you just have to understand that "religious tolerance" means something very different to a militant atheist than it is does to a theistic multiculturalist; what it means is tolerating those fucking idiot ignorant savage religious buffoons until they can pull their heads out of their asses and enter the 21st century. if you want to call me a supremacist of some sort, it's like arguing that i'm a newtonian supremacist for arguing for the abolition of aristotle - it's true and everything, but you're missing the basic point that atheism is, in actuality, an advancement and step forward beyond religion. you can believe in progress without being a racist. you might even then call yourself a progressive.

i would do no such thing. i'm an anarchist. religion is oppression, so muslims are the oppressors. and, if you disagree then you're the oppressor, too. and, if you think that's absurd then tell me when the last time you saw a female imam was, or when you saw a gay marriage in a mosque. these aren't even in the stage of debate. we need to start to have these discussions before i can see your religion as something that should be accepted and respected, rather than merely fucking tolerated...so long as you do it by yourself and don't force it on anyone. and, yes - christians are the oppressors, too.

and, you can yell and scream and get mad and break stuff and stomp your feet around in circles if you want, but it doesn't make you less wrong.

that said, don't misunderstand me - i'm not going to get in your way. i support the bill of rights. i believe in the rule of law. i hope the constitution upholds itself - in a court of law, mind you, rather than through the intimidation of ochlocracy. just, don't expect me to stand up for a bunch of homophobic, misogynistic bigots - and don't expect me to react to the hypocrisy of your anger at me for calling a spade a spade.