as the strange layers of this attempt to forcibly detransition me become more and more clear (i don't think this is 'real' in the sense of being organic, i think this is pre-written and made for an audience, although i will remind you that i am very real), i am realizing that an arab muslim family is being presented as responsible, although i think this is ultimately a ploy. i'm getting the impression that the author is stupid and thinks there's some moral lesson to be had in that, when there isn't; it merely makes the muslims look like they lack any coherent concept of morality, which is broadly actually true. the judaic religions are all deeply immoral to their rotten cores.

i need to interject that, while i know this isn't real, if it were real that would not justify a violent reaction. sort of.

i actually don't oppose reacting to religion with violence in generality. religion is organized violence; the idea that it claims itself as a victim when victims of religion meet the violence of religion with the violence of self-defense is disingenuous. history and geography are pretty clear that muslims will use violence to expand their control in canada, and that violence will be required to stop them. yet, when violence is used, it must be proportionate, and i can't react to what they're doing with force unless or until i actually catch them doing it.

right now, they're doing things like dropping pills in my drinks when i go out and injecting me when i'm asleep and my focus has been stopping them from drugging me rather than reacting. one thing at a time. i realize that what i have at the moment is technically a conspiracy theory and that the primary focus needs to be on undoing the effects of the drugging. however, if i catch them in here, at all, they should not expect to get out alive, and if it ever gets to the point where they physically confront me about my gender identity, they should expect a fight in return, as much as i can generate one. i won't be pushed around by bigots.

i am currently in the process of being victimized by islam, as so many innocent people have been, but i ultimately want to hold them accountable legally and not to lash out against them. i want to address the problem, systemically. a violent reaction may be justified, but it wouldn't help. it would be far more helpful for the legal system to acknowledge the existence of a problem and take steps to stamp it out.

my concern is more to the question of whether force is required to defend myself, and they should expect me to defend myself using whatever means are necessary, which right now means stopping them from getting in here. at all. yet, i want to counter-attack them legally, while i still can. the situation is not yet so far gone that force is the only way to stop them, and there is little indication at the moment that we are heading in that direction.

do not misunderstand me: whether this is real or not, it demonstrates that my concerns are real, as this is the kind of oppressive behaviour that islam is known for perpetuating in other parts of the world. if the authors are so delusional as to think they're making a moral point, rather than demonstrating their moral depravity, it just further demonstrates islam's inherent immorality. we have to remain vigilant against all forms of religion and it may mean resorting to force. we should not be weak-kneed or delusional about the need to react to religion with force, as they will merely interpret us as weak if we do.

using the law to hold the oppressors accountable is better than using force to wipe them out and that is the approach i am endorsing and advancing in this scenario, while i still can. a strong legal precedent that conversion therapy is prohibited is a far better tactic than taking a couple of the fascists out, even if the latter action might be morally justified.