanders campaign should really be apparent.