Tuesday, May 10, 2016

shit hillary said vol 55

I've looked at the legislation that Senator Sanders has proposed. And basically, he does eliminate the Affordable Care Act, eliminates private insurance, eliminates Medicare, eliminates Medicaid, Tricare, children's health insurance program. Puts it all together in a big program which he then hands over to the states to administer.

And I have to tell you, I would not want, if I lived in Iowa, Terry Branstad administering my healthcare. I-- I think-- I think as Democrats, we ought to proudly support the Affordable Care Act, improve it, and make it the model that we know it can be--

BERNIE SANDERS: We don't-- we don't eliminate Medicare. We expand Medicare to all people. And we will not, under this proposal, have a situation that we have right now with the Affordable Care Act. We've got states like South Carolina and many other Republican states that because of their right-wing political ideology are denying millions of people the expansion of Medicaid that we passed in the Affordable Care Act. Ultimately, we have got to say as a nation, Secretary Clinton, is healthcare a right of all people or is it not? I--

Monday, May 9, 2016

shit hillary said vol 54

COOPER: Secretary Clinton, do you regret your vote on the Patriot Act?

CLINTON: No, I don’t. I think that it was necessary to make sure that we were able after 9/11 to put in place the security that we needed.

08-05-2016: more editing (and sorting through show listings, and reading articles)

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

j reacts to another example of why no humans should ever have guns, ever

smug bullshit aside, there is a serious point here, and it's that all of the logic in the world doesn't prevent the temporary loss of reasoning associated with most rage killings.

he says he doesn't remember what happened. he probably really doesn't.

you can put child locks on it, put it in a safe, hide it where nobody else knows where it is - it doesn't matter. the issue is not the need to take precautions. it's rooted in the reality that human beings are dumb apes that are driven by hormones, not rational entities driven by logic.

it's true that he could have grabbed a butcher knife, but it isn't particularly relevant. the reality is that the only way to really address gun violence is to ban them altogether.

it's really unfortunate that you have that constitutional amendment, down there. we don't have anything of the sort in our constitution. and, we're really better off for it.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/08/us/man-allegedly-kills-brother-over-cheeseburger/?iid=ob_lockedrail_topeditorial

j reacts to free university vs "debt-free" university (eight years of high school?)

i'm broadly a fan of the internet - at least as a replacement for tv. certainly, internet >>> tv. but, it would be a lot better if we didn't have a for profit print media that acts as a disincentive.

this actually got published:

"In West Virginia, Bernie is ahead in both of the state’s most recent primary polls. Last week, Public Policy Polling released its findings from a survey of 549 likely Democratic voters. In that poll, Sanders came out ahead of Clinton by eight percentage points, snagging 45 percent compared to her 37 percent. Even with the 3.9 percent margin of error, Bernie will still easily triumph over Hillary if these numbers prove to be accurate."

really. you know what i think the reporter here actually thinks? the thought process, here?

"well, if he's winning by eight and there's a four point margin of error, he's four points better than the margin, so he wins easily."

this is actually exactly why bernie is right. in today's world, you really need statistical literacy to get by - and the level of literacy we actually have is absolutely deplorable. but, you can't cram it all into four years.

i'd even take it to another step - and i've proposed this previously, going back many years. i actually think we should have eight years of actual high school.

Sunday, May 8, 2016

shit hillary said vol 53

"For a lot of people, again, who take their vote seriously and who really see this as a crossroads kind of election, I am asking people to come join this campaign. And I've had a lot of outreach on Republicans in the last days who say that they are interested in talking about that."

07-05-2016: whateverfest

concert footage:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9LyMr3_RSE

review:
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/shows/2016/05/07.html

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

i find stiglitz such a treat to listen to, for the precise reason that he's such a master logician. his arguments are just lucid. i'm constantly finding myself practically finishing his sentences - and not because i have any deeper insight, beyond being decently read on the topic, and simply because he's got that much flow.

what he's really doing in this presentation is masterfully explaining why classical economic theory is useless unless it is applied to an agrarian economy, which is a boat that sailed nearly two hundred years ago over most of the planet.

Friday, May 6, 2016

j reacts to west virginia polling, and what a surprise sanders win *actually* implies

there's some polls coming up in west virginia, and they're kind of splitting the difference - the racist models are suggesting he should win in a landslide (because there are few blacks), where as i actually think a better projection ought to be clinton by about 10-15. the polls i've seen are in the margin of error, suggesting a split, but they're also small samples and wonky sources...

forget how many blacks are in west virginia. it's a boneheaded way to go about this. instead, let's look at how she did amongst whites in the neighbouring states - all of which were open primaries.

virginia: 57% of whites voted for clinton
ohio: 53% of whites voted for clinton
tennessee: 57% of whites voted for clinton
kentucky: hasn't voted.

so, given that west virginia is mostly white, why exactly would you expect sanders to win?

?

but, i'm data driven. so, i'm going to suggest a way out, and it's this - shit happens. people change.

again: i think some skepticism is in order with the polling. we don't have anything really solid right now. but, if sanders does win west virginia, what i would suggest is that voting intentions in the south have shifted since march.

this is likely a fruitless request: if you were to do some rigorous polling in tennessee or virginia, today, what would the results be? because if sanders wins west virginia (after winning indiana), and is then at least competitive in kentucky, it's hard to see how the results from the early primaries can be current.

again: if you want to take the information you have and apply it to west virginia, you should get a big clinton win. if sanders wins, it strongly suggests that southerners, or at least white ones, are actually abandoning clinton.

let's not get carried away, though. i actually still expect clinton to win in west virginia. and kentucky.

my response would have been something like "well, if you don't like the food stamps program, i can always start a riot and burn your house down and steal the food out of your fridge instead.".

welfare isn't charity. it's a way to prevent class warfare and ensure that the property rights dictatorship is not overwhelmed with sheer force. it was understood some time in the last century that the best way to stop the poor from taking what they are entitled to, by force, is to give them enough to survive on. it's a bribe.

if people like her want to get cocky about it, they'll eventually have to deal with the consequences of it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwrNiRngMhc

j reacts to "self-driving cars"

i can't imagine there's any kind of market for this.

i bet the nsa would love it if they had control of your vehicle, though.

why aren't we building more electric vehicles? this is idiotic.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/windsor/no-promise-windsor-will-have-role-in-self-driving-chrysler-pacifica-1.3569919

05-05-2016: wasted day....

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

j reacts to the new radiohead single/video

predictable attempt to relive lost glory years after fading into irrelevance; a little paranoid android, much, eh?

it's good that thom has realized that he does require jonny to make a good record. but, this is egos clashing - it's not collaborative. thom is really doing everything he possibly can to drown out the strings. an epic mix manages to save a catastrophe. although, i'm sure there's more than one patch on that processor? we've heard quite a lot of that one.

this isn't going to turn out well if the process is that thom shows up after jonny's done all the work, like it's just another side project, and howls out some half formed nonsense. he couldn't even be bothered to write a second verse. a band is supposed to be a collaborative affair. i don't know how a band can go more than a decade without remembering that.

i'm not disappointed, i'm just jaded; cynical, even. i've been soooo over this band since 2003. really.

but, there's a bit of a tease here: this is actually new material, not just the same recycled sound they've been stripping down forever, to the point of parody. but, if he wants to go down this orchestral path, i wish he'd be a little more aspirational. i mean, it's not like it's avant garde - listen to eleanor rigby. or how to disappear completely and never be found. this just seems pedestrian, in comparison.

but, if moaning about radiohead were an olympic sport, i'd be competitive.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yI2oS2hoL0k

shit hillary said vol 51

Thursday, May 5, 2016

shit hillary said vol 50

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wA5U_tmILs

j reacts to the idea of a trump/gingrich ticket

marillyn hewson would be a better vp pick than newt gingrich. might balance out the identity politics a little.

picking gingrich would certainly send a message, but that message is something like "you might as well have voted for ted cruz, 'cause that's what you're getting".

we need a hipster meme for newt.

i shut down congress


....before it was uncool.

i'll admit this, though: a cruz/gingrich ticket is bad enough that i'd happily vote for hillary. you'd expect them to go on strike, or something.

it ought to be crazy talk. but, you're batshit to try and read any sense into the campaign.

j reacts to apparent pressure from breitbart for trump to flop on trade

i've said this before: what mexico needs to do is get it's labour standards up. it needs more regulation. it needs higher wages. that's the actual ideal here, rather than ripping nafta up: getting mexico up to code. if mexico had comparable wages, standards and regulations to the united states and canada, they wouldn't have this labour advantage and other factors would determine where the factories end up.

there's a legitimate level of moral outrage over the idea that the comparative advantage is a race to the bottom. i'm no fan of market logic or competitive economies, but you'd get a lot less pushback if the competitive aspect was over who is better, not who is worse. for that reason, this issue is never going to go away. you can throw as many skewed statistics around as you want, you're ultimately not addressing the actual issue.

now, on the one hand, the argument was always that nafta would pull them up to code. on the other hand, everybody always knew that was bullshit - that the point of nafta was for the corporations to escape the code.

enough time has now passed to make the following conclusion: if the purpose of nafta was to pull mexico up to code, then it has failed. there's been some progress, sure, but not enough. and, this should be the focus from the next president, and perhaps the president after that.

so, the way this should work is like this: the president should put some demands down on the mexican political system, and provide it with a timetable to meet those demands. i'm not proposing anything onerous, only that mexico bring itself up to code so that there's an even playing field across the three countries. should it meet those demands, nafta stays. should it reject them, nafta ends.

but, i want to be clear that i don't think the failure here is at a legislative level. nobody seriously ought to expect that a parliament will pass these kinds of laws without pressure from below. i know that mexico has a history of labour repression, but newsflash: so does the united states. and, in fact, so does canada. there may be a difference of scale. but, why has mexican labour not risen up and demanded more? where are the mexican consumer watch dog groups? where is the mexican left?

again: they've had enough time to get this sorted out, and they're not doing it. so, they need some pressure from the outside. and, if they won't do it, the agreement can't continue.

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/05/05/former-mexican-president-vicente-fox-nafta-miracle/

04-05-2016: within the twilight of archiving (and japanese girls in windsor)

concert footage:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JS7MfHCjn4

review:
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/shows/2016/05/04.html

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

Wednesday, May 4, 2016

04-05-2016: japanese girls - circulation (windsor)

their music:
https://jpnsgrls.bandcamp.com/

review:
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/shows/2016/05/04.html

vlog for the day:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BKkpLGWgPU

my music:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com

j reacts to kasich dropping out (and trump's coming conversion into the establishment)

i think kasich would have actually seen his numbers go up without cruz. it wouldn't have been from cruz voters, exactly. but, a lot of people that were voting for trump to stop cruz may have eased up.

the thing is that the states that are left are not the right states - except maybe california. that would have been awkward, huh? kasich winning california, and preventing trump from clinching? then, what?

well, nothing, probably. he just wins on the second ballot.

like i say: this is only feasible now that cruz is gone. so long as cruz is running, trump wins in a landslide, because nobody wants to take the chance that cruz might win. but, when cruz is out, the stakes are not so dramatic, and there's a little more room to go with what they really want...

that's not what happened, though. what happened was that john got a call from head office, informing him that it's done: trump's the guy. and, they don't want to take the chance that he might frustrate the process.

this has been clear for a few days already, but watch it really pivot, now, in the next few weeks. he's going to be rebranding himself, more or less by the book. expect flip-flops on certain issues. expect gushing media coverage from people that were criticizing him last week. expect every ridiculous thing you can imagine.

....and hopefully, maybe, expect a little but of coaching and for it to begin to show.

j reacts to reports that clinton is courting bush administration officials for cabinet

she takes the left for granted. what are they going to do? vote for trump?

dammit, bernie. i know you can't say it yet. but, let's start being a little vague, alright?

they won't vote for trump. they might vote for jill stein. they will vote for bernie sanders.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/05/03/steve_schmidt_the_candidate_most_like_bush_and_cheney_is_hillary_clinton.html

02/03-05-2016: ranting between recovering from the long walks

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

shit hillary said vol 49

"The president did close Guantanamo."

shit hillary said vol 48



shit hillary said vol 47

KING: So maybe a Republican or two in the cabinet?

CLINTON: I think we should look at that. We need to try to have a bipartisan government. We've got to restore confidence and competence to the American government.

j reacts to the indiana primary results

well, he got his unlikely split. exit polling suggests he actually managed to win women. yeah. and, he's doing better and better with young minorities - so long as they're allowed to vote. he apparently split non-white voters under 50 - although the numbers always come out skewed because young people of colour are not voting at the same frequency as young white people are.

i don't think it really changes anything, though. i mean, it suggests he got high turnout - he was able to overwhelm. but, the explanation could very well be that he was piggybacking on trump voters, who see sanders as their second choice. you can vote twice in these open primaries.

i'm all for open primaries. but i really think you should only be able to vote for one party.

you'll note that she won all the southern counties, which are bordering kentucky. that's a better predictor of what's coming. he's not going to lose kentucky or west virgnia because of minorities. he's going to lose white men in these states, as he did in tennessee and the other states in the immediate vicinity.

but, the fact that his numbers are improving with minorities, at least in the north, is promising - should he run outside the party.

Tuesday, May 3, 2016

almost ready to get back to work

month turnover things were unexpectedly hectic, but i'm legitimately finally "there". i should be back to work tomorrow.

it'll be a week before it updates, but i should be getting back to adding to this list, soon.

if you would like candidates to address your concerns, it might help to stop claiming they're incapable of understanding things. this ridiculous arrogance coming out of crt is not only unhelpful, it's flatly wrong.

i'm not going to speak for sanders, but me let me say this: i fully understand what you're saying. but, i also deeply disagree with you.

i am colour blind. i am not racist. and, fuck you for implying that i am.

i don't want to organize with people that erect intellectual hierarchies before a discourse even begins.

rather, here's the truth: american minorities continue to align themselves with capitalist power hierarchies. and, the reason is that american minorities are the most ideologically capitalist voters on the planet.

it's all about the bling, nigga. it has nothing to do with racism.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/may/03/bernie-sanders-failure-diversity-hispanic-black-voters

black voters do not believe that the solution to their problems lays in state aid or social programs. rather, they believe the answer lies in hard work and strong policing. they don't want free health care, they want a fair chance at one day owning their own migrant worker.

it is you, sir, that do not get it.

white people grow up listening to hippie folk music that tells us that money is the root of all evil. black people grow up listening to hip-hop artists that tell us that money is the source of all happiness. it transfers over to every other type of media, and has entrenched itself in popular consciousness. then, we wonder why blacks vote for capitalism and whites vote against it?

i bet bernie would have loved to get beyonce up on the podium with him. she's not going to do it for free, though.

what's happening is reflective of reality: most black americans are voting for the hyper-capitalist, interventionist neo-liberal that wants to bring in a police state because that's what they actually want. if they wanted otherwise, they'd vote otherwise.

the left needs to do outreach to change how minorities think, not change itself to make itself more amenable to minorities. and, fuck you if you don't like it.

Monday, May 2, 2016

on the irrationality of bed-making

i refuse to believe this is actually true. i think my search results are getting filtered, in an attempt to enforce the utter irrationality of bed-making.

i was tipped off to this when youtube wouldn't accept my thumbnail - for no seeming reason other than apparent horror at the idea of thumbnailing an unkempt bed. frankly, i don't fucking care. but, it's worse than this.

i need to point out that i have presented this argument to virtually everybody in my family that is older than me : a mother, a father, a step-mother, a step-father, two grandmothers, various aunts and, i believe, even one uncle. thankfully, it was only really the direct parental units that had opinions that were of any real consequence, and i did manage to convince them both of my superior logic, and at quite a young age. my step-mother was a deeply impulsive type and would simply make the damned bed when i was gone.

but it is not a difficult argument: making your bed is irrational because you're just going to unmake it when you go back to sleep. i mean, what's the first thing you do when you get into a made bed? you rip the sheets out of the side and curl up in the blanket. so, why bother tucking them in? it's not a question of laziness. it's just an utterly preposterous habit.

if you make your bed, you are an irrational person. i'm not crazy: society is crazy. and, i mean that. it's actually fucking true.


01-05-2016: sight-seeing through windsor, while shopping for estrogen

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

Sunday, May 1, 2016

shit hillary said vol 46

"The exchange that followed was remarkable. In strongly supporting the surge in Afghanistan, Hillary told the president that her opposition to the surge in Iraq had been political because she was facing him in the Iowa primary [in 2008]. She went on to say, ‘The Iraq surge worked.’" - robert gates

j reacts to the continuing ideological incoherency of donald trump

the guy is really a walking contradiction, and the more you try and make sense of him, the less sense he makes. he came on here to defend a speech that i think was literally written by bush' old speechwriters, and he ends up using talking points, almost verbatim, from noam fucking chomsky.

no joke. forget hillary - he's plagiarizing fucking chomsky. and, if you're familiar with his interview talking points, you'll see that immediately.

you're voting for a moving target. you don't know what the fuck you're going to get.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9h5uWzElIb8

j reacts to indiana pre-polling

indiana...

i'll admit the numbers are a tad closer than i expected. i was expecting clinton to win indiana by around ten points, based on the reality that it's more conservative than ohio. the civil war was 150 years ago. the boundaries of north and south have shifted, and we have a west, now, too. ohio is split - it's south is south, and it's north is north. but, it's increasingly becoming the south. indiana is the south. west virginia is the south. kentucky is the south, too.

the fact that most of the polls have her under ten, and it's an open primary, means he's within striking distance. she will probably win, but he may just get a split out of it. but, that's not a win, and he needs those right now.

further, given the reality of things, i think you have to expect her to stuff the mail-ins, again. she'll "win" indianapolis by a huge margin, and the numbers to overwhelm are just hard to generate - even without the reality that he's lost a lot of momentum over the last three weeks.

i can't claim that clinton will win. but, the chances of him generating the huge turnout that he needs to overwhelm her are a lot lower than they were a few weeks ago. he might do surprisingly well [that is, he might surprise me - he'll certainly underperform relative to the racist models]. but, a win is really a giant longshot.

on the republican side?

the data suggests that trump is going to beat the snot out of cruz. again. and, this is a state that cruz should be competitive in. but, the numbers suggest he isn't - he's done. where sanders may get close to a tie, cruz will struggle to get to 35.

but, i want to point something out about kasich. if you remove the obviously outlandish ipfw poll, cruz is very stable in his numbers - of the last six polls, two are at 35 and one is at each of 34, 33, 32 and 31. trump, on the other hand, fluctuates between 37 and 49, while kasich fluctuates between 13 and 22. the relationship is that as kasich' vote goes up, trump's goes down - and as kasich' goes down, trump's goes up. that seems to confirm what i've been saying:  there is essentially no swing between kasich and cruz. the swing is between kasich and trump. it follows that cruz should have begged kasich to campaign hard in indiana to try and split the vote. but, he's a dipshit that is ideologically opposed to things like intelligence, mathematics, co-operation and strategy.

j reacts to the likely logic around hillary clinton's vp choice

who will hillary pick as vp?

i'm not sure. but, you can expect the following characteristics:

- southern
- conservative
- more likely to be black than female

i would strongly expect a person of colour. i think she'd like to pick condoleeza rice, but she's in the wrong party. that's her ideal pick: black, female, smart and just barely right of center. i don't know who that transfers over to on the democratic side.

remember: she doesn't think she needs to win votes on the left. she thinks she needs to win votes in the center. she takes the left for granted. because, she won. right?

30-04-2016: adventures grocery shopping [+ tired ranting]

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

Saturday, April 30, 2016

shit hillary said vol 45

“We now finally are where we need to be. We have a strategy and a commitment to go after ISIS, which is a danger to us, as well as the region, and we finally have a UN Security Council resolution bringing the world together to go after a political transition in Syria.”

j reacts to sanders having the balance of power (is 2016 the end of the duopoly?)

https://www.facebook.com/Bernie.Sanders.Go.Green/

j reacts to rubio angling for a spot on the ticket (and trump's optimal vp logic)

the headline should say:

"marco rubio continues to do what he's told, as establishment finally buys the trump brand."

if you were still unclear up to this point, this is the clincher: trump is now the establishment candidate. otherwise, rubio would still be saying mean things about him - because that's what rubio does: what he's told.

the thinking is probably that rubio will help trump win some actual conservatives. but, it's the same incompetence we've seen through the entire race. he's been spent. i mean, that's why he lost everywhere - the facade was blown off.

rubio will probably hurt trump more than he helps him.

http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/the-buzz-florida-politics/marco-rubio-warming-up-to-donald-trump/2275308

if trump is serious, he needs to go full retard. he'd be better off with somebody like jesse ventura. i'm not joking. he'll blow the conservative vote, but what is the conservative vote? it's not that much, really.

i mean, think about this: the epiphany of trump winning is that conservatism is pretty much a dead philosophy. it's been clear in the northeast and the west coast and most of canada for quite a while, now. the surprise is that it's pretty much dead in the south, too - except amongst black democrats, oddly enough. it's still kicking in the midwest, it seems, but it's probably it's last stand. eight years from now, it'll likely be on the absolute fringe.

so, what does trump do? he listens to the establishment - the establishment he just beat the snot out of - and toys with getting a conservative as vp.

he doesn't even understand his own phenomenon. that's the level of dipshit we've got, here.

trump wants anything but a conservative (quiet down, canadians) as a running mate. what he really wants is a libertarian. ideas...

1) jesse ventura. i don't think he'd do it.
2) rand paul. i don't think he'd do it, either.
3) ron paul. you know, i think he might, actually.
4) bob barr. ??.
5) glenn beck <-!!!!
6) gary johnson. ??.

trump/beck. holy shit. i'm already laughing.

but, i'm serious - this is the right tactic. he's never going to win conservatives - and he just proved there aren't enough of them to win a fucking primary, anyways. he wants to go after liberals.

can arnold be vp?

j reacts to if bernie would split the left (he may prevent a split by running!)

(in reply to somebody's comment)

but, hillary also supports war against iran and mass deportations - along with the tpp and nafta. the wall is never getting built. and, did you know that clinton supports a constitutional amendment to limit abortion access?

i think most leftists would have to concede that trump is the lesser evil on foreign policy [he actually seems to be an isolationist, and seems to want to dismantle the empire - whereas hillary is a bellicose interventionist that will no doubt launch at least three unnecessary wars] and just flat out better on trade. his positions on trade and foreign policy are legitimately closer to sanders', although nowhere near as appealing.

where trump is really scary is his fiscal policy. i don't think he's going to punish anybody for getting an abortion. i do think he'll probably bankrupt the country.

...which is why you should probably expect hillary to run to the right of trump. while clinton may demolish him in a two-way race, it's going to be by winning red states - and by being more appealing to conservatives than trump is. so, clinton wins 40 states, sure. but, the result is that even the moderate left ends up disenfranchised.

i think he needs to wait until at least july to decide. but, i actually don't think that sanders really has a choice. if he doesn't run, what is going to happen is that jill stein is going to show up on the map in a big way. i share the author's view that sanders will win a three-way race, as clinton essentially pushes trump out of the spectrum and becomes the republican nominee. but, stein cannot win - not from where she is. so, if he doesn't run, stein could very well split the vote badly enough to screw things up.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/case-for-sanders-running-independent-if-clinton-nominee_b_9803982.html

to put it another way: somebody is going to run to the left of clinton, and that person is going to generate significant support. the real question is whether that person is:

1) not a factor. so, you could see something like clinton 55, trump 35, stein 10. that's a huge boost for the third party, but clinton wins anyways.
2) enough of a factor to split. so, then you'd get something like clinton 45, trump 35, stein 20 - but the electoral college would be kind to trump. that would be the reverse of the perot scenario that elected bill clinton.
3) or enough to actually win. then, you'd get something like clinton 25, trump 35, sanders 38, stein 2.

it ought to be a very delicate decision, made at the very last minute. and, if (3) is made to prevent (2)? it's actually "unsplitting the vote".

i don't think  you can put sanders back in the tube. his supporters are going to be looking for another option, which right now is likely to be stein.

it was always about the price of oil. the criticism was that they tied themselves too strongly to the price of oil, thereby reducing the country's fiscal situation to the whim of global investors. so, when the price of oil comes down, you get huge deficits - and when it comes up, you get huge surpluses. you fix this by recreating a stable tax base, so the country can better deal with the volatility in oil prices.

oil was expected to stay low this year. it hasn't - it has risen. so, we're getting surpluses instead of deficits. it was largely agreed that the liberals low-balled the projections, but it was also largely agreed that the price would stay low.

this is not the point. it's a red herring. it's the situation of relying on oil prices that is the problem that needs to be resolved. and, the fact that we're in this situation cannot be spun out of - it is flat fiscal incompetence. if the government decides to hold to it, it's just carrying on the incompetence. an advanced nation requires an actual tax base.

(of course, i don't particularly care, anyways. i only care about keeping the imf vultures away. i'm just saying.)

www.cbc.ca/news/business/ottawa-federal-surplus-deficit-1.3559175

29-04-2016: end/start of the month transition [here's a few rants...]

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

Friday, April 29, 2016

shit hillary said vol 44

"I am advocating the no-fly zone both because I think it would help us on the ground to protect Syrians; I’m also advocating it because I think it gives us some leverage in our conversations with Russia."

j reacts to how trump is morphing into bush III

"We’re getting out of the nation-building business and instead focusing on creating stability in the world."

that could be a direct quote from bush. and, it's probably neither coincidence nor calculation - rather, i suspect that this speech was literally written by bush' old speechwriters.

but, something else is curious. if you take away the two or three lines about trade and the opaque barbs at obama, it sounds exactly like something hillary would say.

trump's mild appeal as a possible lesser evil is fading fast as he gets in line and becomes a spokesperson for the republican old guard. if you voted for him to flip the tpp, you've been had. might it have been a ploy from the start?

please vote for jill stein or do not vote at all.

http://time.com/4309786/read-donald-trumps-america-first-foreign-policy-speech/

j reacts to an anecdote by max blumenthal about sanders, warren and aipac

interesting sanders anecdote. and, i don't think this is news, i was just watching this as i was eating. nor is it the crux of the talk. i'm just saying....

nobody's ever argued that sanders is ideal. he's still a lesser evil. and, i've frankly never really taken his bit about corruption seriously - it's just politics.

i've heard elizabeth warren explain away her votes for israeli action by saying something like "america needs an ally in the middle east.". it's the same fundamental policy that's been in place since 1973. it's about the - reasonable - american refusal to accept the saudis as a full ally. it's not about any particular support for israeli policy, and really never has been. it's just all about the geo-political realities around controlling the oil supply.and, the palestinians just get thrown under the bus.

even that said, sanders has taken some really bold positions on the campaign trail. it may not be far enough for most activists, but, even on this issue, it's still incomparably better.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HdHkdnc7iA

i think that, if you follow the argument properly, the best thing that activists in the united states can do on the palestine issue is support the shift to renewable energy. if we can get off oil, we can get off israel, too. you're bluntly not likely to see positive changes in american policy in the region until the shift to energy independence is completed.

j reacts to the supreme court argument [red herring...]

so, now it's about the supreme court, apparently - bernie supporters should support hillary to stop the republicans from stacking the supreme court. is that a better argument?

it's not. it's just a restatement of the other arguments, and the response is the same as it is with the other arguments.

first, let's acknowledge that it's a desperate reaction. what it states is that you can't win the argument that hillary is substantively better than trump, so you're just not making it. instead, you're essentially changing the topic. so, it's a red herring. when you say hillary isn't better than trump, that doesn't somehow not apply to the supreme court nominees.

what would hillary's supreme court nominees look like? they'd be pretty shitty, no doubt - designed to protect corporate power and uphold the status quo. and, remember: hillary supports a constitutional amendment to limit abortion rights. she only came out in favour of gay marriage after the court ruling, and only because of the court ruling. she is a conservative, so you should expect her to appoint conservatives. the best case is the status quo; a realistic expectation is actually a shift to the right, as she'll no doubt replace the democrats that resign with justices that are more conservative.

so, like everything else about hillary, you should expect her supreme court nominations to be horrendous. disastrous, even. but, they'll be chosen in such a way as to not rock boats. you won't realize the shit has hit the fan until it does, if you do at all. so, we get this continuing shift to the right without anybody noticing.

what about trump? well, you'd expect little subtlety in his picks, although i don't think you should take him seriously on the abortion thing. but, let's say you do. let's say he literally appoints judge judy. and, let's say he somehow gets her confirmed. people are going to riot.

so, what do you want? do you want eight more years of the status quo, where they're fucking everybody over and nobody reacts? or do you want some serious pushback?

28-04-2016: toilets don't randomly clog.

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

Thursday, April 28, 2016

shit hillary said vol 43

“Adults are not fulfilling their responsibility to talk to young people about the future, about how they should view their lives, about self-discipline and other values they should have. It’s not birth control, but self-control.”

sewer blockage

jessica
hi.

there's a really severe sewer blockage somewhere around my unit that seems to have clicked in overnight. i know that's vague, but i don't actually know where the blockage is. but, i do know that, the last time i had a block like this (two years ago), the eel company told me that the block was probably off the property and the city should have taken care of it. the toilet is currently inoperable due to the block [it takes ten minutes to drain and takes nothing with it].

i will have to call my landlord. but, i'm just wondering what the process is in getting the city to clear it's side of the lines, in case that's what the issue is (as i think it is).

i live at 805 marion. 

311
Good Afternoon,

Thank you for your email.

The City of Windsor offers an eeling program,  I would suggest contacting the Public Works Maintenance Department immediately to schedule an appointment.  Public Works maintenance can be reached at 519-255-6326.  I have also provided The City of Windsor Eeling Program Link:

http://www.citywindsor.ca/residents/maintenanceandfieldservices/Sewers-/Pages/Eeling-Program.aspx

Thank you for using the City of Windsor 311 services. 

(phone call made) 

jessica
hi.

i have contacted them, and they are offering the eeling service at a charge that i can't place on the property owners without their consent. but i want to be clear that i believe that the blockage is not on the property - that it is in the actual sewer, and is a combination of things like coffee cups, tree branches and other trash that washed into the sewer from the street. i consequently feel like this is something the city should be dealing with through a different method than eeling through a cleanout, like by sending a truck to clear out the sewers. it just strikes me as unfair for my landlord to pick up the bill on something that is affecting the entire neighbourhood [simply because i'm pushy enough to force him to]. and, fwiw, the water level in the sewers on my side of the street is very high, while the water level in the sewers across the street is not - i think it's very clear the blockage is not on his property.

is there a different program for this that places the cost on the city, where it really belongs? 

311
Good Afternoon Jessica,

I am so sorry to hear about the sewer blockage at your resident.

Can you please provide your address and if possible your contact information and I will register a Service Request to have your street sewer cleaned of the tree branches and other trash that has washed into the street sewer and I will also submit a Street Sweeping request to Environmental Services so the street can be cleared of waste.

Thank you for using the City of Windsor 311 services.

jessica
i'm at 805 marion.

can i ask how long you expect such a request to take to process and result in a clearing?

311
Good Afternoon,

A sewer complaint's duration can be up to 10 business day.  I've have including your comments in the Service Request and also flagged your e-mail as Emergency.  Your Service Request No. for your Sewer Complaint is  16-000 10159 in case you need to contact Public Works Maintenance.

Thank you for using the City of Windsor 311 services.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  City of Windsor - 311  Automated Response E-mail Notification - DO NOT REPLY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for using 311!

Your request has been added to the service request tracking system.

Request Type: Sewer Complaint

Your reference number is: 16-00015159.

Click here to view the status of your service request online.

Alternatively, you can call 311 for follow-up by quoting your reference number.

more good news (plumbing)

jessica
i'm just the messenger. i don't want all this shit to be happening, either.

the toilet is swirling slowly again. the pump is also hyperactive. it's the same as before: the drains need to be cleared, and the basement is probably going to eventually flood if they're not. i first noticed the pump yesterday when i was doing laundry and the slow toilet swirl this morning, meaning something backed up over night but it's been building up for a while.

i'll just remind you that the last clog was deep enough in the line that it was probably on city property. so, i don't know if there's a process to get the city to clear the lines, or if they'll pay for it that way.

(pause)

i just want to update that "slow flush" is more like "no flush". the toilet is really not operable. it's taking something like ten minutes to drain - it' stuck.

i'm going to see what information i can find about the city clearing the lines, and then see if i can get paul to call the line cleaners. this is really kind of a must-clear-asap type blockage. nothing is actually flushing at all.

(pause)

i have contacted the city and they will send an eel through for $95.00 - although they claim they won't charge you if it's from tree branches.

what i actually think is causing the blockage is a combination of trash that flowed in from the street - coffee cups, tree branches, french fry containers, etc. if you look at the sewers on this side of the street, they're a foot from the top; if you look at the sewers on the other side of the street, you can't even see the water. it's pretty clear that the block is on the street...

so, i'm pushing back a little and trying to figure out if there's a way to get the city to clear the sewers. i don't think it's fair to force the bill on you, when you're clearing a public line that benefits the entire neighbourhood, for the simple reason that i'm pro-active enough to push for an answer and the neighbour next door isn't.

if i don't get a response, or the response is negative, i suppose i'm waiting on permission from you or paul to call 311 back to get the eel in. the toilet does not work, and i can't be sitting with a bowl full of crap for an extended period.

(pause)

ok.

i've got the city coming to clear the sewers from the outside. i don't know when, yet.

they said up to ten business days, but that it's been flagged as emergency.

i'm comfortable waiting until tomorrow, but i don't think i can wait the weekend out.

(pause)

paul came down and plunged it and it seems like it cleared the immediate obstruction, but that doesn't make any sense, and i'm remaining skeptical. it almost seems like it was already cleared, somehow. i mean, i was gone all night last night - it was fine before i left, and it was fine when i came home and went to bed. it was even fine immediately when i woke up. but, the drain then got progressively worse over the day. that doesn't strike me as consistent with a local issue. it's almost more like something migrated into the pipes. an air bubble, even? but, whatever the cause, it is cleared - for now.

i'll say that i noticed something this morning in the bowl that was red and sort of bloody and seemed to be gurgling up. i made note of it because it was very bright red, and i wasn't sure what it was - it caught my eye. like it shouldn't have been there kind of thing. i had made some nachos when i got home last night, and thought it was probably just some salsa from a kleenex or something. but, i'm starting to wonder. the next flush is when it started to flush slowly - seemingly randomly.

there's other signs that there's still something funny. gurgling sounds. i'm glad the toilet works, but the service order for the cleaning in the outside sewer is still in progress and i'm not going to cancel it.

(pause)

lastly - and curiously - i went to throw something away a little after 17:00 and there was actually an enwin vehicle doing something to the manhole in the laneway next door. if they were clearing, that adds up.

i think it's all good.

the landlord
Jessica, I spoke to Paul and he said no other toilets (4 toilets) where backed up and the sewer, sinks etc have no sign of drainage problems. The conclusion was that your toilet was clogged with toilet paper. Please make aware to Paul as soon as possible when an issue arises so it can be handled quickly. Please do not rely on me reading my e-mails and please make sure it is not just you plugging up the toilet. I do not know why you would call the city since it is only when all toilets and sewer are backed up and then we would call a plumber with a snake to unplug to the city sewer. After taking that measure; and if that did not solve an issue with drainage, the next action would be, call the city. We would have to determine that it would be necessary to call the city after a thorough investigation.  Please do not jump the gun and please do not put excessive amounts of toilet paper down the toilet sewer drain. Please deposit other uses of toilet paper to the garbage, such as blowing your nose etc , Please only flush paper that you wipe your butt with down the toilet. This is the wise way to make sure that a toilet does not plug up the system.

jessica
i really don't think that's what happened. and, as i've mentioned, there is no known cause - i had not defecated in the toilet before it began to slow.

in fact, the sinks remain very slow and it's a matter of time before you'll need to come clear the line. i repeat: there remains evidence of a clog in the main line.

there was a truck outside clearing the sewers a little before he came down. the truth is that the toilet was already unclogged before he plunged it - and you could see that if you looked. i nearly asked him to flush first, but it would have been risky because there was the normal amount of water (which was actually clear) in the bowl.

you wouldn't expect the toilets on the first floor to slow down until the one in the basement has already overflowed. it backs up through the lowest point - that's me, and only me.

again: it's impossible that i clogged the toilet. it worked when i left. it was clogged when i came back. the only way that the toilet could have clogged is if somebody came in and used it when i was gone.

but, as mentioned, it wasn't clogged - a truck cleared the sewers from outside.

(pause)

but, to answer your question: why would i call the city?

because i do not think the clog is on your property; i think it's on city property. it's not your responsibility, as a property owner, to clear out the sewers on the street.

you should keep that link handy. the city clears for free. and, i do believe that that was and remains the solution.

you really should *not* call the plumber and waste $100 on a snake until you've called the city to clear the street sewers, which are the actual problem, for free.

(pause)

i've been running a vlog for the last few months. it's not really popular or anything, it's more just something to do. and, this was kind of a boring day because all i did was freak out about the toilet.

it was set to publish tonight at 12:30, but i've published it a few hours early to make the point.

if you watch the whole thing (15 minutes), you'll get a better handle of what happened (and there is actually footage of the truck at the end).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOSGGEm_9Kw

the landlord
Jessica, I see the toilet is draining slow. I have seen this before and sometimes something large may have fallen in the toilet and is jammed in the toilet trap. Some times things fall in that are too large and get jammed. We may have to pull the toilet and turn it upside down. In the video when your where outside on the street, you where looking at the storm sewer. That is where all the evesdroughs and surface water are collected. The pipe from the toilets is connected to the Sanitary sewer much deeper under the streets. This is a closed sewer that you can not see. Google storm sewer vs sanitary sewer so you understand the difference. I will get around asap to check your problem.

jessica
remember when we had this discussion last year or the year before and i contacted the city's engineering department and they explained that there's a combined sewer system in windsor, rather than separate sanitary lines?

the systems in this house are such that if we get a hurricane or something, it could very well backup. and, if the storm drains get blocked, it *is* going to affect the plumbing.

i do still think that's what actually happened and the truck outside was pushing through leaves and other debris. and, that kind of spring cleaning of the storm drains should probably be done on at least a yearly basis.

there's an interesting article here about sewage run-offs from storm drain overflows:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/windsor/brown-stuff-in-windsor-waterways-could-be-human-feces-city-says-1.2782594

the landlord
To the best of my knowledge that is not possible for any city sewer system to be connected into a storm sewer or vice versa by city engineering. In fact if anyone connects storm to a sanitary sewer and are caught they would be fined. Our storm sewer is not connected to the Sanitary and we are in compliance. If illegal hookups are affecting our property from back pressure or over taxed sanitary sewer, your toilet would be overflowing with black shit all over the floor. Paul has cleared your toilet and it is flowing good right now. Please contact Paul ASAP to see the problem visually first hand if you think it is happening when there is a heavy rain or just after. This way we can determine your toilets condition and call the city to the condition if in fact city sanitary is a backup condition. Please call Paul to deal with this condition and do not send me e-mails, I cannot respond quickly.

jessica
this was the email i got from the city last year.

i really think that it's important that you understand the way the plumbing down here works, both for my own benefit and your own benefit.

the sewers in this area are over 100 years old. they were built before it became common to separate drain and sanitary sewers. as such, THERE IS A COMBINED SEWER SYSTEM ATTACHED TO THIS PROPERTY.

and, what that means is that the plumbing system is subject to effects from external conditions like blocked storm drains and heavy rains.

i have explained this in multiple ways. i mean, you can lead a horse to water, right? but, let's get this clear, please, for future concerns. because i will not behave as though the plumbing exists in a way that it doesn't simply because you refuse to listen to good evidence. and, if you refuse to accept the reality, i will have no choice but to take matters into my own hands when it is necessary and bypass you to get the work done.

this is the email from the city: 

I would like to clear up a few points in your email.

While your landlord may be correct in that the house may be serviced by separate storm and sanitary connections (I can't confirm that), both these connections would outlet to the same combined sewer in the road. There is only one sewer Cataraqui and one on Marion, and they are both combined sewers meaning that they accept both rain water and sewage.

With respect to the Wyandotte project, there is no sewer work being undertaken as part of that project. Windsor Utilities is replacing the watermain and services and the City will reconstruct the pavement following that work. This project would have no impact on the sewers servicing your property.

You are most likely correct in that there is a correlation between rainfall and the slow running plumbing in your house. This is due to the combined nature of the sewer that services your property. During rain events, combined sewers fill with rainwater and therefore have limited capacity to accept flows from buildings.

With respect to the apartment building across the street from you, all rainfall runoff from this property would have entered the sewer system via foundation drains prior to the fire, so the fact that the basement may have flooded and the water is now entering the floor drain would change the drainage pattern very little. In fact, rainwater entering the sewers from this property would be very small in proportion to that coming from the catchbasins draining the roads in the area.

With respect to abandonment of the connections servicing the apartment building, that would be addressed when the building is demolished by the Building Department. If you have concerns regarding the state of the building, please contact the Building Department via 311.

Hopefully, this answers some of your questions. Please contact me if you want to discuss this matter further.

Sincerely;

------------. P.Eng.
A/Contracts Co-ordinator 

the landlord
Jessica, what does this have to do with our building and the fact that your toilet does not overflow from the city backing up or a back due to overtaxed sewer system from rain water. Is it your belief that your toilet was plugged from a overtaxed or old city sewer? Please specify clearly?  Paul cleared your toilet with all the paper in it which could not have come from anyone else but you as he tells me. Your toilet has been cleared and ever since Paul has cleared it you have not reported to Paul any other circumstance since he cleared it. No one can enter your place except you and Paul. Feel free to call the City to keep the city sewers cleared if this helps you. As far as your toilet getting plugged, you have to look at the circumstance of one plugged situation and not multiple problems as Paul or I understand. If you had multiple situations please update Paul so he understands your concern with dates, times, frequencies, etc. and any heavy rainfall occurring. Once we document these situations we will have evidence that we can report to the city. Heavy Rain falls must be the root cause to overtax the Illegal over flows to the city sewer. You must first report to Paul ASAP so we can assess the circumstance to have evidence of ongoing problems which so far is not evident to us. So far there is no evidence that we have documented of the city system backing up or causing your toilet to be plugged or any of our toilets in the building to be affected. We have no evidence of this so far. We will have to pay close attention and document details from now on to build a case. You cannot wait for me to look at e-mails to respond promptly to a situation when I do not read my e-mails every day. Paul and you are the Key to the documentation.

Paul can call and request the city to clear their system if that helps you with peace of mind. So if that is what you are requesting then please ask Paul to call the city to request a sewer servicing. Paul will read this e-mail. You have the power to ask him to call and he can call the city once he has an understanding of your concern. I will speak to Paul also.

jessica
well, like i say, we don't really agree about what happened. you can see in the video that there wasn't initially anything substantial in the toilet (some urine, and a couple of pieces of toilet paper - that's not going to create a clog). i suppose we'll have to agree to disagree.

i apologize if i'm coming off as standoffish, it's just that a blocked mainline isn't something i want to play with, and if i think it's the city's lines then i'm going to call them as soon as i identify a problem in order to try and get them cleared outside. it's not just the rain. it's also the fact that people throw all kinds of garbage in the sewers. i don't want to sit around and argue about what the problem is. it's known that the lines in this area are very old and should really be replaced - it's just that it would cost a substantial sum for the city to do it.

as i mentioned, it wasn't just the toilet - the sinks were also draining slowly and sending through air bubbles when they drained. that's the classic sign of a blocked main. which, you wouldn't expect to back up upstairs because it's not the lowest point. you'd have to have a huge mess down here before it becomes an issue upstairs. on that level, i guess i'm the canary, right? i'm going to notice issues before anybody else does.

after the toilet cleared, the sinks were still draining slowly. so, it seemed like it was better but that more work was going to be necessary.

BUT, since then the issue has largely resolved itself. and, consistently, the sewers in the front have also come down about a meter. so, i'm left to conclude that the lines outside have drained and the issue went away with it.

so, i *don't* think anything requires any immediate attention.

but, i *do* think that it's going to remain a constant concern due to the infrastructure in the neighbourhood. and, rather than contact you and have a talk about this or that, i'm going to just jump to calling the city. because if the thing blows up while we're arguing about it....

when i was talking to the city, the impression i got was that they understand that the issue is structural and that periodic calls to get the lines cleared are actually expected. i mean, we can document it and send them a report, but you wouldn't be telling them anything they don't know. they know the lines need to be replaced. it's just, where do you get billions of dollars to do it? it's more cost effective to send out a truck to clear the lines when they get full of trash.

but, like i say - they've come down about a meter since then. we should expect that they'll clog again, eventually. but, they seem to be ok for now.

27-04-2016: finally finishing spring cleaning & catching a weird band (ada) in detroit

concert footage:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnBe0WIxVY8

review:
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/shows/2016/04/27.html

previous vlog:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGiA6m5fIBw

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

Wednesday, April 27, 2016

27-04-2016: ada - ?? (detroit)

their music:
https://adamaine.bandcamp.com

review:
http://dghjdfsghkrdghdgja.appspot.com/categories/shows/2016/04/27.html

vlog for the day:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPVoDwebhUk

the furnace is leaking again...

while i think it needs to be caulked down here, i do suspect that something is loose upstairs.
i've found myself very sleepy this week due to a variety of things, including going cold turkey on coffee for a bit. i want to get my fluids up before i go back on it. it's working, too. see, i have a problem with not drinking enough water. i think it will resolve itself once i can turn the heat off in here (this has been a slow spring, here).

so, it took me a week to do a day's worth of spring cleaning. but it is now actually done. finally. i'll have to do laundry this afternoon, and then some filing tomorrow.

so, will i have anything up by the end of the month? no. but, i should be back on track by the start of may.

i've managed to just lose a whole year. it sucks. but, it's the way it had to be.

j reacts to the cruz-kasich agreement (it's idiotic, tactically)

also: i think that, in indiana, kasich voters are going to be more likely to back trump than cruz. the reason is that it's a socially conservative state anyways, so cruz has kasich dominated. if you're voting for kasich, it's because you consider yourself a moderate. trump is more moderate than cruz, so you'd think they'd rank him as their second choice.

it's kind of the flip of the northeast overall, but the same logic as it applies to kasich voters. cruz finished in third place in four out of five states tonight. kasich voters clearly didn't see the prospect of rallying behind cruz to be very appealing. and, it's not some collapse in logic - it's simply that they (broadly) ranked cruz behind trump in terms of preference. so, they're not going to vote for cruz to stop trump if they prefer trump to cruz. they're just going to shrug and vote for kasich.

in indiana, cruz should probably want kasich to pull those voters away from trump. so, removing kasich is actually probably going to hurt him. if they were going to vote for cruz (to stop trump or some other reason), they would have voted for him in the first place.

it's just more evidence that cruz and his team are just absolute fucking idiots. it's this ultra-competitive mindset that blinds them to any kind of co-operative strategy. they're utility monsters. it's the consequence of unrestrained egoism, selfishness as a virtue - predictable, really. yes: he should have pulled back in the northeast to give kasich a better chance [and don't say that was unpredictable. it was absolutely obvious, from weeks out.]. but, he doesn't want kasich to drop out of the midwest, as he's splitting the "moderates" and actually helping him.

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-04-28/in-indiana-the-deal-to-stop-trump-may-be-backfiring

ok, so is voting for cruz the smarter choice? see, that's my analysis - trump got the gift of ted cruz. even this late, i still think the major reason that people are holding to trump is that anything at all is better than ted cruz.

j reacts to the illegitimate primaries and sanders' politicking around them

no surprises tonight, although the closed primaries are not somehow more legitimate tonight than they were last week. it's still a flawed process, and the outcome is still not very convincing. and, hillary's reaction, through surrogates, is strongly suggesting the need for an independent run.

yes, sanders knows he won't be the democratic party nominee, and it's hard to believe he ever really thought he would be. but, he's also been clear that his endorsement of hillary clinton is not a sure thing - and it shouldn't be. don't expect the media to be able to understand this, because it can't think outside of binary, two-party politics.

see, hillary is not very good at working with others. she's an effective autocrat, but she's not good at making concessions. and, frankly, i don't think she feels she needs to - i think she thinks she won a mandate. but, she's only won a mandate with democrats, and sanders is not really a democrat.

the way that this process is supposed to work in the mind of the party establishment (and probably in the mind of most liberals) is that they have the primary, the candidate with the best ideas wins and the candidates that lose rally around the winner. that, in their minds, is "democracy".

but, leftists have never believed that democracy is reduced to a voting decision, nor have we ever believed that a majority mandate negates the views of the minority. we believe in tough negotiations through civil disobedience and spoiled ballots, if necessary. and, we're not going to support the hillary that we see in front of us. we're just not.

the reality is that sanders is making demands that he cannot truly believe that clinton will accept - and is, in the process, preparing himself for a re-exit of the party he was never really a member of.

i mean, do you think hillary clinton is going to support tuition-free public colleges and universities? or that she'll ban fracking? really?

and, see, this is the irony of the way the media works - it functions so strongly on branding that it even confuses itself. bernie is supposed to be the honest one. so, he couldn't possibly be engaging in politics, could he?

he is. and, the reason he's giving her conditions she'll never accept is that he has no intentions of supporting her.

shit hillary said vol 42

"Research shows that the primary reason that teenage girls abstain is because of their religious and moral values. We should embrace this--and support programs that reinforce the idea that abstinence at a young age is not just the smart thing to do, it is the right thing to do"

shit hillary said vol 41

"And that's why last week I called on our president to decide he would not attend the opening ceremonies of the Olympics because that is a public and very obvious ratification of our government's approval of the Beijing government's actions.

Unless the Chinese began to take very visible steps to begin to end the suppression of the Tibetans and undermining their culture and religious beliefs, and if we could get more cooperation out of the Chinese government with respect to Sudan.

And, of course, I would welcome even more action on behalf of human rights. But the challenge is, how do we try to influence the Chinese government? And I believe we have missed many opportunities during the Bush administration to do so.

In fact, I think it's fair to say our policy toward China is incoherent and that has not been in the best interest of our values or our strategic interest. So I would urge the president at least to consider and, therefore, publicly say that he will not be attending the opening ceremonies.

And let's see whether the Chinese government begins to respond because that for them would be a great loss of face and perhaps we would get more cooperation."

shit hillary said vol 40

"I am surprised and offended by the decision of the Appeals Court of the 9th Circuit and hope that it will be promptly appealed and overturned. I believe that the Court has misinterpreted the intent of the framers of the Constitution and has sought to undermine one of the bedrock values of our democracy -- that we are indeed "one nation under God," as embodied in the pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.

While our men and women in uniform are battling overseas and defending us here at home to preserve the freedom that we all cherish for our country and its citizens, we should never forget the blessings of Divine Providence that undergird our nation. That includes the freedom to recite the pledge of allegiance in our nation's schools. I can only imagine how they will feel about this decision as they risk their lives for our values.

And the children of America, who share a bond with each other and with our nation by reciting the pledge each day -- what effect will a decision like this have on them? It will cause them to wonder about the ways in which our beliefs can be stretched, our heritage can be assaulted. It is the wrong decision, and it is an unfair decision -- especially unfair to those who defend our nation, and to the young people who will inherit our nation's future.

Ours is a nation founded by people of faith. People of faith have helped lead some of the most significant movements of social justice throughout our history -- to end slavery, to win civil rights for all Americans. No one is required to have faith, and our government does not impose faith on its citizens. But ours is the most faith-filled nation on Earth, and there is no moral or Constitutional argument why our pledge of allegiance cannot acknowledge our commonly held belief that ours is one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

I am honored to support S. 292, the Pledge of Allegiance resolution, and I hope that the rule of law will be upheld by an ultimate rejection of this wrongheaded decision of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals."

Monday, April 25, 2016

j reacts to the cruz-kasich co-operative agreement [too little, too late]

this would have mattered if it were applied to the primaries that are tomorrow. i've commented on this in depth - it was the smart strategy....last month. now, it's too late. in fairness, there are reports that kasich understood things as they are, but cruz wouldn't co-operate.

hindsight is 20/20, ted.

it's an adult thing to admit when you're wrong. but, he ought to have just lost the argument, for good.

presuming he sweeps tomorrow, he won't need any of these states outright, and the states that cruz is conceding are proportional (meaning it doesn't matter).

the reality is that trump has already won. and, it's 100% cruz' fault.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/apr/25/ted-cruz-and-john-kasich-team-up-in-deal-to-stop-trump

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CpRCc4Jre8

Sunday, April 24, 2016

23/24-04-2016: trying to start spring cleaning, pt 2 (+ quitting caffeine for a bit)

tracks worked on in this vlog:
https://jasonparent.bandcamp.com/album/period-1

hrmmn. black people blamed for something due to questionable exit polling, despite the data ultimately showing that there wasn't really any meaningful skew. sounds familiar. wonder if there's a pattern....

j reacts to the growing implications of the race (or gender) v class debate

this race v class thing again. it's the issue of our time. it's not new; you can trace it back to the 60s. and, i've pointed out a few times that it's older than that - it's the very idea that the united states was founded on: get the slaves fighting over race so they forget about class and don't fight us (because then we're fucked). but the way it's begun to manifest itself over the last few years, one could posit since occupy, has exposed larger fracture points that the democratic primary seems to have taken to a boil: the debate is not really about 'race v class' anymore, if it ever was at all, it's now just really all about class. and, when i say that, what i mean is that it divides the left very cleanly into liberals and socialists.

if you think it's about race, what you're arguing for is equality of opportunity. so, is it any surprise that you're voting for clinton? you're not really that keen on the unrealistic ideas and lofty ideals on the left in the first place. what you want is a system that gives everybody a fair opportunity to climb up the hierarchy. so, is it about race? it's not - it's about class, and your insistence that it not be abolished, because you want to climb your way up a few rungs and be in a position of greater status and wealth. you have a fundamentally competitive, calvinist, market-oriented, capitalist outlook on society. you just want to make sure the rules are fair - that nobody is starting off from a privileged position. you're a liberal.

but, if you think it's all about class, you're focused more on equality of outcome. you're a sanders supporter. when you argue for equal opportunities to education, it's because education is a human right - not because you think everybody should have the same starting points. you think everybody should have equal access to healthcare, too. it's a right! it's not something you should have to earn, or something that hard work should provide you with advantages in. you don't assign much importance to climbing up any hierarchy, because you don't think there should even be a hierarchy to climb at all. or, you may be a little bit of an existential nihilist about it, too. you have a fundamentally co-operative, egalitarian, distributive justice based, communitarian outlook on society, which should be designed so that people can enjoy their lives from cradle to grave, not spend almost all of it fighting for position in a chart. you're a socialist.

i think you can connect these ideas to the different movements that have defined the last five years, too. occupy was all about class, and is pretty strongly behind sanders. black lives matter was all about race, and seems to be mostly supporting clinton. one is a fundamentally liberal movement with a fundamentally liberal outlook; the other is very much in the tradition of socialism.

i understand that there is a need on the left to build broader movements that integrate different racial organizations, so the idea of breaking movements apart like this may be kneejerked against by many. i'd probably make the same argument, myself. but, that is merely a restatement of my position: it's all about class. is what you're saying any different? and, the more push back i hear on the point, the more i realize that it's coming from viewpoints that are thoroughly liberal and genuinely do not wish to abolish class at all. does a common cause actually exist?

perhaps some sober reflection is in order.

shit hillary said vol 39

"Now we have to figure out how we can see through thick vegetation to find Joseph Kony.”