Monday, June 14, 2021

i can grasp the corruption in sound audio, but how'd it get out of sync? 

what seemed to disappear in the track was the pickup up note that it starts on, which both precedes and finalizes the loop. i'd notate this in 4/4 and make the loop four bars, so you'd end up with the following if you were to notate it:

x |: 1... | 1... | 1... | 1..x :|

...with the pickup note where the xes are. so, it's just an extra quarter note at the front of the pattern...

i don't know how, but something got confused somewhere, as it sounds like the pickup shifted to the one, which just put everything out of order.

like i say - this is very weird...
so, i deleted the track and reuploaded and it sounds better.

weird.

some kind of corruption somewhere, maybe.
yeah, the bandcamp compression seems to be having some difficulties with that rough version of the lost symphony i pulled from tape. there's supposed to be a flanging effect on the right channel, and it's just a gross, muddy, warbled mess on the stream. oddly, it seems like the stream is having difficulty syncing the right and left channels together as well, which i don't quite understand. the file i uploaded is correctly in sync. what process would separate the channels and then put them back together wrong? it's weird.

it sounds fine on the other computer...

but, it's a temp mix anyways, and i'll need to fix it when i clean that up over the next few weeks.
for the slow kids at the back of the room...

if you want to fight against colonialism, you need to be opposed to all forms of religion, including the ones that remain in a colonization stage, and not just the ones that did the colonizing in the past.

if you pick one colonizing force and align with it in it's struggle against the other, you will merely end up colonized by it.
while i would like to see christians and muslims continue fighting each other, as that will prevent them from uniting to undo modernity, we cannot, as leftists, be taking sides in these sorts of conflicts, or picking one pile of nonsense over the other. that's the same mistake that the anarchists made in spain, thinking they could rely on stalin for solidarity - they will slaughter us at the first chance they get.

islam is an excellent ally of capital, which is why they were chosen to be it's foot soldiers by multiple united states presidents in the last century.

but, islam is not an ally to the left, and that point needs to be understood, or we will find ourselves wiped out.
see, it's interesting to note the hypocrisy on the fake left, here.

when you deface a mosque it's a "hate crime". but, when you deface a church it's "dismantling colonialism" - despite the fact that christianity and islam are essentially the same things, and islam is responsible for inventing colonialism, imperialism and capitalism as we understand these things, today.

the confusion these people have in their minds is that they've decided everything's about race. so, when you have religious bigots that are brown, it's ok - religious bigotry is only bad when white people do it.

i'm not going to repeat the line on the right about this, as my view is the logical opposite of theirs - i don't have any more condemnation for an attack on a church than i would on a mosque, and i support a diversity of tactics in combating religion, even if i think this kind of thing is broadly counterproductive in actually turning people against religion. refer to my recent post about the poor tactical choice of killing muslims as a reaction to the re-encroachment of religion into the legal system.

but, my broader concern is this turn towards religionism on the fake left, and this blurry thinking that leads one to (correctly) look the other way when a church is targeted (unless it's a black church, of course) and (incorrectly) cry "hate crimes!" when a mosque is targeted.

that kind of blurry, inconsistent thinking is going to get us all enslaved by islam.

so, yes - i'm several days behind schedule...

what i need to do at the moment is file my backup drive and rebuild it in the back-up sources. i need to get it done before sunrise.
and, today's period 3.1 update post is for the bedroom cassette demos (inri077). this is likely complete.

==============

inri077. 

these are some demos that i recorded on my 4-track in sarah and heather's apartment on dalhousie in ottawa in late 2003.  

initially, the only thing i transferred was a section that became "like divine amoebas", because i was using it, directly. i seem to have lost that tape, but i have found a second tape with an early version of the lost symphony and added it to the ep. it's not currently immediately clear if there are further demos from this period in the other room in a pile of boxes or not.

released november 1, 2003 

so, the pattern recently has been that i sit down for a minute after eating and pass out...

i jumped ahead to period 3.1, but it's going to be probably until early august before i can move into period 3.2. so, let's finish the daily postings...

this is inri070, which is a 2xcd that has the soundblaster mixes from 2001/2002 on one side and completed vst mixes on the other. 

===

back in 2001, and bleeding into about 2003, i wrote a number of tracks into a scorewriter with the explicit intent of eventually having them performed by live ensembles. at the beginning of 2014, i decided that this wasn't likely to ever actually happen and went about completing the tracks in finalized forms - which happened over 2014 and 2015. 

my initial plan for this compilation was to produce a record of midi compositions mapped to modern vst instruments as a "chiptune" (not literally) project, and have it double a record of fully realized versions of the tracks. as i went about completing the project, i began to realize that these vst versions were not sufficiently different enough from the finalized versions to justify a separate album and consequently aborted the project. 

however, something that's happened since 2001 is that a more mature market has developed for midi-generated music, largely on the back of the success of the gaming industry. people have nostalgia for the sounds that their childhood gaming consoles made and an interest in listening to original music in the style of the soundtracks to those games. 

i need to be clear that these are not gaming soundtracks - they're a mix of various types of classical and jazz, taking in influences from across the musical spectrum but essentially none from gaming. gaming isn't a thing i've ever really done, and the little bit i've done has tended to act as an excuse for listening to music (i had a mild civ2 obsession in early high school). 

however, i feel that compiling a record of soundblaster mixes is something that could appeal to a specialized, niche audience and am going to put this record together for those people. i also feel it captures the headspace that i was in at the time. i've decided to mirror this soundblaster disc with the vst disc i was initially contemplating, to demonstrate where the technology has arrived at. 

all of these tracks also appear on a set of cross-listed singles, and most of them are sequenced into a record at some point. there's more info on the track pages. 

i've included the raw midi files in the download for further listening and modification. 

these tracks were written from 2001 to 2003 and in some cases rearranged over the course of 2014 and 2015. all disc 1 tracks rendered through a soundblaster live! device that was manufactured c.1999. all disc 2 tracks created in cubase with vst software synthesizer technology. the compilation date is may 14, 2015. disc finalized as lp019 on jan 13, 2018. as always, please use headphones. 

his release also includes a printable jewel case insert and will also eventually include a comprehensive package of journal entries from all phases of production (2001, 2002, 2003, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018). 

released april 29, 2003 

j - controller inputs, programming, composition, digital wave editing, effects processing, production 

the various rendered electronic orchestras include acoustic bass, synth bass, electric bass, flute, clarinet, brass, trumpet, trombone, tuba, soprano saxophone, orchestra hit, violin, cello, string section (tremolo), drum machine, electronic drum kit, hand drums, finger snaps, nylon guitar, electric guitar (distorted, clean), steel string acoustic guitar, fret noise, sitar, banjo, pc card clavinet, music box, piano, organ, bells, synthesizers, mellotron and choir.

inri076

so, it's uploaded now and it's staying there.

i think that, of the pieces not yet released, this one is the most emotionally difficult to let into the public listening sphere. it was a long time ago...

if it's not obvious, the track is pretty sardonic. but, this is also, like, just pure sound art - i was feeling fucked up and just wanted to capture it best i could.

do i sound like sean in the recording? well, sean admitted he was trying to sound like me in the first place. the rabit working relationship was always sort of weird, as i was in total control of the whole process from the very start, so sean sounded the way he did because i made him sound that way (and he never figured out how to recreate that, if he actually wanted to). what is true is that there is some lingering feeling from that part of the discography, which had at that point just closed down a few months previous. but, i never released this until today, and it doesn't linger much longer than this.

that noise file i found from 2004 actually uses the same jx-8p sound effect i used in this track, and there's a conceptual idea i wanted to document that's kind of lingering, so i will probably add a noise composition to the start of this that is based on that existing file. that works out quite well.

i'm past due to eat....

==============

inri076 will be a short single with the early version of eleventh dimension (& all you need...) 

soul swap piece? 

============ 

i'll do a write-up for this a little later. 

for now, i'm just going to point out that my brain sort of broke in the middle of 2003, and this was the result of it. it sort of speaks for itself in some sense. 

i think maybe two people have heard this.... 

the second track got cleaned up and used for the start of the interplanetary isomorphism (the third trivial group symphony), but the first track just got completely discarded - and there's lots of reasons for that that we'll go over later. 

what i've done in 2021, for now, is remaster the track to turn the vocals down. the track is otherwise bitwise identical (excluding some intentional clipping). 

i may write an original piece to precede this to close it. 

written & recorded in 2003. remastered in 2021. inri076. 

as always, please use headphones.

released september 1, 2003 

j - guitars, drum programming, digital wave editing, synthesizers, electric mandolin, vocals

alright, this is on it's way up a few hours later than i wanted it to be but so be it.

i've never released this before...

....and this is, i think, unlike anything i'd ever done previously. i'm lucky to have an archive like this - i don't tend to repeat myself, creatively. so, let it begin - this is period 3.1...

*deep breath*

(like anybody's listening, anyways.)

Sunday, June 13, 2021

got it, actually...
ok, this is going to take longer than i thought, so i have to eat.

i need this filed before i leave the house, too.
so, what i want to do with this tonight is very simple, and it may be all i do with it at all - as this kind of pre-track for the interplanetary isomorphism is more or less stranded. in the end, i'll have to decide if i want to pull it back into the final product or leave it here, but for now what i need to do is just pull the vocals out and put them back in slightly more quietly.

i was still using cool edit to mix at this point, so the files were pasted on top of each other. period 3 is the last period using this method, but it's still dominant until early 2007. as mentioned many times, there are actually major benefits to this (and i'll continue to come back to it when i want something with a certain blurry sound, like the reprise to the time machine), and the material done in this period really exaggerates it, but it means i have to reline everything up in cubase from scratch to remix it on the existing hardware.

unfortunately, the vocals and guitars were both pasted in with a clip so it's not as easy as phase reversing them out - it leaves the distortion there as a relic. so, i have to rebuild it.

so, what i've done is copy the abandoned combined mix i had into cubase and then take each of the parts and put them into their own new tracks. once i've phase reversed each part out as best i can, they'll be lined up - and i can then reverse them back to where they were initially and mix them without the clipping.
ok, i'm caught up.

so, it's time to eat and get to the next thing, which is creating a first run of inri076.
listen, i'm pretty vocal about the need to stand up for free speech, free association, bodily autonomy and other individual rights that would be considered "political".

but, i'm just as vocal about rejecting much of any concept of property rights, including intellectual property rights.

and, while i'm not a marxist, marx and i wouldn't actually have much disagreement about rights - as i'd also agree with his denunciation of natural rights theory as fantastical, pseudo-religious statist nonsense.

that video i watched yesterday was really mislabelled, but it was more due to the interviewer rather than the author, who i take it wanted to talk about marx & natural rights but instead got hijacked by a discussion of post-modernist interpretations of leninist conceptions of human rights, which have little to do with marxist theory. i had some mild difficulty following it (i think i followed the content of the conversation, even if i didn't get the references), but he seemed to think that marxism was the same thing as leninism (ack.) and then tried to define marxist human rights theory as this pseudo-fascist application of taylorism to leninism, as it existed in the soviet union (double ack.).

it's sort of baffling to me that anybody would define themselves as a leninist in 2021, but the point needs to be stated as clearly as possible: leninism is not marxism, and people that call themselves unhyphenated marxists don't tend to cite lenin very often. certainly, if you're going to title a video with a reference to marx in it, you shouldn't talk about leninism as the content - and if you're going to talk about leninism, you shouldn't title your talk as being about marxism. these aren't related traditions anymore, if they ever were. unhypenated marxists tend to interpret leninists as cryptofascists, and leninists tend to look at marxists as smelly idiots. 

so, it took me some time to figure it out...

i'll readily concede that human rights were not particularly important ideas in the soviet union. china's not in the realm of european civilization, so talking about human rights is a complicated thing, but the russians are europeans so the discussion can be had in the context of european rights theory - and the soviets were pretty vicious, there's no question, and right from the start to the end, too. but, lenin's economic theory was not marxist, it was taylorist, which is the point that unhyphenated marxists make in rejecting him as a fascist. taylorism was the same economic theory in use in american manufacturing at the time, had parallels in dickensian england and was the basic economic framework adopted by mussolini and hitler (although hitler was also famously a fordist and a keynesian). this is a big part of why unhyphenated marxists are so dismissive of leninism - it's just based on the same economic framework as then contemporary capitalism, as orwell so aptly pointed out. 

and, if you read lenin carefully, he didn't even obscure the fact. for all the talk of russia trying to leapfrog the capitalist state of development, lenin was actually pretty explicit in his embrace of historical materialism, and the need for russia to go through the process in the right order - which is why it ended up the way it did, rather than in spite of it. mao tried a little harder, but lenin was fully cognizant of the restraints imposed on russia within the theory of historical materialism, and didn't even get that far before he was dead.

stalin was of course a tsar, so the whole thing falls apart after that. but, this idea that lenin was doing anything other than just trying to convert russia's backwards economy into an american-style taylorist capitalist state is kind of outside the realms of actual factual reality. there's just so much propaganda around it, including his own, that it's hard to get to the really simple, unremarkable facts of the matter.

so, marx would have been just as critical of the russian revolution as he was of the french revolution, and trying to frame marx' views on much of anything in terms of leninist theory is a ridiculous category error.

...even if it took me a few tries to figure out what they were even talking about.

marx lived before any meaningful articulation of "human rights", anyways - what he had in front of him was "natural rights theory", as begun by religious scholars and culminated in things like social contracts and lockeanism. as mentioned, i agree that the crux of this theory is a lot of bullshit - there are no rights out there in the ether to find with human reason, and there is no god to put them there. but, we do have democracy, and ought we not use the legislature to decide certain things are inviolable by the state? indeed, we must.

marx had no faith in a bourgeois state to actually uphold any concepts of rights theory, though, and i don't blame him for that view, at all. you have rights until you don't - because they're not out there in the ether, there is no god to put them there and the bourgeoisie can eliminate them with a stroke of a pen if they truly want to. but, to suggest that means we ought to shrug it off is both nonsense and entirely the opposite of what marx meant to say; marx' point was not that rights don't or ought not to exist but that, as we cannot trust the bourgeois state to uphold them, we must constantly be vigilant in upholding them - or risk collapsing into slavery. if he were alive today, he'd be as vocal a defender of individual rights theory as anybody.

he didn't like property rights,  and i do not either, but it's a result of the proudhonian idea (that he stole) about property being theft. marx would have advocated the libertarian principle that an individual's rights end where another's begin, and for that reason would have argued that property rights are impossible, and aligned with proudhon on that point as a result of it - even if he attacked him in an apparent attempt to deflect from the fact that he stole a lot of his ideas and then tried to take credit for them. it's because of things like this that anarchists can accept marx as a valid theorist, while rejecting people like lenin and trotsky as basically fascist goons.

so, i mean, i'm not a marxist, and i'm not interested in reading all these secondary sources on the evolution from marxism to marxist-leninist-maoism, as it becomes a kind of fascism in the process. but, i know enough about marx to know he'd have stood with me and the other anarchists on most rights issues, and not with these post-leninist cryptofascists that want to bring in taylorism (along with some kind of cult of reason) at the boot of a gun  - and that that guy was badly misinformed via solely reading misleading secondary sources if he thought marx would be aligned with taylorist producerism over enlightenment liberal rights theory.
my peripheral eyesight is not particularly good and helmets make it harder for me to see what's happening around me, as well as slow down the amount of time it takes for me to turn my head.

while i'm hyperaware of what's happening around me (i've never been hit by a car in 30 years of heavy biking), i actually ride on the sidewalk or try to take back roads rather than major highways....and would encourage more cyclists to do so.

regardless, the probability that i'm going to alter my behaviour under any sort of incentive system is 0%. you can write me tickets, and i'll file a constitutional challenge. and, if i lose the challenge, i'll just throw the tickets in the trash - and you can't collect because i'm too poor. then, if i ever get any money, i'll just pay the fine, instead.

today's post is the second version of the lps-only dvd.

======

purchasing this release does not come with a download. 

inri053: written late 2001 and early 2002. this file is ripped from a cd-r that was burnt around 2002, as that was the option that would produce the most accurate reproduction of the original composition. published without modification on oct 6, 2014. expanded, re-released and finalized as symph006 and lp012 on oct 23, 2017. 

inri057: written and recorded in late 2001 and early 2002. initially sequenced in may, 2002. re-sequenced and first released in june, 2002. re-released in slightly different forms from 2002-2014. resequenced to mimic the original sequencing and re-released on november 8, 2014. except to sequence the record, these files have not been altered since 2002. disc finalized as lp013 on nov 3, 2017. 

inri063: these tracks are all based on existing demos from 2001-2002 that were initially intended to be completed with vocal parts and were remixed from july, 2014 to may, 2015 as purely instrumental recordings. released may 2, 2015. disc finalized as lp014 on nov 21, 2017. this is my sixth official record. 

inri066: originally written, programmed and recorded from 1996-2002. reclaimed & remixed from june to december of 2015. initial completion date was december 31, 2015. disc finally released, closed and finalized on nov 26, 2017. lp015. 

inri067: written and recorded between dec, 1999 and july, 2002, except the hidden track (which was created in the summer of 1998). none of these tracks were remastered or otherwise modified after 2002. disc simultaneously created and finalized as lp016 on nov 26, 2017. 

inri068: originally written, programmed and recorded in varying states of finality over 2001 and 2002, except the hidden track (which was programmed in 1997). the associated tracks were completed between february, 2014 and may, 2015; these mixes, however, were spun off as late as nov, 2017. released as lp017 on nov 27, 2017. expanded and finalized on jan 1, 2018. 

inri069: initially written and recorded between 1997-2003. this compilation idea was developed and expanded upon as an intended full record release between 2006 and 2011. reinterpreted, reconstructed and remixed between 2014-2018. sequenced over december, 2017 and january, 2018. disc released & finalized as lp018 and tetris I-IV on jan 7, 2018. 

originally created from 1997-2003. this compilation is dated to april 28, 2003. slowly remastered, reconstituted, compiled, reconstructed, released and finalized from 2013-2018. compilation finalized on jan 9, 2018. as always, please use headphones. 

released April 28, 2003 

j - guitars (electric, acoustic, classical), digital & analog effest processing, bass, bass synth, synthesizers, electric & grand pianos, electric air reed organ, digital piano, flute, mandolin, voice, vocal noises & relics, electronic & analog drum kits, drum programming, drum manipulations, drum sampling, vocal manipulations, loops, orchestral & other sequencing, sampling, equalization, sound raider, found sounds, octavers, noise generators, cool edit synthesis, granular synthesis, generative synthesis, coughs, digital wave editing, production, composition, cover art. 

sean - vocals, lyrics (inri053, inri057), harmonica (inri057, inri063, inri069), ring modulator (inri057, inri067, inri069). 
greg - drum performance sample source (inri057, inri063, inri067-inri069) 
jon - guitar performance (inri057) 

the various rendered electronic orchestras include acoustic bass, synth bass, electric bass, brass, ftuba, french horn, trombone, trumpet, english horn, saxophone, oboe, clarinet, bassoon, flute, bamboo flute, piccolo, organ, sitar, bells, orchestra hit, melodic toms, timpani, orchestral drum set, drum machine, electrmoic drum kit, piano, clavinet, kalimba, hand drums, nylon guitar, distorted & clean electric guitars, guitar effects, guitar noises, synthesizers, synthesizer effects, music box, agogo, tubular bells, glockenspiel, koto, violin, viola, cello, contrabass and various full string sections. it also includes choir.

so, i stopped to eat last night and crashed for far too long, instead.

i need to get this done, today.

Saturday, June 12, 2021

i think the rule of thumb should be (and i'm not just figuring this out now, i posted this in this space over a year ago) that if you want to try to stop a virus then you need to be thinking in binary terms.

if you're going to mandate something, you should be confident that it's 100% effective - and go that extra step to make sure it is.

so, if you think the virus can jump 2 m, you need a 5 m social distancing policy, and you need to enforce it. if you can't enforce it, you should abandon it.

and, if you think that masks are only 80% effective, you should actually ask people not to wear them - and try to get them to wash their hands more often, instead.

we do this every time a public health problem comes up - we get arrogant and decide we know what to do, and then realize 100 years later that we were  exactly, completely wrong. this isn't different. but, what is different is that we at least have the theory to figure it out right away, rather than need to stumble around trying to figure it out for the next 100 years.

trust me, somebody will find this blog in the year 2220 and realize how fucking right i was, in the face of total idiocy, at every level.

but, if you don't want to walk down that path with me, let's at least realize that it's time toe ease up on the selective pressures. the vaccines will be more effective, that way - if you're not creating selective pressures to undo them.
let's stop for a second, because maybe people need this explained to them.

so, social distancing is supposed to prevent the spread of the disease, and maybe it might work if the following things are known and implemented:

- we have to know exactly how far the virus can jump in order to know how far to stand apart.
- we have to fucking do it.

but, we didn't and still don't know the answer to the first part and, if you've been in a grocery store, you know that the second part is fucking hopeless.

then, by implementing this in a half-effective way, without knowing how far the virus can actually jump, what we're doing is creating selective pressures for transmission amongst mutations that can spread further.

let's be concrete.

suppose the virus can jump a maximum of 2.5 metres and the social distancing policy is 2 metres. now, the virus will have some variation, just like humans - some mutations will allow the virus to jump a maximum of 0.5 metres, whereas others may allow it to jump 3 or 4 metres. but, if you force people to stay 2 metres apart from each other, only the viruses that can jump further than 2 metres will get to their next host and transmit further. the ones with minimal ability to jump will not be successful and will die out.

now, it is true that if we were to set social distancing at 3 m and stick to it, and we got a little luck in no mutations getting over that, then the virus would die out via social distancing. but, if we calculated this wrong (and we clearly did.) and then were half-assed about enforcing it (how about quarter-assed, really?) then it's eventually going to be the case that all of the strains of the virus will be able to jump past that 2 metre distance, and social distancing becomes meaningless because we've spurred the virus to evolve beyond it.

so, do we increase social distancing to 10 metres then? well, that's what you'd need to do, if you were to salvage the concept, yes....

likewise, if you start with a virus that can only get through a cloth mask 10% of the time (which is an underestimate of the starting point) and force everybody to wear a mask then only that 10% of virus genomes will carry on to the next generation. but, once that happens, all of the strains can then get through masks with ease - because we've driven the transmission process to select for the variants most adept at getting through masks. we'd have to all wear n95s, then. but, what happens when that selective process works it's way through?

this used to be a relatively harmless virus, but i told you, like, last year that it wasn't going to stay a harmless virus if we kept putting these kinds of selective pressures on it to mutate into a more dangerous one. so, now what?

well, right now, we've just made it more contagious. i don't think we've made it for deadly. yet.

but, if we want to avoid doing that, we should probably back off and stop being so aggressive with it and sort of let it burn out. we have 70%+ vaccination rates now. that's as close as we're ever going to get to mitigating this, and we should be careful to avoid creating a disaster out of a situation that seems like it's going to be alright.
if you're concerned about the virus evolving to be more contagious, maybe you should stop driving it's evolution with measures like social distancing?

remember when i said i was typing into the other computer and backposting here now, instead?

well, i had to stop when i was reinstalling to that machine, and then it got put off for about ten days or so. it's just a reminder of how much i'm typing here - it was over 100 pages at 8x11 to sort through. but, i'm copying over the last bit of it, now.

i want to finish filing the machine before i turn it off and shift gears on monday or possibly tuesday.

for now, today's post is the 6th (and last, so far) compilation of flac dvds, inri063-inri069.

===========

purchasing this release does not come with a download. 

inri063: these tracks are all based on existing demos from 2001-2002 that were initially intended to be completed with vocal parts and were remixed from july, 2014 to may, 2015 as purely instrumental recordings. released may 2, 2015. disc finalized as lp014 on nov 21, 2017. this is my sixth official record. 

inri064: these tracks were written and recorded over november and december of 2002 and uploaded, unmodified, in may of 2015. released on may 2, 2015. re-released on physical media and finalized on nov 24, 2017. 

inri065: written and recorded in early 2003. transcribed, slightly rearranged, remixed repeatedly and re-rendered repeatedly over may, 2015. released on may 16, 2015. expanded & finalized on nov 25, 2017. 

inri066: originally written, programmed and recorded from 1996-2002. reclaimed & remixed from june to december of 2015. initial completion date was december 31, 2015. disc finally released, closed and finalized on nov 26, 2017. lp015. 

inri067: written and recorded between dec, 1999 and july, 2002, except the hidden track (which was created in the summer of 1998). none of these tracks were remastered or otherwise modified after 2002. disc simultaneously created and finalized as lp016 on nov 26, 2017. 

inri068: originally written, programmed and recorded in varying states of finality over 2001 and 2002, except the hidden track (which was programmed in 1997). the associated tracks were completed between february, 2014 and may, 2015; these mixes, however, were spun off as late as nov, 2017. released as lp017 on nov 27, 2017. expanded and finalized on jan 1, 2018. 

inri069: initially written and recorded between 1997-2003. this compilation idea was developed and expanded upon as an intended full record release between 2006 and 2011. reinterpreted, reconstructed and remixed between 2014-2018. sequenced over december, 2017 and january, 2018. disc released & finalized as lp018 and tetris I-IV on jan 7, 2018. 

originally created from 1997-2003. this compilation is dated to april 27, 2003. slowly remastered, reconstituted, compiled, reconstructed, released and finalized from 2014-2018. compilation finalized on jan 9, 2018. as always, please use headphones. 

released april 27, 2003 

j - electric & acoustic & classical guitars, electric bass guitar, bass synth, digital & analog effects processing, synthesizers, electric air reed organ, electric & grand pianos, flute, voice, vocal noises & relics, analog & electronic drum kits, drum programming, drum manipulations, drum sampling, bowls, claps, tables, ebow, mandolin, orchestral & other sequencing, sampling, loops, equalization, light-sound synthesis, generative programming, granular synthesis, sound raider, noise generators, cool edit sequencing, found sounds, octavers, coughs, digital wave editing, sound design, production, composition. 

sean - harmonica (inri063, inri069), ring modulator (inri067, inri069) 
greg - drum performance sample source (inri063, inri067-inri069) 

the various rendered electronic orchestras include tuba, french horn, trombone, trumpet, english horn, saxophone, brass section, oboe, clarinet, bassoon, flute, bamboo flute, piccolo, orchestra hit, melodic toms, hand drums, timpani, orchestral drum set, piano, agogo, celesta, xylophone, marimba, clavinet, kalimba, vibraphone, glockenspiel, tubular & other bells, music box, woodblock, mallet, electronic drum kit, drum machine, jazz drum kit, koto, synth pad, synth bass, synthesizer, synthesizer effects, mellotron, organ, sitar, acoustic bass, synth bass, electric bass, fingered bass guitar, picked electric guitar, nylon guitar, distorted & clean electric guitars, guitar effects, bowed electric guitar, guitar noises (fret noises, knocks, pick scrapes), violin, viola, cello, contrabass and various full string sections. it also includes choir.

no, i need to actually really clarify the question: do you want muslims and christians to build a coalition and get along and work together?

like, have you thought that through?

have you worked out the consequences of such a thing?

i'd have to argue that i'm more in favour of a divide and conquer strategy to keep them bickering with each other, as if they ever get together and join forces, the world is truly done for - it would be the end of modernity, as we understand it.

and, i'd find myself aligning with the chinese, as bad an ally as they would be, to try to stem the collapse into backwardsness.

that is the last thing the world needs.

so, when i look outside and see interfaith marches, my blood curdles - that is frightening.

first upload of inri075

the next chunk of material to come up is going to be inri075-inri080, inclusive. some of this is totally done (inri079, inri080), some of it needs a brief look at (inri076) and some of it will be a project to finish (inri075, inri077, inri078). i'm going to try to get an approximate document for each project up, one per day, over the next week. this was an unstable period, so some of these releases will be short eps meant to represent ideas that were temporarily abandoned due to needing to relocate and finished elsewhere in a different mindset as a result...

for today, here is a rough outline of inri075: 


this release is meant to document a tracklist of acoustic material, as performed over the summer of 2003, when i was backpacking across canada. some of these will be tracks from period 2 and others will be demos for the upcoming period 3. as such, it's a sort of middle point between what was done over 2000--2002 and what is coming up for 2003-2007. 

i want to re-record a number of these tracks on acoustic guitar because the demoes i have were done for electric or classical, and may rerecord everything in the process. we'll have to see.

for now, this is a starting ep that i'll fill out over the next few weeks as i finish these releases for period 3.1, which ran from mid-2003 to mid-2004 and was kind of unfocused and scattered due to reality around me.
i'm reposting this to add aluminum to the list.

my lead levels were fine, which i checked because i'm close to detroit. but, we add huge amounts of aluminum to the water to clear it of lead, and guess what? aluminum also blocks iron...

it's not going to be a major priority, but if we get through this list of things and find nothing then it's worth exploring.

and, it will help me understand if the aluminum in the water is a potential problem or not, as well.

=====

these tests are pending at lifelabs:
- asca   <---crohn's
- mercury

these tests are pending from dynacare:
- pyruvate <----manganese
- gastrin  <---stomach ulcers
- copper serum

this test requires a 12 hour fast:
- amino acid fractionation   <-----total nitrogen
- gastrin (redo)

these tests can be done next time i go
- pth  
- calcitonin
- cortisol

i will need to pay for these tests out of pocket next weekish:
- celiac ($90 at dynacare)
- cea  ($36 at lifelabs)
- p-anca  + c-anca ($70 at lifelabs)
- psa: ($35 at lifelabs )
- another fit test ($59 at dynacare only)
- osteocalcin  ($65 at lifelabs)  <----double check, info from med labs
- igf-1 ($70 at dynacare) <-----double check, info from med labs

these tests need to be done at dynacare because only they offer them, although i'd rather they were done at lifelabs because they have a free reporting system:
- glutathione  <----- windsor site does not collect
- balp  (not yet ordered)

this test is covered by ohip but is not offered anywhere in the region:
- serum oxalate

this test is only available in a california lab:
-hepcidin

these tests were skipped, for now:
- vitamin e
- vitamin k
- selenium
- molybdenum
- manganese
- iodine

and, here's my list for absorption regarding my diet:

a - absorbing at high levels
b1 - next time
b2 - next time
b3 - next time
b5 - next time
b6 - next time
b7 - next time
b9 - absorbing at high levels
b12 - absorbing, and increasing stores
c - absorbing, at saturated levels
d - absorbing, but a tad low. i should check again soon.
e - pending  (paid)
cholesterol - perfect
k1 - pending (paid)  <----but ptt, inr, fibrinogen normal
fluoride?
aluminum?
sodium - absorbing & regulating
potassium - absorbing & regulating
magnesium - absorbing & regulating
phosphorus - absorbing & regulating
chlorine - absorbing & regulating
calcium - absorbing & regulating
chromium - next time
manganese - pending (paid) <----but,  pyruvate kinase is coming immediately
iron - not absorbing in food, but absorbing in pills
nickel - next time
copper - absorbing & regulating
zinc - absorbing & regulating
selenium - pending (paid) <----- need to find access to glutathione test, not priority right now
molybdenum - not available <---but pancreatic function is normal
iodine - pending (paid) <-----note that tsh is lowish. checking pth. no sign of goiter. dietary sodium is low...
mercury - pending
lead - low
my greatest fear is that the muslims and christians unite into a single conservative religious voting block to ram through a return to the dark ages.

...because, then we're fucked.
i'm a godless liberal.

and, these interfaith marches scare the fuck out of me.
and, i think i have good reason to fear the renormalization of religion.

that's not something that belongs in the dsm - that's a rational analysis of something that has a strong potential to substantively harm me.
it's the system of illiberal laws that is the enemy here - not the people enslaved under it's grips.

so, don't shoot the messenger...

but, like i say - i strongly suspect that none of this is actually real, and these kinds of scary displays of religious solidarity are the ultimate intended outcome of the propaganda that created them.
my ultimate concern is not whether some idiots killed some muslims in london, but whether a corollary of that is that i need to fend off further restrictions to my freedom brought in as a result of it.

if you're concerned about the encroachment of religion into the legal system, the right way to do it is to fight it in court, not to lash out against people that are ultimately victims of the ideology, as well.
i think i've been clear that i'm concerned about the encroaching renormalization of religion that is occurring as a byproduct (intentionally, seemingly) of large scale migration from conservative countries. it should be clear that my concerns are rooted in ideology, not in race - as are the concerns of the people pushing the ideology. this isn't about race, it's about religion - and if it's about religion, it's about control.

and, i support a diversity of tactics.

but, i don't think that killing people is helpful, and these kinds of marches demonstrate why - it just makes people more likely to walk freely into the grips of religious control.

...which is why i tend to be very skeptical about news reports of this nature, and tend to avoid commenting on them. i often don't believe that what's being reported is actually true, and i'm often suspicious that events are being manufactured to generate sympathy for the ideologies that the elite wants us to adopt. but, i haven't any evidence of these suspicions. 

what i'll say is that a large interfaith march is an unsettling thing to see, and it makes me feel unsafe and uncomfortable - because it indicates that those who are trying to bring religion back are getting what they want, at the necessary expense of secularism and individual freedom.
listen - a multifaith march is not something i'd go anywhere near, under any circumstance. those people creep me out even more than the anti-lockdown people do.

that's not anywhere near where i stand on the political spectrum.

sorry.

Highlighted comment
jessica murray
1 week ago
that said, let's talk about israel and the evangelicals. let's understand this...

1


 jessica murray
jessica murray
1 week ago
what it says in the christian bible - the revelation, which was written in greek, rather than aramaic - is that israel will be destroyed from the east. i always laugh at these christians that think russia means the east; in fact, russia is to the west of israel. rather, everybody living in israel at the time would have known that the east meant the persians, the ancestors of today's iranians.



jessica murray
jessica murray
1 week ago
so, what do the evangelicals actually want? do they want to support israel as a colonial state and have it take over the region and bomb the iranians? i mean, you could naively assign that to the generals (although larry aptly described why that's wrong), but what about the evangelicals, who you couldn't even get to vote at all until reagan?



jessica murray
jessica murray
1 week ago
what the evangelicals actually want is the second coming, the return of jesus, who will separate the worthy from the damned on judgement day. and, in order for that to happen, the temple must be destroyed, by the beast from the east. which is iran.



jessica murray
jessica murray
1 week ago
so, this idea of evangelical support for israel is sort of a double-edged sword, like jesus' wacky tongue, in the psychedelic visions that describe the prophecies - they want to ensure israel exists....so it can be destroyed. and, by who? by iran.



Digital Communist
Digital Communist
14 hours ago
 @jessica murray  basically they want  Armageddon to come , on the plains of Meggido and all that jazz so Jesus will some again and lead righteous ones to heavenly gardens… Funny thing is they are all basically anti semites of the worst kind. If you ask them if Jews will be taken to heaven , since Jesus showed on this plane as Jew,  they will tell you ( as long as you are not TV, journo etc)  they will all convert …. Lmao.



jessica murray
jessica murray
9 hours ago (edited)
 @Digital Communist  these weird contradictions are pretty standard in europeanized interpretations of christianity, and it's partly because it was never an organic thing in that part of the world. the original christians were, of course jews, themselves. but, the parts of the world where christianity was an actual thing on the ground were egypt and syria, not western europe. in europe, christianity came in via imperialism, feudalism and violent conquest - and was never really successful in converting substantial portions of normal people. so, there was this motif in the middle ages about the jews killing jesus, which is the central point of the religion - christianity is incoherent without the crucifixion, but that doesn't matter in the westernized versions, because it was never anything besides a tool of domination. i'm not going to go down the rabbit hole on this and accuse the british of doing this as a means of control, but it does serve that purpose, still, even today. so long as people think jesus is coming back any day, they're apt to be less concerned about materialist conditions in their physical lives.
 


Digital Communist
Digital Communist
8 hours ago
 @jessica murray  British came late into whole jesus game, nor it was basis of their imperial conquest. Theirs was commercial imperialism , even from the early days their ruling class  held fairly cynical view . Sprinkled with racial theories of the era , Darwin and all that… Various imperial Chinese  dynastic eras are similar in approach…On the other hand , Portuguese, Spanish,  Arabs ( yes Islam is unreformed Old Testament religion)  really did it in high gear , lmao.
 


jessica murray
jessica murray
32 minutes ago (edited)
and, it's of course worth pointing out that the spanish and arabs were both mostly looking for gold, even if they were directed by their respective religious overlords in their journeys to do so. the religion was central to most of their atrocities, as it formed the justification for them. but, from the time the arabs headed across the desert to the time the spaniards crossed the atlantic, they were always looking for gold....



jessica murray
jessica murray
30 minutes ago
 @Digital Communist  google is filtering this, so i'm going to post it in little bits to figure it out.



jessica murray
jessica murray
21 minutes ago
 @Digital Communist  it seemed to post in chunks, but then deleted again when in one piece, so let's try this sequentially. google doesn't tell you what the filters are, so you have to experiment...



jessica murray
jessica murray
13 minutes ago
 @Digital Communist  this isn't working, suggesting it might be being deleted by a live person, rather than filtered by a computer. ok, let me give it some time, then.



jessica murray
jessica murray
13 minutes ago (edited)
 @Digital Communist  yeah, it's sort of a half-truth. the british have always been weird. it's true that the british people never embraced christianity the way they did in italy or france, but the british aristocracy was perhaps the most cynical of the bunch. so, it's true that the british were a commercial power, but what that means is that their use of religion as a control mechanism was always starkly cynical, not that it wasn't there. when the puritans left britain, a big part of the reason is that they thought the british state was horribly corrupt - but the fact that they existed in britain is a consequence of the tactics of control used by the state, which created them in the first place.
 


jessica murray
jessica murray
12 minutes ago (edited)
( to use a twisted metaphor, it's like god's creations realizing how sadistic their creator was. as mentioned, i don't think that this idea that zionism was invented to control british christians is actually true - but it might as well have been, and it's the kind of thing that people in the future might decide is obvious, in the absence of sufficient source material.)...


the more i've looked into this...

brushing and flossing really probably aren't the best way to clean your teeth, whether they're crooked or not. it's a kind of unsophisticated, brute force attack, and for a lot of people is probably creating more problems than solving.

these newer approaches seem to be superior, and will probably replace the older tactics altogether, in time.

but, i need to take it one thing at a time - if i can't get into the curved space behind my teeth with a brush, i need something to spray the area with, instead.
you can also buy these low frequency things that shake it off....

that's the sort of thing i need to look at, as brushing isn't going to help, in that area - and i have to sort of get it and back off before i ruin my gums even more.
so, i mentioned that my crooked teeth were getting worse and it was probably driving the recession...

it's worst on the lower incisors, to the point that one of them is going to get crushed and just fall out, eventually. i don't seem to have extra teeth, but they're completely out of line at the top, as well, in an arrangement that you'd normally associate with extra teeth. on the bottom, the canines are both shifting directly inwards, which is just destroying those little incisors.

i've looked into how to fix this, and it sounds like the cure is worse than the disease, especially at my age, and especially especially in the presence of osteopenia. i'd have to dissolve the bone in the jaw and rebuild it. that's not actually feasible.

but, i've been slowly realizing that i can't brush them anymore, either. it's not that bad in the front, but i'm noticing what is probably the first actual plaque buildup that i've ever had in my life on the inside, and i can't seem to stop it. i've tried rolling up toilet paper and trying to kind of polish it off, and it seemed like it was working, but it wasn't. i've tried flipping the toothbrush over perpendicular to the teeth, and the head is still too big.

if i could find a small enough brush, that would probably do it, but where - and at what expense?

rather, i think i'm going to pull the trigger on a waterpik system when the check gets here (and it had better get here by tuesday at the latest). the basic physics of the shape of the teeth, due to being crushed, is that they're now curved and therefore unreachable with a brush. maybe there's some other answer, but i don't think there is one - i'm going to have to spray them down, instead.

i've mused about genetic approaches to trying to fix my gums, but that's not going to fix that one incisor, which i'm just waiting to fall out. i'll have to bring it up with the dentist in september - is it better to pull a crushed tooth like that, to try to save the rest of them?
and, where did iran get all of these weapons to ship to venezuela from, exactly?

if the russians or chinese wanted to ship them weapons, they'd just fly them in.

and, why exactly isn't the united states intercepting this supposedly dangerous vessel?


as mentioned, the vessel is probably full of oil, and the oil is probably destined for houston. now, it seems as though we're going to ship weapons to iran, in return. which sounds familiar, doesn't it?
no, all the recent brown immigrants to canada are not going to vote for a fag like jusin trudeau.

rather, they're going to vote for a good manly dumbass like doug ford...

again: this sounds strange to americans, right? immigrants voting for conservatives? what? but, it's well understood that these are the demographic boundaries, here. there's been influential books written about it. all the strategists know all about it.

it's not an ethnic characteristic, which is kind of the stupid mistake that liberals make about brown people and their voting preferences. if you listen closely, you even hear a sense of entitlement in the liberal party about it.

rather, there's two simple facts underlying it:

1) brown people tend to come from more conservative cultures, and our conservative party is actually a conservative party. they readily identify with it, because it's leaps and bounds the closer thing to their cultural value system. they don't have the baggage that the republicans have, either.

2) our immigration system was overhauled by stephen harper and jason kenney (now the premier of alberta) in the 00s to actually target conservatives, and i see no evidence that the liberals have fiddled with it at all, since. so, it's not just that recent immigrants tend to be more conservative in general because they come from more conservative cultures, it's that the immigrants we pick and fast track are specifically chosen and fast-tracked because they're conservatives. our system identifies conservative immigrants and targets them, because it was designed by conservative politicians - they've gotten what they wanted.

the election of doug ford was a little weird in the sense that it was the first time these changes were made obvious, but it didn't surprise anybody and the projections are that his coalition is likely stable for the near future. that's the new toronto, as redesigned by jason kenney.

the question is whether the white flight driven by the pandemic is acting as a catalyst or not...
i would be happy to move to a less expensive downtown toronto core and thrive in the decay.
upwards of 200,000 people have left toronto in the last year and a half.
here's an open question - what kind of demographic changes are all of these people moving in and around toronto going to create?

if i understand correctly, what's happening is that the money is fleeing the city, even if the result is higher property values (and empty or half empty properties). it's becoming a city of renters, as all of the property owners flee the city. that's not that different than what happened in detroit in the 70s, although the starting demographics are radically different.

i'm not going to make any predictions at this point because i haven't seen any useful data, but i wonder if the liberal strongholds in toronto (which were defined mostly by older white families) might have just thinned themselves out to the point that other parties might find themselves more competitive. i mean, that seems to be the basic movement - wealthy white liberals are moving into conservative ridings, and probably not in large enough numbers to swing them. 

it seems counterintuitive right now...

...but the main beneficiary of this migration, as the city hollows out to leave behind less wealthy recent immigrants and white renters, may end up being doug ford. that's his base, and they may have been handed the city by liberals trying to get out as fast as they can.

Friday, June 11, 2021

so, this is my new blood test short list...

these tests are pending at lifelabs:
- asca   <---crohn's
- mercury

these tests are pending from dynacare:
- pyruvate <----manganese
- gastrin  <---stomach ulcers
- copper serum

this test requires a 12 hour fast:
- amino acid fractionation   <-----total nitrogen
- gastrin (redo)

these tests can be done next time i go
- pth  
- calcitonin
- cortisol

i will need to pay for these tests out of pocket next weekish:
- celiac ($90 at dynacare)
- cea  ($36 at lifelabs)
- p-anca  + c-anca ($70 at lifelabs)
- psa: ($35 at lifelabs )
- another fit test ($59 at dynacare only)
- osteocalcin  ($65 at lifelabs)  <----double check, info from med labs
- igf-1 ($70 at dynacare) <-----double check, info from med labs

these tests need to be done at dynacare because only they offer them, although i'd rather they were done at lifelabs because they have a free reporting system:
- glutathione  <----- windsor site does not collect
- balp  (not yet ordered)

this test is covered by ohip but is not offered anywhere in the region:
- serum oxalate

this test is only available in a california lab:
-hepcidin

these tests were skipped, for now:
- vitamin e
- vitamin k
- selenium
- molybdenum
- manganese
- iodine

and, here's my list for absorption regarding my diet:

a - absorbing at high levels
b1 - next time
b2 - next time
b3 - next time
b5 - next time
b6 - next time
b7 - next time
b9 - absorbing at high levels
b12 - absorbing, and increasing stores
c - absorbing, at saturated levels
d - absorbing, but a tad low. i should check again soon.
e - pending  (paid)
cholesterol - perfect
k1 - pending (paid)  <----but ptt, inr, fibrinogen normal
fluoride?
sodium - absorbing & regulating
potassium - absorbing & regulating
magnesium - absorbing & regulating
phosphorus - absorbing & regulating
chlorine - absorbing & regulating
calcium - absorbing & regulating
chromium - next time
manganese - pending (paid) <----but,  pyruvate kinase is coming immediately
iron - not absorbing in food, but absorbing in pills
nickel - next time
copper - absorbing & regulating
zinc - absorbing & regulating
selenium - pending (paid) <----- need to find access to glutathione test, not priority right now
molybdenum - not available <---but pancreatic function is normal
iodine - pending (paid) <-----note that tsh is lowish. checking pth. no sign of goiter. dietary sodium is low...
mercury - pending
lead - low
why, exactly, did toronto city council vote to extend mask laws (the lack of live music in toronto in the near future is being pushed down from the province), given that over 70% of the population has received a first dose?

what is the logic, here?

is that proportional?

and, is anybody in toronto willing to launch legal action to determine if a judge thinks it is or not?

it seems a little over the top, if you ask me - even if the functional restrictions on a return to normal behaviour are coming directly from doug ford and are out of the city's jurisdiction.
i'm about 50% done what i was doing.

hopefully, it's just a few more hours.
i won't be assimilated to your herd mentality.

and, you're wasting your time trying.

ease the restrictions, already.
and, listen - the more you try to convince me to get vaccinated, the more likely i am to avoid doing it.

i don't have a religious reason. i don't have a health concern. i'm not afraid of the vaccine and, while i don't think it's going to be effective in the long run, i'm sure the probabilities being published are vaguely accurate. 

i don't think vaccines cause autism.

so, you can throw this list of things at me, and i'm just going to deny every one of them.

rather, i'm just making a principled point about self-autonomy - if you're going to try to force me to get vaccinated, i will resist simply because you're trying to tell me what to do.

so, fuck off.

that, and i don't think it's appropriate to mandate vaccination for a mild flu-like illness - i think that's an abuse of power, and i think it needs to be called out for what it is, and resisted on that basis alone.

this is not a game of chicken, either - the government needs to pick it's battles, here. 'cause i'm perfectly happy to cost it a lot of money and waste a lot of it's time, if it insists on being retarded.
TRUDEAU ARRESTS OPPOSITION LEADER MAXIME BERNIER

it doesn't matter if it's true or not - i mean, our side doesn't care if things are true or not, so why should yours?
hey vlad...

you should make a big deal about bernier. not because it matters much, or will get you anywhere directly, but because the juxtaposition would be embarrassing to the pmo.

bernier isn't any more relevant in canada than alexei navalny is in russia (in fact, the comparison is pretty apt.), but that's just the point.
we're being converted by a prime minster that thinks he's a king and that thinks he has the right to make these decisions for "his people".

that's what's happening.

and, please, people - fight this in court. don't get stupid.
did you notice that all of the pro-maskers supposedly interviewed in that article were women?

that's the peer-pressure: women talking about how much they love wearing masks.

this was a start. this is how it starts...
so, here comes the propaganda.

i've just been telling people i have asthma when they ask why i'm not wearing a mask (which is true), but we're going to have to defeat this in court - and it's time we stop being naive about what just happened and how long it's going to take to undo it.

they have taken away every single one of your rights.

and, you're not going to get most of them back without a fight.

this struggle to restore our rights will define the rest of our lives - it's become the issue of our times.

maxime bernier is not somebody that i would normally stand up for or care much for at all, but his rights to freedom of association are paramount in a free society, and i would call on the rcmp to uphold the rule of law and release him immediately.
what do i think about these definitions?

well, i don't think the role of government is to keep people safe, and i'm going to unload on you as a fascist if you drop a line like that to my face. if that's what you think, you are my enemy and need to be destroyed.

do i think the role of government is to act as a layer for capital to buy legislation? well, there's ought to be and actually is, right? i don't think that ought to be true, but i realize it actually is in a capitalist state. and, because i'm a radical socialist and not a reformist, i don't actually think it's useful to try to regulate capitalism - and even largely agree with the libertarian right on a lot of points, in their arguments that trying to regulate capital just makes it worse (although they of course don't articulate it that way, we're basically making the same arguments about regulatory capture and inefficiency).

i'm an anarchist, so i don't want a totally planned economy. there's some role for worker communes, as well.

but, the role of government should be to centralize production in some abstraction - not to write laws that keep us safe (which is a mentality that needs to be eradicated) or to sell policy to the highest bidder (which is the status quo that needs to be overturned).

but, i'll usually align with realistic liberals over ideological conservatives, when they exist - which is scarce, nowadays. a lot of socialists won't...
if america had a functioning education system, it wouldn't need to concern itself with the premise that big donors might confuse stupid people into voting against their own interests by buying political ads - people would be able to figure it out.
in strict definitional terms, it is conservatives (tories/democrats) that should align with restrictions on campaign contributions and third-party advertising to protect the aristocracy and populace from corruption by capital (to "keep the people safe") and liberals (whigs/republicans) that should align with the bourgoisie in allowing for capital to buy legislation and advance it's own interests (due to free speech and private property rights).

and, then, socialists are supposed to be about nationalizing capital and putting it under the control of parliament (or otherwise democratizing it) so that the issue no longer exists at all.

i support the per-vote subsidy and would like to bring it back, but i don't have an opposition to liberalizing campaign finance laws and i don't oppose third-party advertising.

i do support a greater focus on critical thinking in public education. the cliche attributed to jefferson is what is really apt here:

a well-informed populace is a pre-requisite to a functioning democracy.

and, that is the problem, as it stands - not that third parties are allowed to advertise, but that americans are too stupid to figure out what is true and what isn't.
are you confused that ford wants to restrict campaign-advertising? you shouldn't be - i keep pointing out that canada, and ontario particularly, has something approaching a normal political spectrum, whereas the spectrum in the united states is bizarre and fucked...

most people in the world outside of the united states would associate draconian rules regarding advertising with the political right, and not with the political left. and, most of the world would associate free speech with the left, not the right.

unfortunately, the current pmo has been so americanized that it's trying to flip the spectrum over, and just getting confused stares from the conservative party - and the result is that we have a competition for who can be more conservative, under terms that americans would need somebody to explain to them.

but, our current campaign finance laws at the federal level were brought in by stephen harper and the conservatives, not by jean chretien and the liberals. chretien brought in a reasonable limit of $5000, but he replaced the lost income with a per-vote subsidy - which was actually an increase in funding, given that the liberals essentially always won the popular vote. when harper showed up, he got rid of the per-vote subsidy and slashed contributions to $1000.

well, conservatives are supposed to care about finances, and they're supposed to be concerned about corruption. i know that sounds strange to an american, but that's what being a conservative is supposed to be all about! it's liberals that are supposed to care a little less about strict budgeting, financial accountability and shady money - under the argument that restricting corruption just hurts the economy (which i agree with, mostly).

so, as a canadian, there's nothing confusing to me about this.

what i've always found so confusing is the american pseudo-left's pre-occupation with finance, as it's always made them sound very right-wing, to me. but, if you really study the history, it's a relic of the realignment process, and the fact that the democrats are, historically, the conservative party. american progressivism sounds strangely conservative a lot of the time because it is actually a historical conservative movement at it's core.
if the americans decide i need to get vaccinated to cross the border - despite statements by the white house that they wouldn't do that - is that an incentive to get vaccinated?

the answer right now is "not really". it's more along the lines of a disincentive to enter the united states.

i'm searching through listings right now, and while big venues may be filling up with corporate musicians, it may be a while before the kind of music i like starts back up again.

i mean, i'm not going to go see a concert in a hockey arena - i'm not interested in that. i like small scale venues, with obscure and independent artists. this appears to be a ways away from reopening.

we'll have to see. if something comes up and i can't miss it i'll have to make a decision: is it worth getting vaccinated for, or should i take the train to toronto instead?

chances are that i'll have plenty of time to make that decision.

but, for right now, i don't see any sort of incentive at all - i don't see anything worth crossing for. so, i'm going to continue to wait it out.
so, today's post is the 4 disc tetris compilation, which starts an idea rather than closes one.

there will be tetris releases starting around 2007.

======

the origins of the tetris project emerge in my records some time in mid-2006. i must have been filing some things on my hard drive, and wanting to put a bunch of the loose ends in the same folder, because what i remember is having a lot of loose tracks and trying to find a way to fit them together. the best commonality i could find in these tracks is that they all attempted to merge guitar music with electronic music, so i devised a project that would utilize these tracks by exploring this theme to it's fullest. 

tetris is the idea of combining guitar music with technology. it just sat that way, for years, as a folder on my hard drive, with little progress towards actual completion. 

when i set up the bandcamp site in 2010, i uploaded a number of these loose tracks under the album header 'tetris', with a promise to add tracks to it, slowly, until it completes. this was intended to be an eventual official record with an explicit techno flavour, and some tracks were, in fact, added to it. as of january, 2018, the majority of these tracks have been completed and re-released on my fifth or sixth records. so, this project has been dismantled, as it initially existed. 

upon initial completion of my second period in may of 2015, i sat down to create a guitar volume. some work was completed on a mix tape of solo parts, but this was ultimately where i left off to go back to complete period 1. before i put it aside, i had decided on a three-volume set: a mix tape and a 2xcd set, with one cd being a tetris volume 1 (converted to an end-of-period compilation) and the other cd being of atmospheric, political and noise sections. 

i didn't get back to this until late december, 2017 and sat down to create a tetris volume 1 as i had decided upon in 2015. but, what i started to realize as i was compiling it was that the reason that this connection presented itself amongst the scattered tracks i initially applied it to was that it is a fundamental aspect of my art - nearly every track i've written since 1998 takes the guitar through an exploration in the world of electronic music. i started to think more abstractly about it, this combination of technology with guitars, so that the definition fit across more genres than techno and idm. this wider interpretation of the project's mandate created a larger pool of tracks to choose from, and i eventually settled on two volumes for tetris: one with a faster tempo and more danceable tracks and one with a slower tempo and jazzier or more psychedelic tracks. some tracks that i identified as 'orchestral' were also put aside for future release on a later tetris volume. 

the atmospheric disc wasn't initially contemplated of as a tetris release, it was rather meant to make the release an inclusive guitar works, as that is also a major component of my guitar presentation. but, my wider interpretation of the mandate allowed me to see that the tracks i had put aside for this compilation were also an exploration of guitars and technology. so, i created this disc as a tetris volume. a strategic decision was made to not include tracks on the first ambient works, but rather to defer to it as the ambient component of my second period guitar work. 

i had also decided in late 2017 that i would create a compilation of guitar-only mixes for the lp sequence to close period 2, to draw special attention to the primary focus of my creations, which is the guitar work. i strongly contemplated releasing only disc 4 in this space of inri069, and leaving the other three for a later release, as a coherent multi-disc part tetris. however, the need to include inri071a in the tetris sequence necessitated releasing these tetris volumes in this space. further, a standalone release of disc 4 would also require a tetris number - it is certainly an integration of technology and guitars. 

that makes inri071a tetris V. i've also decided that inri072, the orchestral works, should be tetris VI. 

as a six volume set, this compilation touches upon nearly every track that was written between 1998-2003 and has guitars in it by placing it into one or more of these six slightly overlapping categories. as such, this is a comprehensive introduction to my first two periods, from the perspective of my work as a guitarist. 

initially written and recorded between 1997-2003. this compilation idea was developed and expanded upon as an intended full record release between 2006 and 2011. reinterpreted, reconstructed and remixed between 2014-2018. sequenced over december, 2017 and january, 2018. disc released & finalized as lp018 and tetris I-IV on jan 7, 2018. as always, please use headphones. 

this release also includes a printable jewel case insert and will also eventually include a comprehensive package of journal entries from all phases of production (2015, 2017-2018). 

released april 26, 2003 

j - guitars (electric, acoustic, nylon), digital & analog effects processing, ebow, mandolin, bass, bass synth, drum programming, analog & electronic drum kits, drum sampling, drum manipulations, vocals, vocal noises, sampling, orchestral & other sequencing, soundscaping, sound design, synthesizers, electric & grand pianos, electric reed organ, found sounds, octavers, noise generators, cool edit synthesis, granular synthesis, generative synthesis, loops, flute, coughs, digital wave editing, production 

sean - harmonica (track 19), ring modulator (track 36) 
greg - drum performance sample source (track 21) 

the rendered electronic orchestra includes acoustic bass, synth bass, electric bass, brass, french horn, trombone, trumpet, tuba, english horn, saxophone, flute, bamboo flute, oboe, piccolo, clarinet, bassoon, orchestra hit, drum machine, electronic drum kit, agogo, tubular bells, glockenspiel, clavinet, kalimba, piano, melodic toms, hand drums, timpani, orchestral drum set, koto, nylon guitar, distorted & clean electric guitars, guitar effects, guitar noises, synthesizers, synthesizer effects, music box, piano, bells, organ, sitar, violin, viola, cello, contrabass, full string sections and mellotron. it also includes choir.

i have to keep reminding myself that my appetite is good and i'm gaining weight, which is not consistent with cancer of any sort.

but, the other option is that the osteopenia is a result of cancer spreading to the bone.

and, that's consistent with the anemia.

i'm probably not going to get out today, but i should get out soon.
by the time that you, as a consumer, get this wav file on your computer, it's been so badly degraded, anyways...

but, that's not true if you're listening to music that doesn't go through this destructive process by major label production teams.
i mean, that's what i'm trying to get across here - that the compression done by the producer is 100x worse than anything the mp3 algorithm could do, in the first place.
and, yes - i know that they record at 48 khz or higher,

it doesn't matter, if they sculpt 50% of the frequency range out and then compress the shit out of it, in the end.
they're selling you cds at 44.1/16, so you think it's actually pretty good, right?

see, that's where you go wrong with this...

if it's radio music, the sad and pathetic reality is that it's more like they're functionally upsampling a master done at 22 khz, 8 bit - so your mp3 compression isn't degrading the sound nearly as much as you imagine that it is.

any artist that's actually taking advantage of cd quality audio isn't going to compress to mp3 well at all...
it is true that some of the more sound-conscious artists out there at least used to do things like create mixes for radio and mixes for cd/lp. you'll also find tv mixes back in the mtv/muchmusic days, and i've heard of corporate rock musicians mixing for mp3 (that was even really what the loudness wars were actually about). so, don't take my statements too broadly....

but, generally speaking, if an artist is marketed for radio play then the product that you buy on a physical media in the store is mixed to play on am radio, and plugging it into an expensive sound system is pointless because the source is intentionally garbage.

then, when you compress it it doesn't matter - because it's shit to begin with.

that is why people can't tell the difference - because they're listening to trash.
well.

what kind of music do i make?

the answer is that it's electro-classical music with jazzy and bluesy flairs and only vague references to rock music instrumentation (i play electric guitar. that's not very "classical". but, besides that, i'm a composer.), and while i don't think i need the dynamic range of 24 bits to get those super quiet oboes and flutes, i do insist that you try not to butcher the frequency range too badly, please.
again, we did the ping-pong delay example, but this is another example of something that would never be released by a corporation, in terms of sound quality. this mix is so ridiculously full of data over the entire frequency range that when i tried to reduce the size of the file by running it through a flac algorithm (which works like a zip compressor in that it runs through the file looking for zeroes and replaces them with a variable to save space. so if your wav file has a sequence of 100 zeroes, the flac algorithm replaces those 100 zeroes with the number 100. the decoder will then need to reconvert that 100 into 100 zeroes before it sends it to your sound card.) it decreased by less than 2%.

(edit: it's the middle part that had the impossible compression ratio, not the whole file. but, the vst version, as a whole, compressed less than 25%. that is, the size of the flac is about 79% of the size of the wav)

a corporate music producer would take a major scalpel to this in cutting out 30% of the sound, which would just be butchering the reverb and a lot of the detail in the middle of the mix. and, you consequently can't hear a lot of it via the mp3 stream i'm posting here - you just need to get a lossless version, that's all there is to it.

i'd challenge anybody to find me another piece of music that compresses less than this over flac:

to put it another way, this is the actual pathetic truth - corporate music is so badly produced, in general, that you can run it through massive compression and not lose anything important.

but, what this really is about is garbage in / garbage out, and it's not an argument for the parity of the technology, in a broader sense.
the ranges of frequency that mp3 removes are not chosen at random - frequency bands that are ignored by your kind of standard or "normal" corporate pop/rock/rap producers are taken out rather consciously. mp3 programmers refer to this as "psycho-acoustics".

it's not just the high and low bands that are outside of your frequency range, it's also a fairly large amount of frequency bands that corporate pop producers cut out on purpose. so, it's actually very true that you can't tell the difference if you're listening to celine dion or taylor swift or something - because the production process intentionally cuts out the frequencies that the mp3 removes, which is why the mp3 removes it.

but, if you're listening to abstract techno that's mixed by non-professionals (or professionals that don't know better), anything labeled "classical" or "jazz" or even interesting psychedelic or progressive rock then things actually do exist in those frequency bands - and i demonstrated the point when i posted that ping-pong effect, which the compression algorithm just demolished. you will lose a lot of music with an mp3 if you're listening to these types of music because they weren't mixed with the corporate pop techniques that the mp3 compression is designed to take advantage of.

so, the process is like this:

1) corporate pop producers eliminate specific frequency bands, because they get in the way (and can't be produced on am radio, for example)
2) the designers of the mp3 algorithm realized that and took advantage of it. so, they cut out the same ranges that were cut out during the corporate pop production process. they call this "psycho-acoustics", which is just a pretentious term to describe what i'm describing.
3) creative musicians then come along and they don't cut those ranges out when they're producing their music.
4) somebody uses mp3 compression to compress these songs, unaware of what i'm trying to explain to you.
5) large amounts of the music disappears, and they don't understand why.

a good rule of thumb is this: if the music you like is released on a major record label, it probably doesn't matter if you use mp3 or flac. but, if you're listening to anything that is remotely interesting at all, you're really better off avoiding any kind of lossy compression - because the mp3 algorithm didn't intend for you to use it to compress the music you're listening to.

and, i'm an expert on this topic - you're not.

so, i hope that's clear.
if you can't tell the difference between mp3 and flac, it's because the music you're listening to is boring.

i listen to interesting music, and, to me, it's immediately obvious.