my main book review page is actually going to be by loc# so i should have a separate alphabetical list, too.
| chronological | loc # | librarything pdf |
|---|---|---|
| a note on the opinion numbers | ||
| author | title | year | publisher | loc call # | isbn | opinion | notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| isaac asimov | pebble in the sky | 1950/ 2010 |
doubleday/ orb |
PS3551.S5.P4 | 978-0- 7653- 1913-5 |
||
| the stars, like dust | 1951/ 2009 |
doubleday/ orb |
PS3551.S5.S73 | 978-0- 7653- 1915-9 |
|||
| foundation | 1951/ 1991 |
gnome/ bantam spectra |
PS3551.S5.F59 | 0-553- 29335-4 |
|||
| the currents of space | 1952/ 2010 |
doubleday/ tor |
PS3551.S5.C87 | 978-0- 7653- 1917-3 |
|||
| foundation and empire |
1952/ 1991 |
gnome/ bantam spectra |
PS3551.S5.F596 | 0-553- 29337-0 |
|||
| second foundation | 1953/ 1991/ 2017 |
gnome/ bantam spectra/ del ray |
PS3551.S5.S37 | 978-0- 553- 29336-4 |
|||
| the caves of steel | 1954/ 1991 |
doubleday/ bantam spectra |
PS3551.S5.C381 | 0-553- 29340-0 |
|||
| the end of eternity | 1955/ 1971/ 2000 |
doubleday/ voyager |
PS3551.S5.E5 | 978-0- 586- 02440-9 |
|||
| the martian way and other stories |
1955/ 1965/ /1974 |
doubleday/ panther |
PS3551.S5.M3 | 586 01799 2 3 |
|||
| the naked sun | 1957/ 1991 |
doubeday/ bantam spectra |
PS3551.S5.C381 | 0-553- 29339-7 |
|||
| nightfall and other stories |
1969/ 2023 |
doubleday/ harper- voyager |
PS3551.S5.A15 2023 |
978-0-00- 867240-9 |
|||
| the gods themselves | 1972/ 2013 |
doubleday/ gollancz |
PS3551.S5.G6 | 978-0- 575- 12905-4 |
|||
| the early asimov | 1972 | doubleday | PS3551.S5.E23 | 0-385- 03979-4 |
|||
| the complete robot | 1982/ 2018 |
doubleday/ harper- voyager |
PS3551.S5.C6 | 978-0-00- 827781-9 |
|||
| robots and empire | 1985/ 2018 |
doubleday/ harper- voyager |
PS3551.S5.R64 |
opinion decryption matrix:
0 = fit for gurus, hermits, renaissance people, head honchos and other self-ordained members of the decentralized intelligentsia
1 = required reading to convincingly fake intelligence.
2 = well crafted, worth the time.
3 = readable.
4 = of fragmented quality.
5 = nothing profound, nothing inane.
6 = regressive and/or disappointing.
7 = a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma.
8 = it's fun because it's stupid.
9 = solely research material
10 = caveat lector.
11 = a waste of time