why did the 5% swing?

they weren't racists; they voted for obama, but not clinton.

so, were they all sexists? i'm sure a few were, but not that many.

was the vote suppressed? those numbers seem too big for that...

in wisconsin, and michigan, the 2016 election was about nafta, not identity. that was the swing...

and, i don't think it's particularly outlandish to ask the democratic party to address the labour issues that are losing it votes. otherwise, what is the party even for, anyways?