my argument against mask laws was always that the flimsy masks they were mandating were useless - and that was well understood by the medical community, despite the disinformation in the mainstream press about it. the mask mandates were worse than a placebo, they were mass public panic. and, the way they were being pushed down was - and still is - concerning.
why did the media collectively refuse to look at actual evidence, and push nonsense instead? surely, the mask industry was not that powerful...
if you're going to mandate n95s, i can't really make that argument anymore, because the science is that they should substantively reduce transmission, if they're used properly - a substantive caveat, sure, but the point remains.
i still want to catch the virus - if i haven't already - though.
does that mean it's now technically airborne?