Friday, February 5, 2016

i don't have a tv. and, that might be a part of jeb's problem - the fact that so few people watch tv, nowadays. but, let me say this: this is the most media coverage of him that i've seen since his campaign started.

i actually had to check the other day to see if he was even still running. and, i think that might be what we're really seeing, here. this might be the first example of a campaign that died due to focusing almost solely on traditional media.



he might be all over cnn, nbc, fox - i'd never see it.

and, let's be clear, here: i never thought i'd say a bush is the preferable candidate. but, look at the alternatives. if this is a "republican cycle", and we're stuck with that outcome, i'd rather him than anybody else. he's an ass, but at least he's not insane.

so, you know: sorry to burst your dot-com bubble, but you need to hit the interwebs, jeb.

you see this term moderate thrown around.

rubio is not a moderate. total outlaws on abortion is not moderate. total. moderate. #!.

jeb is really the only moderate in the field. and, if he can't compete then what that says is that the party has rejected moderates.
hadn't heard this in a while.

mildly stoked.

absolutely.

what america needs is more gridlock, more obfuscation and more stasis. none of these "deals".

think about it. a deal is co-operation. co-operation is practically communism. it's unamerican to have deals.

the real america is about the hobbessian condition of decentralized anarchy, where everybody fights everybody else until nobody is left standing. did our forefathers cut deals with the indians? no - we killed them. that's america.

so, to hell with any new deals. let's tear down the rest of the old ones. and, let's be left with just one deal - a raw deal: a social contract directly with goldman sachs, with president cruz as the lesser half of a governing team that ensures it: no new deals!.


i will support the first candidate that promises to pass absolutely no legislation.
i was initially thinking that getting saetia back together might be interesting, as i bet they'd be able to build on all that potential they had if they could approach it with a bit more maturity.

and, i listened to this...
and, i thought "what is this trash?".

WHAT HAVE I DONE

and, i realized: it doesn't say saetia.
and, i couldn't care less about this than i do.


in darkness, and alone, i quietly closed the tab and carried on.
just another thing.

i've changed the profile to allow for my birth date, which is 1981, to be public. that's not an error. i am actually 35 years old. really.

i'm entirely aware that i literally look half of my age. or, let me rephrase that. i look precisely like a fashionable (and single) 35 year old woman - but i can very easily be mistaken for an unruly-looking 17 year-old boy. is that really particularly unusual?

while i acknowledge that there are some advantages to looking young, especially considering that i do not at all act my age, i also need to point out that i'm at the age where a significant generation gap exists. i'm not 17 years old. i'm 35 years old. i identify as generation x (people born from 1965-1985). that might be your parents' generation. and, i'm consequently a little bit leery about being hit on by 17 year-olds. or 25 year-olds, for that matter. of either gender.

and it does happen. which is why i'm pointing this out.

so, yeah. i'm old. we don't need to draw attention to it. but, it would be nice if we all realize it. if you see me out or about, just understand that i'm there to see the show and nothing more.

no: i don't want to hang out with a bunch of kids. i'm friendly. sure. but, no.

no: i don't want to get hit on by kids.

and, no: i'm not going to hit on children.

but, when you center your life around music as much as i have, you don't grow out of it. it's a lifelong thing. i'll be continuing to attend small shows when i'm 50, so long as i don't get bounced. not for the people, and not for the scene. just for the tunes.

this message will self-deconstruct....

it's not just an internet/distance thing. don't be embarassed if you thought i was in my 20s or younger. i get it all the time.

when i went to see jimmy chamberlain a few months ago, i ended up having a smoke outside with a kid from in the bar. i could see he was in his late teens. i ended up giving him a pumpkins lesson (he was there to see the sax player). but, his jaw just dropped when i told him my age - because it opened up a generation gap. he thought he was talking to a peer, at first. then, he felt like he was talking to an adult, and that changed his entire perspective of the situation. he visibly didn't like the idea of "smoking an adult".

then there's the kid in the unit upstairs. he seems to be in high school. and, it took him over two years for him to realize i wasn't in his age group. he seemed offended that i was keeping my distance. he kept obviously waiting for me to ask him to come hang out. but, i hardly want to hang out with the high school kid upstairs. it's just that he had no idea, right. he can't be more than 18, but he interpreted me as in his peer group; the feeling was not at all mutual - i immediately interpreted him as a kid. a few months ago, i gave him a link to my bandcamp site and i think he finally figured it out, because he's seemed more cognizant, since.

so, it's not just you. it's everybody. online. in real life. it's just how i look. and, in fact, it runs in the family - it's those finnish bottleneck genes. everybody from finland is like this.

Thursday, February 4, 2016

if you like the pictures i am posting, i will block you and repost the pictures.

fuck off.

i want zero user interaction on this site. it's a read-only cv.

i just can't figure out how to disable likes.

fucking creeps.

go jerk off somewhere else.

this is historical documentation. that's all.
i'm not actually posting pictures from five years ago. rather, i'm removing pictures from the last five years. but, there's a process to ensure the transition remains documented on the timeline, which now exists in the form of a read-only cv.

i'll be done in a day or two. i will actively continue to update the cv. i will not actively be posting here.

02/03-02-2016: stuck in the underslept insomniac loop, while recovering from the previous day's walk

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

history repeats itself as farce, right?

listen: this is better than most of the "new" techno that i've heard over the last fifteen years. which is not to reduce the entire century to this dj set, so much as it is to point out that it's a little better - and actually encourage it, as the miniscule level of progress out of the abyss of absolute trash that it represents. this appears to be very trendy and whatnot. so, i don't want to come down on it too hard, lest i encourage a dubstep revival.

but, even, so...the truth is that this is what it would sound like if somebody took the 90s and watered it down to it's most basic level. and produced it with a hard beat. this is acid again, i guess.

and, i know that every other artform stagnated in the 90s, so techno shouldn't be any different, right? it's not fair to hold it to a different set of standards based on arbitrary projections created by the feeling that history was over, and there was nothing but future ahead of us. but, there was a lot of mental baggage attached to it, dammit.

i'm not bitter. really. i'm not coming down too hard. or not trying to. i see what the alternative is. really. it's just a little frustrating when "forward-thinking" means "could have been released in 1993".



in 2016, futuristic means not 80s.

seriously.

retro means 80s.

futuristic means 90s.

it's total artistic stagnation. fukuyama may have been wrong about equality, but he seems to have been right about music.

it's been 1995 for twenty years.

and, that's an entire life time, now, for some people that are old enough to get into clubs.

maybe my alter-reality will help break it open a little. give it a kickstart on an alternate evolution.
i can appreciate long periods of sparse music if they have some purpose, but this is really just monotonous. worse than that, it's unabashedly hipster. take the intro, for example. blatant emulation of glass jar by gang gang dance - spliced with what sounds like autechre samples. and, it just spurns on and on from there with no aim or purpose.

it has the atmosphere of idm, sure. but, the construction is truly every bit as stupid as any other disco/club music i've ever heard.

and, what's with the audience? just a lot of poseurs. they're there to be seen; they don't care what they're listening to.


i mean, you got me there for a minute. nibbled.

but, no. it's just more brainless dance music for zombie drug addicts.

Wednesday, February 3, 2016

ok, so i'm going to comment on this, finally.

basically, i think the entire thing - as tends to happen on the internet - has been outrageously misunderstood. this, basically, is the reason i stopped reading my facebook feed. something gets misunderstood, and it gets shared in the wrong context. then, it gets shared a million times in the wrong context. the number of people that bother to do research or think about it is basically zero. so, the end result is not that millions of people are brought to some higher understanding, but that millions of people are badly confused. it's a great example of how the internet has amplified the fact that we're all thoughtless cretins (even while providing us with the tools to transcend it).

what i think they were trying to do was create a franchise. it was less about mcdonalds suing burger king, and more about opening up a starbucks on every corner. what they were trying to do was create a "* reacts" video for just about anything you could imagine, and have it all use the same format.

so, they have their existing reacts franchises. what they wanted to do was allow that concept to explode by allowing others to use what they actually have trademarked - their logos, their music and the other aspects of their format that make them unique. so, you'd have somebody in the north doing "inuit react", somebody in russia doing "russians react", somebody in africa doing "zulus react" & etc - all in the relevant languages, for the relevant markets, and all being fast-food type franchise spin-offs of the copyrighted burger.

there are reasons to criticize this. but, what has gone viral is just factually wrong. yet again. can somebody drop me a line when they can find something viral that isn't factually wrong?

the error was that those few seconds of the video where he talks about copyright, and which really have almost nothing to do with the actual idea expressed in the video, should have been completely edited out. not because they're horrible; because they should have known that people would be too fucking stupid to get their heads around it.

every single one of these thug barbarians is white.


it's just more proof that you can't let white people near civilization, or they'll burn it down.
so, i'm actually partly through clearing out the page. i'm going to be moving posts to an appspot site, where i can properly format them - facebook is useless, in terms of spreading information. it's still useful for concerts. and drive-by postings. but, i'm hoping all this changes.

the platform just sucks. it's the developers. it was never great, but it was workable for a while around 2012. they've removed the things that once made it usable.

for example, now you can't even tell the algorithm which posts to highlight. so, when i post things to this page, i have no control over how it's presented. that's entirely unacceptable to me. so, i'm not even sure i want to reduce the page to a cv. i'll have to see.

but, this will be my last regular post here. i've been saying this for a long time, but i'm finally actually almost cleared. the post will not be up long.

i just want to drop my perspective of the american election before i go quiet.

i've been waiting for the establishment to put down a candidate that will defeat clinton, and at this point this seems unlikely. remember: clinton is not the establishment candidate. that is why she lost in 2008 - the establishment rejected her. which is not to say she is anti-establishment, either.

stated tersely: clinton would love to be the establishment. she's spent her whole life trying to become the establishment. she happily produces establishment talking points. she takes their money, even. but, they will never let her win. they will never bring her inside.

even THEY think she's fake.

what we've seen develop is that the establishment has abandoned the democrats. well, it's been eight years. time to rotate. predictably. they're giving clinton some cash, but it's a kind of contingency plan in case things go wrong. what is more accurate is that they seem to be abandoning her. the banks are actually probably rooting for sanders - not because they want him to win, but because they see him as an easier candidate to beat. there's a lot of disinformation out there about this.

the money is firmly on the republican side. and, that is where the smart bets are.

i think it's clear that i'd be rooting for sanders. but, i'm going to go with:

rubio: 2-1
trump: 5-1
cruz: 10-1
bush: 15-1
clinton: 20-1
sanders: 100-1

that's what the money says, right now.

whoever comes out of the republican field will almost certainly win.

that's the real election.

again: i'm concluding that the fact that there has been no big money candidate sent to beat clinton means that there is no big money behind the democrats; rather, the big money is allowing sanders to openly run amok. it seems like a bankers' consensus to elect a republican.

but, like...

you gotta...

clinton is not plan B. she's, like, plan F.
if you can believe this, it seems like the clinton campaign's paid army of online social media zombies is pushing a protocols-like jewish banker theory to attack sanders as a "communist jew" pushing a zionist agenda with "jewish bankers money".

trump, it appears, does not have a monopoly on the resurrection of goebbels.

Tuesday, February 2, 2016

my experience has actually always been that the people with the most fearful attitudes towards death are religious, whereas atheists tend to take a more healthy approach of resignation and acceptance. and, i don't think that's a coincidence, either.

if what drives religion is the fear of death, or perhaps of irrelevance, then it should logically follow that the way to abolish religion is to foster rational attitudes about the inevitability and certainty of death.

it's a cultural revolution, of course. and, it certainly intersects dramatically with the traditional approach of using reason to counter superstition. but it approaches the issue from a psychological perspective. and i do think that, even if my cause and effect analysis is lacking or incomplete, that this is fundamentally a problem of psychology.
oh, you idealists...

turns out that the conservation laws are wrong: our bodies can create energy out of nothing. who knew?

maybe it's the answer to the energy crisis, too. and, hey - maybe we don't have to eat at all.


it's actually hard to even know what the study is suggesting, as the claim is terminologically incoherent. when one speaks of burning calories, that is a measure of work that is being done. the claim that sedentary people burn the same number of calories as active people is a contradiction in terms; it cannot be what the study actually says. this is a total fail at the editing stage, to the point that whomever oversaw this report should really be fired.

i flipped through the study, and it's suggesting that your body will adjust through subconscious and autonomous functions to ensure that the total number of calories burned is static. even that seems outrageous - you want to think of it as a rate game. so, a reasonable claim would be that if you start exercising then your internal metabolism slows down a little. conceding the point doesn't really get one anywhere: even if this is true (and it is really not that unlikely) then it follows that, if you want to lose weight, you simply need to do even more exercise, so you're overpowering your body's metabolic response.

i mean, your body can only reduce the amount of energy it's burning to a certain point. eventually, the exercise will always win - unless you're attached to an iv while you're on the treadmill.

otherwise, we've got bigger problems than a crisis in nutritional science. we'll need to start over again with physics, too.

----

Mick Biggins
Yeah, the body plateaus after you grow comfortable with your levels of exercise - but this article isn't comparing no exercise vs. moderate exercise, it compares some exercise with more. People who get no exercise whatsoever will still benefit from starting a workout program in conjunction with a proper diet. 300 calories is virtually nothing. If you really want to lose weight, eat an adequate amount of the right foods and run your BMR number with a calculator online. Adjust diet to fit the BMR and hold a deficit of 1,000 or more calories daily, you'll see a significant difference. After adjusting my diet to equal what my body burns in a day without exercise (BMR) then doing a 1,000 calorie deficit's worth of exercise daily, I lost around 25 pounds in just over a month: 235 down to 210. High calorie deficits might not work for everyone, but drop pop and sugar and exercise more, and you'll see the difference. Good luck!

jessica
the idea that weight loss plateaus at a certain point is equivalent to claiming that your body has the ability to spontaneously generate energy out of nothing.

do you have any proposals for a physical mechanism that would allow for this?
the first thing that crossed my mind was "i bet there's a lot of conservatives that mistakenly think they're leftists posting on the video about cultural appropriation".

ignore them. the ones that aren't racists (most of them are racists. what they're actually opposed to is miscegenation. they want racial segregation, of the old-timey conservative type: separate but equal.) are idiots.

the song? meh. i liked them better when they were pretending to be u2. and, i didn't like them much then, either.

i'd suggest looking into some old george harrison records, instead.

you know, it was irritating when this went mainstream.....15 years ago? it was a stupid fad. it would go away like all the other stupid fads.

it's past the point of annoyance, now, and even past the point of dismay. it's just befuddling. what the hell does anybody get out of this absolute trash?



who buys this garbage?

Monday, February 1, 2016

31-01/01-02-2016: compost run, grocery shopping & almost a full day

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

you know what's hilarious?

i pride myself on being ahead of the curve. it's repeatedly demonstrable.

i'm just seeing this now - early on the morning of feb 1. and, i had decided to do a react series as a parody on my channel on jan 25. i upload staggered over eight days, so the vlog for the 25th will come up tonight a little after midnight. i split the reacts section off when i uploaded yesterday, and published it prematurely to get the playlist to show up on the front page. i have three further scheduled uploads and a few more in the editing stage.

i'm not using the fancy graphics; my parodies are extremely tongue-in-cheek. even if you're smart, you're probably only picking up a fraction of it. it's by design. you're not as much of a nerd as i am. trust me. so, you can't keep up.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2UqT6SZ7CU

i'm going to be reacting to political speeches, history documentaries, chomsky lectures and whatnot. and, i'll be speaking in complete sentences.

mostly.
hey cenk.

who's the liberal media?

Sunday, January 31, 2016

30-01-2016: beginning the slow crawl out of the purgatory of quitting smoking

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

this is a good reminder as to why it is that having a black middle class is a good idea.

this is black culture.

Saturday, January 30, 2016

29-01-2016: the return of the son of archiving

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

idek
i took one of these tests too and found out that i was part middle eastern, north african, and south asian. crazy isn't it? i thought i was just half jewish half white.

WashashoreProd
That doesn't sound too far off, actually. Most Jewish people, except converts, have clear Middle Eastern ancestry to begin with, and North African people are more or less white if you're not an Islamophobe.

idek
how are north african people white, theyre black. im so confused

Wabbi wasabi
naaaah they are white xD north africa people are mixed with arab, and it's also fully arab people there

idek
i have never heard of this. i just assumed all people from africa are black. obviously they would be mixed with arab since they are so close. do you know any articles that talk about this sort of thing bc it doesnt really make any sense to me why north africans and arabs are considered white in the US

WashashoreProd
Most people from north Africa are either more or less indigenous (Berber, Egyptian) or a mix of indigenous with a bunch of other things -- Arab, European, Phoenician, whatever. I think Morocco and Algeria have a bunch of people who have some Basque or Gothic DNA in them somewhere that came from ancestors who were kicked out of Spain after the Reconquista (which probably would make them extra-white). I think the dividing line, if such a thing can be said to exist for a concept as muddy as race, is probably somewhere around Sudan/South Sudan. (Not to mention the Sahara Desert, the main reason the Romans and the Bantu peoples never came to blows.)

Of course, Egypt probably has a fair bit of east African DNA floating around from the upper Nile area because of trade connections to Nubian and Ethiopian nations in the old days, and I'd be shocked if most north African nations didn't have a decent-sized population of people of sub-Saharan roots whose ancestors came relatively recently (like, after 1000AD and the spread of Islam), but for the most part I think most people from North Africa would be considered white to someone who wasn't racist.

idek
long story short almost everyone is somewhat mixed and race is just a social construct made up by society to separate people. i wouldnt say its racist if someone who is north african said they werent white.

Wabbi wasabi
My friend is from morocco and that is in north africa, but even if we are both african, she consider her self as arabic or white, i told her once that she is african,she did not believe me and disagreed, because her mother told her that she was Arab or white since she was a little girl,most people I've met who is from the north Africans do not consider themself as african, because that is "black" and they look down on them, not everyone is like that, but most I've met

WashashoreProd
As for what makes someone "white" or whatever -- according to one probably-arbitrary count, there's something like seven "races" (really just broad genetic groups that probably represent settlement waves out of Africa; the number is not to be taken too literally).

The closest to the "original" human race would probably be either the Khoisan (southern Africa) or the Indian Ocean negritos, who look more or less black but have wildly different genetics from any of the African groups. "White" or "Caucasian" is kind of a catchall term for the group that settled from northwest India to Europe and north Africa, with some admixture of Neanderthal; most of the Afro-Asiatic and Indo-European speakers fit into this category, including basically all of Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East (except for Ethiopia; east African -- Ethiopian, Somali, etc. is a group unto itself). "Asian" (in the east Asian sense) I think may have branched off of "White" relatively late, and covers basically everyone whose ancestors came from anywhere between the east side of the Urals down to South America. 

The people we would think of as "black" would be from west and central Africa, of which the Bantu are probably the single largest group. They probably started in central Africa (they are part of the Niger-Congo language group), but spread all over the continent south of the Sahara; for example, Swahili is a Bantu language originating from East Africa, and a lot of black South Africans are actually a mix of Bantu and Khoisan. (Nelson Mandela looked like pretty much a straight-up mix of both, for example.) 

Finally, you have the pygmy groups and the Australian aborigines. The pygmy peoples of Africa represent a separate group that seems to be slowly merging with the black west/central Africans. I'm not sure what the deal with the Australian aborigines is; I believe they're a separate population entirely but I really don't know, and of course by now there's been a lot of European and southeast Asian mixed in as well.

BenjoJames
Erm...where did you think Jews came from?

idek
i know all jews come from the middle east but i just never thought about it

jessica
the dividing line in antiquity was the sahara, and it was really only in egypt where there was substantial mixing.

the indigenous inhabitants are called berbers and are of white-tanned complexion, similar to spaniards or italians.

the carthaginians/phoenicians set up in modern day tunisia and created an empire that included northern africa and southern europe. they built cities all along the mediterranean. the actual fact is that a huge amount of the urban civilization in southern europe developed out of white african colonization.

the carthaginians were eventually conquered by the romans, who incorporated the whole of northern africa into their empire. when you put the roman and carthaginian colonization of north africa together, that's over a thousand years.

the region did not pass directly from romans to arabs. there was a period of chaos in between that lasted several centuries and saw large waves of migration from germany into northern africa - just as it was elsewhere in the roman empire during the empire's collapse. there was a relatively powerful swedish kingdom in the region of tunisia for a few generations. in the end, the emperors (and justinian, especially) retained enough control to settle the barbarians in the countryside.

vikings also settled in north africa in substantial numbers.

there has even been substantial french migration since napoleon.

the system isn't broken. you're getting shut down. think it through.

http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/millions-resent-being-put-in-horrible-position-of-siding-with-megyn-kelly?intcid=mod-most-popular

three weeks...

Friday, January 29, 2016

Thursday, January 28, 2016

http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/14401-hillary-clintons-legacy-as-secretary-of-state

http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2011/08/zize-a27.html

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/girls-pulling-ahead-of-boys-in-school-report-shows-1.1107014
those are props.

i think cenk sort of explained this well, but not really.

the time aggregate isn't useful because it "balances out error". that's not actually a real thing, mathematically speaking - error just doesn't "balance out" like that. that said, if you want an aggregate to "balance out error", what you need to do is do them all at the same time. so, if you had ten firms all doing polling in the same region over the same weekend? then, it "balances out" - because you're increasing the sample size, basically. more people, less error. but it has to be apples and apples.

taking a poll from two weekends ago and averaging it with a poll from last weekend doesn't balance anything out. rather, it amplifies error - because you're aggregating apples and oranges. if you're actually concerned about predicting results, aggregates should be completely ignored. a single snap poll from a trustworthy firm is always better than an aggregate over disparate time periods.

so, why do they do this?

because it's a good measure of branding. it's the kind of thing you do when you want to measure market response to a cereal ad. and, the people that are doing this largely look at the situation as comparable to measuring attitudes in response to advertising. in fact, a lot of the time that's what they're actually being paid to do - not predict outcomes.

so you shouldn't pay very much attention to the rcp averages. it's bad methodology. instead, key in on reliable firms using reliable methods (live interview phone calling) and key in on their most recent snapshots.

i think it would probably be more productive if somebody went up there with a mop - and hit him upside the head with it.

he'd be useless. they'd have to send the fire department in to rescue him from a tree.

http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/14401-hillary-clintons-legacy-as-secretary-of-state
they should send her to the icc while they're at it.

i don't support capital punishment. but, what she did in libya deserves it, if anything does.


kelamuni
that old crook is deluded. more vapid right wing conspiracy theories.... and obama is a muslim from kenya. pfft. what a bunch of clowns.

jessica
it's quite vast, isn't it?
actually, this is the purpose of sports.

red v. blue. bread and circuses. divide and conquer.

ancient imperial strategy.

meanwhile, the ruling classes are engaging in mass slavery and nobody seems to care.

i could do without the right-wing drooling. and, his logic is erected on screwy edifices. but, he is actually expressing a kind of epiphany on the issue that one hopes is visionary: the future of israel-palestine relations lies in integration, not in segregation. there is no peace in segregation; there is only peace in integration.

a one-state solution, followed by a civil rights movement, is the only possible path forwards. it may take a generational overturn for this to be understood.

Wednesday, January 27, 2016

27-01-2016: not archiving

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

perfectly capitalized.

incoherent? check.
controversial? check.
guns? check.
hypocritically criticizes other rappers? check.
gets the girl in the end (it's all about the ego)? check.

disaster capitalism. executed exquisitely.

who cares?


i mean, there's a lot of reasons to avoid alcohol.

1) it makes you retarded.
2) health issues.
3) did i mention that it makes you retarded?

but, whether it's a "sin" or not shouldn't be in the list.

well...unless you're already retarded, i guess.

maybe that's it - maybe this religion thing would make more sense to me if i were to drink myself into a retarded stupor for a few years first.

explains the success of aa, anyways.
whenever anything financial goes viral, you can be certain it will be misunderstood. on finance, the left is just as clueless as the right, too.

what this company seems to be doing is actually trying to privatize the loan process, so that your debt is traded on an open market between individuals. this isn't big government centralization. rather, it's a decentralization of the process - and, if followed through logically, threatens to return us to the days of private slave trading.

your student loan debt will be converted into a bond that can be traded on the market. it stands to reason that the person that owns your debt owns your labour, too. so, what happens if they want to cash the bond in?

26-01-2016: archiving (some more)

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

Tuesday, January 26, 2016

i don't blame her for just forgetting about the issue and moving on.

but, she really ought to contact the ccla and sue the school. you can't fire somebody because they're white. and, the school administrators are government employees.

this is unconstitutional. blatantly.

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2016/01/26/university-of-ottawa-yoga-class-resumes-with-new-teacher.html

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

(2) Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups including those that are disadvantaged because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
 
to clarify: in canada, all universities are public institutions. we do not have private universities. so, these are all public servants with salaries that come directly from the state, not from tuition. doctors are considered public servants in canada, too, although this is a little bit more vague.

regardless, it may actually be prudent to launch a wrongful dismissal suit and a human rights complaint at the same time.

again: i understand why the victim here might not want to take the issue up. but i do think that these people need to be stopped. and, we do have the legal means at our disposal to do it.

Madeleine J. Whitfield I think it was the Student Union, or some such independent body that came up with this ridiculous idea. The governing body of the U of O, the president, board, etc. had nothing to do with it, or so I understand. I have a feeling that someone made an offhand remark one day based on their own need to complain about something; then someone else thought of doing an informal independent survey of about two people, and hey presto! Yoga banned. Isn't anybody held accountable for their actions and opinions at the Student Union?

Louis Picone I agree take it court or arbritration.Give the woman her job back.

Jeffrey Wheeler The student council is out of control. This is unfuckingbelievable. They were - and remain - simply wrong!

Andrew J. Hutton Unless people do sue, it won't change.

jessica amber murray i think the fundamental problem here is that the student union is making hiring decisions. they probably know more about foucault than they know about canadian law; it likely collapses to simple legal ignorance. but, it's ultimately the responsibility of the school's administration to ensure that this doesn't happen. they can't duck out like that.

Andrew J. Hutton Yes. Exactly.

jessica amber murray just as an example of what i mean: i'm actually somewhat of a left-wing activist (i identify as a left libertarian, or as an anarchist) and i can't count how many debates i've had with these people on the ground where they claim that "intent doesn't matter".

and, they'll hold to it. up and down. over and over. it's repeatedly demonstrable.

of course, our legal system is based on the premise that intent is everything. it's less that they don't care. it's actually that they don't know. why? because they're not forced to take "an introduction to law for philosophy students". they might parrot something about liberals being deluded, but the truth is that they actually really just don't know what they're talking about.

and, it's kind of ironic, right - because these are people with advanced degrees. some of them even teach. but they've never even heard of mens rea. and i mean that; it's less a rejection, and more of a lack of exposure to it - the fundamental, basic point of our legal system.

so, there's lots of blame to throw around and everything. people need to educate themselves, and the system is clearly failing to teach them about reality. but, at the end of the day, the most important thing is that you have to put adults in charge of this kind of thing. whether that means taking the whole thing away from them or forcing them to consult with a lawyer, i don't know, but the school has to shoulder it, somehow, and step in to correct it.

Andrew J. Hutton Anyone with moderate ethics knows firing someone for their genetics and replacing them with someone with differing genetics for only that reason regardless of performance is wrong.

jessica amber murray that might seem obvious to you, but what if you were taught in a university course that it's immoral for a white person to "behave like a south asian" because "white privilege" implies that is "theft"? you might have been taught otherwise growing up, and have to weigh those convictions and come to an independent choice. but, you might not have been taught differently. then, the school is an authority and you are ignorant for rejecting what they teach. and, remember: this is being presented to you as a moral conviction, not an ideological debate.

and, what if you were taught that "liberal democracy" has failed to reverse the effects of colonialism, and that the only way to get to a point of true equality is through ameliorative reparations that transfer wealth not from one class to another but from one race to another?

Andrew J. Hutton I could not be taught that. I grew up understanding we are one people separated by education and environment.

jessica amber murray see, i've never been able to swallow it, either. i'm pretty independent-minded. i don't accept much of anything on face value or without some independent research and thinking. but, this is not the norm. most people believe what they're told. and, most people believe that a teacher is a trustworthy source, too.

of course, this particular situation is stupid, no matter how you parse it. south asians are not a disadvantaged group in canada; their per capita income is actually the highest of all ethnic groups. and, to think that any kind of meaningful reparations can be established at such a basic level is foolish. there's a reflection of low entrance requirements, there.

but, it's not as simple as claiming it's immoral. moral systems are pretty fluid. and, the moral systems on campus nowadays are perhaps not what you might expect.
the black community is going to have to weigh the pros and cons.

pro: universal health care
con: jew

pro: free education
con: jew

pro: raising the minimum wage
con: jew

as you can see, it's a very tough decision - especially considering that clinton is merely a wannabe jew.


if you want black votes, you have to do the black church thing. that might not last much longer, but it's been true for decades and will be true for at least a few more cycles. and, you know: jew.

it's not the young activists. the reality is that they're probably not going to vote for anybody at all. rather, it's the older, church-centered folks. it's a big hurdle for all of the evangelicals, but it's well known that it's an especially big hurdle amongst black voters.

bernie needs to get some of the black vote, sure. but, he cannot be planning anything around it. because, jew.
you know what's going to happen by the time this is done, right - some time in between smile more industries buying the rights to bono and kane shocking the world with his first dick pic internet spread - is that britney will join the cast of desperate housewives.

wait for it.

but, seriously: i'm only getting less than an hour a day, and i only watch it a few times a week, and i can clearly see she's already planning "life after roman". all the comments are pushing for marriage. but, it's clear as day that this relationship is already over. britney just won't walk out due to a fear of being single.

instead, she's blatantly waiting for somebody to take her away. and the fantasy is something out of a harlequin romance novel, basically.

so, roman. listen. you want to prank this girl, hard? then make her think she's getting laid by a sexy pirate, and watch her walk right into it.

she's leaving you, anyways. might as well capitalize on it.

fwiw, though, there are digital audio outs on the market and have been for quite a while - they were out first, even. there was the spdif, for example. i have a still functioning sound card from the 90s with an spdif in/out. but, they didn't catch on...

a part of the reason is connectivity, right. the computer was never going to be the center of the sound system - more of an auxiliary in. so, you want the outs to conform to audio industry standards. meaning, you're converting everything to analog at some point. and,

that's kind of the crux of it, right. the complexity in the system is in the conversion to analog. no speaker can take a digital signal; that does not make sense. so, your headphones need to either accept a converted signal or convert the signal themselves. video doesn't really work that way. and, of course, strict data transfer doesn't need to do this kind of conversion at all.

so, there's not any benefit in changing the interface because you really can't increase the data speed on an audio signal. the only way it makes any sense is to put the dacs in the phones. but, that doesn't make any logistical or financial sense.

at the end of the day, the real reason that apple may be doing this may be to force you to buy an ipod and an iphone, rather than just an iphone. it's simply not a comparable technical leap.

Monday, January 25, 2016

25-01-2016: archiving (still)

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

the politics page is done. kaput. deleted.

i dropped it all in temporary files, so i've got hundreds of pages to merge into the main file. but it's done...
january, 2012

i'd rather they kept this closed.

personally? i'm both pro-choice and accept the catholic doctrine of life at conception, albeit for genetic reasons. i think the mp is correct to point out that modern scientific concepts of 'life' uphold the traditional view of conception.

that doesn't factor into my decision to be pro-choice, though, nor should it factor into the law. i'm pro-choice because i accept the mother's right to not be inconvenienced - and i've stated it in those terms on purpose - in any way by an unwanted pregnancy or an unwanted child, right up to the point of umbilical cord separation when the child gains rights of it's own.

in order for me to be intellectually consistent, the piece of christian dogma i need to throw away is not life at conception but the sanctity of life. i would need to throw that away to stay consistent on other related issues as well, such as legalized suicide (assisted or not) and euthanasia for people that can't exist without the aid of machines.

so, this is an irrelevancy for me, personally, and i suspect it is for most people on both sides of the debate.

http://nationalpostnews.wordpress.com/2011/12/21/tory-mp-calls-for-abortion-debate-using-modern-medically-accurate-evidence/
april, 2012  

i know he's right - i've concluded the same thing through my own calculations, and while my calculations are undoubtedly less complex, i may argue that the problem of whether this is in our reach or not is perhaps less complex than he's undoubtedly constructed - but i'm still holding out hope that a big break through in quantum computing combined with a revolutionary epiphany may get us closer....

i know it's just hope, though. mortality sucks.

==========

Horgan: Is DARPA [the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency] supporting your research at Caltech because it wants to create bionic soldiers?

Koch: No

Horgan: I’ll take your word for it. Have you become a member of the Singularity cult? Because I would find that very depressing.

Koch: Most certainly not. I have an article under revision right now that provides a quantitative argument for why the belief that we will understand the brain of a mouse, let alone that of a human, within a decade is as sound as the belief that the rapture is imminent.

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/2012/04/02/christof-koch-on-free-will-the-singularity-and-the-quest-to-crack-consciousness/?WT.mc_id=SA_MindFacebook
april 13, 2012

i don't see how any thinking person could see denying marriage or denying a prescription as a right. it's not even a question of positive or negative rights or freedom. in both of these cases, the need to ask permission at all - for permission to ingest a drug or to marry somebody - is really a rights breach; the doctor or priest has the choice between standing in the way of something they have no real place standing in the way of or getting out of the way as a legal formality.

my response to something like this would be to make birth control available over the counter and get the state out of marriage altogether (it's a personal contract).

http://www.calgaryherald.com/life/Wildrose+favour+conscience+rights/6414747/story.html

<create meme>

i'm always a civil libertarian.

...except when people act in ways i don't like.

</end meme>

it would be different if doctors denying prescriptions and priests performing marriages weren't both performing functions of the state. i'll grant you that.

but, as they are, a doctor denying a prescription is equivalent to the state denying it - which is functionally carrying out prohibition. similarly with the priest...

so, because they're not acting in an individual capacity but as state functionaries, enforcing their individual beliefs is equivalent to acting oppressively on behalf of the state; we can argue about whether this is just or not, but, so long as they are functionally state actors, if they wish to act oppressively then they should be fired or otherwise restricted from carrying out their *statist* functions.

what i mean is that a priest that does not wish to marry homosexual couples should not be allowed to legally marry heterosexual couples either because he is not willing to accept the state's legal definition of marriage.

and, yes, of course the state/people/democracy determine what marriage (a civil contract) is, not the church. suggestions to the contrary are so specious as to not be worth entertaining.

the more i think about it, the more i think that the best way forward is to prohibit ordained religious people (priests, pastors, whatever) from having the right to perform legal marriages and restricting legal marriage to a purely secular process. that would allow them to have their sacraments as they want them, and deny whoever they want, but would also force *all* couples to go through a *second* legal ceremony.

ultimately, religious and legal marriages are two different things and should be treated differently under the law.

i guess the difference between the way i see it and the way mainstream american pols see it is that i don't think the solution is to create civil unions and make them secondary to religious marriages, i think it's to throw religious ceremonies out of the secular legal realm and restrict them to purely symbolic/sacramental processes.

i mean, the real problem here is that marriage encroaches religion too far into the state, isn't it?

...and maybe doctors should be forced to sign a contract with the state, just like every other employee does with their employer. that contract would certainly have to deny the employee's rights to act independently in contradiction to the will of the employer. doctors that do not wish to abide by their contractual obligations would have the choice of finding another profession or moving elsewhere.

i can cut a little slack with the marriage thing, but i have no patience for a doctor denying a prescription on religious grounds. that's simply a bad doctor, imo, and one that should be immediately de-licensed.
http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/insidestoryamericas/2012/04/2012457232669440.html

http://www.masonicinfo.com/illuminati.htm

http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/ViewPage.aspx?pageId=66

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/08/is-the-us-really-responsible-for-post-war-libya/243966/

http://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/libyan-rebels-rounding-up-thousands-of-black-citizens-and-immigrants-1.381988

https://consortiumnews.com/2015/10/22/hillary-clintons-failed-libya-doctrine-2/

http://www.colorlines.com/articles/thousands-kids-lost-parents-us-deportation-system
dammit.

i've still never bought a smartphone. to be frank, i couldn't imagine what anybody actually uses the thing for - it just strikes me as a waste of money. but, i don't have a landline right now, either - and fat chance i'm paying for that. so, i'll have to get something eventually - just so i have a phone.

although, fact is, i haven't had any phone at all in over five years, now. maybe i've just proven that i don't really need one.

but, generally, i wait until technology plateaus and pick up something they can't move at absolute discount. so, if the iphone 7 is coming out, i'd be looking at something like an iphone 3. the idea is that there's basically no loss of meaningful functionality - and that i'd refuse to pay more than $50 for it.

i wouldn't actually buy an apple product, i'd buy something non-proprietary. but, it seems like each new model is inferior to the previous one, which is going to act as a hold on people upgrading and throw a wrench in my careful plan.

this is the dumbest physicist i've ever seen.


what a retard.
listen, if you're going to work a 9-5 job and then complain that your life sucks, you get absolutely no empathy from me.

do the world a favour: quit your stupid fucking job.

j reacts (complete)

Sunday, January 24, 2016

24-01-2016: archiving some more

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

i'm just about done with this, so i'll actually be deleting that flood of posts in the next couple of days.

but, did we get a winter?

we didn't get a snow cover. at all. temperatures...

cold snap 3:
jan 16: +3.3/-1.2
jan 17: -1.2/-11.9
jan 18: -8.3/-12.3
jan 19: -5.5/-12.5
jan 20: -7.0/-10.4
jan 21: -3.6/-12.6
jan 22: -2.7/-6.0
jan 23: -0.9/-7.2
jan 24: +1/-8

it looks like we're above zero for the next ten days.

there's no snow. and nothing below -13. but, that's five straight nights of lows below -10 and seven days in a row of subzero temperatures - even if it's only really three days of winter.

so, i must concede that we've had a "technical winter".

but, listen: claiming we might avoid winter in canada, even here in windsor, is pretty outrageous. you might want to take note that i'm conceding on a technicality, here. there has not been anything substantively approaching "winter" in windsor-detroit this year.

but, i'm an honest person and i'll concede, nonetheless.
http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/a_peek_at_the_militarys_budget_for_eternal_salvation_20110822

http://www.rawstory.com/2011/08/afl-cio-president-obama-is-aligned-with-tea-party-not-fixing-jobs/

http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/2036:union-workers-replaced-with-prison-labor-under-scott-walkers-collective-bargaining-law

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/11_01_10_afghanpoll.pdf

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/news/High-cut-offs-drive-students-to-US/articleshow/9499575.cms

http://www.rawstory.com/2011/08/upper-class-people-less-empathetic-than-lower-class-people-study/

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/01/is-charles-koch-a-closet-liberal/

http://www.glapn.org/sodomylaws/sensibilities/introduction.htm

http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/the_untimely_death_of_francesca_pompilia/

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-to-give-2bn-to-fund-bailouts-in-Europe/articleshow/9463341.cms

[i know it's pravda. but it's at least as entertaining as colbert. and, it's actually a pretty good reminder of why hillary clinton is unelectable.

she's a war criminal.
she should be in jail.

http://www.pravdareport.com/opinion/columnists/01-08-2011/118630-NATO_too_stupid_to_face_reality-0/ ] - august or september, 2011

http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2011/07/cana-j30.html

http://www.cfr.org/defense-budget/tightening-pentagons-belt/p25548

http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2011/0830/A-troubling-lesson-from-Libya-Don-t-give-up-nukes

http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/08/americas-fiscal-union?fsrc=scn%2Ffb%2Fwl%2Fdc%2Ftheredandtheblack
what does it mean to "talk like a black person"?

or, even more fundamental: what are your views on intellectual property rights?


those are just a few of the obvious questions that jump when listening to this track. another is:

do you really believe that equality means equality of opportunity?

this just all seems so very right-wing to me. sorry.

the basic concept seems to be separate but equal.

Saturday, January 23, 2016

23-01-2016: still archiving

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

http://www.conferenceboard.ca/economics/hot_eco_topics/default/11-10-20/don_t_kid_yourself_lower_taxes_usually_mean_reduced_services_and_higher_debt.aspx

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/10/17/texas-conservatives-rejec_n_1016705.html

http://news.nationalpost.com/news/did-george-soros-fund-occupy-wall-street

http://gizmodo.com/5833916/

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/ground-zero-mosque-opens-no-one-notic

http://networkedblogs.com/luSz8

http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/17-08-2011/118775-Moon_the_incompetent_goon-0/
what i've noticed with strawberries, specifically, is that the grocers will buy them, pass the costs down and then watch them sit on the shelf. eventually, they have to cut the price - and then you can pick them up. so, as a consumer, i'm sitting around waiting for the food to go rotten, so i can get it at discount. if they'd just cut the price, they'd move the units at a higher volume, and make up for the loss. so, for the last few months, some of the stores haven't even been carrying strawberries at all. but, i'll come out and say it: at the end of the day, i won't pay exorbitant prices for imported produce. i'll just buy something else. so, again: let's get some local growers going.

www.theweathernetwork.com/news/articles/canadian-grocers-struggling-with-produce-shortage/62567/
if you're curious, the results of this were very predictable given the content of canadian law. it's the fear thing that's key. the article actually explains it fairly well...

this sets the precedent. these are the rules. it's a pretty trivial jump from the abstract to the concrete - there was very little ambiguity in how the law should have been applied - but there it is, nonetheless.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/twitter-harassment-trial-verdict-1.3415112
that's what guard rails are for.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0-IePrhTs4
i'm not going to pretend that i know how to target democrat-leaning votes in iowa or nebraska or missouri or colorado. i'd have a better handle on seattle or detroit or pittsburgh or minneapolis. even los angeles is sort of alien. so, i'm going to put that down and be quiet.

other than to point out that there's something inherently necessary in resuscitating the electoral powers of the progressive movement (which is very alive, on the ground) if sanders wants to beat clinton, let alone win the presidency.

http://briarpatchmagazine.com/articles/view/fair-trade-and-empire

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc

http://www.michaelparenti.org/Tibet.html

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/analysis-and-features/what-price-the-new-democracy-goldman-sachs-conquers-europe-6264091.html

http://news.nationalpost.com/news/pizza-keeps-vegetable-status-on-school-lunch-menus-house-rules

http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadas-only-elected-senator-also-the-most-expensive
that's two weeks, btw.

cold turkey.

it's in the two-three week window that i usually crack, although i must say this: i don't usually go that long as total, cold turkey. there's usually some kind of break in there. i might buy one of those $1.25 cigars, or maybe bum a smoke when i'm out. normally, what it really means is "two-three weeks without buying a pack".

but, this is totally cold turkey. so, it's different. and, i think i'm consequently just about there.

i guess i have about another week of data archival ahead of me. so, that will be three weeks - cold turkey. and, i can't see why i'd look back after that...

Friday, January 22, 2016

22-01-2016: start of archival week

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

in a few hours, it'll be 13 days cold turkey - which at the very least indicates i'm serious about this.

as i previously stated, i'm in the process of collecting writing from various sources. i should get through the first phase of this today, and be over a hurdle by the end of the weekend. this *is* actually important for the period discs, even if it is writing rather than music.

so, i'm working. productively, even. really. i may even meet my feb 1 release date.
dec, 2011

the ignored drawback of choosing charity over public aid is that, while it eliminates a means of questionably justified coercion, it also removes aid work from public oversight, allowing financial dictatorships to pick and choose which causes they wish to support based on their own whims and amusements. that prioritizes wealth over research as a factor in decision making. philanthropists should consequently be regulated.

to put it another way, these are resources that should be controlled by the community and not by what amounts to the modern equivalent of feudal landowners.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/27/sunday-review/policy-making-billionaires.html?pagewanted=all
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3AlqISZaTSy2EJ%3Acepr.net%2Fblogs%2Fbeat-the-press%2Fthe-myth-of-profligate-euro-zone-countries+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca&client=firefox-a\

Spain had a budget surplus before the economic collapse. Spain had a budget surplus before the economic collapse. Spain had a budget surplus before the economic collapse.

Perhaps repeating this line three times will help the type of people who have columns in the Washington Post on the euro zone crisis get some understanding of the issue. Today we get a lecture on southern country profligacy from Daniel M. Price. Yesterday, Post columnist Matt Miller told us how he misleads his daughter about the nature of the euro zone crisis and suggested that the rest of us be equally misleading with our own children.

The reality is that most of the countries currently facing debt troubles were not profligate prior to the crisis. While it may be reasonable to describe Greece as being profligate, the only euro zone country that looks much like Greece is Greece. The other euro zone crisis countries had hugely better finances in the years leading up to the crisis.

Italy, the closest Greece competitor among euro zone crisis countries, had relatively small budget deficits in the years before the crisis. Its debt to GDP ratio fell from 93.7 percent of GDP in 2001 to 87.3 percent of GDP in 2007. In other words, the deficits of these years were completely sustainable.

Spain ran budget surpluses in the years from 2005-2007. Its debt to GDP ratio fell from 50.3 percent in 2000 to 26.5 percent of GDP in 2007. There is no remotely plausibly story of government profligacy here.

In short, people who describe the euro zone crisis as a story of excessive government deficits are pushing an ideological agenda that has nothing to do with reality. The story of the current deficits of the non-Greece countries is the story of the collapse of housing bubbles that threw the euro zone economies into a severe downturn. The European Central Bank (ECB) has magnified the problem by maintaining relatively tight monetary policy in order to maintain very low inflation and also explicitly asserting that it would not act as a lender of last resort to the heavily indebted countries.

Blaming government profligacy may be useful to those who want to see cuts in social spending, but it is not a story that is based in reality. It conceals the incompetence/greed of the private sector bankers who fueled the bubble. It also ignores the recklessness of the ECB of clinging to its inflation obsession even in the midst of a crisis that threatens the survival of the euro and could cause millions of additional workers to lose their job.

http://www.democracynow.org/2011/10/20/lost_in_detention_as_obama_admin
http://www.democracynow.org/2006/11/9/defense_secretary_nominee_robert_gates_tied
http://articles.latimes.com/1987-01-22/news/mn-397_1_biden
http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/progressive-economics-forum/2011/12/battle-wages-study-dispels-myths-about-public-sec
do you know what i think, honestly?

it's that merkel's concept of currency is rooted squarely in conservation laws.

it's what happens when you send a plumber to fix your car.
dec, 2011

looks like i'm waiting a few days. i expected the decision to be ripped to shreds, even by a lot of conservatives.

to be clear...

the agreement is that the various governments will force balanced budgets on themselves without the use of integrated monetary policy. this completely misunderstands the problem. the problem is monetary, not fiscal. this is equivalent to implementing a de facto gold standard in the euro. the result in the satellite countries will be very difficult to manage, as they all have individual economies with individual stimulus requirements.

this will not rein in debt, it will spiral debt out of control as austerity exponentially shrinks the economy into a deflationary spiral.

don't just divest. emigrate. this is going to get ugly.

http://econ.st/vtQ6Ma

http://money.cnn.com/2015/09/30/news/economy/economy-europe-deflation/
http://www.haaretz.com/iran-is-too-rational-to-attack-israel-1.402481
http://www.rawstory.com/2011/12/tougher-drug-laws-mean-nearly-13-arrested-by-age-23/
http://www.haaretz.com/israeli-woman-refuses-ultra-orthodox-dictate-to-move-to-back-of-bus-1.402021
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/games-primates-play/201112/testify-comes-the-latin-word-testicle
the future of conflict!

don't miss out! don't be left behind...

http://www.cnas.org/media-events/cnas-in-the-news/articles/the-south-china-sea-is-the-future-of-conflict - .UuJIThBOnIU

you actually want to read it more like a sales brochure for military equipment - which is surreal and disgusting and absolutely accurate all at the same time.

10-01-2016: dropped section

this is a section from the tenth that the device deallocated because i physically dropped it. it was recovered after the fact in a chkdsk and is uploaded here as a standalone file. i discuss the effects of quitting smoking.

see, the writing in these skits is actually often fairly subtle.

it's been clear the whole time that these were skits, but i was wondering if they were actually his parents or not. clearly, what's happened here is that "dad" has taken off all right - no doubt because he's not getting paid. he's not coming back, either. twisting the narrative around like this is something he seems to do fairly often.

i'm going to point something out here that you won't see pointed out elsewhere and is probably very relevant:

1) the female appears to be an upper class indian.
2) the driver appears to be a lower class arab.

so, i don't think the observation of her skin colour and ethnic background is entirely irrelevant, it's just that you have to put it in context; i think that what you're seeing here is a normal class relationship in india, with the difference being that, in india, the lower class arab would not dare defend himself.


to be clear: what i'm saying is that it seems as though she is behaving in a racist manner.
i find the cluster in the alps very curious.

is this a still existing measure of hannibal's army?

http://cache.eupedia.com/images/content/mtDNA-X-map.png


what he's talking about is mt-dna haplotype X, and his presentation here is incredibly inaccurate.

the mt-dna is traced through maternal lineages, and it is indeed a little bit curious to find it in north america. this is not because it clusters specifically with jews - in fact, it does not. it actually clusters with greeks. search terms would be "mt-dna haplotype X". the wiki map is good at showing where it clusters.

it clusters as a minority lineage everywhere it exists, so it is very difficult to try and determine it's origin using migration patterns. molecular testing has suggested that the lineage probably originated in central asia and migrated over to the americas with the bering land bridge, while it also stayed behind in asia and floated towards greece. but, molecular testing of this sort is a kind of house of cards argument.

a more interesting - and probably more correct - suggestion is the idea that it may be a carthaginian lineage. this would suggest pre-columbian transoceanic contact - which is an idea that is increasingly gaining momentum. we can measure the effect of colonialism in the native american gene pool (you may have noticed that many people that identify as natives actually look very white; in fact, some tribes report upwards of 90% european dna on the male side). it's entirely reasonable to suggest that carthaginian contact may have left some evidence of itself.

but, this is not the dominant theory. the dominant theory is that X developed in the steppes and found it's way into the greek speaking areas by genetic drift, then spread around those areas through trade.

they wish they were forty...

i'm going to guess the female is 47 and the male is 52.


i'm 40.

and i look and act half their age.
it's nice to see that people have stopped pretending that there aren't bosses in china.

maybe a little bit of a shift in consciousness will lead to a rekindling of the revolution.

i believe that the use of the words new american is a sort of a code that suggests that marco is essentially a front for the john birch society (that is, the koch brothers). whenever you see those words together, you should be a little wary.

examples:

center for a new american security
project for a new american century


...and, of course, the new american magazine, itself.

the religious thing has been a front from the beginning. that's the actual history lesson. those guys were all deists. and, marco's master is likewise not his god but his handlers.

Thursday, January 21, 2016

21-01-2016: chilling out

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

thank you for the birthday check, too

nana
I was beginning to worry you didn't receive it as I mailed it 10 days ago,so much for canada post fast delivery.I hope you are enjoying the good winter weather as we are.Hard to believe it is 6% today & even more crazy it was 16% on xmas day.I hope all is well with you,we miss you.luv nana. 

jessica
i quit smoking cold turkey on the 9th, and have actually only been outside once since (to get groceries). in fact, i've basically been bed-ridden for the last two and a half weeks. i'm very serious about it this time, so i'm just restricting myself to zero-stress activities like reading and typing. i think i should be able to get out of bed at about the month point. so, it may have sat in my mail box for a few days...

nana
 Good for you I am very glad to hear you are quitting,not only for your health but also it is such a waste of money.I have recently switched my services from rogers to bell,mostly because of the fees.I am saving $90.00 per month so not small change!I hope you are up & about again now.I had to buy a new printer & got a different brand'' Epson'', I really wished you were here to set it up for me,as you know how lame i can be around electronics.your mother came over to do the job & got everything running smoothly.When you get to be my age technology becomes a problem.Must run now, Leo is picking me up to go shopping.Bye Bye.
what are the oscars? what do they measure? what does it mean when somebody gets an oscar?

jada seems to be approaching the issue from the same lens as kayne was - that the oscars actually legitimately reflect excellency in the field of acting. so, to get an oscar is a form of recognition for that excellence. jada seems to be upset for the same reason as kanye, which is also the same reason nicki minaj was upset - they felt they produced something excellent and they should be acknowledged for that excellence. they think they won the talent show, kind of thing, and it's an injustice that they are (or their preferred choice is) being ignored.

(audience laughter)

vivian, here, seems to be taking a different perspective - namely that the oscars are a kind of promotional tool, and should be awarded not based on total excellency but on more of a needs-based basis. that is, they should go to the actors that demonstrate the best potential and need the most exposure. to vivian, the oscars should be used as a way to establish a career.

their different deductions come from their different perspectives.

if you think the oscars are all about massaging your own ego, it follows that they should only go to established icons - and so it must be all about acknowledgement. the obvious racial biases that exist across all american institutions become a clear reason to boycott the institution; because, from that perspective, it is truly all about reaching the top of a hierarchy. yet, if you think the oscars are to be seen as a launching pad that has little reflection on actual performance or actual talent, then that logic makes no sense - winning an oscar is just another public relations tactic.

so, who is right?

i'm leaning towards vivian. but, not because the oscars are racist; rather, because the oscars have no artistic credibility. if they had any credibility at all, i would agree with jada. but, they don't. so, i agree with vivian.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9eY-kKXBnQ